Connect with us

Politics

Environmental projects with Everglades focus run deep in Gov. DeSantis’ budget proposal

Published

on


Another ambitious set of environmental proposals are proposed in Gov. Ron DeSantis’ $115.6 billion “Focus on Fiscal Responsibility” budget.

While the aggregate trims roughly $3 billion from the current fiscal year budget, as pandemic stimulus cash dries up from D.C., the seventh DeSantis budget continues to show his attempts to fulfill various promises he made  in 2018 and beyond to put the ecosystem first and be a “Teddy Roosevelt Republican” even as this $3,188,225,446 proposal comes in $325,003,812 lighter than the current year’s budget.

Part of the reason for the conceptual haircut, compared to the budget currently enacted, could be that much has been done already.

DeSantis noted last month, when teasing these proposals, that $3.3 billion in projects were done in his first term, and that his administration “doubled down” on that.

“Governor DeSantis reinforced his commitment to prioritizing Florida’s waterways in his second term by calling for an historic $3.5 billion investment for Everglades restoration and protection of our water resources. The Governor’s Budget includes more than $1.5 billion for this initiative, bringing the total investment during the Governor’s three years of the second term to $4.8 billion, already exceeding the $3.5 billion goal,” the Governor’s Office notes in the memo accompanying its proposals.

Unsurprisingly, the biggest tranche of funds ($613 million) is proposed for the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP). Another $78 million could be spent, pending legislative approval, on the Northern Everglades and Estuaries Protection Program, designed to improve water quality.

Additionally, $64 billion is contemplated for the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) Reservoir, in a continued effort to move water to the central Everglades and Everglades National Park (ENP).

And $50 million is proposed for “specific project components designed to achieve the greatest
reductions in harmful discharges to the Caloosahatchee and St. Lucie Estuaries as identified in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan Lake Okeechobee Watershed Restoration Project Draft Integrated Project Implementation Report and Environmental Impact Statement dated August 2020.”

In a smaller spend, $3 million is proposed to wipe out invasive Burmese pythons in the Everglades.

Water quality writ large makes up $550 million of this proposal, with half of that for the Water Quality Improvement Grant Program, which includes ongoing septic to sewer conversions and Stormwater management, as well as nutrient reduction.

Speaking of nutrient mitigation, $50 million is contemplated to reduce Total Maximum Daily Loads. And another $50 million is seen as the right number for ongoing springs restoration, with $69 million slotted to state parks.

The Governor wants to spend $100 million on the Indian River Lagoon Protection Program, $80 million on the Lower Kissimmee Basin Stormwater Treatment Area project, $25 million for water quality improvements in the Caloosahatchee River watershed, and $20 million for water quality and coral reef restoration in Biscayne Bay.

In light of all this, the South Florida Water Management District is set to be a big winner, with another year of $150 million contemplated as its allocation.

The Florida Forever Program, meanwhile, looks to get the lion’s share ($100 million) of the $132 million designated to “protect Florida’s conservation lands and waterways to ensure Florida’s prized properties are accessible for future generations of Florida families.” That same number is slotted in the proposal for the Rural and Family Lands Protection Program, money intended to boost farming.

While the Governor doesn’t believe in global warming or climate change, he does think hurricanes are inevitable, and wants $261 million for local infrastructure and $100 million for beach renourishment.

Other potential budgetary winners include the oyster industry, with $30 million considered for reef restoration in Apalachicola Bay, and $20 million for citrus, with “$7 million for research and additional advertising by the Department of Citrus including research to help increase the production of trees and advance technologies that produce a resistance to citrus greening.” Wildfire mitigation could also get $49 million if this proposal is enacted as is, with $4 million for new trees and the remainder.

Finally, $206 million is contemplated to clean up contamination, with $196 million for petroleum tanks cleanup, $7 million for dry cleaning solvent, and $4 million for hazardous waste sites.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Marco Rubio says Panama must reduce Chinese influence around the canal or face possible U.S. action

Published

on


U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio brought a warning to Panamanian leader José Raúl Mulino on Sunday: Immediately reduce what President Donald Trump says is Chinese influence over the Panama Canal area or face potential retaliation from the United States.

Rubio, traveling to the Central American country and touring the Panama Canal on his first foreign trip as top U.S. diplomat, held face-to-face talks with Mulino, who has resisted pressure from the new U.S. government over management of a waterway that is vital to global trade.

Mulino told reporters after the meeting that Rubio made “no real threat of retaking the canal or the use of force.”

Speaking on behalf of Trump, who has demanded that the canal be returned to U.S. control, Rubio told Mulino that Trump believed that China’s presence in the canal area may violate a treaty that led the United States to turn the waterway over to Panama in 1999. That treaty calls for the permanent neutrality of the American-built canal.

“Secretary Rubio made clear that this status quo is unacceptable and that absent immediate changes, it would require the United States to take measures necessary to protect its rights under the treaty,” the State Department said in a summary of the meeting.

The statement was unusually blunt in diplomatic terms, but in keeping with the tenor and tone Trump has set for foreign policy. Trump has been increasing pressure on Washington’s neighbors and allies, including the canal demand and announcing Saturday that he was imposing major tariffs on Canada and Mexico. That launched a trade war by prompting retaliation from those close allies.

Mulino, meanwhile, called his talks with Rubio “respectful” and “positive” and said he did not “feel like there’s a real threat against the treaty and its validity.”

The President did say Panama would not be renewing its agreement with China’s Belt and Road Initiative when it expires. Panama joined the initiative, which promotes and funds infrastructure and development projects that critics say leave poor member countries heavily indebted to China, after dropping diplomatic recognition of Taiwan and recognizing Beijing.

Rubio later toured the canal at sunset with its administrator, Ricaurte Vásquez, who has said the waterway will remain in Panama’s hands and open to all countries. Rubio crossed the lock and visited the control tower, looking down over the water below, where a red tanker was passing through.

Earlier, about 200 people marched in the capital, carrying Panamanian flags and shouting “Marco Rubio out of Panama,” “Long live national sovereignty” and “One territory, one flag” while the meeting was going on. Some burned a banner with images of Trump and Rubio after being stopped short of the presidential palace by riot police.

Rubio also pressed Trump’s top focus — curbing illegal immigration — telling Panama’s president that it was important to collaborate on the work and thanked him for taking back migrants. Rubio’s trip, however, comes as a U.S. foreign aid funding freeze and stop-work orders have shut down U.S.-funded programs targeting illegal migration and crime in Central American countries.

In a Sunday evening post on X, formerly Twitter, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said he’s heading to the U.S.-Mexico border Monday to visit troops deployed as part of Trump’s immigration crackdown.

In a Wall Street Journal opinion piece on Friday, Rubio said mass migration, drugs and hostile policies pursued by Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela have wreaked havoc, and port facilities at either end of the canal are run by a China-based company, leaving the waterway vulnerable to pressure from the Beijing government.

“The President’s been pretty clear he wants to administer the canal again,” Rubio said Thursday. “Obviously, the Panamanians are not big fans of that idea. That message has been brought very clear.”

Despite Mulino’s rejection of any negotiation over ownership, some believe Panama may be open to a compromise under which canal operations on both sides are taken away from the Hong Kong-based Hutchison Ports company, which was given a 25-year no-bid extension to run them. An audit into the suitability of that extension is already underway and could lead to a rebidding process.

What is unclear is whether Trump would accept the transfer of the concession to an American or European company as meeting his demands, which appear to cover more than just operations.

Rubio’s trip, which will also take him to El Salvador, Costa Rica, Guatemala and the Dominican Republic, comes amid a freeze in U.S. foreign assistance. The State Department said Sunday that Rubio had approved waivers for certain critical programs in countries he is visiting but details of those were not immediately available.

___

Republished with permission of The Associated Press.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Gov. DeSantis budget shells out $30M for oyster reefs

Published

on


Natural habitats for Florida bivalves are getting special attention in Gov. Ron DeSantis’ new proposed budget.

DeSantis is proposing a $30 million earmark for the 2025-26 fiscal year to restore oyster reefs in Apalachicola Bay, a 30-mile bivalve paradise on the gulf coast in Franklin County.

For decades, the shallow bay produced more than 90% of Florida’s commercially harvested oysters, accounting for roughly a tenth of the nation’s yearly supply.

But oyster fisheries suddenly collapsed in 2012, due to a combination of low freshwater flows from the Apalachicola River Basin, which led to a steep oyster population decline.

The area’s been in recovery ever since. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration issued a declaration of emergency in 2013. Seven years later, Florida imposed a moratorium on wild harvest.

Efforts to revive the bay’s health have advanced, albeit slowly, in the years since. Last January, an advisory board to the Apalachicola Bay System Initiative, headed by scientists from Florida State University (FSU), released a comprehensive list of recommendations for the bay’s restoration and maintenance, with an eye on rebuilding its oyster reefs.

Notably, the recommendations “have a consensus of stakeholder agreement,” Sandra Brooke, a senior researcher at FSU’s Coastal and Marine Laboratory and the Apalachicola Bay System Initiative’s principal investigator, told WFSU last April.

DeSantis’ recommended budget apportionment, part of a $115.6 billion spending plan, comes about 10 months before the oyster harvesting moratorium is scheduled to end.

It also comes less than a month after PBS stations began airing an award-winning documentary, “Unfiltered: The Truth About Oysters,” detailing the issue, which isn’t unique to Florida; studies have shown at least 85% of oyster reefs worldwide have vanished.

A note in the Governor’s budget outline says the funds and project they’ll finance “will provide for continued restoration in Apalachicola Bay in support of sustainable oyster reefs that protect and enhance the ecosystem services this natural resource provides to the public.”

The current budget, when DeSantis signed it last June, had $160,000 set aside for oyster planting. That earmark was there too in the 2023 budget, which also provided $1.75 million for the Apalachicola Bay Drone Oyster Seeding Project and $6,180 for an oyster restoration project in Perdido Bay.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nick DiCeglie, Lindsay Cross buck partisanship with neighborhood flood safety measure

Published

on


State Sen. Nick DiCeglie, an Indian Rocks Beach Republican, and state Rep. Lindsay Cross, a St. Petersburg Democrat, are collaborating on legislation to improve traffic safety and manage vehicle behavior during floods and severe weather.

The lawmakers filed bipartisan legislation (SB 350 and HB 241) prohibiting motorists from driving at high speeds through a flood zone. This proposed law would reduce the number of vehicles creating wakes and exacerbating potential flood damage to homes and businesses. 

“I heard from countless residents whose homes were already flooded during Hurricane Helene forced to endure even more flood damage from vehicles driving at high speeds through their neighborhood, causing additional wake,” DiCeglie said. “This is a common-sense fix that will ensure our communities are protected during these extreme weather events.”

Added Cross: “In the aftermath of hurricanes Eta, Debby, Helene and Milton, we need to do everything we can to minimize the impact from flooding to homes and businesses. It’s heartbreaking for neighbors to stand in their doorways, praying that a vehicle driving down their street doesn’t push more water into their homes, destroying their possessions and memories.” 

The measures would allow local governments to enact ordinances governing the operation of motor vehicles, boats and other conveyances to limit wake on roadways. 

“As a coastal community, it is important to champion initiatives that will aid our public safety officials in keeping our residents and properties safe,” St. Petersburg City Council member Brandi Gabbard said. “By making this change to state statute, it will allow local governments to enact lower speed enforcement during times of street flooding, alleviating undue stress and damage. I am grateful to leaders such as Rep Cross and Sen. DiCeglie for their leadership and their partnership in this effort.”

The need for such measures became painfully evident last year when storm surge from Hurricane Helene caused widespread flooding in the Tampa Bay area, including Pinellas County beaches represented by DiCeglie, and low-lying areas such as Shore Acres in St. Petersburg, which Cross represents. The wake from vehicles zooming through floodwaters can create or worsen flooding to homes, other cars, businesses and infrastructure. 

“I want to thank Sen. DiCeglie and Rep. Cross for listening to the people of Shore Acres. Time and time again, we have witnessed reckless drivers plowing through floodwaters, creating a wake that causes millions more in property damage. The community of Shore Acres fully supports this critical legislation,” Shore Acres Civic Association President Kevin Batdorf said.

The measure would also give law enforcement an additional tool for educating the public about safe driving during weather events.

“Residents and business owners shouldn’t have to worry about careless drivers causing additional water damage to their properties as they try to begin the recovery process,” said Pinellas County Sheriff Bob Gualtieri, who added his thanks to DiCeglie and Cross for their “common sense legislation.”

St. Petersburg Police Chief Anthony Holloway similarly celebrated the proposal. 

“St. Petersburg Police Department supports the Vehicle Wakes bill, as it empowers communities to better address post-storm flood damage,” he said. “By reducing the destructive impact of vehicle wakes during flooding, this legislation will help protect homes, businesses, and vital infrastructure, ensuring our neighborhoods recover more quickly and effectively after storms.”


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.