Connect with us

Business

Trump warns he’ll be impeached if Republicans lose midterms

Published

on



President Donald Trump implored Republicans to turn around their political fortunes ahead of November’s midterm elections, warning that if Democrats retake control of Congress, he would be impeached for a third time.

“You got to win the midterms,” Trump said Tuesday at a retreat for the party’s House caucus in Washington. “They’ll find a reason to impeach me. I’ll get impeached.”

Trump offered a familiar blueprint for majority parties, which historically have lost seats in off-year elections: blaming their troubles on messaging problems and insisting that voters just aren’t seeing their achievements.

Trump predicted the GOP would pull off an “epic” victory and defy those trends. Yet polls showing Americans’ dissatisfaction with his leadership and the state of the economy bode poorly for Republicans’ chances of keeping control of Congress.

Trump at times expressed exasperation with voters who have given him low marks on his stewardship of the country.

“I wish you could explain to me what the hell’s going on with the mind of the public, because we have the right policy,” he said.

Trump touted his migrant crackdown, sweeping tariffs, efforts to lower drug costs and his landmark tax-and-spending bill. He also offered pointed advice to his party’s lawmakers over their message, urging them to aggressively tout his policy priorities and overhaul the nation’s health insurance system.

“You have so much ammunition, all you have to do is sell it,” Trump said. “You want to turn this thing? You work on favored nations, you work on borders, you work on all of the things that we talked about, but now you take the health care issue away from them.” 

As for his tax law, Trump said “there are so many goodies” that “you have to get the word out.”

Pivotal Year

Trump’s pep talk comes at the start of a pivotal year for the president, with elections that will determine control of both the House and Senate.

Trump’s first year back in office saw him flex his executive powers, circumventing Congress to achieve a number of his policy goals. 

Where Trump has sought to enlist lawmakers, he has faced little resistance from Republicans. Still, a loss of either chamber would dramatically undercut the president’s ability to further his agenda in the second half of his term. Major legislation already faces a tougher path this year thanks to GOP divisions and their slim majority.

It would also open him up to fresh investigations from a Democrat-run Congress. During his first term, Trump was impeached twice: once over his pressure campaign on Ukraine to probe Democratic rival Joe Biden and then again for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the US Capitol.

Despite Trump’s exhortations to lawmakers, surveys indicate the president himself is among his party’s biggest albatrosses. Approval of his job performance stood at 36% in a year-end Gallup poll. The overall figure was just barely above his personal low of 34% in January 2021. The high cost of living, an issue Trump ran on in 2024, remains at the top of voters’ minds.

Republicans in Congress start the year facing immediate challenges, including averting a shutdown after Jan. 30 when funds for much of the federal government run out. They’re also grappling with questions about Trump’s capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro in a brazen military raid over the weekend, as well as a looming vote on Obamacare subsidies only days before open enrollment is set to close. 

Health-Care Fight

Trump highlighted the fight over health coverage, reiterating his opposition to extending those subsidies and insisting to his party’s lawmakers that his stance would be embraced by voters.

“I came out with a statement, let the money go not to the big fat cats in the insurance companies,” Trump said. “Let the money go directly to the people where they can buy their own health care.”

House Democrats are planning to force a vote on reviving expired subsidies under the health-care law. Trump’s proposal to deliver that money directly to consumers to make their own health coverage choices has raised questions about how such an arrangement would work and whether it would deliver better outcomes. 

Some GOP lawmakers have questioned whether the party is taking advantage of their hold on both chambers to move aggressively enough to pass their legislative priorities. Others fret that the party has not done enough to promote their wins, such as the landmark tax-and-spending package passed last summer.

GOP Challenges

Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill extended tax cuts passed during his first term along with other new measures the president had promised on the 2024 campaign trail, including exempting taxes on tips and overtime pay. The White House has said Americans will see its benefits in the coming year, and urged voters to give the administration more time to demonstrate that its economic policies are working.

Republicans have struggled to get that message to break through with voters. Democrats pulled off a series of significant victories in off-year 2024 elections in which worries about affordability were front and center, with voters expressing anxiety over high costs for groceries and housing and the pace of wage growth.

Democrats have pointed the finger at Trump’s sweeping tariff agenda, the end of expanded health-care subsidies and growing energy demands from the artificial intelligence sector the president has sought to boost as contributing to the rise in consumer costs. Inflation, has eased from a four-decade high seen in 2022, but prices overall continued to climb last year.

Intraparty tensions among Republicans have been evident, with a number of prominent lawmakers announcing plans to retire. That includes Representatives Elise Stefanik of New York and Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, whose final day in office was Monday. While Stefanik has been a staunch Trump loyalist, Greene is a onetime ally who transformed into one of his sharpest GOP critics, splitting with the president over the administration’s handling of files pertaining to the late, disgraced sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his focus on foreign policy.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Employees can’t coast after graduation anymore thanks to the rise of AI, says VC CEO

Published

on



Top consulting and venture capital leaders say the idea learning ends after college is outdated in today’s AI-driven economy.

While many assume formal learning is limited to a bachelor’s or master’s degree, both the CEO of VC firm General Catalyst, Hemant Taneja, and McKinsey’s top executive, Bob Sternfels, say that’s not the case anymore.

Employees must skill and re-skill constantly to stay afloat, said Taneja, whose VC firm has invested in companies such as Anduril and Anthropic. Taneja discussed this during  a live taping of the All-In podcast, hosted by entrepreneur and investor Jason Calacanis Tuesday at CES 2026, a massive annual tech trade show in Las Vegas.

“This idea that we spend 22 years learning and then 40 years working is broken,” Taneja said.

Yet, in a workplace where AI agents can be trained quicker than employees, workers don’t only need knowledge, they must find ways to stay relevant, said host Calacanis, who himself made early investments in trading app Robinhood and Uber.

“You’re going to have to show chutzpah, drive, passion,” he said.

McKinsey’s global managing partner, Sternfels, said he’s seen first-hand how AI is transforming the workplace. McKinsey has used the tech to grow client-facing consultant roles by 25%, simultaneously cut the same number of jobs in non-client-facing roles, all the while increasing its output 10% overall.

McKinsey will have just as many AI agents as it has human employees by the end of the year, Sternfels said. Currently, its human employees outnumber AI agents 40,000 to 25,000.

“Our model has always been synonymous that growth only occurs with total head count growth. Now it’s actually splitting,” Sternfels said. “We can grow in this part, the client-facing side, and we can shrink in this part and have aggregate growth in total.” 

AI job anxiety

McKinsey’s stark results from incorporating AI agents play to the heart of workers’ fear about how AI will disrupt their jobs as adoption increases. Some could argue young workers have a right to worry. 

A study by the Stanford University Digital Economy Lab in November found early career workers between the ages of 22 to 25 in occupations at most risk of disruption have experienced a 13% relative decline in employment levels since 2022, when OpenAI released ChatGPT. Another study by Gallup from last year found 37% of workers claimed their workplace had implemented AI.

As Sternfels and Taneja said, the added pressure of AI means learning and evolving is more essential than ever. Yet, some have pushed back on the idea that more AI means entry-level workers don’t matter.

Despite the increased push by Amazon CEO Andy Jassy to implement AI at the company, Matt Garman, the CEO of subsidiary Amazon Web Services, has repeatedly said entry-level workers are essential to a healthy organization. Without entry-level workers, “you have no talent pipeline,” Garman told Wired.

Thus, replacing entry-level workers with AI is “one of the dumbest things I’ve ever heard,” Garman said on the Matthew Berman podcast last year.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

OpenAI launches ChatGPT Health in a push to become a hub for personal health data

Published

on



Millions of people already use ChatGPT to ask questions about their health. In fact, OpenAI has previously said it is one of the most common use cases for its popular chatbot. Some upload blood test results, medical scans, and other deeply personal data.

Now OpenAI is leaning into this trend as it seeks to build out more products to keep users engaged and establish itself as the new digital interface that will mediate interactions between different industry sectors—from e-commerce to finance to, yes, wellness and healthcare—and their customers.

Today OpenAI announced the debut of ChatGPT Health — a dedicated experience inside ChatGPT where it says users can securely connect medical records and wellness apps such as Apple Health, Function, and MyFitnessPal to further personalize conversations. OpenAI said it would not train its models on personal medical data.

During a press preview, Fidji Simo, OpenAI’s CEO of applications, introduced ChatGPT Health by sharing a personal story about how ChatGPT helped her after she was hospitalized for a kidney stone last year and developed an infection. A resident had prescribed a standard antibiotic, but she checked it against her medical history in ChatGPT, which flagged that the medication could reactivate a serious life-threatening infection she had suffered years before.

“The resident was relieved I spoke up, she told me she only has a few minutes per patient during rounds, and that health records aren’t organized in a way that makes it easy to see,” she said. “I’ve heard many stories like this from people who are using AI to help connect the dots in their healthcare system that really wasn’t built to see the full picture.”

Five months ago, OpenAI signalled its push into healthcare with two high-profile hires: Nate Gross, the cofounder and former chief strategy officer of Doximity, a leading digital platform for medical professionals, leads OpenAI’s healthcare strategy. Ashley Alexander, former co-head of product at Instagram, leads healthcare product. But Karan Singhal, who leads health AI at OpenAI, said during the press preview that the company had been laying the groundwork for ChatGPT Health for about two years.

According to an OpenAI blog post, the company analyzed deidentified ChatGPT conversations and found that more than 230 million people globally ask health- and wellness-related questions on ChatGPT every week. Even with that massive user base, however, that doesn’t mean the company has an easy road ahead: They are joining a fast-moving race among Big Tech and startups to become the AI front door for consumer healthcare. 

For example, for ChatGPT Health OpenAI has partnered with b.well, a health management platform which combines patients’ health records, financial information, and wearable and other healthcare data. But Google also announced a partnership with b.well in October 2025 – potentially setting the stage for future AI-driven consumer health tools, though the internet giant has not yet announced a health-specific feature set for its AI chatbot product Gemini. 

ChatGPT Health will not be widely available immediately. There is a waitlist for access to a small group of early users, but the company said it will make Health available to all users on web and iOS in the coming weeks. Electronic Health Records (EHR) integrations and some apps are available in the U.S. only. 

OpenAI does not describe ChatGPT Health as HIPAA compliant (consumer health apps are not covered by HIPAA) but says it adds layered protections for sensitive health data and excludes health conversations from model training by default. It also says users can enable multi-factor authentication (MFA) to add an extra layer of protection to help prevent unauthorized access, and that access to medical records can be removed at any time in the “Apps” section of Settings.”

ChatGPT Health also fits a broader pattern at OpenAI: building vertical-specific experiences on top of its core models, rather than relying solely on general-purpose chat. In education, the company launched Study Mode, a ChatGPT spinoff for students, in July to compete with Google’s Gemini for Education. It has also rolled out agentic shopping and shopping research features. There are also reports that a finance-specific experience is also in the works.

OpenAI also clarified that ChatGPT Health was not part of the company’s eight-week long “code red,” announced in early December by Sam Altman in an internal memo. “[ChatGPT Health is] actually sitting outside of Code Red,” said Simo. “We have been working on health for a very long time…we know this is a core use case of ChatGPT, we’ve known that we wanted to make that use case even better and serve even more of people’s needs with the changes that we’ve made.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Jensen Huang might be fine with a billionaires tax, but Google cofounder Larry Page is already dumping California

Published

on



Google cofounder Larry Page appears ready to bid farewell to the state where he established his tech giant and much of his wealth.

Page is converting several of his assets out of California, according to filings reviewed by Fortune, cutting ties with the state following the proposal of a wealth tax that would impact California’s roughly 200 billionaires. While some billionaires have started fleeing the Golden State, others appear unbothered, like Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, who says he doesn’t care about the tax.

Koop, Page’s family office, was converted out of California and incorporated in Delaware on Dec. 23, filings in the respective states show. Flu Lab LLC, a health care testing services company linked with Page, as well as One Aero, reportedly Page’s shell company that has funded his ventures to develop a flying car, were likewise moved from California to Delaware. Ocean science nonprofit Oceankind, founded by Page’s wife Lucy Southworth in 2018, was also incorporated in Delaware last month, having previously been in California.

These assets were converted out of California ahead of a de facto end-of-year deadline. If the ballot initiative wins approval after the November election, it will retroactively apply to California residents as of Jan. 1, 2026.

The proposed tax calls for California residents with more than a $1 billion net worth to pay a one-time tax equivalent to 5% of their assets. The tax can be paid over five years, and 90% of the payments would be allocated to health care spending. 

By that math, Page, who is worth about $270 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaire Index, would owe the state roughly $13 billion in taxes, should the proposal pass.

Though the fate of the proposal won’t be decided by voters for months, Page is seemingly not taking any chances. The Google co-founder has reportedly already left the state, an anonymous source told Business Insider, which also first reported Page converting his businesses out of California. The New York Times reported last month that Page, as well as billionaire venture capitalist Peter Thiel, were considering leaving California by the end of 2025.

Fortune could not reach Page for comment.

Billionaires’ great escape from California

Many tech leaders have made their opinions about California’s proposed wealth tax clear, arguing the initiative would exacerbate the trend of the ultra-wealthy leaving the state for destinations with fewer taxes and regulations, ultimately leaving California with fewer resources. Garry Tan, CEO of tech startup accelerator Y Combinator, warned additional levies would scare off the state’s billionaires, driving capital out of California—and eventually threaten innovation and support for health care services the tax is meant to support.

Indeed, California’s high levies, including corporate, sales and use, and franchise taxes, as well as a stricter regulatory environment, is the oft-considered reason why once-residents of Silicon Valley have shifted their business operations to other states. Elon Musk’s 2020 move from California to the income-tax free Texas—now the headquarters of Tesla, SpaceX, X, and the Boring Company—may have saved him an estimated $18 billion in capital gains taxes. Oracle, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and Charles Schwab are among other major companies that have relocated from California to the Lone Star State. Delaware, where Page has incorporated several entities, does not require limited liability companies (LLC) owners to publicly disclose their names.

But not every billionaire is in such strong opposition to the proposal. Nvidia CEO Huang, the world’s ninth richest man worth $155 billion, appears to be unbothered by it.

“I haven’t thought about it even once,” Huang told Bloomberg Television in an interview on Tuesday. “We chose to live in Silicon Valley, and whatever taxes I guess they would like to apply, so be it. I’m perfectly fine with it.”

In fact, Nvidia is likely increasing its Silicon Valley footprint, having reportedly finalized its first office lease in San Francisco in November 2025, defying concerns of widespread divestment or talent loss in California.

“We work in Silicon Valley because that’s where the talent pool is, and we have offices all over the world, wherever there’s talent,” Huang said.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.