Connect with us

Business

Women are leaving the workforce in droves. Melinda French Gates launched a competition to solve it

Published

on



Hello from Riyadh, where I’m at the Fortune Global Forum. I’ll be moderating a few panels, including one on how to build a future-ready workforce. Follow along with our livestream here

In other news, billionaire philanthropist Melinda French Gates recently announced that her investing and advocacy organization Pivotal is partnering with nonprofit the Aspen Institute to launch a $60 million grant competition. Why? To discover bold, future-of-work ideas that remove barriers women face in the workplace. 

I chatted with Gates about this initiative via email. Her responses have been edited and condensed for clarity:

Fortune: Why did you launch this challenge? What are you hoping to come out of it?

French Gates: This year, the number of women in the workforce has fallen by 500,000, while the number of men rose by nearly 400,000. That statistic tells us something is very broken. We’ve built systems that aren’t working, and women are bearing the brunt of it. I believe that if we’re bold enough to rethink how work works—if we make it more flexible, more fair, more inclusive—then we’re not just helping women. We’re unlocking opportunity for everyone.

What are the biggest challenges we’re facing?

The world of work is being reinvented right before our eyes. AI is putting new power in people’s hands. Big companies are more profitable than ever, which in theory should lead to better outcomes for employees, but often doesn’t. Traditional employment models are being disrupted, and many careers are starting to look nothing like they used to.

There’s a lot of change happening very fast, and as I see it, every question about the future of work comes down to one: Will the opportunities created by these changes be open to everyone, or just benefit the people who are already in positions of power and privilege? For my part, I think they can be a force for progress, but it’s going to take a lot of action and effort. 

What barriers are women facing in the workplace? What would you like to see change?

It’s very concerning to see so many women leaving the workforce—but if you’ve been listening all along to what women say about their careers, it’s not surprising. When we survey women to see what’s holding them back at work, they tell us about the impossible tradeoffs they’re forced to make to balance careers with caregiving responsibilities, especially given how expensive child care has become. 

They tell us that even though #MeToo opened up important conversations, they still experience harassment at work. They tell us about facing outdated assumptions that they’re not cut out for leadership. And it’s simply a fact that if they try to launch businesses, they have a much harder time getting capital than men do. 

What would I like to change? I want to see more women leading—making decisions, directing resources, and shaping policies at the highest levels of society. That requires us to make sure they’re not facing unique barriers along the way to positions of power.

Over time, people will see that having more women step into leadership doesn’t hold back anyone else. It actually helps move everyone forward.

You’ve often spoken about systemic change vs. quick fixes. How do you make sure a $60 million challenge leads to structural change in workplaces, not just surface-level interventions?

If you look at what we’re asking of applicants, you’ll see one word again and again: scale. That’s because we hope to find ideas with the power to grow and create lasting change.

Not everything we try will succeed—and that’s okay. That’s part of the process. Philanthropy gives us the space to test different approaches, see what really makes a difference, and let go of what doesn’t. Every lesson will help us get closer to workplaces that work for everyone. 

What gives you hope right now about the future of women at work, even amid sobering statistics?

When I was growing up, I barely knew any women who worked outside the home. My dad, an aerospace engineer working on the Apollo missions, would often tell me how much better his team was because it included women—but I always knew that diverse teams were the exception and not the norm. 

That’s not the world my granddaughters live in. That’s not the world my daughters live in. One’s a pediatrician, and one’s an entrepreneur. They grew up seeing so many different archetypes of women working at the highest levels. 

Of course we’re not at gender parity in our country yet, but we’ve come really far—and that’s exactly why I believe we can go even further. While the status quo is powerful, so are the people who refuse to accept it. 

Kristin Stoller
Editorial Director, Fortune Live Media
kristin.stoller@fortune.com

Around the Table

A round-up of the most important HR headlines.

Citing stress and burnout, Gen Z is rejecting the state of “workplace emergency” in favor of work-life balance boundaries. Washington Post

Employees at some of Silicon Valley’s biggest AI labs are regularly working 80 to 100 hours a week to win the tech arms race. Wall Street Journal

Many professionals with DEI experience on their resumes are struggling to find work in the current job market. Bloomberg

Watercooler

Everything you need to know from Fortune.

Insurance squeeze. U.S. employers and workers are facing the steepest run-up in health insurance costs in years, with average family premiums nearing $27,000. —Ashley Lutz

Rising tensions. Author and researcher Brené Brown warns American workers are not neurologically wired for this current level of rapid change and instability—and they’re “not okay,” she says. —Emma Burleigh

Role reshaping. Leaked documents show OpenAI is planning to automate away entry-level tasks in finance—but experts say AI won’t replace those roles completely. —Nino Paoli

This is the web version of Fortune CHRO, a newsletter focusing on helping HR executives navigate the needs of the workplace. Sign up to get it delivered free to your inbox.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Bessent says Trump’s $2,000 checks would need congressional vote

Published

on



Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said President Donald Trump’s proposal to send $2,000 “dividend” payments from tariffs to US citizens would require congressional approval.  

“We will see,” Bessent said on Fox News’ Sunday Morning Futures. “We need legislation for that.”

Trump, who has touted the billions raised in US tariff revenue this year, has talked about the checks as public frustration mounts over the cost of living. Speaking to reporters on Air Force One on Friday, Trump said the checks would go out sometime next year to “everybody but the rich.”

“It’s a lot of money,” he said. “But we’ve taken in a lot of money from tariffs. The tariffs allow us to give a dividend.” He added that “we’re also going to be reducing debt.” 

Read More: Trump’s $2,000 Tariff ‘Dividend’ Marks Throwback to Covid Checks

The plan could cost the US government double what it’s projected to take in for 2025, according to one estimate. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a centrist watchdog group, estimated a preliminary $600 billion cost for the proposal, if the dividends were designed along the lines of government stimulus payments during the Covid pandemic. 

Net US tariff revenue for the fiscal year through September totaled $195 billion and many economists have penciled in about $300 billion for calendar-year 2025.

Bessent said Americans should start feeling more economic relief in the beginning of next year, citing the tax cuts in Trump’s signature policy bill passed earlier this year. 

“So I would expect in the first two quarters we are going to see the inflation curve bend down and the real income curve substantially accelerate,” he said.  



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

The Coast Guard has seized a record amount of cocaine while Trump says interdiction has failed

Published

on



 In justifying American military strikes on boats suspected of smuggling drugs, President Donald Trump has asserted that the longtime U.S. strategy of interdicting such vessels at sea has been a major failure.

“We’ve been doing that for 30 years,” he said last month, “and it’s been totally ineffective.”

Trump’s comments came around the same time that the U.S. Coast Guard announced it had set a record for cocaine seizures — a haul of 225 metric tons of the drug over the previous year. That milestone, however, has not dissuaded the Republican president from upending decades of U.S. counternarcotics policy.

Under Trump, the U.S. military has blown up 20 suspected drug boats, resulting in 80 deaths, in the Pacific Ocean and Caribbean Sea. Trump and other top officials have contended that such boats are being operated by narco-terrorists and cartel members with deadly drugs bound for America.

The strikes have generated international pushback from foreign leaders, human rights groups, Democrats and some Republicans who have raised concerns that the United States is engaging in extrajudicial killings that undermine its stature in the world.

Veterans of the drug war, meanwhile, say U.S. resources would be better spent doubling down on the traditional approach of interdicting drug boats, especially in the long term. That is because crews of drug boats frequently have valuable intelligence that can help authorities better target cartels and trafficking networks. Dead men, they say, tell no tales.

The Coast Guard has fought the drug war a long time

The Coast Guard for decades has interdicted small vessels suspected of smuggling illicit narcotics. Much of that work is focused on halting shipments of cocaine, most of which is produced in the jungles of Colombia.

Working with partner nations and other federal agencies — the Drug Enforcement Administration, the departments of State and Justice as well as U.S. Southern Command’s Joint Interagency Task Force-South in Key West, Florida — the aim is to inflict heavy losses on traffickers and limit the amount of drugs entering the U.S.

That campaign, by at least one measure, has never been more successful, despite constant complaints by the Coast Guard that it lacks funding to seize even more drugs.

The Coast Guard’s recent record cocaine seizure was almost 40% higher than the past decade’s annual average. The haul included 38 tons of cocaine offloaded by the cutter Hamilton when it returned from a two-month patrol. It was the largest amount confiscated by a single Coast Guard ship during a deployment, the Coast Guard reported. The interdictions have continued as part of what’s known as Operation Pacific Viper even during the federal government shutdown, with several cutters reporting major seizures last month.

In almost every case, drug smugglers have been brought to the U.S. for prosecution, and valuable information about ever-changing smuggling routes and production methods was collected — all without any loss of life and a far lower cost to American taxpayers. Experts said each missile strike is likely to cost far more than the payload of cocaine on every ship.

“The Coast Guard has extraordinary powers and authorities to do effective drug interdiction without killing unidentified people on small boats,” said Douglas Farah, a national security expert on Latin America and president of IBI Consultants. “When resourced, they are far more effective, sustainable and likely legal than the current Pentagon-led operations.”

Trump administration officials say strategy needed to change

Secretary of State Marco Rubio this week defended the shift in strategy, saying that “interdictions alone are not effective.”

“Interdictions have limited to no deterrent effect,” he added. “These drug organizations, they’ve already baked in the fact they may lose 5% of their drug shipments. It doesn’t stop them from coming.”

Part of the problem is that demand for cocaine is high, and supplies have never been so robust, according to authorities and experts. A sign of that trend: Cocaine prices have been hovering at historical lows for more than a decade.

The Coast Guard also does not have enough vessels or crew to halt it all. At most, it seizes not even 10% of the cocaine that officials believe flows to the U.S. on small vessels through what is known as the “Transit Zone” — a vast area of open water larger than Russia.

Cocaine shipments bound for the U.S. primarily work their way up the west coast of South America to Central America and then overland into the U.S. via Mexico. Shipments heading to Europe are smuggled through the Caribbean, often hidden in container ships.

Such interdiction efforts target cocaine, not fentanyl

In social media posts, Trump has claimed that his strikes have blown up boats carrying fentanyl and that each destroyed vessel has saved 25,000 American lives. According to experts and former U.S. counternarcotics officials, Trump’s statements are either exaggerations or false.

For the past decade, U.S. officials have sounded the alarm about rising overdose deaths in the U.S., particularly from opioids and synthetic opioids. Overdose deaths from opioidspeaked in 2023 at 112,000 but dropped to 74,000 in April. Experts have attributed that decline mostly to Biden administration efforts to boost the availability of lifesaving drugs that prevent overdose deaths.

The drug flowing to the U.S. from South America is cocaine. Fentanyl, on the other hand, is typically trafficked to the U.S. overland from Mexico, where it is produced with chemicals imported from China and India. Cocaine overdose deaths are less frequent than those from fentanyl. In the last year, just under 20,000 people in America died from cocaine overdoses, federal data shows.

Trump and administration officials have also claimed that the crews of targeted vessels were narco-terrorists or members of cartels.

The Associated Press visited a region in Venezuela from which some of the suspected boats have departed and identified four men who were killed in the strikes. In dozens of interviews, residents of the region and relatives said t he dead men were mostly laborers or fisherman making $500 a trip.

Law enforcement officials and experts echoed those findings, saying the smugglers captured by the Coast Guard are hired for little money to ferry drugs from point A to point B.

“They are hardly kingpins,” said Kendra McSweeney, an Ohio State University geographer who has spent years researching U.S. drug policies.

Trump administration officials recently promoted big seizures

In April, months before Trump launched his military campaign, his attorney general, Pam Bondi, traveled to South Florida to welcome home the Coast Guard cutter James from its latest antinarcotics patrol. It had seized 20 tons of cocaine worth more than $500 million.

Flanked by FBI Director Kash Patel, she praised a “prosecutor-led, intelligence driven approach to stopping these criminal enterprises in their tracks.”

“This is not a drop in the bucket,” said Bondi, standing in front of the vessel loaded with colorful, plastic-wrapped bales of narcotics stacked several feet high. “Behind you is half a billion dollars of pure, uncut cocaine.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

The 2026 class of American Rhodes scholars includes 5 students at U.S. military academies

Published

on



Five students at U.S. military academies and three each from Yale University, Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology are among the 32 American winners named Sunday as 2026 Rhodes scholars.

The group includes students focused on housing, health outcomes, sustainability and prison reentry programs. They include:

Alice L. Hall of Philadelphia, a varsity basketball player at MIT who also serves as student body president. Hall, who has collaborated with a women’s collective in Ghana on sustainability tools, plans to study engineering.

Sydney E. Barta of Arlington, Virginia, a Paralympian and member of the track team at Stanford University, who studies bioengineering and sings in the Stanford acapella group “Counterpoint.” Barta plans to study musculoskeletal sciences.

Anirvin Puttur of Gilbert, Arizona, a senior at the U.S. Air Force Academy who serves as an instructor pilot and flight commander. Puttur, who is studying aeronautical engineering and applied mathematics, also has a deep interest in linguistics and is proficient in four languages.

The students will attend the University of Oxford as part of the Rhodes scholar program, which awards more than 100 scholarships worldwide each year for students to pursue two to three years of graduate studies.

Named after British imperialist and benefactor Cecil John Rhodes, the scholarship was established at Oxford in 1903. The program has more than 8,000 alumni, many of whom have pursued careers in government, education, the arts and social justice.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.