Politics
Will a nasty 2018 State Attorney Primary bring professional consequences for lawyers seeking Florida office?
Published
5 months agoon
By
May Greene
Could fallout from a contentious 2018 State Attorney race in Southwest Florida change the rules for lawyers seeking office in 2026?
The Florida Bar brought an action against Chris Crowley over his campaign conduct after he lost a contentious 2018 Republican Primary for State Attorney in Florida’s 20th Judicial Circuit. Over the course of the race, Crowley rigorously criticized opponent Amira Fox’s record as Chief Assistant State Attorney under former State Attorney Steve Russell, while his political supporters attacked her Palestinian heritage.
Crowley, a former Republican State Committeeman for Lee County, maintained for years that he never lied about Fox, and that his rhetoric, however heated, should enjoy protection as political speech.
But the Bar alleged that the “humiliating and disparaging” attacks from one lawyer about another crossed a line to the point of being “prejudicial to the administration of justice.” A Bar referee in 2020 found Crowley guilty of misconduct and ordered his license to practice law be suspended for 60 days.
Crowley for years has fought that decision all the way to the Florida Supreme Court, arguing it would chill not only his own speech but that of any lawyer seeking office in Florida.
Bar officials argued at a Supreme Court hearing in June that all candidates for legal offices such as State Attorney, Public Defender and even Florida Attorney General should adhere to professional standards already expected of candidates for Judge.
Justice Charles Canady, the longest-serving member of the Florida Supreme Court, showed skepticism and said the Bar’s argument “flies in the face of a lot of a tradition of the way campaigns and the First Amendment works in this country.”
It’s unclear if other members of the court found Crowley’s argument more compelling than they found his assertions about Fox offensive. In the coming months, the court will release a ruling to determine not only if Crowley must take off two months from practicing law, but if every candidate for legal office in 2026 must comport their campaign rhetoric to a new standard.
Nasty campaign
Crowley once worked in the State Attorney’s Office in Fort Myers, but shifted to private practice when Russell in 2018 announced he would not seek another term. Russell signaled a desire for Fox to succeed him in office. But when Crowley filed for the seat, it set in motion one of the nastiest Republican Primaries in a red region rich with caustic rhetoric.
Before the August election, Crowley would be arrested for violating election laws by holding a gift basket lottery. But he publicly alleged that Fox and Russell were behind the charges. In one radio ad produced by his campaign, he called the legal attack “corrupt” and “swampy.”
But he also took aim at Fox’s heritage, slamming a book written by her father, Taher Dajani, that expressed sympathy with Palestinians waging war with Israel. Crowley demanded at campaign events that she renounce the book, and one political mailer posed that “she won’t answer questions about Sharia Law. Why?”
Crowley also worked with controversial political consultant Roger Stone, a South Florida-based ally of President Donald Trump who vowed on social media to “expose the radical Muslim running for State’s Attorney.” He alleged Fox’s “real name is Amira Dajana” and that her “family founded the PLO (Palestinian Liberation Organization” in a post reported by the Naples Daily News.
The candidate also personally shared an article on his Facebook page from the right-wing American Thinker questioning a rise in the number of Muslim candidates seeking office in the U.S. The article included Fox, though she is not Muslim, and alleged family ties to deceased Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat.
Ultimately, the heated rhetoric didn’t land with voters. Fox won 57% of the Republican Primary vote and went on to win the General Election against only write-in opposition. She declined to comment for this article, but at various points she attended Zoom meetings about the Bar’s disciplinary measures involving Crowley.
Crowley acknowledges that Fox allies may have found his campaign tasteless, but said he never violated the law and that his rhetoric did not justify a threat to his legal license. At his hearing before the Supreme Court, he called Fox a “nice lady.” He also stressed that the most personal attacks came from other sources, and that he cannot be held responsible professionally for others’ speech.
“I don’t know my opponent’s religion, and I don’t care,” Crowley said at the Supreme Court hearing. “Some other people said some stuff. I didn’t, OK — just to clarify those facts. When I joined the Army in 1995, I took an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States. Now the Florida Bar says the Constitution doesn’t apply to Florida attorneys.”
Crossing the line?
But the Bar said officers of the court should be held to a higher standard, even when seeking office. Mark Mason, representing the Bar to the Supreme Court, said Crowley did more than voice unpopular opinions. “Mr. Crowley leveled several false statements accusing his opponent in a race for state Attorney of corruption,” he said.
The Bar took particular issue with an atypical method Crowley used to calculate the prosecution record for the State Attorney’s Office during Fox’s time as the Chief Assistant State Attorney. Crowley routinely said the Office recorded just a 39% conviction rate, a figure he calculated by taking total arrests in the judicial circuit and dividing that by the number of cases that resulted in a guilty verdict and sentence.
“There could be a million reasons that there wasn’t a conviction and it doesn’t have to do with the office,” Mason argued. Regardless, he said the math was inaccurate, and the statistic floated by Crowley is flatly false.
Scott Tozian, an attorney for Crowley, argued the Florida Bar cannot hold lawyers responsible for rhetoric during a campaign.
Justice Jamie Grosshans questioned whether Crowley was arguing that lawyers could make statements with “a reckless disregard for whether they’re true.” Crowley stands by the statistic, and Tozian said no one has proven otherwise. But when Grosshans asked if “misleading” rhetoric would violate Bar standards, Tozian argued it should not.
“The whole idea of the First Amendment giving breathing space to political speech, it’s got to be something that’s pretty severe,” Tozian argued. “Otherwise, the First Amendment doesn’t mean anything.”
During the debate, Justice John Couriel questioned how many political races the Bar could potentially touch.
“If it were an election for Governor, and that sort of clearly, demonstrably true or false statement was made, what would the Bar’s position be in that case?” Couriel asked.
That seems especially relevant considering that Gov. Ron DeSantis remains a licensed lawyer eligible to practice in Florida, as is his Democratic opponent in the last election, former U.S. Rep. Charlie Crist.
But Mason said standards should be different for executive or legislative elections. The Bar argued to Justices that candidates for legal offices like State Attorney and Public Defender must abide by different professional standards. When Couriel asked if such elections should be held to the same rules as lawyers running for Judge, Mason answered affirmatively.
“It would apply to any candidate for legal office. However, that term ended up getting defined in subsequent case law,” Mason said.
But Justices also expressed some concern that Mason, as he criticized Crowley’s method of calculating a conviction rate, could not cite a figure the Bar would accept as accurate instead.
“It seems like you should have to establish that something’s false first before someone then has to defend themselves,” suggested Chief Justice Carlos Muñiz.
Mason disagreed.
“Very frankly, the burden was on him to establish that he had an objective factual basis,” he said. “The Bar just had to show that he made those statements that were questioning her integrity or her qualifications, and then he had to establish the objective factual basis.”
Wider ramifications
That’s a burden that could fall on a number of candidates if the court agrees. That includes Attorney General James Uthmeier, who has already filed to run statewide in 2026 and who has been involved in some sharply political efforts in the months since DeSantis appointed him to office.
A spokesperson for Uthmeier declined to comment on the pending case.
But just applying the standards to other State Attorney races in Florida could be messy as more political attention falls on those contests than in recent decades.
DeSantis suspended two Democratic State Attorneys, Andrew Warren in Hillsborough County and Monique Worrell in Orange County, alleging that neither aggressively enforced the law. Both ran for office in 2024 against replacement prosecutors appointed by DeSantis, and many of the same allegations were repeated on the campaign trail.
Worrell won her race and returned to office. She declined to comment about Crowley’s case.
Warren, though, lost in November to State Attorney Suzy Lopez, and maintains frustration at what he considered mischaracterization and outright lies about his record as a prosecutor. “The Governor and his cronies absolutely mischaracterized my record every time they talked about me,” he said. “That was found to be true in a court of law.”
But Justices also declined to reverse DeSantis’ suspension of Warren, and the Democrat voiced mixed feelings about how consequences might be doled out if State Attorney candidates’ law licenses go on the line as soon as they start to campaign.
“The Governor and his followers do things others would never get away with,” Warren said. “If rules are only enforced on one political party’s candidates, that would be a travesty of democracy. If the rules were enforced fairly to raise the bar in State Attorney or Public Defender races, then that’s a good thing for voters.”
Terry Miller, Fox’s Campaign Manager in 2018 and subsequent races, hopes to see Crowley face consequences for the tactics in the campaign.
“It seemed a couple Justices were more concerned with arguing the merit of the law rather than applying the law to this case,” Miller said. “However, it is not the statute that is on trial. The question is/was whether or not Mr. Crowley broke the law as it is written — which I believe he did.”
Lawyers stressed that the case relies on professional standards enforced by the Bar, and that the Florida Supreme Court has oversight power on the organization’s disciplinary proceedings.
Crowley no longer lives in the Fort Myers area, or even the state of Florida. He now resides in Georgia, where he works as a lawyer for federal law enforcement.
But he said the free speech ramifications remain too steep for any candidate seeking office to ignore.
“The Florida Bar should have never pursued this action from the beginning,” Crowley said.
Post Views: 0
You may like
Politics
Lawmakers propose tough penalties for adults who involve minors in animal cruelty
Published
19 minutes agoon
December 5, 2025By
May Greene
Bipartisan legislation filed this week would expand Florida’s criminal penalties for adults who involve children in acts of animal cruelty or expose them to violent offenses against animals.
Democratic Sen. Kristen Arrington and Republican Rep. Linda Chaney filed the legislation (SB 676, HB 559). The bills would add new crimes to state law that make it a third-degree felony for an adult to entice a minor to commit animal cruelty, or for an adult to commit animal cruelty in the presence of a minor.
The lawmakers cite studies that show children who witness acts of animal cruelty experience an increase in mental health issues, along with an increased likelihood of engaging in violence themselves. By addressing the cycle of abuse early on, they say children can be shielded from additional trauma caused by witnessing violence.
The proposal would also create offenses for adults who involve minors in animal fighting or baiting, and for sexual activities with animals, while also ranking the new crimes on the state’s offense severity chart and increasing penalties for certain felony offenses. If approved, the act would take effect Oct. 1, 2026.
Arrington, of Kissimmee, said the goal is to strengthen protections for both children and animals.
“Exposing children to acts of animal cruelty not only harms animals but has a profound negative impact on children’s emotional development and wellbeing” Arrington said in a statement. “This bill is meant to protect both our youth and our animals, ensuring that those who would involve minors in such heinous acts face strict consequences.”
Chaney, of St. Pete Beach, said animal crimes committed in front of children are closely linked with other forms of family violence.
“Committing animal crimes in front of minors is a serious issue that often co-occurs with other forms of family violence and can have severe, long-term traumatic effects on the children involved” Chaney said. “We must do all we can to break generational cycles of violence. This bill can do that.”
Democratic Rep. Johanna López of Orlando signed on as a prime co-sponsor.
“I’m honored to join Senator Arrington and Representative Chaney in advancing reforms that protect the safety and mental health of our minors and ensure that those who abuse our children or our pets are held accountable,” López said.
Politics
Florida delegation warns Donald Trump against new offshore drilling plan
Published
50 minutes agoon
December 5, 2025By
May Greene
U.S. Rep. Vern Buchanan and the full Florida congressional delegation are urging President Donald Trump to keep offshore drilling away from the state’s coastlines, pressing him to maintain a moratorium he put in place in 2020.
Buchanan, co-Chair of the 30-member bipartisan delegation, joined U.S. Sen. Rick Scott and Sen. Ashley Moody in leading a letter asking Trump to uphold his executive order extending a ban on oil and gas leasing off Florida’s Gulf and east coasts through 2032.
“President Trump made the right call in 2020 when he protected Florida from offshore drilling, and we’re asking him to keep those safeguards in place,” Buchanan said. “Florida’s coastline is essential to our tourism-based economy, environment and military readiness. A single mistake offshore could cost our state billions of dollars. We cannot afford to lose even an inch of these critical protections.”
The Florida lawmakers sent the letter in response to a program proposed by the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, which would open part of the Eastern Gulf of America to new oil and gas drilling. The area overlaps with waters explicitly protected under Trump’s executive order.
In the letter, the delegation expressed strong opposition to any attempts to expand offshore oil and gas drilling off Florida’s coasts to protect “the incredible value Florida’s pristine coasts have to our state’s economy, environment, and military community.” They added that Trump’s 2020 action received overwhelming and bipartisan support.
Lawmakers also warn that the newly proposed leasing area falls inside the Gulf Test Range, a large military training zone used for advanced air and weapons systems testing. They describe the range as a critical national security asset.
“The Gulf Test Range remains an integral part of Department of War training to ensure mission readiness and is supported by multiple military bases in Florida’s Panhandle,” the lawmakers wrote. “Collectively, these bases employ tens of thousands of military and civilian personnel and are of critical importance to national security.”
The area is the largest multidomain military training and testing complex in the country, and the lawmakers stated that “protecting this range from encroachment, including oil exploration, is essential.” The letter says more than 50,000 jobs in the Panhandle depend directly on the military facilities tied to the range.
The delegation cites Eglin Air Force Base as a key example, noting it “supports 20,000 personnel, provides the country with $11 billion in economic impact every year, and currently boasts 123,000 square miles of water range, which would all have to be reduced in an instance of an encroachment of the Gulf Test Range.”
The delegation also points to the economic weight of Florida’s tourism industry, and its vulnerability to fallout from potential oil spills, arguing that the risks outweigh any short-term gains.
“Florida’s beaches alone generate more than $127.7 billion per year in tourism spending and support over 2.1 million tourism-related jobs,” lawmakers wrote. “Unfortunately, all these resources suffered devastating harm during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill of 2010. That disaster wiped billions of dollars from Florida’s industries and caused irreparable damage to our environment and coastal communities.”
“For these reasons, we urge you to uphold your existing moratorium and keep Florida’s coasts off the table for oil and gas leasing,” they added. “Florida’s economy, environment, and military readiness depend on this commitment.”
Every member of the Florida congressional delegation signed the letter, including Buchanan, Scott, Moody and U.S. Reps. Aaron Bean, Gus Bilirakis, Kat Cammack, Kathy Castor, Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, Mario Díaz-Balart, Byron Donalds, Neal Dunn, Randy Fine, Lois Frankel, Scott Franklin, Maxwell Frost, Carlos Giménez, Mike Haridopolos, Laurel Lee, Anna Paulina Luna, Brian Mast, Cory Mills, Jared Moskowitz, Jimmy Patronis, John Rutherford, María Elvira Salazar, Darren Soto, Greg Steube, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Daniel Webster and Frederica Wilson.
Politics
Woman says James Fishback dated her while she was underage, then harassed her after breakup
Published
1 hour agoon
December 5, 2025By
May Greene
As investment executive James Fishback ramps up his campaign for Governor, a review of court filings from this year shows a former employee accused him of starting a relationship with her when she was 17 and later harassing her — allegations he disputes.
In an amended petition for a protection order request filed in January, a woman named Keinah Fort is claiming Fishback “initiated a romantic relationship with (her)” in Spring 2022, while she was 17 and he was 27, and “explicitly directed” her to keep their relationship secret.
She said in the amended April filing that she joined the nonprofit Fishback founded, Incubate Debate, which runs in-person tournaments for middle and high school students, in 2021, when she was 16. Shortly thereafter, she said he “systematically cultivated a relationship with her” by increasing “opportunities for personal interaction.”
The petition described his approach as “an isolation tactic commonly employed in grooming scenarios.”
Fishback, who grew up in Broward County and now lives in Madison County, is the CEO of Azoria, a startup asset management firm he registered with the state in 2023. He is a frequent political commentator and activist but has never held public office.
He told Florida Politics by phone that Fort’s account of when they began dating and the events that preceded and followed their eventual breakup — including her accusations of stalking and cyberbullying — in the since-denied petition are “absolutely false.”
“There was no evidence entered into the record to support that allegation, and I was fully exonerated of any wrongdoing in this case,” he said.
Fort’s allegations remain uncorroborated beyond the statements she submitted in her filings.
Of note, the case centered on whether Fishback behaved in a manner that justified issuing a protective order against him, not whether he had an improper relationship with a minor.
Under Florida law, the age of consent is 18, though a 16- or 17-year-old may legally consent to sexual activity with an adult no older than 23. Fort’s petition did not detail the level of her and Fishback’s alleged intimacy while she was underage, and she did not respond to multiple interview requests.
In Spring 2023, after she turned 18, Fishback and Fort moved in together. Her LinkedIn page shows she worked at the time as a Program Director for Incubate Debate, though she’d later rise to Executive Director and “Lead” roles. The petition said Fort still depended financially on Fishback, since Incubate Debate would “sporadically and randomly” pay her.
Their domestic life was hardly tranquil, according to Fort, who said Fishback lost his temper, threw objects across the room and screamed at her “on multiple occasions” and once grabbed Fort by the arm, “leaving visible marks.”

After that last incident, Fort said Fishback “laughed without remorse and attempted to justify his behavior by stating (she) exaggerated her injuries.” Fort said Fishback also turned his aggression inward “at times,” threatening to hurt himself while pulling on his hair and slapping himself in the face. He blamed her “each time” for such actions, the petition said.
The couple were nevertheless engaged by March 2024, though not for long. They split up that September, but reconciled briefly in December, after which Fort said she “definitively terminated the relationship.” Fishback claims he was the one who called things off.
After that, she said Fishback’s “controlling behaviors escalated into stalking and cyberbullying.” He “repeatedly (contacted) her through emails, voice memos, text messages,” and communications with her family, the petition said. When she turned down his offer to drop off a gift at her Tallahassee home in early January, explaining that her family was over, Fishback allegedly asked, “Are you afraid I’ll hurt you?” and inquired whether her father had a gun before screaming, “I hate you,” at her three times.
Fishback maintains he never threatened Fort — and, notably, none of his many written communications that Fort filed with the court included any threat of physical harm — but he admitted in texts submitted as evidence and affirmed by a sworn digital forensics expert that he was “tough on (her) and (his) words were not OK.”
Evidence Fort submitted also includes hundreds of unanswered texts that Fishback allegedly sent her over several days. It also consists of a text Fort’s father sent chastising Fishback for a “petty and vindictive” X post about the breakup.

According to a filing by Fort, the since-deleted X post read, “I broke off my engagement to an incredible woman for one simple reason: She couldn’t be proud of anything I worked on – big or small.”
He allegedly told Fort’s mother that he would take the post down if Fort contacted him.
Fort returned to work at Incubate Debate a few days later, where she said Fishback continued to make unwanted contact.
By then, the Koch family-funded Bill of Rights Institute had acquired the nonprofit and Fort had assumed many of Fishback’s prior responsibilities there while Fishback stayed on as a contractor. Fishback said control of Incubate Debate has since reverted to him after the acquisition was “dissolved.”
Fort reported him to the company’s Human Resources Department. She said Fishback then “acquired knowledge of the specific information (she) disclosed during the meeting” before immediately and repeatedly calling her.
Fishback then resigned from his contract work, but Fort said he continued contacting her despite several emailed requests — several of which were included in court filings — that he refrain from doing so.

Fort filed a petition for an injunction for protection against stalking and cyberstalking on Jan. 27, just under two weeks after Fishback threatened to take legal action against her if she filed “an untrue restraining order” or made “defamatory public statements” about him in an email he also sent to several Incubate Debate employees.
Judge Joshua Hawkes of the 2nd Judicial Circuit in Tallahassee denied Fort’s petition on June 20. He wrote that Fishback is “perhaps a little obsessive-compulsive, but he did not initiate contact with the petitioner directly and indirectly with no legitimate purpose.”
Hawkes described Fishback as having an “odd nature” that was “apparent during the hearing.”
“The Respondent is greatly concerned first with the business implications of the parties’ breakup, then with the potential HR complaint, and finally with the injunction itself. The Respondent would litigate his version of events with anyone and everyone and as often as possible. He litigated his entire case in response to just about every question during the hearing,” Hawkes wrote. “He is trying to defend himself and protect his business.”
Hawkes said he found neither Fishback nor Fort’s account of who ended the relationship and why credible. He also said Fort failed to sufficiently prove that Fishback’s post-relationship contacts, a not-insignificant portion of which were work-related, were cause for “substantial emotional distress to a reasonable person.”
Hawkes quoted the 2020 case Quinones-Dones v. Mascola, in which Judge Jay Cohen ruled, “Uncivil behavior or annoyance is not sufficient to obtain an injunction.”

In a written statement to Florida Politics after the phone interview, Fishback reiterated his assertion that Fort had made false accusations against him as part of a wider trend that is “sadly all too common today.”
The court in Florida’s Second Judicial Circuit reviewed these egregious accusations, conducted two lengthy hearings, and fully exonerated me,” he wrote. “I have never been arrested or charged with any crime, unlike my opponent (Republican U.S. Rep.) Byron Donalds.”
While the case was ongoing, Fishback posted online about Fort. In a March 6 X post, he wrote, “Yesterday would have been my three-month wedding anniversary. I called off my engagement when I realized I couldn’t say, with certainty, that I’d want her raising my children if something happened to me. That moment hit hard.”
The moment in question: Fort telling him she didn’t think it was wrong for a friend to let her 12-year-old son skip church. “If you don’t see eye to eye on how to raise your children, don’t walk down the aisle,” he wrote. “It’s not fair to anyone: you, her, or your future sons and daughters.”
On March 18, he wrote, “BREAKING NEWS: A District Judge has ordered me to get back together with my ex-fiancé.”
On March 25, he posted photos and a transcript of a praiseful handwritten letter he said Fort wrote to him after their breakup. Comments with the most likes included, “Did she want that to be shared with the internet? Seems kinda personal,” and “Hey James, I really think you should delete this. Some things are best left private.”
Fishback included a snippet of the letter in a June 10 court filing where he claimed Fort had made “numerous attempts to rekindle their relationship” between September and December 2024. He said that before they met, Fort had “long suffered from mental health issues, including engaging in self-harm (cutting) and diagnosed anxiety, which required her to be medicated.”

In October 2024, Fishback said he found Fort in his Washington, D.C., condominium with her left wrist slashed. He also said Fort left him a “fawning voicemail” for his birthday on Jan. 1, which, with four other voicemails he provided to the court, proved Fort “wanted to rekindle their relationship as recently as December 2024.”
Fishback proffered an alternative motive for Fort’s legal action: greed and competitiveness. He said that since the Bill of Rights Institute and Incubate Debate parted ways, with Fort remaining at the Bill of Rights Institute, Fort’s new employer launched its own debate organization in direct competition with Fishback’s nonprofit.
That, he argued, provided Fort “a secondary motive to pursue” the injunction.
Fishback also said Fort published false statements about the success of Incubate Debate while the organization was under her leadership at the Bill of Rights Institute, which led to it receiving an unprecedented “cash donation (that) the donor specifically referencing the false figures.”
He said the Bill of Rights Institute updated its website “at some point” between Jan. 22 and Jan. 24 to fix the figures he said Fort misrepresented so that they “comport with reality.”
Less than a week later, and days after Fort filed her petition, Fishback’s filing said, the Bill of Rights Institute “stripped control of Incubate Debate” from her and returned its control to him.
He said the “last direct contact” he had with Fort was an attempt to return a missed phone call from her on Jan. 21. A screenshot of phone call records Fort submitted to the court shows Fishback called three times.
He said he’s had “zero direct contact” with her since” then.
“Respondent testified he does not wish to speak with or see (Fort) ever again,” the filing said, “but he does wish her well, as far away from him as possible.”

Florida Politics contacted Fort and one of her lawyers in the case, Mozianio “Trey” Reliford III, of the Polsinelli law firm, which represents the Bill of Rights Institute. Neither responded to multiple interview requests.
Another of Fort’s lawyers, Nardo Dorsin, has since left Polsinelli and was unavailable for comment by press time.
Fishback launched his campaign for Governor on Nov. 4, pitching himself as an affordability-focused alternative to corporately compromised mainstream GOP candidates. His platform includes ending H-1B visas, which provide legal status to immigrants working in special industries, eliminating property taxes and continuing the “anti-woke” agenda of Gov. Ron DeSantis.
Other Republicans actively competing for the job include Donalds, whom President Donald Trump is backing, and former House Speaker Paul Renner.
Two high-profile Democrats, former U.S. Rep. David Jolly and ex-Orange County Mayor Jerry Demings, are also running.
DeSantis hasn’t yet weighed in on the contest, which Lt. Gov. Jay Collins has hinted at entering.
Florida Politics first flagged Fort’s protection order petition last month in a report that detailed Fishback’s various controversies.
Among them: Fishback’s calls for YouTube to re-platform White nationalist Nick Fuentes and notorious conspiracist Alex Jones and multiple lawsuits brought by Fishback’s former employer, Greenlight Capital, which accuses him of lying about his role with company — he claimed to have been “head of macro,” overseeing $100 million in gains, while Greenlight says he was a low-level research analyst — and attempting to defraud the company into donating to Incubate Debate.
Fishback has also used loaded language to describe Donald, who is Black, as a “DEI Republican” and a “slave” to donors, corporate interests and “tech bros that want to turn our state into, in his own words, a financial capital.”
Elden Campbell 911 Audio Released, NBA Champ’s Body Found On Beach
Puneet Gupta steps into fine jewellery
Lawmakers propose tough penalties for adults who involve minors in animal cruelty
Trending
-
Politics8 years agoCongress rolls out ‘Better Deal,’ new economic agenda
-
Entertainment8 years agoNew Season 8 Walking Dead trailer flashes forward in time
-
Politics8 years agoPoll: Virginia governor’s race in dead heat
-
Entertainment8 years agoThe final 6 ‘Game of Thrones’ episodes might feel like a full season
-
Entertainment8 years agoMeet Superman’s grandfather in new trailer for Krypton
-
Politics8 years agoIllinois’ financial crisis could bring the state to a halt
-
Business8 years ago6 Stunning new co-working spaces around the globe
-
Tech8 years agoHulu hires Google marketing veteran Kelly Campbell as CMO




