Connect with us

Business

Venture Global didn’t disrupt the energy sector by making friends. VG is in its ‘slander’ era with aims to dominate the industry

Published

on


By the beginning of this year, the world’s leading gas exporter, the United States, grew the capacity to ship nearly 100 million metric tons of liquefied natural gas per year—incredibly rapid growth for a U.S. industry that only started exporting a decade ago.

By 2030, a little-known startup, Venture Global, is projected to exceed that volume all by itself. It only began shipping three years ago. The oil and gas outsiders at Venture Global are doing so by upending project design norms, upsetting the Big Oil hierarchy, and dominating the nascent gas export industry.

The business of exporting natural gas—it needs to be liquefied to be shipped overseas in tankers—has taken off thanks to the nation’s ongoing shale gas boom, the world’s growing power needs, and the desire to rely less on Russian gas. Liquefied natural gas (LNG) is the biggest sector of U.S. oil and gas growth, responding to more gas demand than even the burgeoning AI data center construction surge. Just from 2024 to 2028, North America’s LNG export capacity should more than double, according to the U.S. Department of Energy.

The pace of Venture Global’s growth is staggering. Its speed has shocked virtually every industry analyst. It has no plans to slow down through the early 2030s. Even cofounder and CEO Mike Sabel is surprised by what he has built: The company has exceeded his expectations on timelines and production capacity. Not bad for a company founded by leaders with only ancillary energy experience.

“The markets for years convinced themselves that we would fail, and they didn’t need to react to us, and that was helpful to us,” Sabel told Fortune, highlighting Venture Global’s Arlington, Virginia headquarters far away from the energy epicenter in Houston. “We were out of sight and out of mind.”

Now, Venture Global is on pace to surpass U.S. LNG export pioneer and leader Cheniere Energy in capacity before the end of the decade, Sabel and analysts said.

Gleefully embracing its “disruptor” status, Venture Global has grown despite upsetting the industry. Big Oil giant Shell accused Venture Global of deceit—not disruption—in a contract dispute. And, in an overambitious initial public offering early this year, the company sought a market valuation approaching $110 billion—double that of Cheniere—while riding the pro-fossil fuel, Trump inauguration wave—only for its market cap to plunge to a low of $17 billion in early April.

Still, Venture Global won its arbitration fight against Shell in August. Shell, BP, and others had accused Venture Global of unfairly profiting on cargo sales before fulfilling their long-term contracts—and the stock has more than doubled since its low, bringing it to a market cap over $36 billion.

“We’re following the trajectory of the disruptors in lots of industries. First, you’re ignored. Then you get ridiculed by the incumbents and those that criticize people with new ideas,” Sabel said. “Then, as you start to impact the incumbents, they slander you, which is the phase we’re in now. Eventually they figure out they’re losing, and they try to figure out how to compete. The commercial strategy of a lot of competitors in the market is to say mean things about us, hoping that slows us down, which it hasn’t.”

Venture Global’s main differentiator is building smaller, modular LNG facilities—called liquefaction “trains”—at its massive, U.S. Gulf Coast plants at Calcasieu Pass and Plaquemines in southwestern and southeastern Louisiana, respectively. Whereas a rival might build four huge trains, VG’s new Plaquemines campus will soon count 36 modular trains when it’s completed.

These cost-efficient facilities can come online more quickly, one at a time, while construction goes on, turning on revenue streams faster, Sabel said. “This has largely been about the realization that we developed a new way to do this, and that it changes the competitive landscape.”

Energy analyst Jack Weixel, of East Daley Analytics, said Venture Global is demonstrating a “remarkable turnaround” from its Calcasieu Pass startup and arbitration issues, as well as from President Biden’s temporary LNG permitting moratorium last year.

“They’re very much looking at this like an assembly line. Just the sheer number of facilities coming online is incredible,” Weixel said. “They were pretty bold right out of the gate. They had some stumbles, but they persevered. They’re just out there hustling.”

From Sri Lanka to Haiti to Louisiana

The hustle dates back over 15 years ago to Sabel and his cofounding partner, Bob Pender, considering building natural gas facilities throughout the world from Sri Lanka to Haiti before homing in on exporting from the U.S.

Sabel, an investment banker and entrepreneur, says he was lunching at a Washington, D.C.,  restaurant when a Sri Lankan waiter he’d befriended pushed the idea of developing a coal plant after the end of his native country’s civil war.

Sabel was intrigued and, through a lawyer friend, he met Bob Pender, then a partner at Hogan Lovells, who brought expertise in project financing to the table.

“[My wife] was happy to let me go over to Sri Lanka in the middle of a civil war,” Sabel said with a laugh. Sabel made the trek and quickly realized the greater need in Sri Lanka and worldwide was for regasification facilities that receive the LNG and covert it back into gas for power generation.

Following the 2010 Haiti earthquake, Pender served as legal consultant to the Interim Haiti Recovery Commission. Sabel and Pender saw an opportunity for Haiti to reduce its dependence on pricy, heavy fuel oil for power by building smaller-scale gas facilities.

“While we were looking at smaller-scale loads potentially going to Haiti, it got us thinking about smaller-scale sources of liquefaction, which led us to look at smaller-scale development projects in the U.S.,” Sabel said.

Thus Venture Global was born via the idea of going big by going smaller. Pender remains executive co-chairman with Sabel today.

When Venture Global submitted its federal permitting applications for its Calcasieu Pass project in 2015, the industry was largely dismissive of the unknown outsider whose project, they assumed, had little chance of ever becoming a reality.

“We compete in a commodity market. Everyone produces the same product, so it’s really about cost and speed of production,” Sabel said. “Think of building a commercial office tower, but you figure out how you can start leasing the floors from the bottom up as you go. By the time you get to the top floor, you’ve earned a substantial amount of revenue that defrays the cost of construction.”

Development and contracting took time—offering cheaper, long-term deals to foreign buyers—but the first LNG came online from Calcasieu Pass in early 2022, just as Russia invaded Ukraine, sending global gas prices skyrocketing.

Venture Global benefited not only from the timing, but also because it takes years to develop these massive projects. When competitors finally saw that Venture Global was legit, Sabel said, the company had three projects underway in Calcasieu Pass, Plaquemines—which is mostly online today—and CP2. The $15 billion, first phase of CP2 just began construction near to Calcasieu Pass and is slated to start producing LNG in 2027.

“By the time they (rivals) realize—wait a minute—we’re not failing, we’d grabbed all this other market share,” Sabel said. “Well, now we’re not the little startup we were a few years ago.”

Conflicts and victories

While Venture Global’s Calcasieu Pass first began shipping small cargoes in early 2022 when prices spiked, it didn’t complete final commissioning and begin fulfilling contract obligations until April of this year.

There’s the rub. For three years, Venture Global sold its LNG for heavier profits while the final trains were completed before selling to contracted customers at cheaper prices. Customers alleged this was a manipulation—the company could have sold at the cheaper, contracted level from the get-go, they have claimed.

That said, Venture Global suffered pandemic-related supply chain and construction issues, hurricane delays, and power supply problems during the same timeframe, Sabel said. Venture Global couldn’t fulfill all its contracts until the LNG plant was finished, he argued.

But Shell, BP, Spanish energy major Repsol, and others filed for arbitration over the dispute. While the others are still pending, Venture Global believes it set a winning precedent with a victory in the Shell arbitration.

Even if Venture Global upset some in the industry, its lower-cost approach is allowing it to offer cheaper contracts that keep bringing in new customers from China to Europe.

Then, early this year Venture Global went public with its massive, eyebrow-raising valuation.

Rystad Energy LNG analyst Mathieu Utting believes it was a calculated move.

“We thought it was a little bit strategic just to put it out there at a very, very high number and then let it come back down, because it seemed like the number that they ended up at, they were still very happy with,” Utting said. “But it was definitely a little bit bizarre.”

Regardless, Sabel isn’t satisfied with the stock price, even though it is on the rise.

“We’re very unhappy with how the stock has performed, and we expect—as people watch us execute and exceed what we said we were going to do—that it will right-size,” Sabel said.

“Maybe every CEO in history has said that,” he added, turning from serious to laughter.

The debate on Venture Global’s future now turns to bulls versus bears. When the Biden administration implemented an LNG permitting moratorium, it was largely about environmental concerns along the Gulf Coast. But the argument also focused on the wave of construction leading to a global gas glut and cratering prices.

Utting believes a glut is on its way starting in 2030 and lasting until 2035 or so—right when VG is largely finished ramping up its incredible wave of growth. China’s shrinking LNG imports are of the utmost concern.

Venture Global and Weixel, of East Daley, are much more bullish, arguing that global demand will keep rising faster than many expect with electrification, AI, and coal-to-gas power switching.

Venture Global is already near the capacity to export 40 MTPA (million tonnes per annum) of LNG between its Calcasieu Pass and Plaquemines facilities. The CP2 project would add another 28 MTPA.

A subsequent, smaller CP2 expansion would bring yet another 10 MTPA, and a planned Plaquemines expansion prior to 2030 would tack on about 25 MTPA. That would all total over 102 million metric tons of annual capacity by 2030 if all goes as planned, Sabel said.

Finally, a CP3 project is in development for another 30 MTPA after 2030, he said.

For comparison, current industry leader Cheniere aims to grow to about 75 MTPA near 2030—big growth, but not keeping pace with Venture Global’s plans.

“This is like Barry Bonds and Mark McGwire going at it,” Weixel said, comparing them to the retired, home run hitters.

Sabel prefers comparing VG to another sport.

“We have the esprit de corps of a small-town football team. No one wants to let down their teammates,” he said. “We to this day still feel like the underdog that a lot of people are rooting against, and it makes us come together to prevail.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Epstein grand jury documents from Florida can be released by DOJ, judge rules

Published

on



A federal judge on Friday gave the Justice Department permission to release transcripts of a grand jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of underage girls in Florida — a case that ultimately ended without any federal charges being filed against the millionaire sex offender.

U.S. District Judge Rodney Smith said a recently passed federal law ordering the release of records related to Epstein overrode the usual rules about grand jury secrecy.

The law signed in November by President Donald Trump compels the Justice Department, FBI and federal prosecutors to release later this month the vast troves of material they have amassed during investigations into Epstein that date back at least two decades.

Friday’s court ruling dealt with the earliest known federal inquiry.

In 2005, police in Palm Beach, Florida, where Epstein had a mansion, began interviewing teenage girls who told of being hired to give the financier sexualized massages. The FBI later joined the investigation.

Federal prosecutors in Florida prepared an indictment in 2007, but Epstein’s lawyers attacked the credibility of his accusers publicly while secretly negotiating a plea bargain that would let him avoid serious jail time.

In 2008, Epstein pleaded guilty to relatively minor state charges of soliciting prostitution from someone under age 18. He served most of his 18-month sentence in a work release program that let him spend his days in his office.

The U.S. attorney in Miami at the time, Alex Acosta, agreed not to prosecute Epstein on federal charges — a decision that outraged Epstein’s accusers. After the Miami Herald reexamined the unusual plea bargain in a series of stories in 2018, public outrage over Epstein’s light sentence led to Acosta’s resignation as Trump’s labor secretary.

A Justice Department report in 2020 found that Acosta exercised “poor judgment” in handling the investigation, but it also said he did not engage in professional misconduct.

A different federal prosecutor, in New York, brought a sex trafficking indictment against Epstein in 2019, mirroring some of the same allegations involving underage girls that had been the subject of the aborted investigation. Epstein killed himself while awaiting trial. His longtime confidant and ex-girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, was then tried on similar charges, convicted and sentenced in 2022 to 20 years in prison.

Transcripts of the grand jury proceedings from the aborted federal case in Florida could shed more light on federal prosecutors’ decision not to go forward with it. Records related to state grand jury proceedings have already been made public.

When the documents will be released is unknown. The Justice Department asked the court to unseal them so they could be released with other records required to be disclosed under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The Justice Department hasn’t set a timetable for when it plans to start releasing information, but the law set a deadline of Dec. 19.

The law also allows the Justice Department to withhold files that it says could jeopardize an active federal investigation. Files can also be withheld if they’re found to be classified or if they pertain to national defense or foreign policy.

One of the federal prosecutors on the Florida case did not answer a phone call Friday and the other declined to answer questions.

A judge had previously declined to release the grand jury records, citing the usual rules about grand jury secrecy, but Smith said the new federal law allowed public disclosure.

The Justice Department has separate requests pending for the release of grand jury records related to the sex trafficking cases against Epstein and Maxwell in New York. The judges in those matters have said they plan to rule expeditiously.

___

Sisak reported from New York.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Miss Universe co-owner gets bank accounts frozen as part of probe into drugs, fuel and arms trafficking

Published

on



Mexico’s anti-money laundering office has frozen the bank accounts of the Mexican co-owner of Miss Universe as part of an investigation into drugs, fuel and arms trafficking, an official said Friday.

The country’s Financial Intelligence Unit, which oversees the fight against money laundering, froze Mexican businessman Raúl Rocha Cantú’s bank accounts in Mexico, a federal official told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to comment on the investigation.

The action against Rocha Cantú adds to mounting controversies for the Miss Universe organization. Last week, a court in Thailand issued an arrest warrant for the Thai co-owner of the Miss Universe Organization in connection with a fraud case and this year’s competition — won by Miss Mexico Fatima Bosch — faced allegations of rigging.

The Miss Universe organization did not immediately respond to an email from The Associated Press seeking comment about the allegations against Rocha Cantú.

Mexico’s federal prosecutors said last week that Rocha Cantú has been under investigation since November 2024 for alleged organized crime activity, including drug and arms trafficking, as well as fuel theft. Last month, a federal judge issued 13 arrest warrants for some of those involved in the case, including the Mexican businessman, whose company Legacy Holding Group USA owns 50% of the Miss Universe shares.

The organization’s other 50% belongs to JKN Global Group Public Co. Ltd., a company owned by Jakkaphong “Anne” Jakrajutatip.

A Thai court last week issued an arrest warrant for Jakrajutatip who was released on bail in 2023 on the fraud case. She failed to appear as required in a Bangkok court on Nov. 25. Since she did not notify the court about her absence, she was deemed to be a flight risk, according to a statement from the Bangkok South District Court.

The court rescheduled her hearing for Dec. 26.

Rocha Cantú was also a part owner of the Casino Royale in the northern Mexican city of Monterrey, when it was attacked in 2011 by a group of gunmen who entered it, doused gasoline and set it on fire, killing 52 people.

Baltazar Saucedo Estrada, who was charged with planning the attack, was sentenced in July to 135 years in prison.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Elon Musk’s X fined $140 million by EU for breaching digital regulations

Published

on



European Union regulators on Friday fined X, Elon Musk’s social media platform, 120 million euros ($140 million) for breaches of the bloc’s digital regulations, in a move that risks rekindling tensions with Washington over free speech.

The European Commission issued its decision following an investigation it opened two years ago into X under the 27-nation bloc’s Digital Services Act, also known as the DSA.

It’s the first time that the EU has issued a so-called non-compliance decision since rolling out the DSA. The sweeping rulebook requires platforms to take more responsibility for protecting European users and cleaning up harmful or illegal content and products on their sites, under threat of hefty fines.

The Commission, the bloc’s executive arm, said it was punishing X because of three different breaches of the DSA’s transparency requirements. The decision could rile President Donald Trump, whose administration has lashed out at digital regulations, complained that Brussels was targeting U.S. tech companies and vowed to retaliate.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio posted on his X account that the Commission’s fine was akin to an attack on the American people. Musk later agreed with Rubio’s sentiment.

“The European Commission’s $140 million fine isn’t just an attack on @X, it’s an attack on all American tech platforms and the American people by foreign governments,” Rubio wrote. “The days of censoring Americans online are over.”

Vice President JD Vance, posting on X ahead of the decision, accused the Commission of seeking to fine X “for not engaging in censorship.”

“The EU should be supporting free speech not attacking American companies over garbage,” he wrote.

Officials denied the rules were intended to muzzle Big Tech companies. The Commission is “not targeting anyone, not targeting any company, not targeting any jurisdictions based on their color or their country of origin,” spokesman Thomas Regnier told a regular briefing in Brussels. “Absolutely not. This is based on a process, democratic process.”

X did not respond immediately to an email request for comment.

EU regulators had already outlined their accusations in mid-2024 when they released preliminary findings of their investigation into X.

Regulators said X’s blue checkmarks broke the rules because on “deceptive design practices” and could expose users to scams and manipulation.

Before Musk acquired X, when it was previously known as Twitter, the checkmarks mirrored verification badges common on social media and were largely reserved for celebrities, politicians and other influential accounts, such as Beyonce, Pope Francis, writer Neil Gaiman and rapper Lil Nas X.

After he bought it in 2022, the site started issuing the badges to anyone who wanted to pay $8 per month.

That means X does not meaningfully verify who’s behind the account, “making it difficult for users to judge the authenticity of accounts and content they engage with,” the Commission said in its announcement.

X also fell short of the transparency requirements for its ad database, regulators said.

Platforms in the EU are required to provide a database of all the digital advertisements they have carried, with details such as who paid for them and the intended audience, to help researches detect scams, fake ads and coordinated influence campaigns. But X’s database, the Commission said, is undermined by design features and access barriers such as “excessive delays in processing.”

Regulators also said X also puts up “unnecessary barriers” for researchers trying to access public data, which stymies research into systemic risks that European users face.

“Deceiving users with blue checkmarks, obscuring information on ads and shutting out researchers have no place online in the EU. The DSA protects users,” Henna Virkkunen, the EU’s executive vice-president for tech sovereignty, security and democracy, said in a prepared statement.

The Commission also wrapped up a separate DSA case Friday involving TikTok’s ad database after the video-sharing platform promised to make changes to ensure full transparency.

___

AP Writer Lorne Cook in Brussels contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.