Connect with us

Politics

U.S. immigration officials look to expand social media data collection

Published

on


U.S. immigration officials are asking the public and federal agencies to comment on a proposal to collect social media handles from people applying for benefits such as green cards or citizenship, to comply with an executive order from President Donald Trump.

The March 5 notice raised alarms from immigration and free speech advocates because it appears to expand the government’s reach in social media surveillance to people already vetted and in the U.S. legally, such as asylum seekers, green card and citizenship applicants — and not just those applying to enter the country. That said, social media monitoring by immigration officials has been a practice for over a decade, since at least the second Obama administration and ramping up under Trump’s first term.

Below are some questions and answers on what the new proposal means and how it might expand social media surveillance.

The Department of Homeland Security issued a 60-day notice asking for public commentary on its plan to comply with Trump’s executive order titled “Protecting the United States from Foreign Terrorists and Other National Security and Public Safety Threats.” The plan calls for “uniform vetting standards” and screening people for grounds of inadmissibility to the U.S., as well as identify verification and “national security screening.” It seeks to collect social media handles and the names of platforms, although not passwords.

The policy seeks to require people to share their social media handles when applying for U.S. citizenship, green card, asylum and other immigration benefits. The proposal is open to feedback from the public until May 5.

“The basic requirements that are in place right now is that people who are applying for immigrant and non-immigrant visas have to provide their social media handles,” said Rachel Levinson-Waldman, managing director of the Brennan Center’s Liberty and National Security Program at New York University. “Where I could see this impacting is someone who came into the country before visa-related social media handle collection started, so they wouldn’t have provided it before and now they’re being required to. Or maybe they did before, but their social media use has changed.”

“This fairly widely expanded policy to collect them for everyone applying for any kind of immigration benefit, including people who have already been vetted quite extensively,” she added.

What this points to — along with other signals the administration is sending such as detaining people and revoking student visas for participating in campus protests that the government deems antisemitic and sympathetic to the militant Palestinian group Hamas — Levinson-Waldman added, is the increased use of social media to “make these very high-stakes determinations about people.”

In a statement, a spokesperson for the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service said the agency seeks to “strengthen fraud detection, prevent identity theft, and support the enforcement of rigorous screening and vetting measures to the fullest extent possible.”

“These efforts ensure that those seeking immigration benefits to live and work in the United States do not threaten public safety, undermine national security, or promote harmful anti-American ideologies,” the statement continued. USCIS estimates that the proposed policy change will affect about 3.6 million people.

The U.S. government began ramping up the use of social media for immigration vetting in 2014 under then-President Barack Obama, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. In late 2015, the Department of Homeland Security began both “manual and automatic screening of the social media accounts of a limited number of individuals applying to travel to the United States, through various non-public pilot programs,” the nonpartisan law and policy institute explains on its website.

In May 2017, the U.S. Department of State issued an emergency notice to increase the screening of visa applicants. Brennan, along with other civil and human rights groups, opposed the move, arguing that it is “excessively burdensome and vague, is apt to chill speech, is discriminatory against Muslims, and has no security benefit.”

Two years later, the State Department began collecting social media handles from “nearly all foreigners” applying for visas to travel to the U.S. — about 15 million people a year.

Artificial intelligence tools used to comb through potentially millions of social media accounts have evolved over the past decade, although experts caution that such tools have limits and can make mistakes.

Leon Rodriguez, who served as the director of USCIS from 2014 to 2017 and now practices as an immigration attorney, said while AI could be used as a first screening tool, he doesn’t think “we’re anywhere close to where AI will be able to exercise the judgment of a trained fraud detection and national security officer” or that of someone in an intelligence agency.

“It’s also possible that I will miss stuff,” he added. “Because AI is still very much driven by specific search criteria and it’s possible that the search criteria won’t hit actionable content.”

“Social media is just a stew, so much different information — some of it is reliable, some of it isn’t. Some of it can be clearly attributed to somebody, some of it can’t. And it can be very hard to interpret,” Levinson-Waldman said. “So I think as a baseline matter, just using social media to make high-stakes decisions is quite concerning.”

Then there’s the First Amendment.

“It’s by and large established that people in the U.S. have First Amendment rights,” she said. This includes people who are not citizens. “And obviously, there are complicated ways that that plays out. There is also fairly broad authority for the government to do something like revoking somebody’s visa, if you’re not a citizen, then there’s steps that the government can take — but by and large, with very narrow exceptions, that cannot be on the grounds of speech that would be protected (by the First Amendment).”


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Florida thoroughbred industry supporters keep saying ‘business is great,’ but data shows otherwise

Published

on


Thoroughbred horse breeding is in decline in Florida.

That much was already known, but new data shows the problem worsening, and it raises new questions about legislation moving through the Legislature that would decouple live racing at Florida tracks from slot machine and card room operations.

Namely, if horse racing is so prominent to Florida’s economy, why do races need to be tethered to other wagering activities?

Senate Democratic Leader Jason Pizzo laid out the dilemma perfectly during debate on the decoupling measure (SB 408) in a recent committee hearing on the issue. He asked for clarification about claims “that business is going great,” specifically whether the Jockey Club, which has released troubling data for the horse breeding industry in Florida, is a reputable publication.

“Certainly it is,” responded Tod Wojciechowski, Director of Sales for the Ocala Breeders’ Sales Company and an opponent of the bill.

“Mares bred of Florida Stallions have drastically declined 60% over the last decade,” Pizzo noted. “A raw number standing alone at 3,057 in 2014 down to 1,316 in 2024. Florida’s foal crop has decreased 51% over the last decade, and in 2014 the foal crop was at 2,214, and at the end of 2023, only 1,089.’ Is Jockey Club wrong on those numbers?”

“No, those stats are accurate,” Wojciechowski answered.

And the declines are ongoing. From 2022 to 2023, the share of the North American foal crop fell from 6.4% to 6%, and the number of Florida registered foals dropped by 7.3%. The number of Florida-bred stallions dropped from 72 in 2023 to just 60 in 2024, a nearly 17% reduction. That’s after the number of Florida-bred stallions dropped by a staggering 76% from 2004, when 259 were bred in the state.

Auction results for Florida-bred thoroughbreds is also in decline, with 434 weanlings sold in 2004, but just 10 in 2024. And the average price paid for the weanlings dropped nearly 24% over that period.

So too are racing performance and participation trends on the decline, with 10,331 Florida-bred starters in 2004 and just 3,273 in 2024.

Opponents to decoupling legislation, including veterinarians, breeders and trainers, argue it would devastate the breeding and horse racing industry. But given the ongoing decline that is already in place, it might be more accurate to argue that the decoupling would devastate the subsidies that are keeping the industry afloat amid the devastation that has already occurred.

“The statistics in every category is alarming,” said Republican Rep. Adam Anderson, who is sponsoring the House version of the bill (HB 105).

“As I have been discussing throughout committee weeks and Session, there is a staggering decline in our Florida-bred thoroughbred industry. Considering the amount of funds the breeders receive in state and private subsidies, it is clear that something has to change. My bill seeks to do just that and, without question, is needed more now than ever.”

Last year, the Governor signed legislation establishing permanent yearly distributions of $27.5 million “to promote breeding and racing horses.”

“That’s not sustainable,” Pizzo said during a committee hearing on the Senate bill.

Both measures would allow thoroughbred horse racing tracks to maintain licenses for slot machines and card rooms without requiring them to also host live racing.

In response to concerns from the breeding and racing industry, Sen. Danny Burgess, the bill sponsor, offered a strike-all amendment providing concessions to the thoroughbred horse racing industry and affiliated partners, which was adopted. The House also adopted a committee substitute to its bill offering a similar compromise.

It adds language confirming that a track cannot stop racing unless they provide a three-year notice to the thoroughbred industry. It further states that such notice cannot be given until 2027. The revision is meant to ensure the state’s two existing thoroughbred tracks, Tampa Bay Downs and Gulfstream Park, continue racing into the future.

The Senate amendment that was adopted provides an even longer window for thoroughbred racing, with at least seven years before decoupling can happen.

But time is running out for the measure. The Senate bill is still awaiting a hearing in the Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government, which is currently scheduled for Tuesday. The House version is further along, awaiting activity on the House floor. But it’s been waiting since late March.

With time ticking on the 2025 Legislative Session, which is expected to end May 2, there is only one thing that is clear: The thoroughbred industry will continue to push back on decoupling in an industry they describe as vital to Florida’s economy and culture.

They may well win the battle this year. But that win, based on data an industry insider himself has confirmed as accurate, would seem to support a status quo on an industry in decline, while offering few solutions other than continued subsidies.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Hillary Cassel adds $164K in Q1 with help from hemp extract companies, GOP allies

Published

on


Dania Beach Republican Rep. Hillary Cassel stacked a lot of campaign cash before Session, amassing more than $164,000 to defend her House District 101 seat.

Her Democratic challenger, Todd Delmay, was no slouch either. He raised nearly $81,000 through a flood of small donations between Jan. 1 and March 31.

At the close of the first quarter reporting period, Cassel had $183,500 remaining in her campaign account, eponymous political committee and a new one called Balanced Leadership, which took in a sizable share of her gains.

Her biggest single contribution, $25,000, came from a Daytona Beach-based hemp extract company (read: legal weed) called Nectris Labs that sells products as Outpost.

She also took a $5,000 check from POB Ventures, a Florida business that runs a medical cannabis training institute and a chain of hemp-related businesses. Last year, POB Ventures helped fund Gov. Ron DeSantis’ push to defeat a ballot measure that would have legalized recreational pot in the state.

Cassel also added funds from medical companies. That includes $5,000 from for-profit health care company Centene Corp. and the Florida Health Care Executive PAC whose Chair, Andrew Weisman, is the CEO of Fort Lauderdale-based nursing home management company NuVision Management.

Several unions — including the Teamsters, Metro-Broward Firefighters, Broward County Professional Firefighters, Teach Florida PAC and Florida Professional Firefighters gave between $1,000 and $2,000 each.

Other contributions included $5,000 from a political committee associated with the Florida Association of Public Insurance Adjusters, $4,500 from political committees linked to the Florida Association of Insurance Agents and $5,000 from the political donations arm of the Florida Justice Association.

Clay County Rep. Sam Garrison, who is slated to take the House Speaker gavel for the 2026-27 term, gave $12,000 through various political committees he controls. Cassel also banked $2,000 from Bonita Springs Rep. Adam Botana and $1,000 apiece from Reps. Tiffany Esposito, Tracy Koster, Jason Shoaf and John Snyder.

She spent just over $7,000 in Q1, not counting a $25,000 transfer she made between her Friends of Hillary Cassel and Balanced Leadership political committees. The preponderance of that, $7,000, went to Miami Beach consulting firm Polaris Public Affairs for mail media services.

She also paid $600 to Bluestream Consulting in Fort Lauderdale for compliance services. The remainder covered web costs and donation-processing fees.

Delmay, the Executive Director of LGBTQ advocacy group SAVE, launched his campaign in February to unseat Cassel, whom he criticized for switching from Democrat to Republican after she won re-election in November.

So far, he’s run an exclusively grassroots campaign.

More than 1,500 people donated to him in his first seven weeks running, with an average contribution of about $50.

After less than $2,000 worth of spending on compliance consulting and donation-processing fees, he had roughly $79,000 left between his campaign account and political committee, Delmay for Florida, by the beginning of this month.

HD 101 covers parts of Dania Beach, Hallandale Beach and Hollywood. The district leans Democratic, with nearly 42,000 registered Democrats, close to 30,300 Republicans and about 41,000 third- and no-party voters.

So far, only Cassel and Delmay are in the race.

The 2026 Primary is on Aug. 18, followed by the General Election on Nov. 3.

Candidates faced a Thursday deadline to report all campaign finance activity through March 31.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Michelle Salzman to offer taxation amendment on hemp as House irons out policy details on caps

Published

on


Rep. Michelle Salzman may be giving Florida a clearer picture of what hemp legislation could pass out of the Legislature this year.

The Pensacola Republican is leading the effort to craft House legislation and will likely unroll an amendment on Monday to legislation that could impose taxes on THC-infused drinks and other products.

The bill (HB 7029) would tax hemp goods similar to cigarettes and wines.

“I think we’re just going to give it a syntax on the sales so when you buy that, when you purchase a product, it’ll be a 20% markup or whatever instead of collecting the taxes in the forefront,” Salzman said. “We’re considering ways to change the collection model so we don’t have to worry about people circumventing paying the 20% of wholesale, or whatever it is for that particular product.”

An amendment should have details ready before the legislation is presented to the House Budget Committee on Tuesday.

Representatives on April 1 advanced two pieces of legislation out of the House Housing, Agriculture & Tourism Subcommittee with bipartisan support, with neither bill receiving a dissenting vote. Salzman hopes to keep the House unified around legislation and has reached out for input from all 120 members as the bill works its way through The Process.

She held a lengthy meeting with House Commerce Committee staff on a separate policy bill (HB 7027) that would mandate the testing of consumable and hemp products to ensure they meet specific safety standards.

As written now, the legislation would block the sale of the products at any businesses where those under 21 can enter. But before the bill lands in front of the Commerce Committee, Salzman expects to have an amendment that would ensure at least beverages infused with THC from hemp can remain on gas station and convenience store shelves. With the federal government allowing products to exist and a major sector already formed around hemp beverages, she said House legislation likely won’t try to stop the sale of drink products entirely in places where they are available now.

“I just can’t see unwinding that machine, and in the third largest economy In America,” Salzman said. “So we just have to be cognizant of the businesses as well as the will of Floridians, while keeping the safety of the citizens and protecting kids as our number one priority.”

The bill sets out several regulations on packaging, Salzman’s top priority. The bill said hemp consumables cannot be marketed with colorful labeling or cartoon mascots that would attract children’s interest. After consulting with business interests, she does say that the legislation will likely allow logos that cover no more than 20% of packaging, something she called a “huge gift” to the industry.

The Senate has already passed hemp legislation as a single bill (SB 438) that would significantly restrict signage promoting products outside the business premises. The House hasn’t focused as rigidly on that.

“We are not discussing the signage outside. We’re not discussing the signage inside,” Salzman said. “We’re only discussing the packaging and the caps and the distribution.”

But she doesn’t want to see hemp-infused gummies or brownies that children could mistake for treats and consume as such. She knows that remains controversial among retailers and manufacturers of the products, but it’s one area Salzman has been unwilling to budge.

“The moment they take that package out of the store, it is one color period, with a description, with the warnings, with all of the stuff so it doesn’t look exciting,” Salzman said. “No kid is going to go, ‘Oh, that looks like I want to do that today.’ They would have to know what it was, and they would have to intentionally be doing the drug. And that is the whole purpose of the packaging requirements to be that way.

“That’s the hardest pill for a lot of these people to swallow. But every single one of them have said, ‘We’ll make it work.’”

That legislation sets out laboratory standards and restricts the sale of THC products with a total delta-9 THC concentration greater than 0.3%. Salzman continues to examine the practicality of making the goods with manufacturers but remains concerned about how caps translate into products.

“The way that we have it written in the bill currently, it tells them how much additives they can have, and that’s really to prevent somebody from creating 100-milligram brownie that’s only a quarter of an inch thick, and then say that it’s got 50 doses in there,” she said. “So the weight limit as it pertains to THC content is critical, but the way it’s written, there are several manufacturers that are concerned with being able to sell their product with that.”

She offers an example of whether the same caps were applied to a corn chip and whether manufacturers could guarantee that the same balance in each chip meets the statutory limits in THC.

She expects conversations over the coming weeks with House leadership on how to translate the cap discussions into written policy and expects there to be further discussion with the Senate. She ultimately expects any disagreements on hemp to end up in conference, a rarity for policy as opposed to appropriations in the Legislature.

“You can conference on policy just like you conference on budget,” she said. “You just haven’t seen it in 20 years.”

Then there’s concern about where it goes once the Legislature finishes its debate. Last year, Gov. Ron DeSantis vetoed a regulation framework on hemp. But that’s why Salzman wants so much input now and why she pushed for a Committee bill instead of the House-run one of multiple pieces of competing hemp regulation filed this year.

If all concerns about hemp rules are aired in public before the bill passes, and so long as all business concerns outlined in DeSantis’ veto letter are addressed, she expects legislation to become state statutes.

Salzman stressed that if that happens, it will just be a starting point for implementing hemp regulations.

“We hope to get this across the finish line, the Governor signs it, and then next year, we reevaluate what’s next,” she said.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.