Connect with us

Business

Trump’s H-1B shift is a bold reform that will power U.S. workers and immigrant dreamers alike

Published

on



America just told the world’s governments: stop shipping us your best and brightest. Make your own country great again!

President Trump has thrown a grenade into America’s immigration system — and it’s exactly what the country needed. By slapping a $100,000 filing fee on H=1B visas, the White House has declared the days of cheap labor pipelines and visa abuse officially over.

For decades, the H-1B program has been tech’s favorite loophole, a foreign government’s free subsidy, and one of the most quietly exploited corners of U.S. immigration. Now, it’s facing a hard reset. Critics cry “protectionism.” They’re wrong. This isn’t about shutting doors. It’s about raising the bar. America is saying loud and clear: we want the best, not the cheapest. And the truth is, other nations should stop complaining — and start learning.

From Y2K to AI: A different world

In the 1990s, the H-1B made sense. The Y2K panic, the dotcom boom, the internet’s birth — America desperately needed coders, and India delivered. Win-win. Many rose to lead U.S. tech.

But this is 2025. AI is rewriting the rules. Silicon Valley giants admit: AI will write code within a year. Tech companies are already cutting thousands of jobs. The age of mass coding armies is ending. The future belongs to a smaller pool of elite innovators — not vast back-office battalions. Trump saw it. He acted.

Big tech can pay — and they know it

Let’s be real. The 10 largest U.S. tech giants are worth a mind-blowing $23 trillion (Nvidia, Google, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, Broadcom, Tesla, Oracle, Netflix)— about the size of China and India’s GDP combined. For them, a $100,000 visa fee is pocket change.

They already burn billions on stock buybacks, perks, and lavish campuses. If they want that one-in-a-million AI researcher, they can pay up. Instead of paying taxes, they would happily pay for H-1B fee to the government.

And startups? In Silicon Valley today, $25 million seed rounds are just another Tuesday. If you can raise millions overnight, you can cough up $100K for extraordinary talent.

The ones screaming loudest aren’t the innovators. They’re the body shops and consulting mills that turned H-1B into a glorified staffing agency. Trump just told them: the gravy train is over.

The H-1B legacy: America already benefited

If we look back to 1995, the early waves of Indian H-1B holders were overwhelmingly strong in math, science, engineering, and medicine. Rough estimates suggest that more than one million Indians entered the U.S. on H-1B visas in that era. Many stayed on, became green card holders, and ultimately U.S. citizens.

Fast-forward three decades, and that community has grown roots. Those first-generation H-1Bs have now raised an estimated two million American-born children. And here’s the kicker: those kids are excelling at the very same things their parents were recruited for — math, science, technology, and medicine. They’re graduating from the top U.S. universities, building startups, entering research labs, and staffing hospitals.

In other words, the jobs their parents once filled as immigrants will now be filled by their American-born children. That’s the natural arc of immigration done right. And that’s why the U.S. government is focused on prioritizing employment for American citizens today. The system has already delivered: one generation of H-1Bs seeded a powerhouse second generation of Americans.

The original spirit, restored

The H-1B was never meant to import endless armies of mid-level engineers. It was designed for brilliance. For the extraordinary few. Somewhere along the way, it was hijacked — people turned into export cargo.

Trump’s reset rips it back to its DNA. You want an H-1B? Prove the worker is worth $100K in fees. Prove they’re indispensable. Otherwise? Hire American.

Simple. Fair. Long overdue.

America first doesn’t mean America alone

This isn’t xenophobia. It’s common sense. America invests trillions into its education system. Why should its own graduates be undercut by imported “cheaper alternatives?”

At the same time, Trump isn’t slamming the door on all international talent. Students already in the U.S. — with OPT work permits, SSNs, and driver’s licenses — are still in play. They’ve lived here, learned here, and earned their shot. That’s smart policy: keep the best who have already invested in America, while shutting loopholes that enabled mass outsourcing.

India’s $80 billion dependency

No country feasted on the H-1B quite like India. Its top five IT firms built an $80 billion annual revenue machine by sending workers abroad. Instead of reforming at home, India exported its best and brightest — and cashed the checks.

But exporting human capital isn’t nation-building. It’s dependency. No young graduate wants to leave their family and culture — they leave because opportunity is missing at home.

Trump’s reset is India’s wake-up call: stop banking on America to absorb your youth. Build your own ecosystem. Slash corruption. Kill red tape. Fund R&D. Empower entrepreneurs. Give the next generation a reason to stay.

The lesson for the world

This isn’t just about India. From Africa to Latin America to Southeast Asia, governments have used migration as a pressure valve — letting their best talent leave, send remittances, and keep broken systems intact. That game is finished.

We’re entering an AI-driven world. Nations that don’t nurture their own talent will get left behind. The H-1B reset is a blunt lesson: don’t whine when America closes its doors. Build your own Silicon Valley instead.

A bold, controversial, necessary move

Make no mistake: this policy will sting. Consulting firms will howl. Foreign governments will protest. Even Silicon Valley will grumble. But real leadership isn’t about keeping everyone happy. It’s about making tough calls for the long-term good.

By pricing out abuse, Trump’s policy ensures only the best — the truly irreplaceable — get through. That’s good for American workers. Good for American innovation. And ironically, good for the countries now forced to face reality: you can’t outsource your future forever.

Make your own country great again

This is not just an American reset. It’s a global reset. The White House just told every capital in the developing world: stop blaming Washington. Start building your own greatness.

Governments must invest in universities. Wealthy elites must back entrepreneurs, not offshore accounts. Bureaucrats must get out of the way. Dreamers must be given room to create.

For too long, America carried the burden of global brain drain. That era is over.

The world after the reset

In 20 years, this moment may be seen as a turning point. America chose to protect its workers and demand excellence. Other nations, forced to stand on their own, may finally unleash their own revolutions.

Trump’s $100K H-1B reset isn’t the end of opportunity. It’s the end of dependency. And that may make it one of the most consequential, world-shaping decisions of our time.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

SpaceX to offer insider shares at record-setting valuation

Published

on



SpaceX is preparing to sell insider shares in a transaction that would value Elon Musk’s rocket and satellite maker at a valuation higher than OpenAI’s record-setting $500 billion, people familiar with the matter said.

One of the people briefed on the deal said that the share price under discussion is higher than $400 apiece, which would value SpaceX at between $750 billion and $800 billion, though the details could change. 

The company’s latest tender offer was discussed by its board of directors on Thursday at SpaceX’s Starbase hub in Texas. If confirmed, it would make SpaceX once again the world’s most valuable closely held company, vaulting past the previous record of $500 billion that ChatGPT owner OpenAI set in October. Play Video

Preliminary scenarios included per-share prices that would have pushed SpaceX’s value at roughly $560 billion or higher, the people said. The details of the deal could change before it closes, a third person said. 

A representative for SpaceX didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. 

The latest figure would be a substantial increase from the $212 a share set in July, when the company raised money and sold shares at a valuation of $400 billion.

The Wall Street Journal and Financial Times, citing unnamed people familiar with the matter, earlier reported that a deal would value SpaceX at $800 billion.

News of SpaceX’s valuation sent shares of EchoStar Corp., a satellite TV and wireless company, up as much as 18%. Last month, Echostar had agreed to sell spectrum licenses to SpaceX for $2.6 billion, adding to an earlier agreement to sell about $17 billion in wireless spectrum to Musk’s company.

Subscribe Now: The Business of Space newsletter covers NASA, key industry events and trends.

The world’s most prolific rocket launcher, SpaceX dominates the space industry with its Falcon 9 rocket that launches satellites and people to orbit.

SpaceX is also the industry leader in providing internet services from low-Earth orbit through Starlink, a system of more than 9,000 satellites that is far ahead of competitors including Amazon.com Inc.’s Amazon Leo.

SpaceX executives have repeatedly floated the idea of spinning off SpaceX’s Starlink business into a separate, publicly traded company — a concept President Gwynne Shotwell first suggested in 2020. 

However, Musk cast doubt on the prospect publicly over the years and Chief Financial Officer Bret Johnsen said in 2024 that a Starlink IPO would be something that would take place more likely “in the years to come.”

The Information, citing people familiar with the discussions, separately reported on Friday that SpaceX has told investors and financial institution representatives that it is aiming for an initial public offering for the entire company in the second half of next year.

A so-called tender or secondary offering, through which employees and some early shareholders can sell shares, provides investors in closely held companies such as SpaceX a way to generate liquidity.

SpaceX is working to develop its new Starship vehicle, advertised as the most powerful rocket ever developed to loft huge numbers of Starlink satellites as well as carry cargo and people to moon and, eventually, Mars.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

U.S. consumers are so strained they put more than $1B on BNPL during Black Friday and Cyber Monday

Published

on



Financially strained and cautious customers leaned heavily on buy now, pay later (BNPL) services over the holiday weekend.

Cyber Monday alone generated $1.03 billion (a 4.2% increase YoY) in online BNPL sales with most transactions happening on mobile devices, per Adobe Analytics. Overall, consumers spent $14.25 billion online on Cyber Monday. To put that into perspective, BNPL made up for more than 7.2% of total online sales on that day.

As for Black Friday, eMarketer reported $747.5 million in online sales using BNPL services with platforms like PayPal finding a 23% uptick in BNPL transactions.

Likewise, digital financial services company Zip reported 1.6 million transactions throughout 280,000 of its locations over the Black Friday and Cyber Monday weekend. Millennials (51%) accounted for a chunk of the sizable BNPL purchases, followed by Gen Z, Gen X, and baby boomers, per Zip.

The Adobe data showed that people using BNPL were most likely to spend on categories such as electronics, apparel, toys, and furniture, which is consistent with previous years. This trend also tracks with Zip’s findings that shoppers were primarily investing in tech, electronics, and fashion when using its services.

And while some may be surprised that shoppers are taking on more debt via BNPL (in this economy?!), analysts had already projected a strong shopping weekend. A Deloitte survey forecast that consumers would spend about $650 million over the Black Friday–Cyber Monday stretch—a 15% jump from 2023.

“US retailers leaned heavily on discounts this holiday season to drive online demand,” Vivek Pandya, lead analyst at Adobe Digital Insights, said in a statement. “Competitive and persistent deals throughout Cyber Week pushed consumers to shop earlier, creating an environment where Black Friday now challenges the dominance of Cyber Monday.”

This report was originally published by Retail Brew.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

AI labs like Meta, Deepseek, and Xai earned worst grades possible on an existential safety index

Published

on



A recent report card from an AI safety watchdog isn’t one that tech companies will want to stick on the fridge.

The Future of Life Institute’s latest AI safety index found that major AI labs fell short on most measures of AI responsibility, with few letter grades rising above a C. The org graded eight companies across categories like safety frameworks, risk assessment, and current harms.

Perhaps most glaring was the “existential safety” line, where companies scored Ds and Fs across the board. While many of these companies are explicitly chasing superintelligence, they lack a plan for safely managing it, according to Max Tegmark, MIT professor and president of the Future of Life Institute.

“Reviewers found this kind of jarring,” Tegmark told us.

The reviewers in question were a panel of AI academics and governance experts who examined publicly available material as well as survey responses submitted by five of the eight companies.

Anthropic, OpenAI, and GoogleDeepMind took the top three spots with an overall grade of C+ or C. Then came, in order, Elon Musk’s Xai, Z.ai, Meta, DeepSeek, and Alibaba, all of which got Ds or a D-.

Tegmark blames a lack of regulation that has meant the cutthroat competition of the AI race trumps safety precautions. California recently passed the first law that requires frontier AI companies to disclose safety information around catastrophic risks, and New York is currently within spitting distance as well. Hopes for federal legislation are dim, however.

“Companies have an incentive, even if they have the best intentions, to always rush out new products before the competitor does, as opposed to necessarily putting in a lot of time to make it safe,” Tegmark said.

In lieu of government-mandated standards, Tegmark said the industry has begun to take the group’s regularly released safety indexes more seriously; four of the five American companies now respond to its survey (Meta is the only holdout.) And companies have made some improvements over time, Tegmark said, mentioning Google’s transparency around its whistleblower policy as an example.

But real-life harms reported around issues like teen suicides that chatbots allegedly encouraged, inappropriate interactions with minors, and major cyberattacks have also raised the stakes of the discussion, he said.

“[They] have really made a lot of people realize that this isn’t the future we’re talking about—it’s now,” Tegmark said.

The Future of Life Institute recently enlisted public figures as diverse as Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, former Trump aide Steve Bannon, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, and rapper Will.i.am to sign a statement opposing work that could lead to superintelligence.

Tegmark said he would like to see something like “an FDA for AI where companies first have to convince experts that their models are safe before they can sell them.

“The AI industry is quite unique in that it’s the only industry in the US making powerful technology that’s less regulated than sandwiches—basically not regulated at all,” Tegmark said. “If someone says, ‘I want to open a new sandwich shop near Times Square,’ before you can sell the first sandwich, you need a health inspector to check your kitchen and make sure it’s not full of rats…If you instead say, ‘Oh no, I’m not going to sell any sandwiches. I’m just going to release superintelligence.’ OK! No need for any inspectors, no need to get any approvals for anything.”

“So the solution to this is very obvious,” Tegmark added. “You just stop this corporate welfare of giving AI companies exemptions that no other companies get.”

This report was originally published by Tech Brew.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.