A Baltimore Terrapins of the Federal League lawsuit led to MLB’s Antrust exemption
Most of the exemption has eroded over the years
Senators Take Aim at Baseball’s Legal Shield
In what could be filed under the “Washington has nothing better to do” category, two U.S. Senators want to reopen one of sports’ oldest legal debates. Utah Republican Mike Lee and New Jersey Democrat Cory Booker have renewed calls to revoke Major League Baseball’s antitrust exemption. The move targets a legal protection that many critics argue no longer fits the modern sports business. Lee and Booker frame their effort as a matter of restoring fair competition to America’s pastime.
Lee, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy, and Consumer Rights, argues that baseball should operate under the same laws as every other American business. He claims MLB understands competition better than most industries and should therefore embrace it fully. Booker echoed that sentiment, saying baseball has enjoyed a “free pass” for far too long. Both senators suggest the exemption allows MLB to bend or break competition rules without consequence.
How Baseball Got Its Exemption
The roots of baseball’s unique legal status stretch back more than a century. In 1922, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Major League Baseball was not subject to federal antitrust laws. Chief Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes authored the opinion, declaring that baseball was a sport rather than an interstate business. That decision gave MLB a sweeping exemption that no other major professional league fully enjoys today.
The ruling stemmed from a lawsuit involving the Federal League and its Baltimore Terrapins franchise. After the Federal League collapsed in 1915, the Terrapins’ ownership sued the National and American Leagues. They argued the established leagues destroyed their business and failed to compensate them fairly. The case worked its way to the Supreme Court, where MLB prevailed.
Holmes famously wrote that baseball involved “personal effort, not related to production,” and therefore did not constitute interstate commerce. That logic ignored an obvious reality. Teams routinely crossed state lines to play games. Fans paid money. Owners profited. The sport operated as a business then, just as it does now.
A Ruling That Never Aged Well
Even at the time, the decision raised eyebrows. In the modern era, it looks absurd. Baseball generates billions of dollars annually through ticket sales, sponsorships, media rights, and merchandise. The idea that it exists outside interstate commerce no longer holds water. Many legal scholars believe the Supreme Court simply got it wrong.
Over the years, Congress and the courts have chipped away at MLB’s exemption. Labor relations and franchise relocation now face antitrust scrutiny. Still, the core exemption remains intact, setting baseball apart from the NFL, NBA, and NHL. Ironically, the Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961 grants all major leagues a limited antitrust exemption for negotiating national television contracts. That law already places MLB on similar footing with its peers in one of its most lucrative areas.
A Debate That Refuses to Die
Lee and Booker’s effort may gain headlines, but the practical impact remains uncertain. Baseball’s exemption no longer carries the sweeping power many believe it does. Still, the symbolism matters. The debate highlights how outdated legal reasoning continues to shape a modern, multibillion-dollar industry.
Baseball is not just a game. It never was. It is a business, and it always has been. More than a century later, lawmakers continue to wrestle with a ruling that never matched reality. and eventually it got to the Supreme Court and baseball got an antitrust exemption because it was a game not an interstate business even though the Brooklyn, New York Dodgers could play the Cincinnati, Ohio Reds in what was clearly an interstate business. Justice Holmes wrote that “personal effort, not related to production, is not a subject of commerce” and that baseball therefore wasn’t subject to federal regulation. Baseball on all levels is a business. More than a century ago, the Supreme Court got it all wrong.
Nigeria advanced into the knockout phase of the 2025 Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) in style with a comfortable 3-1 win over 10-man Uganda in Fes.
A brace from Raphael Onyedika and Paul Onuachu’s lone strike made the Super Eagles the first team in the tournament to grab the maximum nine points from three games in the group stage.
Nigeria coach Eric Chelle made seven changes to his starting XI that started in their 3-2 defeat of Tunisia on Saturday but how did each player fare on a scale of 1-10 at the Fez Stadium.
Sports Talk’s Player Ratings: Nigeria vs Uganda.
Goalkeeper
Francis Uzoho – 6
Uzoho was not really tested in the entire 90 minutes, however, he could not manage to keep a clean sheet, just like Stanley Nwabali who conceded in the last two matches.
Defenders
Ryan Alebiosu – 7
The Blackburn Rovers right-back gave a good account of himself on his first international appearance for the Super Eagles. His pace was an added advantage for Eric Chelle’s team but he was a bit slack in physicality when the Ugandans charge forward.
Igoh Ogbu – 8
It was Ogbu’s first defensive partnership with Calvin Bassey and he showed no signs of weakness. The defensive partnership made life difficult for Uganda to break through from the start of the game.
Calvin Bassey – 7
He was unlucky to have received a yellow card in the opening minutes of the game but the Fulham centre-back showed professionalism and his experience was key in shutting out Uganda’s no. 9 Uche Ikpeazu who did not manage any shot.
Bruno Onyemaechi – 7
Onyemaechi showed his versatility once again. He played as a left-back on Tuesday, even though he featured in the opposite position in Nigeria’s last two games. His timely supply to Moses Simon made the skilful a real threat on the wing.
Midfielders
Samuel Chukwueze – 8
Chukwueze grew into the game in the second-half and his impact were evident with the two assists for Onyedika’s goals. He also made some pinpoint passes to Osimhen but the Galatasaray star was caught offside on several occasions.
Fisayo Dele-Bashiru – 8
A real pivot in the heart of Nigeria’s midfield and he was able to dictate play whenever they are in possession. He capped his fine midfield display with an assist for Onuachu’s opening goal.
Raphael Onyedika – 10
The Club Brugge midfielder was timely with his movement both in defence and attack. His attacking runs and composure resulted in the two goals scored within five minutes. His recovery and charging also won Nigeria the midfield battle against Uganda.
Truly an undisputed man-of-the-match performance.
Moses Simon – 7
The Paris FC winger provided an alternative for the Super Eagles to infilterate Uganda on the flank. His ability to hold on to the ball and dribbles were crucial in Nigeria’s game management technique after going three goals up.
Forwards
Paul Onuachu – 7
Shaked off a big miss with an instant response that resulted in Nigeria’s opening goal. There was a fine connection between him and Osimhen which gave Nigeria options in the final third.
Victor Osimhen – 9
Although he did not find the back of the net, Osimhen led Nigeria to a comfortable win with his leadership as stand-in captain, in the absence of Wilfred Ndidi.
He was not just hungry for goals, he was hungry to win every ball when the team was out of possession.
Substitute
Chidozie Awaziem – 4
Awaziem replaced Calvin Bassey just before the start of the second-half but he was caught sleeping which led to Uganda’s goal through Rogers Mato.
Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang will miss Gabon’s final group game against Cote d’Ivoire at the 2025 Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) due to a thigh injury.
The Gabon Football Federation confirmed on Tuesday that the 36-year-old striker is suffering from a thigh injury and they reached an agreement with his French Ligue 1 club Marseille for his immediate return for further treatment.
Aubameyang made two appearances in the tournament and he has a goal to his name after converting from the spot in their 3-2 loss to Mozambique.
Wednesday’s match against Cote d’Ivoire is an inconsequential game for Gabon as they currently sit at the bottom of Group F with no points after two matches.
“Following the established medical protocol between Marseille and Gabon medical staff regarding Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang, clinical examinations were conducted daily,” read the statement from the Gabon Football Federation.
“The most recent examination confirmed the discomfort he experienced in his left thigh the day after the Gabon-Mozambique match. Given the disappointing results, which cut short Gabon’s participation, the medical staff, in consultation with his club, agreed to protect the player’s physical well-being by exempting him from the final, inconsequential match.”
Since he made his international debut for the Panthers in 2009, Aubameyang has made 82 appearances for Gabon, scoring 39 goals.
At 36 years, it remains unclear if the 2015 African Footballer of the Year will draw the curtain on his international career anytime soon.
Aubameyang returned to Marseille in August after a successful brief spell in Saudi Arabia with Al-Qadisiyah and his injury comes a worry for Roberto De Zerbi who is still without injured Algeria star Amine Gouiri since October.
This season, Aubameyang has contributred eight goals and nine assists in 19 games for Marseille across all competitions.
They tell us to move on. 2025 is over. Close the book and turn the page. History, however, rarely listens to that advice.
When historians look back decades from now, 2025 will stand out for one uncomfortable reason. Gambling scandals cut across professional and collegiate sports. Major League Baseball, the NCAA, and the NBA all faced serious questions about integrity. The year exposed how deeply betting had embedded itself into sports. It also showed how little resistance existed from those who profit the most.
The games continued. The partnerships continued. The arrests did too.
Major League Baseball Faces a Direct Hit
MLB took one of the hardest blows. Cleveland Guardians pitchers Emmanuel Clase and Luis Ortiz became central figures in a federal investigation that shook the league.
In July, MLB placed both pitchers on paid administrative leave while investigators examined suspicious betting activity. In November, federal authorities arrested both players. Prosecutors allege the two began conspiring with sports bettors as early as 2023. According to the indictments, the pitchers shared advance information about specific pitches they planned to throw during games.
Bettors allegedly used that information to place prop bets totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars. The trial is scheduled for May 4, 2026. The case marked one of the most serious gambling-related scandals MLB has faced in decades.
NBA Scandals Extend Beyond the Court
The NBA did not escape the storm. Miami Heat guard Terry Rozier was placed on indefinite leave after federal authorities launched an investigation into an illegal sports betting operation.
In October, agents arrested Rozier on charges that include conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering. Prosecutors allege he played a role in a betting scheme tied to manipulated outcomes.
That same month delivered another shock. FBI agents arrested Portland Trail Blazers head coach Chauncey Billups in connection with a separate illegal gambling investigation. The NBA placed Billups on indefinite leave as the case proceeds. A sitting head coach facing federal charges sent tremors through the league.
College Basketball Pays the Price
At the collegiate level, the consequences were swift and severe. In November, the NCAA suspended multiple players for gambling violations. Six men’s basketball players received permanent bans from competition.
Unlike professional leagues, college athletes do not have unions or guaranteed contracts. Their careers ended instantly. The message was clear. The rules exist. The penalties remain harsh.
Gambling Grows While Oversight Lags
Despite all of this, the business of sports betting never slowed. Team owners maintained partnerships with gambling companies. Sports cable networks continued promoting betting lines and prop wagers during broadcasts.
The contradiction became impossible to ignore. Gambling was labeled a growing problem. At the same time, it remained a primary revenue stream.
2025 exposed the fault line. Integrity matters, but profits matter more. That is the legacy historians will not forget.