Connect with us

Business

U.S. shale oil boom transforms from money treadmill into cash cow, Chevron president says

Published

on


For years Big Oil producers chased U.S. shale profits with big spending hikes while seeking something even more elusive than the next big gusher: steady, sustained profitability. Now Chevron, long the industry’s No. 2 player, believes it hit upon a formula for just that.

Leaning on West Texas’ booming Permian Basin, Chevron says its combination of sheer scale and technology allows it to hop off the spending treadmill and finally pump the shale business for healthy profitability without the constant cry for “Drill, baby, drill.” While Exxon Mobil may remain larger, Chevron is aiming for No. 1 in the leery eyes of a Wall Street that previously soured on the oil sector.

The closing of its $53 billion megadeal to acquire Hess in July allows Chevron to focus internationally on new growth, especially its acquired position offshore Guyana—arguably the largest oil discovery of the century—while using the U.S. and its massive footprint in the Permian to reap the needed influx of free cash flow.

The Hess deal also includes a massive footprint in North Dakota’s Bakken Shale oil play, adding to Chevron’s heavy reliance on oil and gas production in onshore U.S. shale—revolutionized 20 years ago through enhanced horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing (fracking) techniques.

After growing the U.S. onshore shale position to 40% of its global oil and gas production portfolio—nearly 50% including the Gulf of Mexico—through big capital spends and a five-year buying spree, Chevron now aims to plateau its U.S. output and turn it into a cash machine for churning out dividend hikes, said Bruce Niemeyer, Chevron’s new president of shale and tight, meaning he oversees onshore American oil and gas.

“There’s been a period of time in shale and tight in this industry where a lot of the attention was on growth—as much growth that you could have,” Niemeyer told Fortune. “The pivot for us is from growth, which is where the attention was for the last few years, to one of cash flow generation. We are adjusting activity to manage it on a plateau and focus on becoming extremely efficient in what we do.

“Given the portfolio we have, we’ll be able to do that out to the end of the next decade,” he added.

Industry analysts are largely praising the “pivot.”

“That’s what we’ve been looking for a decade from some of these companies,” said RBC Capital energy analyst Biraj Borkhataria, noting that Chevron can cut shale spending by about $1.5 billion annually and keep production volumes relatively even.

Another element is a global Big Oil giant not wanting to place too much of its reliance on any one country, even if it’s the U.S. “Chevron has been very clear about shale production as a percentage of the portfolio, and wanting to put some kind of limit on that,” Borkhataria told Fortune.

Permian powerhouse

The Permian Basin dominates the U.S. oil industry, producing almost half of the nation’s roughly 13.4 million barrels of crude oil daily.

And Chevron is no exception, having just hit its milestone goal in the Permian of 1 million barrels of oil equivalent daily, including natural gas. That makes Chevron the region’s second-largest net producer after rival Exxon.

The so-called treadmill effect in the Permian is based on the thesis that shale wells are drilled quickly for big initial influxes of oil that start to deplete relatively rapidly, so the constant spending and drilling must continue to keep volumes up.

Chevron largely solved that conundrum with the combination of scale, increased efficiencies, and its new slowdown, allowing for more oil and gas to be churned out with fewer drilling rigs and fracking crews—drilling ever-longer subsurface wells and more wells per location with each rig, while fracking three wells simultaneously, Niemeyer said.

Just this year, Chevron shrunk its Permian activity from 13 active drilling rigs to nine with more declines expected, he said.

Chevron’s unique legacy Permian position dates to the 19th century when the Texas Pacific Railway tried and failed to build a railroad from Texas to California. It transformed into the Texas Pacific Land Trust to manage the railroad’s roughly 3.5 million Texas acres.

The oil boom struck West Texas in the 1920s and Texas Pacific spun off an oil company that was eventually acquired by Texaco in 1962. Chevron bought Texas in 2001 for $36 billion at a time when the Permian position was considered a depleted afterthought before the shale revolution unlocked reservoirs previously considered uneconomic.

“There was a time in our company’s history where there wasn’t a lot of attention to it because the Permian had peaked and was on this long and slow decline,” Niemeyer said. “But we made a deliberate decision to hold it. We have a history of big fields getting bigger.”

What’s unusual about Chevron’s Permian position because of the legacy history is Chevron only operates a small majority of its footprint. Instead, the rest is owned through longstanding minerals rights and joint venture partnerships, meaning that some Permian revenues come in without any capital spending.

“The terms of it are unlike anything that you could find on the market today, which makes the portfolio that we have extremely unique in that regard,” Niemeyer said. “It might be hard to reassemble that at any price today under the terms that we have it. It’s a tremendous advantage.”

That equates to Chevron owning a partial stake in one of every five Permian wells, he said.

To compare apples and oranges, Exxon owns and controls the vast majority of its industry-leading Permian position, and is operating a whopping 35 drilling rigs there. Exxon became by far the top Permian player last year when it bought Pioneer Natural Resources for $60 billion. So, Exxon is going to keep growing and not think about plateauing—arguing it generates big profits because of its huge footprint to drill ever-longer, more efficient wells.

“I think Chevron is managing the Permian resource probably the way that they believe they could generate the highest returns from those assets,” said TD Cowen energy analyst Jason Gabelman. “Exxon just did this acquisition and a lot of what they acquired was not developed, so it makes sense that they’re growing while Chevron is kind of stabilizing.”

And stabilizing makes sense when oil prices are weaker now and more global oil supplies aren’t needed, Borkhataria said.

“One of them is very clearly responding to what they think the market dynamics are, which is Chevron,” he said. “Does the market need me to grow significantly 10% to 15% a year? Probably not. Therefore, why do it?”

What’s next?

Chevron and Exxon are continuing embracing technology and the AI boom to become more cost efficient, leaning more towards computing power and brains than brawn.

“Up to this point in shale and tight, there’s been a lot of brute force,” Niemeyer said, as companies relied on drilling ever-longer wells and fracking ever-more-intensely. “Where we’re headed next is we’re going to get more out of the wells, but it’s going to require a different kind of insight and the ability to connect things together, and AI is going to be a big part of that.”

Outside of the Permian, Chevron and Exxon plan to focus much of their growth through oil offshore Guyana, which Exxon discovered a decade ago, now that Chevron bought into the partnership via Hess—much to Exxon’s chagrin and, after legal arbitration, eventual acceptance.

For Chevron, it also must decide where to divest and where else to grow. Some of those decisions could come at its investor day in November.

Late last year, Chevron sold its Canadian oil and gas assets in Alberta for $6.5 billion, representing roughly half of the goal to divest $10 billion to $15 billion by 2028.

While Chevron is counting the Bakken as an important new piece gained, analysts question whether Chevron might be better off selling there. It’s more mature and may struggle to compete with the Permian. Chevron also holds a 30% stake in the publicly traded Hess Midstream pipeline business in the Bakken.

Chevron can either acquire the rest of Hess Midstream to increase Bakken profitability, hold steady, or sell it.

“We’ll have to see where the Bakken goes. The asset that had everybody’s attention was Guyana, and that’s clearly a world-class asset, and we’ll have to see how things proceed in the Bakken,” Niemeyer said. “We’re really excited about the opportunity to be there and connect it with our other assets in the shale and tight business.”

Otherwise, Chevron must look to grow organically through ramped-up international exploration in Africa, South America, the Eastern Mediterranean, or potentially elsewhere, analysts said. The Permian’s success had allowed Chevron to cut back on global exploration spending in recent years, part of a broader industry trend.

“I think what we’ll see is a sort of return to exploration, which is a little less American and taking a bit of risk in different regions globally,” Borkhataria said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Millionaire YouTuber Hank Green tells Gen Z to rethink their Tesla bets—and shares the portfolio changes he’s making to avoid AI-bubble fallout

Published

on



For years, YouTube star Hank Green has stuck to the same straightforward investing wisdom touted by legends like Warren Buffett: Put your money in an S&P 500 index fund and leave it alone.

It’s advice that has paid off handsomely for millions of investors: this year alone, the index is up roughly some 16%, and averaged more than 20% in gains over the last three years and roughly 14.6% over the past two decades. In most cases, it’s easily beaten investors who try to pick individual stocks like Tesla or Meta.

But as Wall Street frets over a possible AI-driven bubble—with voices from  “Big Short” investor Michael Burry to economist Mohamed El-Erian sounding alarms—Green isn’t waiting around to see what happens. He’s already rethinking how much of his own wealth is tied to Big Tech.

A major reason: The S&P 500 is more concentrated than ever. The top 10 companies—including Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and Meta—make up nearly 40% of the entire index. And nearly all of them are pouring billions into AI.

“I feel like my money is more exposed than I would like it to be,” Green said in a video that’s racked up over 1.6 million views. “I feel like by virtue of having a lot of my money in the S&P 500, I am now kind of betting on a big AI future. And that’s not a future that I definitely think is going to happen.”

So Green is hedging. He’s taking 25% of the money he previously invested in S&P 500 index funds—a meaningful chunk for a self-made millionaire—and moving it into a more diversified set of assets, including:

  • S&P 500 value index funds, which tilt toward companies with lower valuations and less AI-driven hype.
  • Mid-cap stocks, which he believes could benefit if smaller firms catch more of AI’s productivity gains.
  • International index funds, offering exposure outside the U.S. tech-heavy market.

Green’s thesis is simple: even if AI transforms the economy, the biggest winners may ultimately not be the mega-cap companies building the models.

“I think that these giant companies providing the AI models will actually be competing with each other for those customers in part by competing on price,” Green said. “And that might mean that the value delivered to small companies will be bigger than value delivered to the big AI companies. Who knows though? I just think that’s a thing that could happen.”

And if his concerns are overblown? He’s fine with that, too.

“If I’m wrong, 75% of my money is still in the safe place that everybody says your money should be, which is the S&P 500.”

YouTuber’s message to his Gen Z and Gen Alpha viewers: The stock market isn’t a ‘Ponzi scheme’

Gen Z continues to trail other generations in financial know-how—from saving and investing to understanding risk, according to TIAA. Moreover, one in four admit they are not confident in their financial knowledge and skill—a stark admission considering that 1 in 7 Gen Z credit card users have maxed out their credit cards and many young people hold thousands in student loan debt.

As a self-described “middle-aged, 45-year-old successful person,” Green said he’s trying to model what thoughtful, long-term decision-making actually looks like. And part of that effort includes dispelling one big misconception shared among some of his audience:

“I get these comments from people who are like, I can’t believe that you’re participating in this Ponzi scheme,” Green told Fortune. “I do want to alienate those people, because I don’t believe that the stock market is a Ponzi scheme. I do think that it’s overvalued right now, but I think that it’s tied to real value that’s really created in the world.”

His broader point: Investing isn’t about vibes or just dumping money into the hot stock of the week; rather, it’s something to seriously research.

“A lot of people think that investing is like getting a Robinhood account and buying Tesla,” Green added. “And I’m like, ‘Nope, you’ve got to get a Fidelity account and buy a low cost index fund everybody and or just keep it in your 401K and let the people who manage it manage it’—which is what a lot of people do, which is also fine.”

His younger viewers are paying attention. One popular comment summed it up: “As a young person entering the point in my life where I’m starting to think about investing, I really appreciate you talking through your logic and giving a ton of disclaimers rather than telling me I should buy buy buy exactly what you buy buy buy.” The comment has already racked up more than 4,700 likes.

Financial advisors agree: Portfolio diversification is king

While Green doesn’t come from a financial background, experts from the world of investing said they agree largely with his rationale: Having a diversified portfolio is the way to go—especially if you have worries about an AI bubble.

“Unlike many dot-com companies, today’s tech giants generally have substantial revenue, cash reserves, and established business models beyond just AI,” certified financial planner Bo Hanson, host of The Money Guy Show, said in a video analyzing Green’s take.

“Still, the concentration risk remains a valid concern for investors that are seeking diversification. However, this is precisely why we advise against putting all investments solely in the S&P 500, especially if you have a shorter time horizon.”

Hanson added wise investors spread their money across various asset classes, including small-caps, international, and bonds, in order to reduce portfolio volatility and provide

more consistent returns across various market environments.

It’s sentiment echoed by Doug Ornstein, director at TIAA Wealth Management, who said it’s important to realize that not every investment needs to chase growth.

“Particularly as you get older, having guaranteed income streams becomes crucial. Products like annuities can provide reliable payments regardless of market swings, creating a foundation of financial security,” Ornstein told Fortune. “Think of it as building a floor beneath your portfolio—one that market volatility can’t touch.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Warren Buffett: Business titan and cover star

Published

on


Warren Buffett’s face—always smiling, whether he’s slurping  a milkshake, brandishing a lasso, or palling around with fellow multibillionaire Bill Gates—has graced the cover of Fortune more than a dozen times. And it’s no wonder: Buffett has been a towering figure in both business and 

investing for much of his—and Fortune’s—95 years on earth. (The magazine first hit newsstands in February 1930; Buffett was born that August.) As Geoff Colvin writes in this issue, Buffett’s investing genius manifested early, and he bought his first stock at age 11. By Colvin’s calculations, over the 60 years since Buffett took control of his company, Berkshire Hathaway, its returns have outpaced the S&P 500 by more than 100 to one.  

Buffett has always had a special relationship with Fortune, particularly with legendary writer and editor Carol Loomis, who profiled him many times, and to whom he broke the news of his paradigm-shifting moves in philanthropy in 2006 and 2010. The end of an era is upon us, as Buffett on Dec. 31 will step down from his role as Berkshire’s CEO. We’re grateful to have been along for the ride. 

Warren Buffett on the cover of Fortune in 2009 and 2010.

Cover photographs by David Yellen (2009), and Art Streiber (2010)

Warren Buffett on the cover of Fortune in 2003 and 2006.

Cover photographs by Michael O’Neill (2003), and Ben Baker (2006)

Warren Buffett on the cover of Fortune in 2001 and 2002.

Cover photographs by Michael O’Neill

Warren Buffett on the cover of Fortune in 1986 and 1998.

Cover photographs by Alex Kayser (1986) and Michael O’Neill (1998)



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Kimberly-Clark exec says old bosses would compare her to their daughters when she got promoted

Published

on



Women have their own unique set of challenges in the workforce; the “motherhood penalty” can set them back $500,000, their C-suite representation is waning, and the gender pay gap has widened again. One senior executive from $36 billion manufacturing giant Kimberly-Clark knows the tribulations all too well—after all, she’s one of few women in the Fortune 500 who holds the coveted role. 

Tamera Fenske is the chief supply chain officer (CSCO) for Kimberly-Clark, who oversees a massive global team of 22,665 employees—around 58% of the global CPG manufacturer’s workforce. She’s in charge of optimizing the company’s entire supply chain, from sourcing raw materials for Kimberly-Clark products including Kleenex and Huggies, to delivering the final product into customers’ shopping carts. 

It’s a job that’s essential to most top businesses operating at such a massive scale; around 422 of the Fortune 500 have chief supply chain officers, according to a 2025 Spencer Stuart analysis. However, most of these slots are awarded to white men; only about 18% of executives in this position are women, and 12% come from underrepresented racial and ethnic backgrounds. It’s one of the C-suite roles with the least female representation, right next to chief financial officers, chief operating officers, and CEOs. 

In fact, Fenske is one of just 76 Fortune 500 female executives who have “chief supply chain officer” on their resumes. However, the executive tells Fortune it’s an unfortunate fact she “doesn’t think about” too often—if anything, it motivates her further.

“Anytime someone tells me I can’t do something, it makes me want to work that much harder to prove them wrong,” Fenske says. 

The first time Fenske noticed she was one of few women in the room

Fenske has spent her entire life navigating subjects dominated by men—something she didn’t even consider until college. 

Her father, aunts, uncles, and grandfather all worked for Dow Chemical, so she grew up in a STEM-heavy household. Naturally, she leaned into math and science as well, eventually pursuing a bachelor’s in environmental chemical engineering at Michigan Technological University. It was there that her eyes first opened to the reality that she was one of few women in the room. 

“It definitely was going to Michigan Tech, where I first realized the disparity,” Fenske said, adding that there was around an eight-to-one male-to-female ratio. “As you continue through the higher levels and the grades, it becomes even more tighter, especially as you get into your specialized engineering.” 

Once joining the world of work, it wasn’t only Fenske who noticed the lack of women in senior roles—some bosses would even point it out. 

The Fortune 500 boss is paying it forward—for both men and women

After Fenske graduated from Michigan Tech, she got her start at $91 billion manufacturer 3M: a multinational conglomerate producing everything from pads of Post-It notes to rolls of Scotch tape. Fenske was first hired as an environmental engineer in 2000. Promotion after promotion came, but all people could seem to focus on was her gender.

“It would come to light when I moved relatively quickly through the ranks. Some of my bosses would say, ‘You’re the age of my daughter,’ and different things like that. ‘You’re the first woman that’s had this role at this plant or in this division,’” Fenske recalls. Over the course of 2 decades, she rose through the company’s ranks to the SVP of 3M’s U.S. and Canada manufacturing and supply chain. 

And anytime she was asked about her gender? She’d flip the questions back at them while standing her ground. “I would always try to spin it a little bit and ask them questions like, ‘Okay, so what is your daughter doing?’…I always try to seek to understand where they are coming from, but then also reinforce what brought me to where I am.”

Now, three years into her current stint as Kimberly-Clark’s CSCO, the 47-year-old is paying it back—but not just to the women following in her footsteps.

“I never saw myself as necessarily a big, ground-breaker pioneer, even though the statistics would tell you I was,” Fenske says. “I tried to give back to women and men, to be honest. Because I think men [are] one of the strongest advocates for women as well. So I think we have to teach both how to have that equal lens and diverse perspective.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.