Connect with us

Business

Zillow’s chief people officer says it’s remote-forward working model supercharged recruiting—But there are 2 key reasons they’re keeping their offices

Published

on



As more and more companies force employees to go back into the office full time, one company is letting staffers make their own choices about where they want to work. 

Like the rest of the world, Zillow’s employees were forced to work from home at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. In the autumn of 2020, company leadership told employees that they would not be asked to return to the office full-time. As a result, hundreds of workers decided to relocate, prompting the company to establish a “CloudHQ” model: the company considers its headquarters to be online, not in one physical location. 

Approximately 84% of Zillow’s 6,900 employees are fully remote, meaning they’re not associated with a permanent corporate office, and they aren’t required to be in office regularly. The rest are a combination of mortgage roles that require high levels of in-office attendance because of compliance laws, or regional sales workers who are asked to report to a specific field office. 

Dan Spaulding, chief people officer at Zillow, spoke with Fortune about the company’s approach to asynchronous work, what exactly a “Z-retreat” is,” and how often he actually goes into the office (spoiler: not a lot). 


This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Fortune: Tell me about Zillow’s CloudHQ approach to work. 

Dan Spaulding: CloudHQ really started in the confusion of “post” the beginning of the pandemic [fall 2020], when you just kind of didn’t know when you were going to be able to get back to the way that work used to be. We started asking ourselves the questions of: ‘We’re learning a lot working in this distributed way. How do we build on that and how do we think differently about what our employees want and need coming out of the pandemic?’ And that grew into our CloudHQ strategy.

Our CloudHQ strategy is that we want employees to have the ability to choose where they live and work [based on] what is most effective for them on a daily basis. And then we want to be hyper-intentional about when we are together in person.

How has Zillow’s relationship to the physical office changed?

We had 11 offices across the country before the pandemic. And to put it in perspective, 95% of our employees lived within daily commuting distance of those offices. Today, we have six offices across the country within major hubs: Seattle, San Francisco, Irvine, New York, to name a few. And we have employees now in all 50 states. 

We still use those offices on a daily basis for one of two scenarios. One is that we have a lot of employees who still like to come into the office on a fairly frequent basis. We don’t have mandates about time spent in office. The broader use case is for what we call “Z-retreats,” which are intentional gatherings that we plan and execute centrally that line up with a calendar that we build from the beginning of the year. It’s based on: when do we need teams to come together? When do we need leaders to come together? When do we have important product launches where we need cross functional work streams coming together and spending focused time together? And then we rotate those across the country and bring employees in for for all sorts of meetings.

The first full year of “Z-retreats” for us was 2022, when [there were] vaccination levels that we felt really comfortable [with] from a health and safety perspective. That year, of course, there was also pent-up demand. Teams were so desperate to come together.

What kind of results are you seeing from the remote and hybrid work strategy? 

We’re in our ninth quarter of outperforming residential real estate. We’re shipping product faster than we’ve shipped product historically. Our voluntary attrition is down. Our employee sentiment about working at Zillow—pride and excitement and working at Zillow—all of those measures continue to be up.

We haven’t seen a dip in any productivity measure that we track since we’ve moved into this modality. 

What are the impacts on talent recruitment and retention? 

I have four times the applicants for every job opening that I had pre-Cloud HQ. So if you look at those measures directionally, that tells us that we’re doing something that’s compelling to job seekers. 

We do internal surveys three times a year to measure employee sentiment—94% of our workforce are proud to work at Zillow and 84% believe they have the resources to do their job effectively. 

Then some of the things that really matter to us are about inclusion—84% of our workforce feel that they can be their authentic selves at work. If you look at some of [Zillow’s] hiring numbers, pre-pandemic, 41% of our employee population were women. Today, 46% of our employee population are women, and that’s on a growing headcount basis. That is a huge demographic shift. I’ve worked in HR for 25 years, I’ve never seen the demographic shift that I’ve seen since moving to Cloud HQ. And we believe that’s a differentiator for us in terms of not just attracting those employees to Zillow, but retaining them for a longer period of time. 

How often do you go into the office? 

I would say I go into the office probably four to five days a month. But never four to five days in a row. 

What do you think are common mistakes that companies make when it comes to RTO?

I obviously can’t speak to other companies, but for us, the question is always the same: why go back to the past when you can understand the challenges that your workforce is facing today, and push forward into the future? 

Trying to figure out asynchronous work, trying to figure out intentional gathering strategies, trying to give employees flexibility. These are all things that you can look [at] on one side and say, “Well, that’s too difficult.” But pushing everybody in the company—from our senior leadership team to our frontline employees—to be more intentional with the way they think about their work, the way they partner with each other? There’s a benefit for all of us. 

One common complaint that workers have about RTO is that they feel like it’s more about control than productivity. What would you say to that?

We like to think we hire adults. We like to treat people like adults. At Zillow, we think it’s a real privilege that we get this flexibility. Now, what I would say as an HR leader, I believe that great work contributions come from the marginal efforts that employees make. I don’t think that letting employees have flexibility to run that errand or to coach Little League or go to the yoga class that works with their schedule [will diminish that]. Our employees understand that in exchange for that flexibility, when the company needs you to step up, you step up. Giving employees a little bit more flexibility during their day, I think you get paid back 10 fold from that marginal effort when you really need it from employees. 

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

FCC chairman orders DEI investigation into Disney, ABC

Published

on



The head of the Federal Communications Commission ordered an investigation into Walt Disney Co. and its ABC network over their diversity, equity and inclusion practices, broadening his examination of media and telecom companies for perceived discriminatory biases. 

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr directed the agency’s Enforcement Bureau to “ensure that Disney and ABC have not been violating FCC equal employment opportunity regulations by promoting invidious forms of DEI discrimination.” 

Carr specifically called out policies at Disney including its “Reimagine Tomorrow” initiative designed to advance its DEI mission and inclusion standards across ABC that require “50% of regular and recurring characters” be drawn from “underrepresented groups,” according to a letter Carr wrote to Disney Chief Executive Officer Bob Iger and posted on X on Friday. 

“Disney started out a century ago as an iconic American company,” Carr wrote. “But then something changed. Disney has now been embroiled in rounds of controversy surrounding its DEI policies.”

Since being appointed by President Donald Trump earlier this year, Carr has sent similar letters to Verizon Communications Inc. and Comcast Corp. He recently told Bloomberg that a company’s DEI practices would affect its chances of receiving merger approval.

Carr noted that Disney has recently walked back some of its DEI initiatives but said “significant concerns remain.” Earlier this year Disney said it would end the Reimagine Tomorrow program that Carr called out. The company is also removing diversity from the criteria for determining manager compensation. 

“We are reviewing the Federal Communications Commission’s letter, and we look forward to engaging with the commission to answer its questions,” a spokesperson for Disney said.

Disney’s modern remake of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs hit theaters earlier this month under a deluge of criticism, including over casting an actress of Colombian heritage as the title character and the re-imagining of the seven dwarfs.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Trump seeks even more aggressive tariffs to fundamentally transform the US economy and eyes a single universal duty, report says

Published

on



  • President Donald Trump is pressing his staff to take a harder stance on tariffs as part of an effort to transform the US economy, sources told the Washington Post. That could include a universal tariff that hits most imports without regard to the country of origin. The discussions come right before April 2, which Trump has billed as “Liberation Day,” when his next batch of tariffs will be unveiled.

As part of an effort to fundamentally transform the US economy, President Donald Trump has been pushing his staff to get even more aggressive on tariffs, sources told the Washington Post.

That could include a universal tariff that hits most imports, no matter which country they are from, the report said, adding that Trump views a single duty as less likely to be watered down by exemptions.

Intense discussions are ongoing ahead of April 2, which Trump has billed as “Liberation Day,” when his next batch of tariffs will be unveiled.

For now, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s “dirty 15” plan to set tariffs on the 15% of countries that the administration considers the worst trading partners is seen as the most likely outcome, according to the Post.

“There’s still a lot of options still on the table. They are considering everything and trying very hard to make the idea of a reciprocal tariff both understandable to the American public and effective,” Wilbur Ross, Trump’s commerce secretary during his first term, told the Post. “They are quite correctly exploring every alternative in the hope they come to the best possible solution.”

The White House didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Trump has already slapped tariffs on China, Canada, Mexico, steel, aluminum and autos, while threatening duties on pharmaceuticals, chips, lumber and the European Union.

He said reciprocal tariffs would come out on April 2, but suggested he would show some “flexibility.” And earlier reports that said those would be more targeted raised hopes on Wall Street that their impact would be less severe.

But after stocks rallied, his announcement of the auto tariffs on Wednesday contributed to another selloff, which was also fueled by signs that tariffs were worsening inflation and consumers’ expectations of future inflation.

Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee recently warned that inflation expectations could become a self-fulfilling prophecy, and Boston Fed President Susan Collins has said tariff-induced inflation “looks inevitable,” adding that he suspects the central bank will hold rates steady for longer.

After their most recent policy meeting this month, Fed officials lowered their forecasts for economic growth and raised their inflation estimates, raising the specter of “stagflation.”

Meanwhile, surveys of consumers and businesses show that they are turning increasingly gloomy about the economy amid tariff uncertainty and mass federal layoffs. Even executives in deep-red states that voted for Trump say business conditions are collapsing.

And economists have been hiking recession odds, with some even seeing a 50-50 chance of a downturn.

Fitch Ratings previously estimated that If Trump carries out all his plans, the effective US tariff rate could hit 18% on average—the highest level in 90 years. 

Trump has acknowledged Americans will feel “some pain” from his tariffs but that they are necessary to revitalize US manufacturing and rebalance trade to more favorable terms.

While several companies have pledged to set up more factories in the US, Wall Street has warned that tariffs meant to reshuffle the auto sector, which has closely integrated supply chains across Canada and Mexico, will create chaos.

Still, the White House said the Trump administration is committed to delivering on his vision restore the US industrial base.

“America cannot just be an assembler of foreign-made parts—we must become a manufacturing powerhouse that dominates every step of the supply chain of industries that are critical for our national security and economic interests,” spokesman Kush Desai previously told Fortune.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

The ‘competition going on for supremacy’ between China and the U.S. may create benefits, says International Chamber of Commerce secretary general

Published

on



  • The tech race between the U.S. and China may have future benefits for the global industry, according to the International Chamber of Commerce’s secretary general. Chinese AI is heating up, and the country is making economic gambles on a tech industrial revolution, he said.

The race for economic dominance between the United States and China could have some upside too, International Chamber of Commerce Secretary General John W.H. Denton said.

“There is a competition going on for supremacy, and I think it’s perfectly important to understand that competition may actually have positive benefits,” he said during Fortune’s Building a Geopolitical Muscle for a Multipolar World event.

That’s despite a trade war between the two countries that is escalating as President Donald Trump levied 20% all-encompassing tariffs on imports from China while President Xi Jinping imposed retaliatory tariffs on U.S. agriculture imports.

That followed the Biden administration’s sweeping export control measures against China to limit its access to cutting-edge technology.

But it hasn’t stopped Chinese AI advancements like DeepSeek, a large language model (LLM) that claimed to compete with American AI at a fraction of the cost.  

Additionally, China-based Alibaba is launching an LLM and has pledged $53 billion over three years to bolster its cloud computing and AI infrastructure, while TikTok owner ByteDance is exploring a deep-reasoning model.

“China has made and is making some huge, highly risky macroeconomic bets in order to drive what they see is this techno-driven industrial revolution that they want,” Denton said. 

Beijing said earlier this month that it would boost support for AI and the development of venture capital investment to spur breakthroughs and become more self-reliant.

As part of that effort, China is mobilizing 1 trillion yuan ($138 billion) for a government-backed fund to support technology startups.

According to the head of China’s state planner, the fund will carry long-term investment cycles, heightened patience for risk, and investment into tech companies through market-based approaches. The fund will focus on sectors like AI, quantum technology, and hydrogen energy storage.

“And clearly, they’re prepared to actually take a lot of damage from a macroeconomic point of view in order to emerge in a superior position in key sectors, industries and obviously relationships as well,” Denton said. 

For its part, the U.S. has made advancement in tech a priority of its own, and Denton thinks the U.S. has risen to the challenge of localizing its production. 

Arjun Sethi, co-CEO of crypto platform Kraken, said at the same event that the White House is sending a “very clear message” that it wants to bring people from outside the U.S. into the country that are highly skilled, especially in the tech industry, to make the U.S. as competitive as possible.

“The speed at which I’m able to bring the entrepreneurs that are sitting anywhere in the world, so from France, from Germany, from Mexico, from Argentina, from Brazil has been weeks, not years or months,” Sethi said. “So that’s a huge distinction in terms of a competitive advantage for the startup ecosystem.

While the Trump administration has been pro-crypto, cracking down on immigration has been one of the many focal points in the first few months in office. Still, Trump has expressed support for H-1B visas, which are critical for bringing international talent into the U.S. tech industry.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.