Connect with us

Politics

Would you like some cries with that? McDonald’s FAFO moment

Published

on


McDonald’s CEO Chris Kempczinski took to CNBC earlier this month to complain that President Donald Trump’s “no tax on tips” policy isn’t very fair.

“The issue with no tax on tips is it only benefited those restaurants that have tips,” he said.

Sounding as salty as one of his fast food chain’s french fries, Kempczinski clearly didn’t get the memo that another higher up at McDonald’s had already weighed in.

Jon Banner, McDonald’s Executive Vice President and Global Chief Impact Officer, had previously posted on X, in response to claims of the contrary, that “McDonald’s supports the tax policies in the Big Beautiful Bill that enable small businesses to win and supports the President’s No Tax on Tips policy,” he wrote, adding that “contrary info is fake news.”

But it turns out Kempczinski wasn’t lovin’ it, and supersized his frustration by leaving the National Restaurant Association over it, at least in part. (Listen to more on that here.)

I haven’t spoken to either Kempczinski or Banner, but from the looks of it, Banner started with some Trump McLovin’ despite Trump’s tax on tips policy creating a more desirable job market for competitors who do allow their employees to accept tips.

Nevertheless, the whining goes over about as well as McDonald’s perpetually broken soft serve machines. And for what?

As the saying goes, never look a gift horse in the mouth, but here Kempczinski is gaping directly into it.

Love him or hate him, Charlie Kirk perhaps called it out best.

“President Trump has single-handedly given McDonald’s more free PR than the company has received throughout the rest of its entire history. Just say thank you,” he wrote on X in response to Kempczinski’s quarter-pounder-sized beef with the President’s “no tax on tips” policy.

It’s true.

He even worked a shift there during his most recent presidential campaign, which drew all of the headlines. 

And remember that time Trump hosted the Clemson Tigers at the White House to celebrate their NCAA football championship? It was the butt of a lot of jokes, but Trump served a giant helping of fast food to the visiting players, including trays upon fancy trays of McDonald’s favorites, and then went on and on about how it was probably their favorite. Sure, there was some fare from others, such as Wendy’s and Burger King, but McDonald’s was the most prominent.

Ka-ching!

And why would Mickey D’s not be front and center at Trump’s heart attack White House cafe? It is, after all, his favorite. While the President’s reasons for preferring the Golden arches aren’t exactly related to its culinary offerings — he thinks it’s safer since it’s pre-made, and for whatever reason, he thinks chains like McDonald’s have higher standards for food safety — it is nevertheless the biggest endorsement any dining establishment can land.

A clever 7-year-old, if they were to catch wind of the President’s infatuation with fatty foods, might give an unsuspecting parent a run for their money. “What do you mean I can’t eat at McDonald’s? The President does!”

To be clear, the “no tax on tips” conundrum for places like McDonald’s does offer an advantage to its tip-accepting competitors — where can you go these days without being asked if you want to leave a tip? However, the solution might be to start taking tips.

Or Kempczinski could just offer a side of cries with that, which apparently he’s done.

But it’s a pretty crummy look for a company that supported something it thought would be a boon, only to turn around and blast its most prolific customer.

And what’s that saying?

“The customer is always right.”


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Carlos G. Smith files bill to allow medical pot patients to grow their own plants

Published

on


Home cultivation of marijuana plants could be legal under certain conditions.

Medical marijuana patients may not have to go to the dispensary for their medicine if new legislation in the Senate passes.

Sen. Carlos G. Smith’s SB 776 would permit patients aged 21 and older to grow up to six pot plants.

They could use the homegrown product, but just like the dispensary weed, they would not be able to re-sell.

Medical marijuana treatment centers would be the only acceptable sourcing for plants and seeds, a move that would protect the cannabis’ custody.

Those growing the plants would be obliged to keep them secured from “unauthorized persons.”

Chances this becomes law may be slight.

A House companion for the legislation has yet to be filed. And legislators have demonstrated little appetite for homegrow in the past.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Rolando Escalona aims to deny Frank Carollo a return to the Miami Commission

Published

on


Early voting is now underway in Miami for a Dec. 9 runoff that will decide whether political newcomer Rolando Escalona can block former Commissioner Frank Carollo from reclaiming the District 3 seat long held by the Carollo family.

The contest has already been marked by unusual turbulence: both candidates faced eligibility challenges that threatened — but ultimately failed — to knock them off the ballot.

Escalona survived a dramatic residency challenge in October after a rival candidate accused him of faking his address. A Miami-Dade Judge rejected the claim following a detailed, three-hour trial that examined everything from his lease records to his Amazon orders.

After the Nov. 4 General Election — when Carollo took about 38% of the vote and Escalona took 17% to outpace six other candidates — Carollo cleared his own legal hurdle when another Judge ruled he could remain in the race despite the city’s new lifetime term limits that, according to three residents who sued, should have barred him from running again.

Those rulings leave voters with a stark choice in District 3, which spans Little Havana, East Shenandoah, West Brickell and parts of Silver Bluff and the Roads.

The runoff pits a self-described political outsider against a veteran official with deep institutional experience and marks a last chance to extend the Carollo dynasty to a twentieth straight year on the dais or block that potentiality.

Escalona, 34, insists voters are ready to move on from the chaos and litigation that have surrounded outgoing Commissioner Joe Carollo, whose tenure included a $63.5 million judgment against him for violating the First Amendment rights of local business owners and the cringe-inducing firing of a Miami Police Chief, among other controversies.

A former busboy who rose through the hospitality industry to manage high-profile Brickell restaurant Sexy Fish while also holding a real estate broker’s license, Escalona is running on a promise to bring transparency, better basic services, lower taxes for seniors and improved permitting systems to the city.

He wants to improve public safety, support economic development, enhance communities, provide more affordable housing, lower taxes and advocate for better fiscal responsibility in government.

He told the Miami Herald that if elected, he’d fight to restore public trust by addressing public corruption while re-engaging residents who feel unheard by current officials.

Carollo, 55, a CPA who served two terms on the dais from 2009 to 2017, has argued that the district needs an experienced leader. He’s pointed to his record balancing budgets and pledges a residents-first agenda focused on safer streets, cleaner neighborhoods and responsive government.

Carollo was the top fundraiser in the District 3 race this cycle, amassing about $501,000 between his campaign account and political committee, Residents First, and spending about $389,500 by the last reporting dates.

Escalona, meanwhile, reported raising close to $109,000 through his campaign account and spending all but 6,000 by Dec. 4.

The winner will secure a four-year term.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Florida kicks off first black bear hunt in a decade, despite pushback

Published

on


For the first time in a decade, hunters armed with rifles and crossbows are fanning out across Florida’s swamps and flatwoods to legally hunt the Florida black bear, over the vocal opposition of critics.

The state-sanctioned hunt began Saturday, after drawing more than 160,000 applications for a far more limited number of hunting permits, including from opponents who are trying to reduce the number of bears killed in this year’s hunt, the state’s first since 2015.

The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission awarded 172 bear hunt permits by random lottery for this year’s season, allowing hunters to kill one bear each in areas where the population is deemed large enough. At least 43 of the permits went to opponents of the hunt who never intend to use them, according to the Florida chapter of the Sierra Club, which encouraged critics to apply in the hopes of saving bears.

The Florida black bear population is considered one of the state’s conservation success stories, having grown from just several hundred bears in the 1970s to an estimated more than 4,000 today.

The 172 people who were awarded a permit through a random lottery will be able to kill one bear each during the 2025 season, which runs from Dec. 6 to Dec. 28. The permits are specific to one of the state’s four designated bear hunting zones, each of which have a hunting quota set by state officials based on the bear population in each region.

In order to participate, hunters must hold a valid hunting license and a bear harvest permit, which costs $100 for residents and $300 for nonresidents, plus fees. Applications for the permits cost $5 each.

The regulated hunt will help incentivize maintaining healthy bear populations, and help fund the work that is needed, according to Mark Barton of the Florida chapter of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, an advocacy group that supported the hunt.

Having an annual hunt will help guarantee funding to “keep moving conservation for bears forward,” Barton said.

According to state wildlife officials, the bear population has grown enough to support a regulated hunt and warrant population management. The state agency sees hunting as an effective tool that is used to manage wildlife populations around the world, and allows the state to monetize conservation efforts through permit and application fees.

“While we have enough suitable bear habitat to support our current bear population levels, if the four largest subpopulations continue to grow at current rates, we will not have enough habitat at some point in the future,” reads a bear hunting guide published by the state wildlife commission.

___

Republished with permission of the Associated Press.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.