Dimas Gimeno, founder of WOW – IV Congreso Aragonés de Comercio e Innovación
FashionNetwork.com: You mentioned at the beginning of your talk that retail defines a city’s identity. How can that identity be maintained in a world where commerce is increasingly uniform?
Dimas Gimeno: By focusing on the local. It’s essential to recognize that a city—and its retail—should represent local products. And that’s where I think Spain is particularly privileged, because it offers an extraordinary variety of craftsmanship and gastronomy. We are also manufacturers and home to thriving brands—that’s what tourists are looking for.
FNW: You maintain that omnichannel has not worked, despite being the big bet of many brands, and that we must move toward “phygital.” Why?
D. G.: Omnichannel is a concept—a goal. I think it was conceived the wrong way. Why do I think it didn’t work? Because, at the time, it was framed—quite logically for those of us already in the physical world—as the task of digitizing our offline reality. It made sense: if your business is there, you adapt the new to what you already have.
However, it has been demonstrated that this alone isn’t sufficient. It’s not about digitizing the physical, but about understanding that you have to be 100% digital and, from there, design your physical presence. Now they call it “unified commerce”; I call it “phygital.” The key is to understand that channels no longer exist. We must stop thinking in terms of “physical” and “digital.” There’s one customer who moves fluidly, engages with your brand constantly, and in different ways.
FNW: Do customers no longer make that distinction between channels?
D. G.: If you ask a customer about physical or digital channels, they probably don’t care. They may have discovered you on a social network; from there, if they decide to buy, they’ll naturally move to your e-commerce. And from e-commerce, you guide them into the physical store. Why? Because the physical store is where true loyalty is forged, the brand develops far more, and, above all, the conversion rate is much higher.
Think of the shopping basket we all recognize online: the key would be for that basket to be the same in-store and online. Omnichannel doesn’t work because it simply digitizes a physical process. And the first requirement for being unified is that your range is 100% available online. Many brands and retailers still haven’t achieved this because it’s highly complex.
FNW: How can small businesses face this challenge? These are the ones that give cities their identity.
D. G.: By being very true to themselves—making sure what they sell is authentic, different, and unique. In that respect, small businesses are unbeatable. They also have a tremendously valuable relationship with their customers. We’re talking about generations, neighborhoods, personal connections—that’s fundamental.
However, these businesses struggle to invest in technology because they’re too small. They should also make their physical offer purchasable online. But individually, they can’t do it. Platforms must emerge that aggregate many small players and, by pooling them, create a kind of digital marketplace that unites them. That’s where I think public funding should play a role.
Dimas Gimeno, in his talk in Zaragoza – IV Congreso Aragonés de Comercio e Innovación
FNW: Why do you believe the physical store is the future of retail?
D. G.: First, because I consider myself a shopkeeper and because I’ve been a salesperson; I know what I’m talking about and I know how important it is. It’s a wonderful profession, although it’s not always well-regarded because it demands hard work. But I’m an advocate because I’ve seen—and I know—what a well-executed physical store can do when a customer comes in and wants to buy everything. The digital channel can’t do that; only a physical store can.
If you add to that a distinctive, surprising product proposition and a salesperson who is well-trained, passionate about what they sell, and equipped with today’s technological tools, you’ll be creating something unparalleled. That’s the key to competing with the big platforms: it’s exactly what they can’t do.
FNW: Customer experience, along with omnichannel, is one of the most recurring concepts in recent years. What should retailers offer customers?
D. G.: If you asked someone from the last century about customer experience, they’d say, “What’s that?” The experience itself is a combination of various things. For example, you can have a beautiful store, but if the salesperson hasn’t treated the customer well, the experience is ruined.
It’s a space that catches the eye, where you want to be, but where there’s also someone who attends to you, cares about you, perhaps even knows who you are. And thanks to that person, when you plan to buy one thing, you end up buying seven. That—and leaving satisfied—is a shopping experience. It’s about getting to know your customer, bringing them the product they want, even beyond that, and ensuring they return. And that was already true in the last century.
FNW: You discuss the importance of sales staff, but is it challenging to find those profiles for retail, as is the case in the hospitality industry?
D. G.: The service sector as such has the same problem: it’s not a career that’s well regarded. At WOW, we are successfully attracting top salespeople and, above all, young individuals who are eager to pursue a career in this field. This challenge has always existed: you need a good recruitment process, but you also have to train and motivate your people.
Another important point is to offer a professional career path within the company, with room for growth. If the idea is to hire people, keep them for a year, and then replace them… who wants to be a salesperson in a model like that?
FNW: Speaking of WOW, what is the company’s current status?
D. G.: We have been around for three and a half years. At that time, our ambition and what we want to achieve haven’t changed, but there has been a learning curve in understanding the economic model. It’s one thing to be clear that you’re presenting something truly unique and innovative, and another to learn how to translate that into profitability.
If you’re doing something different, you have to understand how you achieve profitability. It’s something we’ve already learned: we’re not profitable yet, but it’s a horizon we can already see. The idea is that, at some point next year, or at the latest, by the beginning of the following year, we will be profitable.
The key to our growth continues to be our commitment to the physical store, and in Spain, Barcelona is a city where we’d clearly like to be. But our big bet is digital. In digital, you can explore markets more cost-effectively and with less risk. The important thing, in any case, is to be profitable: no company grows if it isn’t.
FNW: What percentage does the online channel represent in your business?
D. G.: We had to change our technology platform less than a year ago, and now we’re working with Shopify. So we’ve had to reset our digital operations. Online is now growing strongly, and our idea is that, in 2026, it will account for more than 15% of the business. Of course, in the long term, it has to exceed that percentage by a wide margin.
FNW: Is your platform also available outside Spain?
D. G.: Yes, although, for the moment, we are only shipping within the European Union. The plan is to begin entering new markets in 2026.
FNW: Which store performs better, Gran Vía or Serrano?
D. G.: Serrano is a more rewarding store because it’s bigger; it delivers results more quickly. However, Gran Vía is surprising us: it’s a much more eye-catching store, and now that we’re taking greater care of it and expanding the range, it’s going to bring us plenty of satisfaction. Serrano has a higher turnover because it’s larger and has a much more recurrent customer base; Gran Vía is surprising us because it’s experiencing the boom along this retail corridor.
FNW: You talk about curating the assortment—what does that mean?
D. G.: The first phase of WOW was product curation, but obviously, this isn’t just about selecting brands; otherwise, we’d be a magazine or a museum, and we’d charge admission. From there, we embarked on a journey to understand the economic model and move a little closer to something more traditional—more commercial, with more recognizable stores.
At one point, we carried higher-priced products from luxury and semi-luxury brands, and we’ve phased out many of them—not because they didn’t sell well, but because of the purchasing model. We’ve had to evolve toward a more profitable format. When luxury brands force you to buy the merchandise, that’s where the numbers don’t stack up; it’s not so much about choosing one product or another.
Curating the range remains key, and we want to invest even more in it—bringing in different, innovative brands that can’t be found in physical stores. That’s the value proposition, regardless of whether the brands are expensive or affordable.
This article is an automatic translation. Click here to read the original article.
Thanks to the extensive CV of its founder, who also works as a buyer, stylist, and fashion editor, particularly in the US and Brazil, Pop Closet has become a point of reference, despite the modest premises where it made its debut in the Portuguese capital.
The façade and interiors are defined by industrial finishes, in contrast to the century-old structural stone — salvaged from the fire that ravaged Chiado in 1988, starting at Armazéns Grandella and spreading through the area, destroying 18 historic buildings — and the restored wooden furniture that showcases second-hand clothing, eyewear, accessories, and footwear, as well as art and décor pieces.
@popclosetofficial / Instagram
The new Pop Closet also includes a space dedicated to art displayed on the walls, such as photographs by Cátia Castel-Branco, which are also for sale and will be replaced by works from other artists to foster a sense of dynamism and a changing atmosphere. There are even second-hand design pieces for the home — some recycled or part of collections from renowned brands such as Kartell.
“I want to have good items that anyone who comes in here feels they can wear, that aren’t specific to one type of customer. Above all, quality, beautiful and contemporary pieces,” António Branco told Time Out. He sources pieces in northern Europe or northern Portugal, from factories that offload leftover stock, in addition to those consigned by clients or bought directly by the shop, thus ensuring turnover.
The right and the far right joined forces in the European Parliament on Thursday to unpick a law on major corporations’ social and environmental “due diligence” — a bombshell in Brussels.
Shutterstock
By 382 votes to 249, MEPs approved scaling back the text’s ambitions, limiting the number of companies covered, and removing some obligations. A weakened version of the text had been rejected by MEPs on October 22.
In a break with the traditional “pro-European” majority, an ad hoc alliance between the right (the EPP) and the far right sparked an outcry among the other groups.
The EPP “has torpedoed any moderate compromise,” lamented Social Democrat René Repasi. The vote serves as a warning to the pro-European camp, just as Parliament begins to tackle a series of measures to “simplify” business life.
The far right savoured a “great victory” on Thursday. “Another majority is possible” and “this is just the beginning”, declared the Patriots group, chaired by Jordan Bardella.
Adopted only eighteen months ago, this due diligence law is bearing the brunt of the European Union’s pro-business turn, buffeted by competition from China and tariffs in the US.
Its implementation had already been postponed by a year, from 2027 to 2028. But Brussels wants to go even further to lighten the administrative burden on companies across the continent.
Backed by penalties, the law adopted in 2024 required companies with over 1,000 employees to prevent and remedy human rights violations (child labour, forced labour, safety, etc.) and environmental damage throughout their value chains, including among their suppliers worldwide.
On Thursday, in line with the Member States, the European Parliament raised the thresholds for companies covered to more than 5,000 employees and over €1.5 billion in annual turnover.
Above all, MEPs scrapped the European civil liability regime, which served to harmonise companies’ obligations and their liability before the courts in the event of breaches.
Instead, parliamentarians opted to leave it to national legislation. They also abandoned the climate transition plans that companies were supposed to provide. A move that France, which has long boasted of having created the first national due diligence law, has pushed hard for since the beginning of the year, including through its president, Emmanuel Macron.
“Asphyxiation”
The law is now “completely empty”, laments centrist Pascal Canfin. This vote comes “during COP30” in Brazil and “represents a considerable setback for private-sector climate action”, he believes.
On the right, MEP François-Xavier Bellamy argues, by contrast, that this “simplification” will “save our businesses from regulatory asphyxiation”.
Following this vote, negotiations will begin with the Member States, with a view to the final adoption of the revised law.
“It is still possible to correct course”, says Jurei Yada of the E3G think tank, but the vote shows that “the far right is gaining influence” and that the pro-European majority is “crumbling”.
The absence of European civil liability risks introducing “competition between the 27 Member States to see who has the most lax regime to try to attract companies”, warns Swann Bommier of the NGO Bloom.
In the name of fighting bureaucracy, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and French President Emmanuel Macron had called for the law to be scrapped altogether.
But even if it is only slashed, the pill is hard to swallow for some of the parliamentarians who had celebrated its “historic” adoption in April 2024 after several years of tug-of-war within the European institutions themselves.
There was no shortage of superlatives at the time, including among Macronists, such as the current president of the centrist Renew group, Valérie Hayer.
However, the political balance has shifted in the chamber since the June 2024 elections, marked by the strengthening of the right and the breakthrough of the far right, which wants to roll back the Green Deal, the package of environmental measures adopted during the previous term.
FashionNetwork.com with AFP.
This article is an automatic translation. Click here to read the original article.
Italy is considering a one-off levy for households to declare gold held off the books, an amendment to the 2026 budget law showed, in a move that could potentially yield the state more than 2 billion euros ($2.3 billion).
Gold jewels are seen in a jewellery shop in downtown Rome, Italy, December 11, 2017 – REUTERS/Max Rossi
The proposal would allow individuals to pay a 12.5% tax to certify the market value of bullion, gold jewellery, and collectible coins for which purchase records are missing, the same rate as on government bonds. The certification has to be done by June 2026.
Under current rules, the lack of proof of purchase can lead to a 26% tax on the entire sale value, rather than just the actual capital gain. This has discouraged people from selling their inherited gold on the official market and pushed some transactions into informal or undeclared channels, limiting market liquidity and tax revenues, lawmakers from the co-ruling League and Forza Italia party said.
Some estimates put privately held gold in Italy at 4,500–5,000 metric tons, worth roughly 500 billion euros at current prices. Italy’s network of “Compro Oro” shops — businesses that buy and sell gold — has seen a sharp rise in activity as prices hit record highs. Sales of used gold jumped by around 25% in 2025, with more than 1.2 million transactions per month, driven by households cashing in old jewellery and coins, according to Metropolitan Magazine, an Italian publication.
Under the proposed measure, taxpayers opting in would declare their holdings at market value, pay the substitute tax in one or three annual instalments, and obtain a stepped-up fiscal value basis for future sales. The process would be overseen by authorised intermediaries and advisers, with strict anti–money-laundering checks.
Supporters say the measure could generate significant one-off revenues for the Treasury, while improving transparency in a market long characterised by opaque holdings and informal family transfers. Based on an assumption that 10% of privately held investment gold is certified, the draft estimates additional revenue of up to 2.08 billion euros.
The proposal also seeks to encourage the “legal circulation” of gold by removing what stakeholders see as a punitive regime for individuals unable to document purchases made years—or generations—ago. The amendment still needs to clear parliamentary scrutiny and government vetting.