Connect with us

Business

US-China tariff talks to continue Sunday after first day wraps up while shrouded in secrecy

Published

on



Sensitive talks between U.S. and Chinese delegations over tariffs that threaten to upend the global economy ended after a day of prolonged negotiations and will resume Sunday, an official told The Associated Press.

There was no immediate indication whether progress was made Saturday during the meeting over 10 hours between Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and a delegation led by Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng.

The official who spoke to the AP requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the talks, which could help stabilize world markets roiled by the U.S.-China standoff. The talks have been shrouded in secrecy, and neither side made comments to reporters on the way out.

Several convoys of black vehicles left the residence of the Swiss ambassador to the U.N. in Geneva, which hosted the talks aimed at de-escalating trade tensions between the world’s two biggest economies. Diplomats from both sides also confirmed that the talks took place.

Saturday’s talks were held in the sumptuous 18th-century “Villa Saladin” overlooking Lake Geneva. The former estate was bequeathed to the Swiss state in 1973, according to the Geneva government.

Prospects for a major breakthrough appear dim. But there is hope that the two countries will scale back the massive taxes — tariffs — they have slapped on each other’s goods, a move that would relieve world financial markets and companies on both sides of the Pacific Ocean that depend on U.S.-China trade.

U.S. President Donald Trump last month raised U.S. tariffs on China to a combined 145%, and China retaliated by hitting American imports with a 125% levy. Tariffs that high essentially amount to the countries’ boycotting each other’s products, disrupting trade that last year topped $660 billion.

Even before the talks began, Trump suggested Friday that the U.S. could lower its tariffs on China, saying in a Truth Social post that “ 80% Tariff seems right! Up to Scott.″

Sun Yun, director of the China program at the Stimson Center, noted it will be the first time He and Bessent have talked. She doubts the Geneva meeting will produce any substantive results.

“The best scenario is for the two sides to agree to de-escalate on the … tariffs at the same time,” she said, adding even a small reduction would send a positive signal. “It cannot just be words.”

Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has aggressively used tariffs as his favorite economic weapon. He has, for example, imposed a 10% tax on imports from almost every country in the world.

But the fight with China has been the most intense. His tariffs on China include a 20% charge meant to pressure Beijing into doing more to stop the flow of the synthetic opioid fentanyl into the United States. The remaining 125% involve a dispute that dates back to Trump’s first term and comes atop tariffs he levied on China back then, which means the total tariffs on some Chinese goods can exceed 145%.

During Trump’s first term, the U.S. alleged that China uses unfair tactics to give itself an edge in advanced technologies such as quantum computing and driverless cars. These include forcing U.S. and other foreign companies to hand over trade secrets in exchange for access to the Chinese market; using government money to subsidize domestic tech firms; and outright theft of sensitive technologies.

Those issues were never fully resolved. After nearly two years of negotiation, the United States and China reached a so-called Phase One agreement in January 2020. The U.S. agreed then not to go ahead with even higher tariffs on China, and Beijing agreed to buy more American products. The tough issues — such as China’s subsidies — were left for future negotiations.

But China didn’t come through with the promised purchases, partly because COVID-19 disrupted global commerce just after the Phase One truce was announced.

The fight over China’s tech policy now resumes.

Trump is also agitated by America’s massive trade deficit with China, which came to $263 billion last year.

Trump slaps hefty tariffs on Switzerland

In Switzerland Friday, Bessent and Greer also met with Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter.

Trump last month suspended plans to slap hefty 31% tariffs on Swiss goods — more than the 20% levies he plastered on exports from European Union. For now, he has reduced those taxes to 10% but could raise them again.

The government in Bern is taking a cautious approach. But it has warned of the impact on crucial Swiss industries like watches, coffee capsules, cheese and chocolate.

“An increase in trade tensions is not in Switzerland’s interests. Countermeasures against U.S. tariff increases would entail costs for the Swiss economy, in particular by making imports from the USA more expensive,” the government said last week, adding that the executive branch “is therefore not planning to impose any countermeasures at the present time.”

The government said Swiss exports to the United States on Saturday were subject to an additional 10% tariff, and another 21% beginning Wednesday.

The United States is Switzerland’s second-biggest trading partner after the EU – the 27-member-country bloc that nearly surrounds the wealthy Alpine country of more than 9 million. U.S.-Swiss trade in goods and services has quadrupled over the last two decades, the government said.

The Swiss government said Switzerland abolished all industrial tariffs on Jan. 1 last year, meaning that 99% of all goods from the United States can be imported into Switzerland duty-free.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says Gen Z and millennials are using ChatGPT like a ‘life adviser’—but college students might be one step ahead

Published

on

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Sea shares hit highest point in three years after it records $410.8 million in quarterly profit

Published

on

Sea, the Singapore-based tech company, reported a net profit for the three months ending March 31, 2025, which topped analysts’ estimates, on Tuesday.

A strong quarter from its e-commerce division, its biggest business unit, helped drive Sea to a quarterly profit of $410.8 million, higher than the analysts’ average of $353.4 million calculated by Bloomberg. The quarterly profit also reverses a loss of $23 million from the same period a year ago.

Revenue for the quarter rose 30% to reach $4.8 billion, roughly in line with estimates.

Sea’s shares rose about 6.6% in early trading Tuesday to reach $152.21, its highest in three years, though that is still less than half of its peak of around $350 seen in late 2021.

“Our businesses are now all self-sufficient and cash-generating, positioning us well to capture future opportunities,” said CEO Forrest Li on the earnings call. Li added that the strong start gives Sea the confidence to achieve its full-year guidance.

All three of Sea’s businesses, e-commerce, digital financial services, and gaming logged double digit percentage growth.

Its digital financial services, which was recently rebranded to Monee, was the company’s fastest-growing segment. Monee’s revenue for the quarter grew 57.6% to reach $787.1 million.

As of March 31, 2025, consumer and loans principal outstanding stood at $5.8 billion, up 76.5% from the same period a year ago. Sea generates revenue from lending to consumers and small-and-medium enterprises.

Sea’s gaming arm, Garena, reported bookings of $775.4 million, up 51.4% year-on-year. The company also revealed the daily active users for Free Fire, one of its more popular mobile games, during the quarter was close to its pandemic peak.

Yet, the positive first quarter was still mainly driven by online shopping, which formed the bulk of its revenue.

E-commerce revenue rose 28.3% year-on-year to reach $3.5 billion and made up 73% of Sea’s quarterly revenue. Shopee, its e-commerce platform, delivered record-high gross merchandise value and gross order volume for the quarter, Li said.

Shopee primarily operates in Southeast Asia and Taiwan and expanded to Brazil in 2019.

Continued cost-management improvements are helping drive profitability for its largest business segment. Li said on the earnings call the company has reduced the overall logistics cost per order by 6% and 21% in Asia and Brazil, respectively. AI tools for sellers have also helped increase advertising spending on the platform.

“Shopee has started 2025 on very strong footing, delivering high growth while improving profitability across our markets. We remain confident of achieving our full year GMV growth guidance of 20% with improving profitability,” Li said.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Ken Griffin says Trump won the election by promising lower inflation—so he needs to think ‘long and hard’ about how to protect Americans’ standard of living

Published

on



  • Ken Griffin argues that while many voters supported Donald Trump expecting lower inflation and improved living standards, Trump’s tariff policies risk causing price hikes and undermining that goal. He urges Trump to reconsider his foreign policy and warns that reshoring manufacturing could be inherently inflationary, putting further pressure on Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s already difficult role in managing interest rates amid economic uncertainty.

Ken Griffin believes that when voters backed Donald Trump to the Oval Office, one of their main motivations was the belief that he would lower inflation and improve their standard of living.

Yet a couple of months after Trump’s inauguration, consumer confidence is suffering as they eye potential price hikes because of Trump’s tariff regime.

As a result, the Citadel founder and CEO has encouraged Trump to think “long and hard” about his foreign policy strategy moving forward.

“Ultimately, any effort to force manufacturing back onshore in the United States is going to be inflationary,” Griffin told a Bloomberg podcast in an episode released today.

“There’s no doubt about it. And what frustrates me on this is that one of the reasons that Trump won the election was the American people had had enough of inflation.

“They wanted a break from seeing their standard of living deteriorate by the ever-increasing price of goods and services.”

Since the campaign trail when the president first began floating tariffs as a way to rebalance trade with the rest of the world’s economies, experts have been concerned.

Their caution has covered American isolation through to fear of trade wars, and also price rises which would be expected to be passed back to consumers.

There is some debate over how inflationary tariffs may prove to be—after all, the sharpest end of the policy hasn’t yet been felt. President Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs were paused a little over a week later, and reduced to 10% for the 90-day interim.

Likewise, while tariffs on nations like Canada and Mexico went ahead—and for a brief period, the 145% hike on Chinese imports—some reprieve can now be found in the further breather from tariffs announced by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Monday.

Yet even with the tariff levels coming down, a 10% blanket raise on all imports will likely still raise prices.

“I really think that the president needs to think long and hard about … protect[ing] the standard of living of the American people,” Griffin added.

Navigator survey of more than 5,000 voters in November found that the top reasons people backed the Republican candidate were that he would bring down inflation and improve the state of the national economy.

Likewise, in the weeks before the election, a New York Times and Siena College poll found 52% of people trusted Trump to lead the economy over Kamala Harris, who scored 45%.

Griffin added that Americans may not even want the jobs that rebalancing the trade deficit may open up: “I don’t understand why we think it’s a virtue to bring back to America low-skilled jobs in manufacturing. I complete agree with the president, we need the ability to ramp up our manufacturing base to strengthen our national defense—spot on.

“I don’t think the American people are looking for a return to low-skilled, low-paying manufacturing jobs in our country. I don’t think they want those jobs.”

Powell’s impossible task

Griffin, worth $43 billion according to Forbes, added that Fed chairman Jerome Powell’s job is not one he would relish in the current environment.

Powell has been criticized by fellow economists and President Trump directly, who even suggested he would remove Powell from his post if he didn’t cut the base rate.

Opinions are divided on whether Powell and the Federal Open Market Committee should normalize the base rate further to offset any economic slowdown or whether they are right to hold out for more data in an uncertain environment.

“I’m really happy not to have [Powell’s] job,” Griffin told the ‘Bullish’ podcast. “He has the biggest no-win job in the country because, through the lens of hindsight, we will always be able to second-guess every single decision he makes.

“Right here, right now, he’s grappling with how do you cut rates as the labor market shows ever so slightly signs of softening? Or do you hold the course because of the risk of an inflationary spike coming from tariff increases? He’s going to have to make that decision based upon evolving policies over the weeks ahead—it’s a really tough predicament he’s in.”

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.