Connect with us

Politics

State Attorney declines to pursue charges against Monroe GOP officials after election probe

Published

on


Monroe County’s top Republican leaders are breathing easier after prosecutors announced they will not pursue charges tied to a disputed $20,000 political contribution that set off months of infighting, allegations of fraud and an almost one-year investigation.

In a memo finalized last month, State Attorney Amira Fox of the 20th Judicial Circuit said her Office found insufficient evidence that Republican Party of Monroe Chair Rhonda Rebman Lopez and then-Treasurer Sherri Hodies violated state law when the organization endorsed and donated to Hodies’ successful Supervisor of Elections campaign.

Rebman Lopez celebrated the decision this week, commending Gov. Ron DeSantis for ensuring a “fair, transparent process” and blasting Republican Monroe State Attorney Dennis Ward, whom she accused of pushing the complaint to help Hodies’ Democratic opponent last year.

“This was a political attack from the start,” Rebman Lopez said. “Ward’s efforts to slander loyal Republicans failed. Thanks to Governor DeSantis and to the voters of Monroe County for standing strong.”

(L-R) Republican Party of Monroe County Chair Rhonda Rebman Lopez and Supervisor of Elections Sherri Hodies, a past Monroe GOP Chair. Images via Rhonda Rebman Lopez and Republican Party of Monroe County.

The controversy dates to an April 20, 2024, meeting of the Monroe County Republican Executive Committee (MCREC). At that gathering, members voted to endorse Hodies over Republican primary rival Margaret Romero and contribute $20,000 to her campaign.

Soon after, Key West resident Phyllis May filed a complaint alleging that the vote did not satisfy Rule 8-B of the Republican Party of Florida (RPOF), which requires either 60% of a local Executive Committee’s total membership or two-thirds of those present to endorse a candidate in a contested Primary.

May argued that the April vote — 20 in favor, 18 opposed — fell short of that threshold, making the contribution unlawful. She also alleged that the move amounted to voter fraud and unlawful distribution of funds, placing both Rebman Lopez and Hodies in violation of Florida law that makes it a third-degree felony for a county party Chair or Treasurer to misappropriate or unlawfully expend party funds.

Because Ward had been present at the April meeting, he recused himself to avoid a conflict. DeSantis reassigned the case to Fox through an executive order Sept. 20, 2024.

Investigators interviewed numerous MCREC members and reviewed meeting the group’s minutes, bylaws and testimony. According to a close-out report investigators from Fox’s Office submitted in June, the April meeting was contentious, and many members were unfamiliar with Rule 8-B.

Key testimony came from MCREC Secretary Jessica Prescott, who said she researched Rule 8-B and believed a simple majority was sufficient because a 60% quorum was present; MCREC member Patrick Foley, who testified that confusion stemmed from conflicting interpretations of Rule 8-B, but that nothing nefarious occurred; and the group’s current Treasurer, Henry Stark, who argued Rule 8-B as vague and subject to “a variety of interpretations.”

Fox’s Office concluded there was no evidence that Rebman Lopez or Hodies had criminal intent to misappropriate funds, finding instead that there had been an honest dispute among members about how to apply party rules.

“The evidence is clear that different members of the MCREC had different interpretations of RPOF Rule 8-B and members had little to no experience with RPOF Rule 8-B,” the report stated.

Fox’s Office also noted that Rule 8-B governs endorsements but not financial contributions, which the committee had historically approved by simple majority.

“Had the MCREC simply proceeded with a majority vote for the financial distribution, as the organization had always done in the past,” the memo said, “the allegation of misappropriation of funds may have been avoided.”


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Carlos G. Smith files bill to allow medical pot patients to grow their own plants

Published

on


Home cultivation of marijuana plants could be legal under certain conditions.

Medical marijuana patients may not have to go to the dispensary for their medicine if new legislation in the Senate passes.

Sen. Carlos G. Smith’s SB 776 would permit patients aged 21 and older to grow up to six pot plants.

They could use the homegrown product, but just like the dispensary weed, they would not be able to re-sell.

Medical marijuana treatment centers would be the only acceptable sourcing for plants and seeds, a move that would protect the cannabis’ custody.

Those growing the plants would be obliged to keep them secured from “unauthorized persons.”

Chances this becomes law may be slight.

A House companion for the legislation has yet to be filed. And legislators have demonstrated little appetite for homegrow in the past.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Rolando Escalona aims to deny Frank Carollo a return to the Miami Commission

Published

on


Early voting is now underway in Miami for a Dec. 9 runoff that will decide whether political newcomer Rolando Escalona can block former Commissioner Frank Carollo from reclaiming the District 3 seat long held by the Carollo family.

The contest has already been marked by unusual turbulence: both candidates faced eligibility challenges that threatened — but ultimately failed — to knock them off the ballot.

Escalona survived a dramatic residency challenge in October after a rival candidate accused him of faking his address. A Miami-Dade Judge rejected the claim following a detailed, three-hour trial that examined everything from his lease records to his Amazon orders.

After the Nov. 4 General Election — when Carollo took about 38% of the vote and Escalona took 17% to outpace six other candidates — Carollo cleared his own legal hurdle when another Judge ruled he could remain in the race despite the city’s new lifetime term limits that, according to three residents who sued, should have barred him from running again.

Those rulings leave voters with a stark choice in District 3, which spans Little Havana, East Shenandoah, West Brickell and parts of Silver Bluff and the Roads.

The runoff pits a self-described political outsider against a veteran official with deep institutional experience and marks a last chance to extend the Carollo dynasty to a twentieth straight year on the dais or block that potentiality.

Escalona, 34, insists voters are ready to move on from the chaos and litigation that have surrounded outgoing Commissioner Joe Carollo, whose tenure included a $63.5 million judgment against him for violating the First Amendment rights of local business owners and the cringe-inducing firing of a Miami Police Chief, among other controversies.

A former busboy who rose through the hospitality industry to manage high-profile Brickell restaurant Sexy Fish while also holding a real estate broker’s license, Escalona is running on a promise to bring transparency, better basic services, lower taxes for seniors and improved permitting systems to the city.

He wants to improve public safety, support economic development, enhance communities, provide more affordable housing, lower taxes and advocate for better fiscal responsibility in government.

He told the Miami Herald that if elected, he’d fight to restore public trust by addressing public corruption while re-engaging residents who feel unheard by current officials.

Carollo, 55, a CPA who served two terms on the dais from 2009 to 2017, has argued that the district needs an experienced leader. He’s pointed to his record balancing budgets and pledges a residents-first agenda focused on safer streets, cleaner neighborhoods and responsive government.

Carollo was the top fundraiser in the District 3 race this cycle, amassing about $501,000 between his campaign account and political committee, Residents First, and spending about $389,500 by the last reporting dates.

Escalona, meanwhile, reported raising close to $109,000 through his campaign account and spending all but 6,000 by Dec. 4.

The winner will secure a four-year term.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Florida kicks off first black bear hunt in a decade, despite pushback

Published

on


For the first time in a decade, hunters armed with rifles and crossbows are fanning out across Florida’s swamps and flatwoods to legally hunt the Florida black bear, over the vocal opposition of critics.

The state-sanctioned hunt began Saturday, after drawing more than 160,000 applications for a far more limited number of hunting permits, including from opponents who are trying to reduce the number of bears killed in this year’s hunt, the state’s first since 2015.

The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission awarded 172 bear hunt permits by random lottery for this year’s season, allowing hunters to kill one bear each in areas where the population is deemed large enough. At least 43 of the permits went to opponents of the hunt who never intend to use them, according to the Florida chapter of the Sierra Club, which encouraged critics to apply in the hopes of saving bears.

The Florida black bear population is considered one of the state’s conservation success stories, having grown from just several hundred bears in the 1970s to an estimated more than 4,000 today.

The 172 people who were awarded a permit through a random lottery will be able to kill one bear each during the 2025 season, which runs from Dec. 6 to Dec. 28. The permits are specific to one of the state’s four designated bear hunting zones, each of which have a hunting quota set by state officials based on the bear population in each region.

In order to participate, hunters must hold a valid hunting license and a bear harvest permit, which costs $100 for residents and $300 for nonresidents, plus fees. Applications for the permits cost $5 each.

The regulated hunt will help incentivize maintaining healthy bear populations, and help fund the work that is needed, according to Mark Barton of the Florida chapter of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, an advocacy group that supported the hunt.

Having an annual hunt will help guarantee funding to “keep moving conservation for bears forward,” Barton said.

According to state wildlife officials, the bear population has grown enough to support a regulated hunt and warrant population management. The state agency sees hunting as an effective tool that is used to manage wildlife populations around the world, and allows the state to monetize conservation efforts through permit and application fees.

“While we have enough suitable bear habitat to support our current bear population levels, if the four largest subpopulations continue to grow at current rates, we will not have enough habitat at some point in the future,” reads a bear hunting guide published by the state wildlife commission.

___

Republished with permission of the Associated Press.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.