Connect with us

Business

Why probiotic supplements might be ‘a waste of money’ and could even backfire for some

Published

on



As the gut health trend continues to grow, the probiotic market has exploded—it was valued at $87.7 billion in 2023. Probiotic supplements—beneficial live bacteria and yeasts—can seem appealing if you’re looking to improve gut health, or how well your digestive system is working to break down food, absorb nutrients, and eliminate waste. Probiotics can also help strengthen the gut microbiome, made up of trillions of microorganisms including bacteria, viruses, and fungi that are vital in nutrient absorption, digestion, and overall health.

But experts are increasingly shifting away from recommending the supplements—the American Gastroenterological Association does not recommend using probiotics for most digestive conditions, nor has there been sufficient evidence for the AGA to recommend it to the general population.

“I don’t advocate for daily use of probiotics if you’re healthy and you’re eating well. I think it’s just a waste of money,” says professor of microbiology at UMass Chan Medical School, Vanni Bucci.

Should you take probiotics?

There are only three situations in which the AGA recommends taking probiotics, all under clinical supervision: 

  • Preventing bacterial infection in adults and children taking antibiotics.
  • Preventing necrotizing enterocolitis, a life-threatening illness in preterm, low birthweight infants
  • Managing pouchitis, a complication of inflammatory bowel disease.

“They are definitely good at restoring and temporarily relieving problems until your good bacteria that were disturbed can come back and reestablish the healthy ecosystem,” Bucci tells Fortune. He advises using them for temporary relief, but research has shown that taking probiotics after a course of antibiotics might not do much—and could delay gut health recovery.

Some people may find that probiotics make them feel better, but it’s certainly not to transform your gut health in isolation.

“It will ameliorate some distress, but it’s not the solution,” he says. What’s much more important, Bucci explains, is eating a healthy diet. “That’s much better than any probiotic out there,” he says.

King’s College London professor of epidemiology Tim Spector, who has done substantial research on the gut microbiome, encourages people to shift their diet before thinking about probiotics. He advises eating at least three servings of fermented foods per day and 30 different plants per week—fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and legumes—which contain essential fiber and prebiotics to feed your gut bacteria.

“I think we’ve underestimated [fermented foods] and overestimated the effect of commercial probiotics,” he told Fortune.

“Your microbiome is a record of how you’re living,” Bucci says. If you have a poor diet—high in red meat and low in fiber, fruits, whole grains, and vegetables—and frequently take antibiotics, you’ll likely have poor gut health, and probiotics can’t fully fix that.

When probiotics make things worse

Some research indicates that probiotics could disrupt the balance of your microbiome—which has its own unique ecosystem—and interfere with your good gut bacteria. 

And for for those dealing with—or who have previously had—small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, also known as SIBO, taking a probiotic supplement may actually worsen their symptoms.

“You’re holding too many bacteria in your gut and it leads to inflammation,” Bucci says. “If you’re suffering from this and you’re overloading with extra bacteria that you’re ingesting, it might lead to some inflammatory exacerbation.”

SIBO arises when there is an abnormal increase in the amount of bacteria in the overall bacterial population in the small intestine, especially bacteria that is not normally found there, according to the Mayo Clinic. It can cause diarrhea, loss of appetite, abdominal pain, nausea, bloating, malnutrition, and unintentional weight loss.

People can develop SIBO from complications after abdominal surgery, structural problems in and around the small intestine, and from certain medical conditions like Crohn’s disease, celiac disease, diabetes, or other conditions that slow movement of food through the small intestine.

A 2018 study found that some probiotics may provoke symptoms for SIBO patients including gas, bloating, and brain fogginess, suggesting that the supplements should be used with caution among people with the condition.

The type of probiotic you take is important

If you and your doctor agree that probiotics could be helpful, here’s some guidance on how to pick a one: Bucci says that all of the probiotics on the market are more or less the same, because they contain the same bacterial strains. However, each brand may vary in quality. You should check the label of a probiotic for the following:

  • CFU count, or Colony-Forming Units, at the time of expiration to ensure there are enough live cultures through the product’s shelf life.
  • Storage requirements—Because probiotics are live bacteria, some need to be refrigerated, but others are manufactured to be shelf-stable.
  • Third-party testing for potency and purity.
  • Delayed-release capsules, enteric coating, or spore-based strains, which will ensure the bacteria can survive in stomach acid.

For more on probiotics:



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Hegseth likens strikes on alleged drug boats to post-9/11 war on terror

Published

on



Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth defended strikes on alleged drug cartel boats during remarks Saturday at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library, saying President Donald Trump has the power to take military action “as he sees fit” to defend the nation.

Hegseth dismissed criticism of the strikes, which have killed more than 80 people and now face intense scrutiny over concerns that they violated international law. Saying the strikes are justified to protect Americans, Hegseth likened the fight to the war on terror following the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

“If you’re working for a designated terrorist organization and you bring drugs to this country in a boat, we will find you and we will sink you. Let there be no doubt about it,” Hegseth said during his keynote address at the Reagan National Defense Forum. “President Trump can and will take decisive military action as he sees fit to defend our nation’s interests. Let no country on earth doubt that for a moment.”

The most recent strike brings the death toll of the campaign to at least 87 people. Lawmakers have sought more answers about the attacks and their legal justification, and whether U.S. forces were ordered to launch a follow-up strike following a September attack even after the Pentagon knew of survivors.

Though Hegseth compared the alleged drug smugglers to Al-Qaida terrorists, experts have noted significant differences between the two foes and the efforts to combat them.

Hegseth’s remarks came after the Trump administration released its new national security strategy, one that paints European allies as weak and aims to reassert America’s dominance in the Western Hemisphere.

During the speech, Hegseth also discussed the need to check China’s rise through strength instead of conflict. He repeated Trump’s vow to resume nuclear testing on an equal basis as China and Russia — a goal that has alarmed many nuclear arms experts. China and Russia haven’t conducted explosive tests in decades, though the Kremlin said it would follow the U.S. if Trump restarted tests.

The speech was delivered at the Reagan National Defense Forum at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute in California, an event which brings together top national security experts from around the country. Hegseth used the visit to argue that Trump is Reagan’s “true and rightful heir” when it comes to muscular foreign policy.

By contrast, Hegseth criticized Republican leaders in the years since Reagan for supporting wars in the Middle East and democracy-building efforts that didn’t work. He also blasted those who have argued that climate change poses serious challenges to military readiness.

“The war department will not be distracted by democracy building, interventionism, undefined wars, regime change, climate change, woke moralizing and feckless nation building,” he said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

US debt crisis: Most likely fix is severe austerity triggered by a fiscal calamity

Published

on



One way or another, U.S. debt will stop expanding unsustainably, but the most likely outcome is also among the most painful, according to Jeffrey Frankel, a Harvard professor and former member of President Bill Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisers.

Publicly held debt is already at 99% of GDP and is on track to hit 107% by 2029, breaking the record set after the end of World War II. Debt service alone is more than $11 billion a week, or 15% of federal spending in the current fiscal year.

In a Project Syndicate op-ed last week, Frankel went down the list of possible debt solutions: faster economic growth, lower interest rates, default, inflation, financial repression, and fiscal austerity. 

While faster growth is the most appealing option, it’s not coming to the rescue due to the shrinking labor force, he said. AI will boost productivity, but not as much as would be needed to rein in U.S. debt.

Frankel also said the previous era of low rates was a historic anomaly that’s not coming back, and default isn’t plausible given already-growing doubts about Treasury bonds as a safe asset, especially after President Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariff shocker.

Relying on inflation to shrink the real value of U.S. debt would be just as bad as a default, and financial repression would require the federal government to essentially force banks to buy bonds with artificially low yields, he explained.

“There is one possibility left: severe fiscal austerity,” Frankel added.

How severe? A sustainable U.S. debt trajectory would entail elimination of nearly all defense spending or almost all non-defense discretionary outlays, he estimated.

For the foreseeable future, Democrats are unlikely to slash top programs, while Republicans are likely to use any fiscal breathing room to push for more tax cuts, Frankel said.

“Eventually, in the unforeseeable future, austerity may be the most likely of the six possible outcomes,” he warned. “Unfortunately, it will probably come only after a severe fiscal crisis. The longer it takes for that reckoning to arrive, the more radical the adjustment will need to be.”

The austerity forecast echoes an earlier note from Oxford Economics, which said the expected insolvency of the Social Security and Medicare trust funds by 2034 will serve as a catalyst for fiscal reform.

In Oxford’s view, lawmakers will seek to prevent a fiscal crisis in the form of a precipitous drop in demand for Treasury bonds, sending rates soaring.

But that’s only after lawmakers try to take the more politically expedient path by allowing Social Security and Medicare to tap general revenue that funds other parts of the federal government.

“However, unfavorable fiscal news of this sort could trigger a negative reaction in the US bond market, which would view this as a capitulation on one of the last major political openings for reforms,” Bernard Yaros, lead U.S. economist at Oxford Economics, wrote. “A sharp upward repricing of the term premium for longer-dated bonds could force Congress back into a reform mindset.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

The $124 trillion Great Wealth Transfer is intensifying as inheritance jumps to a new record

Published

on



Nearly $300 billion was inherited this year as the Great Wealth Transfer picks up speed, showering family members with immense windfalls.

According to the latest UBS Billionaire Ambitions Report, 91 heirs inherited a record-high $297.8 billion in 2025, up 36% from a year ago despite fewer inheritors.

“These heirs are proof of a multi-year wealth transfer that’s intensifying,” Benjamin Cavalli, head of Strategic Clients & Global Connectivity at UBS Global Wealth Management, said in the report.

Western Europe led the way with 48 individuals inheriting $149.5 billion. That includes 15 members of two “German pharmaceutical families,” with the youngest just 19 years old and the oldest at 94.

Meanwhile, 18 heirs in North America got $86.5 billion, and 11 in South East Asia received $24.7 billion, UBS said.

This year’s wealth transfer lifted the number of multi-generational billionaires to 860, who have total assets of $4.7 trillion, up from 805 with $4.2 trillion in 2024.

Wealth management firm Cerulli Associates estimated last year that $124 trillion worldwide will be handed over through 2048, dubbing it the Great Wealth Transfer. More than half of that amount will come from high-net-worth and ultra-high-net-worth people.

Among billionaires, UBS expects they will likely transfer about $6.9 trillion by 2040, with at least $5.9 trillion of that being passed to children, either directly or indirectly.

While the Great Wealth Transfer appears to be accelerating, it may not turn into a sudden flood. Tim Gerend, CEO of financial planning giant Northwestern Mutual, told Fortune’s Amanda Gerut recently that it will unfold more gradually and with greater complexity

“I think the wealth transfer isn’t going to be just a big bang,” he said. “It’s not like, we just passed peak age 65 and now all the money is going to move.”

Of course, millennials and Gen Zers with rich relatives aren’t the only ones who sat to reap billions. More entrepreneurs also joined the ranks of the super rich.

In 2025, 196 self-made billionaires were newly minted with total wealth of $386.5 billion. That trails only the record year of 2021 and is up from last year, which saw 161 self-made individuals with assets of $305.6 billion.

But despite the hype over the AI boom and startups with astronomical valuations, some of the new U.S. billionaires come from a range of industries.

UBS highlighted Ben Lamm, cofounder of genetics and bioscience company Colossal; Michael Dorrell, cofounder and CEO of infrastructure investment firm Stonepeak; as well as Bob Pender and Mike Sabel, cofounders of LNG exporter Venture Global.

“A fresh generation of billionaires is steadily emerging,” UBS said. “In a highly uncertain time for geopolitics and economics, entrepreneurs are innovating at scale across a range of sectors and markets.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.