Connect with us

Business

Why Is America’s 911 system still running on decades-old infrastructure?

Published

on



When news broke about the shortage of air traffic controllers, the public took notice because flights were delayed, and safety was questioned nationwide. But what about the other shortage that’s been happening on the ground? 911 dispatchers are currently in crisis, too, and they’re the ones guiding help when it matters most.

The average vacancy rate across U.S. 911 centers hovers around 25%, and in some communities, half of the dispatchers the center should have simply aren’t there. That doesn’t mean calls stop, though. The burden falls on whoever’s available, piling on stress and fatigue that comes with longer response times. It’s not just a staffing problem but a wider public safety problem.

Why the job is so hard to fill

The demands of the dispatcher role are extraordinary. These aren’t switchboard operators but rather true community lifelines. In the middle of chaos, dispatchers have to listen closely and make sense of what’s happening. They’re entering details into different systems, talking a caller through some of the worst moments of their life, and at the same time keeping first responders in the loop. It’s a juggling act few people could manage, let alone day after day.

Agencies often report only a small fraction of applicants make it through the first round of screening, and fewer than that finish probation. This is no surprise, the job simply isn’t for everyone. It requires sharp multitasking and a calm voice under pressure, with some estimating that fewer than one in 10 who are hired actually stay for longer than three years.

Operator training reflects that intensity. The learning curve is steep and becoming fully capable can take anywhere from six months to over a year. New hires have to master computer-aided dispatch (CAD) software, radio systems, mapping tools, medical protocols, legal standards, disaster protocols, crisis communication techniques and hundreds of city, state, county and federal procedures, often on systems that don’t integrate and require the same information to be entered more than once.

At the same time, they’re trained to keep composure while listening to gunshots in the background, pulling critical details from callers in shock and making split-second decisions where a wrong address or delayed instruction can cost lives. Training scenarios include domestic violence, shootings and medical emergencies, pushing recruits to manage chaos in real time while juggling multiple screens, radios and conversations. It goes beyond just learning software and requires trainees to rewire how they think, talk and react under pressure, which is why so many never make it past probation.

Why retention is even harder

Getting people in the door is one thing, yet keeping them is another. Turnover in some 911 centers is upward of 25% annually, which is a staggering number when you consider the stakes. Every departure means more overtime for the remaining staff, more fatigue and more burnout, which is a cycle that often repeats itself.

The reasons people leave aren’t hard to understand, and it’s why many people don’t consider the line of work in the first place. Shifts are long and unpredictable, and often rotate between days and nights. The stress of handling crisis calls takes a real toll, with research showing that nearly one in five dispatchers experience PTSD, a rate comparable to police officers in the field. Using outdated and inconvenient systems only makes the job frustration deeper. Imagine trying to juggle life-or-death decisions while waiting on a computer to process, or having to enter the same data twice because systems can’t work with each other.

The pay doesn’t match the responsibility, either. The median annual salary for dispatchers is around $50,000, which may be decent on paper but falls short when weighed against the emotional and cognitive demands of the job. Despite being the first voice in nearly every emergency, dispatchers are often classified as clerical staff instead of first responders. That technicality means fewer benefits, less recognition and reduced resources to deal with the emotional strain and PTSD that come with the job, sending an underlying message that their work isn’t valued the same as police, fire or EMS.

The role of technology

Technology alone won’t fix the staffing crisis, but it plays a big part in both retention and effectiveness. Many Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs) still run on infrastructure designed decades ago, patched together to handle cell phones and newer forms of communication. The result is slow, siloed and cumbersome for all parties involved.

Next Generation 911 (NG911) points to a better way forward. Instead of relying on old phone lines, it runs on modern networks that can handle texts, photos, video and even sensor data. It also lets agencies share information without the usual roadblocks. For dispatchers, that means less busywork and more useful tools, giving them confidence that the right information is reaching the right responder when seconds matter most.

The problem? Funding. While some states are already operating with NG911 and others are partially rolled out, many areas, especially rural ones, are still in planning. The price tag to bring NG911 to every corner of the country is somewhere between $9 billion and $12 billion. That’s a heavy lift, and because 911 systems operate behind the scenes, they rarely get the same public attention (and political urgency) as more visible investments like police squad cars or fire trucks.

Looking ahead

The comparison to air traffic controllers is hard to ignore. Both jobs are highly specialized. Both carry enormous weight. And both are facing shortages that put safety at risk. The difference? Aviation gets national attention and clear staffing standards, and 911 doesn’t.

The path forward has to be multi-pronged. Dispatchers deserve recognition as first responders, not just in name, but in the pay, benefits, and protections that come with the title. A handful of states have already enacted this change, but until it becomes universal, dispatchers will remain caught in a paradox: carrying the weight of a first responder’s responsibilities without the recognition or resources of the role. Additionally, investment in mental health support, scheduling reforms and career development could help keep people in the job longer, and modernization of technology must also be part of the equation, not only to improve efficiency, but also to ease the burden on those who carry the responsibility every single day.

The truth is that 911 dispatchers are as essential to public safety as any officer, firefighter or paramedic. Without them, the system collapses. If the nation can sound the alarm for air traffic controllers, it can do the same for dispatchers.

The dispatcher shortage isn’t coming, it’s here. If we fail to act, the strain on those currently in the role will only deepen. The people answering our most urgent calls deserve the same recognition and support as those they dispatch, because without them, there is no first response.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

Fortune Global Forum returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and global leaders will gather for a dynamic, invitation-only event shaping the future of business. Apply for an invitation.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Databricks CEO Ali Ghodsi says company will be worth $1 trillion by doing these three things

Published

on



Ali Ghodsi, the CEO and cofounder of data intelligence company Databricks, is betting his privately held startup can be the latest addition to the trillion-dollar valuation club.

In August, Ghodsi told the Wall Street Journalthat he believed Databricks, which is reportedly in talks toraise funding at a $134 billion valuation, had “a shot to be a trillion-dollar company.” At Fortune’s Brainstorm AI conference in San Francisco on Tuesday, he explained how it would happen, laying out a “trifecta” of growth areas to ignite the company’s next leg of growth.

The first is entering the transactional database market, the traditional territory of large enterprise players like Oracle, which Ghodsi said has remained largely “the same for 40 years.” Earlier this year, Databricks launched a link-based offering called Lakehouse, which aims to combine the capabilities of traditional databases with modern data lake storage, in an attempt to capture some of this market.

The company is also seeing growth driven by the rise of AI-powered coding. “Over 80% of the databases that are being launched on Databricks are not being launched by humans, but by AI agents,” Ghodsi said. As developers use AI tools for “vibe coding”—rapidly building software with natural language commands—those applications automatically need databases, and Ghodsi they’re defaulting to Databricks’ platform.

“That’s just a huge growth factor for us. I think if we just did that, we could maybe get all the way to a trillion,” he said.

The second growth area is Agentbricks, Databricks’ platform for building AI agents that work with proprietary enterprise data.

“It’s a commodity now to have AI that has general knowledge,” Ghodsi said, but “it’s very elusive to get AI that really works and understands that proprietary data that’s inside enterprise.” He pointed to the Royal Bank of Canada, which built AI agents for equity research analysts, as an example. Ghodsi said these agents were able to automatically gather earnings calls and company information to assemble research reports, reducing “many days’ worth of work down to minutes.”

And finally, the third piece to Ghodsi’s puzzle involves building applications on top of this infrastructure, with developers using AI tools to quickly build applications that run on Lakehouse and which are then powered by AI agents. “To get the trifecta is also to have apps on top of this. Now you have apps that are vibe coded with the database, Lakehouse, and with agents,” Ghodsi said. “Those are three new vectors for us.”

Ghodsi did not provide a timeframe for attaining the trillion-dollar goal. Currently, only a handful of companies have achieved the milestone, all of them as publicly traded companies. In the tech industry, only big tech giants like Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta have managed to cross the trillion-dollar threshold.

To reach this level would require Databricks, which is widely expected to go public sometime in early 2026, to grow its valuation roughly sevenfold from its current reported level. Part of this journey will likely also include the expected IPO, Ghodsi said.

“There are huge advantages and pros and cons. That’s why we’re not super religious about it,” Ghodsi said when asked about a potential IPO. “We will go public at some point. But to us, it’s not a really big deal.”

Could the company IPO next year? Maybe, replied Ghodsi.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

New contract shows Palantir working on tech platform for another federal agency that works with ICE

Published

on



Palantir, the artificial intelligence and data analytics company, has quietly started working on a tech platform for a federal immigration agency that has referred dozens of individuals to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for potential enforcement since September.

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services agency—which handles services including citizenship applications, family immigration, adoptions, and work permits for non-citizens—started the contract with Palantir at the end of October, and is paying the data analytics company to implement “Phase 0” of a “vetting of wedding-based schemes,” or “VOWS” platform, according to the federal contract, which was posted to the U.S. government website and reviewed by Fortune.

The contract is small—less than $100,000—and details of what exactly the new platform entails are thin. The contract itself offers few details, apart from the general description of the platform (“vetting of wedding-based schemes”) and an estimate that the completion of the contract would be Dec. 9.Palantir declined to comment on the contract or nature of the work, and USCIS did not respond to requests for comment for this story.

But the contract is notable, nonetheless, as it marks the beginning of a new relationship between USCIS and Palantir, which has had longstanding contracts with ICE, another agency of the Department of Homeland Security, since at least 2011. The description of the contract suggests that the “VOWS” platform may very well be focused on marriage fraud and related to USCIS’ recent stated effort to drill down on duplicity in applications for marriage and family-based petitions, employment authorizations, and parole-related requests.

USCIS has been outspoken about its recent collaboration with ICE. Over nine days in September, USCIS announced that it worked with ICE and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to conduct what it called “Operation Twin Shield” in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area, where immigration officials investigated potential cases of fraud in immigration benefit applications the agency had received. The agency reported that its officers referred 42 cases to ICE over the period. In a statement published to the USCIS website shortly after the operation, USCIS director Joseph Edlow said his agency was “declaring an all-out war on immigration fraud” and that it would “relentlessly pursue everyone involved in undermining the integrity of our immigration system and laws.” 

“Under President Trump, we will leave no stone unturned,” he said.

Earlier this year, USCIS rolled out updates to its policy requirements for marriage-based green cards, which have included more details of relationship evidence and stricter interview requirements.

While Palantir has always been a controversial company—and one that tends to lean into that reputation no less—the new contract with USCIS is likely to lead to more public scrutiny. Backlash over Palantir’s contracts with ICE have intensified this year amid the Trump Administration’s crackdown on immigration and aggressive tactics used by ICE to detain immigrants that have gone viral on social media. Not to mention, Palantir inked a $30 million contract with ICE earlier this year to pilot a system that will track individuals who have elected to self-deport and help ICE with targeting and enforcement prioritization. There has been pushback from current and former employees of the company alike over contracts the company has with ICE and Israel.

In a recent interview at the New York Times DealBook Summit, Karp was asked on stage about Palantir’s work with ICE and later what Karp thought, from a moral standpoint, about families getting separated by ICE. “Of course I don’t like that, right? No one likes that. No American. This is the fairest, least bigoted, most open-minded culture in the world,” Karp said. But he said he cared about two issues politically: immigration and “re-establishing the deterrent capacity of America without being a colonialist neocon view. On those two issues, this president has performed.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

CoreWeave CEO: Despite see-sawing stock, IPO was ‘incredibly successful’ amid challenges of tariff timing

Published

on



CoreWeave has been rocked by dizzying stock swings—with its stock currently trading 52% below its post-IPO high—and a frequent target of market commentators, but CEO Michael Intrator says the company’s move to the public markets has been “incredibly successful. And he takes the public’s mixed reaction in stride, given the novelty of CoreWeave’s “neocloud” business which competes with established cloud providers like Amazon AWS and Google Cloud.

“When you introduce new models, introduce a new way of doing business, disrupt what has been a static environment, it’s going to take some people some time,” Intrator said Tuesday at Fortune’s Brainstorm AI conference in San Francisco. But, he added, more people are beginning to understand the CoreWeave’s business model.

“We came out into one of the most challenging environments,” Intrator said of CoreWeave’s March IPO, which occurred very close to President Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs in April. “In spite of the incredible headwinds, we’re able to launch a successful IPO.”

CoreWeave, which priced its IPO at $40 per share, has experienced frequent severe up-and-down price swings in the eight months since its public market debut. At its closing price of $90.66 on Tuesday, the stock remains well above its IPO price.

As Fortune reported last month, CoreWeave’s rapid rise has been fueled by an aggressive, debt-heavy strategy to stand up data centers at unprecedented speed for AI customers. And for now, the bet is still paying off. In its third-quarter results released in November, the company said its revenue backlog nearly doubled in a single quarter—to $55.6 billion from $30 billion—reflecting long-term commitments from marquee clients including Meta, OpenAI, and French AI startup Poolside. Both earnings and revenue came in ahead of Wall Street expectations.

But the numbers were not all celebratory. CoreWeave disclosed a further increase in the debt it has taken on to finance its expansion, and it revised its full-year revenue outlook downward—suggesting that, even with historic demand in the pipeline.

With media headlines calling CoreWeave a “ticking time bomb,” with critics calling out insider stock sales, circular financing accusations and an overreliance on Nvidia, Intrator was asked whether he felt CoreWeave was misunderstood.

“Look, we built a company that is challenging one of the most stable businesses that exist—that cloud business, these three massive players,” he said, referring to AWS, Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud.  I feel like it’s incumbent on CoreWeave to introduce a new business model on how the cloud is going to be built and run. And that’s what we’re doing.” 

He repeatedly framed CoreWeave not as a GPU reseller or traditional data-center operator but as a company purpose-built from scratch to deliver high-performance, parallelized computing for AI workloads. That focus, he said, means designing proprietary software that orchestrates GPUs, building and colocating its own infrastructure, and moving “up the stack” through acquisitions such as Weights & Biases and OpenPipe.

Intrator also defended the company’s debt strategy, saying CoreWeave is effectively inventing a new financing model for AI infrastructure. He pointed to the company’s ability to repurpose power sources, rapidly deploy capacity, and finance large-scale clusters as proof it is solving problems incumbents never had to face.

“When I look back at history of the company, it took us a year with with a company investor like Fidelity, before they were like, ‘Oh, I get it,’” he said. “So look, we’ve been public for eight months. I couldn’t be prouder of what the company has accomplished.” 



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.