Connect with us

Politics

Vanessa Oliver says wine distributors shouldn’t be limited to ‘reusable’ kegs

Published

on


Wine can be a very fickle product, and one legislator says wine producers in Florida should not be limited in the kegs they use.

Rep. Vanessa Oliver, a Port Charlotte Republican, filed a measure (HB 6015) to end the requirements that wine producers use “reusable” kegs.

“It is unlawful for a person to sell within this state wine in an individual container holding more than 1 gallon of such wine, unless such wine is in a reusable container holding 5.16 gallons or a glass container holding 4.5 liters, 6 liters, 17.9 liters, 12 liters, or 15 liters,” the current law reads.

Oliver’s bill removes one word — “reusable” — from the legislation that was approved about a decade ago. Oliver said it may seem like a small adjustment. But for wine makers in Florida, it’s an essential change and can make a difference in taste of the final product.

“This was actually brought to me by one of my constituents who is a blueberry farmer in DeSoto County,” Oliver said. “He is part owner of a winery and they make blueberry wine out of his blueberries and sell it throughout the Southeastern United States.”

The problem for the blueberry farmer is they cannot distribute the wine in large quantities in Florida because it can only be sold in reusable kegs, which are usually made of metal. Oliver said that negatively impacts the taste of the wine.

“It’s really hindering their ability to sell their products to restaurants in our state,” Oliver said. “They normally use a glass keg that’s recyclable, but not reusable.”

While Florida will never be known as a wine region like other states such as California or Washington, there are still about three dozen wine producers in the Sunshine State, according to the American Winery Guide.

Oliver’s proposal doesn’t change the size of the kegs that are permitted or the size of any container for wine sales. The proposed change would not eliminate “reusable” kegs. But it would make them optional and Oliver said the glass kegs are simply better for the taste of the product.

“It’s a really big deal for small businesses in my district. So, that makes it a big deal to me,” Oliver said. “Those particular businesses are really limited because they are not going to buy this really expensive one type of keg. They (customers) are not going to buy this one type of expensive wine when it ruins the taste.”


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Shon Owens wants to serve in the Florida House, but family’s homestead exemption is on a Georgia home

Published

on


House candidate Shon Owens wants to serve in the Florida Legislature. But he and his wife claim a homestead exemption in Georgia, and he never applied for one on the Jay home he owned since 2007.

Owens told Florida Politics he believed he did have an exemption in his Highway 4 home, but acknowledged that his wife for years claimed one on a Jackson County property listed in both of their names.

“My wife claims that, separate from me,” he said. “I claim a homestead here, she claims the Georgia address, and we have kids in college in Georgia.”

Jackson County records show Owens and Jina Cadena Jones as the owners of the Georgia property, but list a Jay address as the owners’ home address. Nevertheless, the county property records in Georgia show a homestead exemption on the Jackson County property.

Georgia law requires a home to be occupied and considered a legal residence in order for the property to be eligible for a homestead exemption. A state website also clearly states that to be eligible, an individual “cannot already claim a homestead exemption for another property in Georgia or in any other state.”

Owens said it was his wife who claimed the Georgia exemption, not him. He also said Jones had a Georgia driver’s license and grew up in Georgia. Both Owens and Jones have adult children from previous relationships, all of whom live in Georgia.

But there may be a reason not to worry about the Georgia requirements on exemptions. Owens does not have, and has never sought, a homestead exemption on his Jay home. According to the Santa Rosa Property Appraiser’s Office, he has owned the home on Highway 4 since 2007 but has never applied for an exemption.

Owens notably owns several properties in Santa Rosa County, most of which are owned by corporations in his control. But none of the properties have a homestead exemption.

Yet Owens served at the Jay City Council for 15 years, including seven as Mayor.

“All of my businesses are here,” he said. “This is where I work out of every week. I spend 90% of my time here in Florida.”

Owens, head of Owens Custom Homes & Construction, is one of eight Republicans qualified as candidates for a Special Election in House District 3. The seat opened after former Rep. Joel Rudman, a Navarre Republican, resigned to run for Congress, though he lost a Republican Primary in January to Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis.

The Republican Primary in HD 3 will be held on April 1. The winner advances to a June 20 Special General Election.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Florida’s insurance market stabilizing — now is not the time for more reforms

Published

on


For years, Florida’s insurance market faced a crisis, with skyrocketing premiums and insurer insolvencies leaving homeowners with few options. Thanks to landmark reforms championed by Gov. Ron DeSantis and the Legislature, the tide is finally turning. These strategic policy changes have brought much-needed stability, attracted new insurers, and provided homeowners with more choices.

Given this progress, now is not the time to disrupt the market with untested reforms. Stability takes time, and the full effects of recent legislation must be allowed to take hold. When Florida lawmakers convene their next two-month session on March 4, they should resist the urge to enact further changes that could derail the positive momentum we have seen so far.

The evidence speaks for itself. In 2023 alone, more than 10 new property and casualty insurers entered the Florida market, giving consumers increased options and fostering a more competitive landscape. A stable insurance environment encourages more capital investment, ultimately benefiting consumers. However, regulatory changes at this stage could deter new entrants and potentially drive up costs for policyholders.

Even more encouraging, the market has seen 12 consecutive months of underwriting improvement, with the potential for rate reductions on the horizon. Since January 2024, 17 companies have filed for rate decreases, and 34 companies have requested 0 percent increases. As these reductions accumulate over time, consumers will benefit from increased competition, leading to more affordable rates and, most importantly, a financially viable market. These transformational changes demonstrate that recent reforms are working as intended and delivering the expected rate relief for consumers. When these measures were enacted, legislative leaders cautioned that the impact would not be immediate — it would take time for the systemic changes to stabilize the market and lower insurance rates.

The real challenges facing Florida’s insurance market stem from external pressures, including natural disasters, rising reinsurance costs, and past litigation abuse. Recent hurricanes have caused widespread damage, increasing claims costs and straining insurers financially. To manage risk and keep coverage affordable, insurers rely on reinsurance — but reinsurance costs in Florida have surged, making it more expensive for insurers to operate. Misconceptions about insurer profitability or affiliated transactions often overlook the significant expenses of running a property insurance company, including reinsurance, claim payouts, and operational costs. In reality, most insurers operate on tight margins and must engage in responsible financial management to remain viable. The Office of Insurance Regulation has a robust financial oversight framework to regulate affiliated party transactions and prevent unlawful or excessive asset distributions, contrary to some recent assertions in the media.

Excessive litigation was a major driver of Florida’s past insurance crisis. Recognizing this, lawmakers enacted strong reforms to curb litigation abuse and promote market stability. At the same time, they enhanced the Insurance Commissioner’s ability to hold insurers accountable. If companies fail to properly adjust and promptly pay claims, Commissioner Yaworsky now has a dedicated Deputy Commissioner and a proactive team tasked with enforcing insurers’ claims-paying responsibilities. Additional regulatory changes at this juncture would be premature and could introduce further uncertainty and disruption.

Given Florida’s heavy reliance on catastrophe reinsurance, lawmakers may want to consider harmonizing the state-created Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund with the private reinsurance market to serve as a stabilizing buffer during periods of stress and volatility. While future legislation may be necessary or desirable, for now, it is essential to let the reforms work and allow the Office of Insurance Regulation to collect the necessary data to guide informed legislative decisions.

The Legislature has enacted comprehensive, thoughtful reforms to stabilize a struggling property insurance market. Now, the best course of action is to allow these measures to take full effect. By maintaining a steady approach and fostering a competitive, stable insurance market, lawmakers can continue to protect Florida homeowners and support a resilient insurance industry.

___

Kevin McCarty is a former Florida Insurance Commissioner who served from 2003 to 2016. With decades of experience in insurance regulation and policy, he played a key role in shaping Florida’s insurance landscape. McCarty is a nationally recognized expert on insurance market stability and risk management, advising industry leaders and policymakers on best practices for maintaining a competitive and consumer-friendly market.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Andrew Tate rips Ron DeSantis for caving to media pressure

Published

on


Andrew Tate said he was disappointed in Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Monday while speaking on a podcast several days after he and his brother, Tristan, who are charged with human trafficking in Romania, returned to the U.S.

Andrew Tate appeared on the PBD Podcast, hosted by Patrick Bet-David, and said DeSantis likely caved to media pressure last week when he told reporters that the Tates weren’t welcome in Florida, after they landed in Fort Lauderdale on Thursday. DeSantis said Florida’s Attorney General was examining whether the state may have any jurisdiction over the brothers’ alleged crimes, and if so, how to hold them accountable. In court documents, the Tates have said they are not and have never been Florida residents.

“I don’t know why Ron’s answer wasn’t, ‘He has an American passport. The judicial system in Romania, which I know absolutely nothing about, decided to let him fly, and he’s flown to his home country. As far as we’re concerned, he’s broken no laws,’” Tate said. “Instead, what he did was say: ‘We’re going to get our Attorney General to try and find some laws he’s broken and wreck this man who’s done nothing inside of the United States ever.’”

In contrast, Tate described U.S. President Donald Trump as “such a boss” in his response to reporters about the Tate brothers. A reporter asked Trump if his administration had pressured the Romanian government to release the brothers, and Trump said, “I know nothing about that.”

Andrew Tate, 38, is a former professional kickboxer and self-described misogynist who has amassed more than 10 million followers on the social platform X. He and his brother Tristan Tate, 36, are vocal supporters of Trump.

Andrew reiterated on Monday that he has not been convicted of any crimes.

“Isn’t the whole point of democracy, innocent until proven guilty?” Tate said. “I’ve yet to even have a trial, let alone a conviction. I’ve never even been tried after three years. I’ve never been to trial.”

Andrew Tate is a hugely successful social media figure, attracting millions of followers, many of them young men and schoolchildren drawn in by the luxurious lifestyle the influencer projects online.

He previously was banned from TikTok, YouTube and Facebook for hate speech and his misogynistic comments, including that women should bear responsibility for getting sexually assaulted.

The Tates, who are dual U.S.-British citizens, were arrested in late 2022 and formally indicted last year on charges they participated in a criminal ring that lured women to Romania, where they were sexually exploited. Andrew Tate was also charged with rape. They deny the allegations.

The Tates’ departure came after Romanian Foreign Minister Emil Hurezeanu said this month that a Trump administration official expressed interest in the brothers’ case at the recent Munich Security Conference.

Just weeks ago, Andrew Tate posted on X: “The Tates will be free, Trump is the President. The good old days are back. And they will be better than ever. Hold on.”

DeSantis’ office didn’t immediately reply to an email seeking comment about Monday’s podcast with Tate.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.