A 200th anniversary deserves a major statement and Clarks has made just that. The UK’s heritage footwear business marks the major milestone of shoemaking heritage with a documentary film, ‘From Somerset to the World’.
The documentary celebrates the brand’s journey from humble beginnings in 1825 in Street, Somerset, “to becoming one of the most recognised and loved footwear brands in the world”.
Narrated by Yasiin Bey, aka Mos Def, the American rapper and actor, and directed by Set Free Richardson, the film highlights Clarks’ “evolution, cultural relevance, and global impact”.
It interviews a host of celebrities and influencers about their associations with the brand including musicians Liam Gallagher, Big Youth, Raekwon, Ghostface Killah, singer Lila Ike, DJ/presenter Becca Dudley, British-Jamaican designer Martine Rose, Dutch designer Danielle Cathari, and Jamaican former footballer Allan ‘Skill’ Cole.
Gallagher, who is due to launch his second collaboration with Clarks this year, reflects: “My earliest memories of Clarks, is probably when I’ve gone to school… because everyone was wearing them, they were the all the rage back then. I wore Clarks all the way through the ‘90s, got lots of memories… I don’t think there is any other brand for me, really… I find it hard to even look at other brands… Clarks have never let me down.”
Cathari also shares her perspective in the film: “Clarks introduced me to footwear outside of sneakers… What I think Clarks represents for women today is versatility. You know, the little black dress is to apparel what Clarks is to footwear.”
The documentary is now available to watch globally on the Clarks and Clarks Originals Instagram channels @ClarksShoes and @ClarksOriginals.
US firm PVH, which owns Tommy Hilfiger and Calvin Klein, said Wednesday it was “deeply disappointed” by China’s decision to place it on the country’s sanctions list.
Beijing on Tuesday added the fashion group and biotech giant Illumina to its list of “unreliable entities” – part of a swath of measures against US businesses in China in an escalating trade war between the two economic superpowers.
In response, the New York-based firm told AFP it was “surprised and deeply disappointed to learn of the decision from the Chinese Ministry of Commerce”.
“PVH maintains strict compliance with all relevant laws and regulations and operates in line with established industry standards and practices,” they said.
“We will continue our engagement with relevant authorities and look forward to a positive resolution,” they added.
PVH was already in Beijing’s crosshairs.
Chinese officials in September said they were investigating its “unreasonable” boycott of cotton from its Xinjiang region, where Beijing is accused of widespread rights violations.
Biotech firm Illumina, in turn, also told AFP they “comply with all laws and regulations”.
“Illumina has a long-standing presence in China, where we serve the local market through our advances in genomics that help improve human health,” a company spokesperson said.
“We are assessing this announcement with the goal of finding a positive resolution.”
China’s commerce ministry on Tuesday accused the two US companies of violating “normal market transaction principles” and taking “discriminatory measures against Chinese enterprises”, adding that the government’s move would “safeguard national sovereignty, security and development interests”.
Beijing also on Tuesday announced a probe into US tech giant Google over violations of its anti-monopoly laws.
Authorities did not give further details about the allegations.
Contacted by AFP, a Google spokesperson declined to comment.
Recovering South Korean shopaholic-turned-climate activist Lee So-yeon used to buy new clothes almost daily — until a $1.50 winter coat triggered an awakening that stopped her shopping entirely.
While looking at the ultra-cheap padded jacket at an H&M shop in the United States, where she was working at the time, Lee asked herself how any item of clothing could be sold so cheaply.
The 30-year-old embarked on a deep dive into fast fashion production methods and was horrified at the human, social and environmental toll hyperconsumerism is having on the planet — and on the mental health of women who make and buy cheap clothes.
“I used to buy one new outfit each (working) day of the week,” Lee told AFP, adding that each item from major high street retailers would typically cost less than a dollar.
But the reason the clothes are so cheap, Lee learned, is because the women who sew for companies are paid little, while the business model itself is causing significant environmental harm.
Lee stopped buying any new clothes — and has not purchased a single fast fashion garment since her epiphany around six years ago.
Her much more compact wardrobe consists of used items that she received from friends and family, including a vintage leather jacket that once belonged to her mother.
Unlike fast fashion items, which are often designed to be thrown away after just a few wears, each piece is irreplaceable because it carries a unique story and history, she said.
“Ultimately, the most eco-friendly clothes are the ones already in your wardrobe,” said Lee.
Break the cycle
Lee now organises clothing swaps with her friends and family, and has written a book to promote the idea of valuing garments for “the story behind it,” rather than chasing ephemeral trends.
She is part of a small but growing global movement seeking to promote second-hand clothing and help people — especially women — opt out of the cycle of over-consumption.
The app Lucky Sweater provides a platform for users to trade items from their closets with each other, focussing on sustainable brands, founder Tanya Dastyar told AFP.
“We’re programmed to believe the only way to express my fashion or show that I’m beautiful or trendy… is new outfits,” Dastyar said.
“But you can still be fashionable and feel good and look great and not have to do that,” she said, adding that although trading clothes did not have the same quick dopamine hit as making a fast-fashion purchase, it was far more rewarding over time.
The app’s growing uptake indicates that people are hungry to shift their relationship with clothing and consumerism, she said.
People realise: “I don’t have to follow trends and I can just dress in a way that feels comfortable to me,” she said. “Is that like a mass market thing? No. But do I feel like it can be a movement? Yes.”
For Lee, breaking the cycle of cheap clothing consumption helped her improve her mental health.
As a teenager, she would worry about what to wear on school trips — when uniforms were not required — at least a month in advance and would go shopping to ease her fears.
“I felt a lot of pressure about how others would see me,” she told AFP.
But learning about Bangladesh’s 2013 Rana Plaza tragedy — one of the world’s worst industrial disasters that killed more than 1,130 garment factory workers, most of them young women — was a turning point.
The factory workers died making clothes for “women like me”, Lee said.
No second-hand?
The global fashion industry is one of the most polluting, accounting for up to 10 percent of greenhouse gas emissions, according to World Bank estimates.
Most modern clothes are made of synthetic materials like nylon and polyester, which are essentially plastic and do not biodegrade in landfills, industry data shows.
Keeping clothes out of landfills can help, but in South Korea, many still avoid used garments, said Kim Dong-hyun, who runs a used clothing export factory.
“People often don’t look favourably on someone wearing used clothes because they are seen as unwanted items,” Kim told AFP, noting he has found dirty diapers and food waste in the collection bins.
South Korea is the fifth largest exporter of used clothing in the world — and activists say many garments are essentially dumped in developing countries, which lack the capacity to process them.
At Kim’s second-hand clothing factory in Paju, outside Seoul, a mechanical claw categorised piles of used clothes to be exported overseas.
“Many people treat the clothing collection bin as just a trash can,” Kim said.
Danish jewellery maker Pandora said on Wednesday that its growth and profit margin this year would be lower than last, as it expects sluggish demand in Europe and slowing growth in Germany after a strong run.
Pandora, known for its charm bracelets, reported operating profit in line with expectations for the key holiday shopping quarter, but said Black Friday discounts had driven a bigger share of sales, weighing slightly on profitability.
The world’s biggest jewellery company by volume said it sees 7-8% organic growth in 2025. Organic growth for 2024 was 13%, better than the company’s guidance of 11-12%.
Pandora reported fourth quarter comparable sales growth of 9% in the U.S., helping drive 6% growth overall. Germany’s comparable sales grew by 28%, slower than the 42% growth in the third quarter, while revenues in France and Italy both fell.
“We had a very strong fourth quarter in the U.S. and Canada,” Lacik said in an interview. “It’s a stronger consumer demand and sentiment in the U.S. than we see in Europe, and one would probably think that that’s going to continue into this year.”
Pandora said performance in Italy and France was impacted by economic challenges and an “intense promotional environment” – competitive pressure to lower prices and discount products.
Fourth-quarter operating profit rose to DKK4.15 billion from a year-earlier DKK 3.67 billion, against a mean forecast of DKK 4.10 billion in an analyst poll provided by Pandora. Pandora’s operating profit margin was 34.7%, slightly above analysts’ average forecast.
The company expects an operating profit margin of around 24.5% in 2025, down from 25.2% last year.
Pandora, whose shares recently hit a record high, also launched a new share buy-back programme for up to DKK4 billion.