Connect with us

Business

Trump task force will probe $8.7 billion in funding for Harvard after Columbia bowed to federal demands

Published

on



Harvard University has become the latest target in the Trump administration’s approach to fight campus antisemitism, with the announcement of a new “comprehensive review” that could jeopardize billions of dollars for the Ivy League college.

A federal antisemitism task force is reviewing more than $255 million in contracts between Harvard and the federal government to make sure the school is following civil rights laws, the administration announced Monday. The government also will examine $8.7 billion in grant commitments to Harvard and its affiliates.

The same task force cut $400 million from Columbia University and threatened to slash billions more if it refused a list of demands from President Donald Trump’s administration. Columbia agreed to many of the changes this month, drawing praise from some Jewish groups and condemnation from free speech groups, who see it as a stunning intrusion by the federal government.

Dozens of other universities have been put on notice by the Trump administration that they could face similar treatment over allegations of antisemitism. The federal government is a major provider of revenue for American universities through grants for scientific research.

Education Secretary Linda McMahon said Harvard symbolizes the American Dream, but has jeopardized its reputation by “promoting divisive ideologies over free inquiry” and failing to protect students from antisemitism.

“Harvard can right these wrongs and restore itself to a campus dedicated to academic excellence and truth-seeking, where all students feel safe on its campus,” McMahon said in a statement.

Harvard did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment. The elite university is among more than 100 colleges and school systems facing investigations for antisemitism or Islamophobia following Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack against Israel. The Trump administration has promised tougher action than its predecessor, naming antisemitism as the top priority for civil rights investigations.

Monday’s announcement didn’t say whether the government had made any specific demands of Harvard. The Education Department, the Health and Human Services Department and the U.S. General Services Administration are leading the review of its contracts and grants.

Those agencies will determine whether orders to halt work should be issued for certain contracts between Harvard and the federal government, the government said. The task force is also ordering Harvard to submit a list of all contracts with the federal government, both directly with the school or through any of its affiliates.

“The Task Force will continue its efforts to root out anti-Semitism and to refocus our institutions of higher learning on the core values that undergird a liberal education,” said Sean Keveney, acting general counsel for Health and Human Services. “We are pleased that Harvard is willing to engage with us on these goals.”

Some of the nation’s most prestigious colleges have faced extraordinary scrutiny from Republicans in Congress following a wave of pro-Palestinian protests that started at Columbia and spread across the country last year. Presidents of several Ivy League schools were called before Congress over allegations that they allowed antisemitism to fester.

The hearings on Capitol Hill contributed to the resignation of presidents at HarvardColumbia and Penn. The interim president who took over at Columbia, Katrina Armstrong, resigned last week after the school agreed to the government’s demands.

Trump and other officials have accused the protesters of being “pro-Hamas.” Student activists say they oppose Israel’s military activity in Gaza.

Instead of going through a lengthy process that allows the Education Department to cut funding from schools that violate civil rights laws, the Trump administration has found quick leverage by pulling contracts and grants. The tactic is being challenged in a federal lawsuit brought by the American Association of University Professors and the American Federation of Teachers.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Walmart CEO says paying its star managers upwards of $620,000 yearly empowers them to ‘feel like owners’

Published

on



  • Walmart CEO John Furner said raising top manager compensation to upwards of $620,000 yearly made them “feel like owners.” The pay hike hoped to combat supervisor attrition and disengagement—a strategy paying off for other like-minded bosses who are putting their money where their mouth is. 

For many employees, it can be hard to feel connected to their company, especially at huge corporations like Walmart. But in 2024, U.S. CEO John Furner pulled out the big guns to ensure star managers feel the love—by paying them upwards of $620,000 per year. 

“What we did last year was make managers feel like owners,” Furner said recently at a retail and consumer conference. “This includes shareholding, which has positively impacted their approach to the company’s profits and losses.”

In a bold move to boost morale and retention after fighting turnover and manager shortages during the pandemic, the $689 billion retail giant gave its top-performing regional store managers a serious payday in January—raising their total compensation to between $420,000 and $620,000. 

Their average base pay was hiked from $130,000 to $160,000, with the rest of the roughly half-a-million dollar salary made up of hefty stock grants and annual bonuses.

“This is the latest wage investment in our people,” Walmart spokesperson Anne Hatfield told Fortune. “This has been a years’ long journey with increases in hourly pay that started in 2015.”

With more than 4,000 store managers across the U.S. (and around 1.6 million workers), the payout isn’t just generous—it’s a calculated bet on culture.

And that bet is working. In 2024, Walmart claimed the top spot on the Fortune 500—and landed on Fortune’s Best Companies to Work For list not just last year, but again in 2025. With a 1.6 million-strong workforce, it’s not easy to keep everyone happy, but Walmart went straight to the source: cold, hard cash

Pay raises are essential for employee satisfaction and retention

Bosses may sling around promises of “unlimited PTO” and swanky office amenities, but it’s more money that most workers really want.

About 73% of workers would consider leaving their employer for a higher paycheck, according to a 2024 report from BambooHR. Money talks, yet 40% of employees haven’t received a pay bump in the last year. 

Salary deflation and a slowdown of pay raises have been driving staffers up the wall. As grocery prices continue to soar and the cost-of-living crisis persists, many would be swayed by more money now than ever.

“The cost of getting compensation wrong is easily realized in multiples later,” said Kelsey Tarp, director of HR business partners at BambooHR. 

“When employers need to go to market for talent, they might find the salary ranges to be inadequate to attract the talent that is needed; there is wage compression to address—all of which will be more costly in the long run.”

The employers paying up to boost company culture 

Some employers have already caught on. When Cameo wanted workers back in their Chicago headquarters, the company offered up $10,000 bonuses for going into the office four days a week, rather than shoving a mandate in their face. 

After Rolls-Royce pulled an extraordinary business turnaround in recent years, it handed out nearly $39 million in shares to employees. It wanted to pay its successes forward, by rewarding the people that made it happen. Each staffer got 150 company shares each, worth a little over $900 in total. 

“We want to recognize your contribution to our future success and reward you for the role you will play in it,” CEO Erginbilgiç said in an internal memo to employees.

Even when companies are hitting the wall, they turn to pay hikes as a Hail Mary to try and turn things around. When thousands of Volkswagen employees in Germany were striking over pay cuts and factory closures, the car manufacturer offered its Tennessee plant workers a 14% pay raise over four years. 

After Exxon employees faced a tough era of salary freezes, 401(k) match suspension, and intense layoffs, the oil giant changed its tune. On average workers received a pay hike of 9%, above inflationary levels—with some top performers who got promoted seeing raises between 15% and 25%. 

“Our company performance reflects the hard work, commitment and perseverance of our employees,” Exxon spokeswoman Amy Von Walter said. “We take great pride in the exceptional business results our teams delivered despite it being a time of uncertainty and significant change.”

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Ask a CEO coach: My ‘wins’ never seem to last but I feel ‘losses’ forever. What am I doing wrong?

Published

on

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

The new leadership imperative: Championing uniquely human skills in the AI era

Published

on

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.