Connect with us

Business

Top investment bank CEO says he was ‘defrauded’ by the bankruptcy that’s rattling Wall Street. Famous shortseller sees an Enron moment

Published

on



A leading Wall Street investment bank’s top executive claims to have been “defrauded” in the bankruptcy saga surrounding First Brands Group, a collapse that now threatens a chain reaction across global credit markets. At the same time, legendary shortseller Jim Chanos, famed for his role exposing Enron’s scandal, has drawn ominous parallels between this moment and that one, warning this may be another watershed moment for Wall Street.

Jefferies CEO Rich Handler told investors on Thursday that the bank believes it was “defrauded” after being grilled over its exposure to First Brands Group’s bankruptcy, the bank disclosed in an SEC filing. Handler’s comments followed an investor letter released by Jefferies on Sunday, revealing the bank’s stake in First Brands debt — originally thought to be as high as $715 million — is closer to $45 million, a figure they claim is absorbable and not threatening to Jefferies’ overall financial health. Nonetheless, the bank’s share price has plunged over 20% since the bankruptcy unfolded last month.

Handler, who said he did not see the First Brands bankruptcy as a “canary in the coal mine,” talked about First Brands and the wider business climate. “I’ll just say this is us personally, we believe we were defrauded, okay, from a company. I personally talk to a lot of investors, a lot of CEOs, a lot of operating businesses. I think the environment is generally pretty darn good.” Handler added he thinks “there’s a fight going on right now between the banks and direct lenders who each want to point fingers at each other and say, ‘It’s your fault, no, it’s your fault.’ The fact of the matter is, the economy is generally good.” He added “it doesn’t feel like we’re on the edge of a default cycle, quite frankly, to me, and I’ve been on the edge of default cycles before” and it doesn’t look to him like the climate in 2007, “when the world’s about to come to an end.” The canary in the coal mine, he added, is usually the entire financial sector, and he just doesn’t see that.

Handler’s statement comes amid growing public scrutiny. First Brands, a sprawling auto-parts conglomerate, collapsed with over $2 billion reportedly missing from its accounts and more than $10 billion owed to creditors, including some of Wall Street’s biggest firms.

In their letter, Handler and Jefferies President Brian Friedman strongly denied earning undisclosed fees and emphasized the bank was never aware of fraudulent activity at First Brands, stating, “We learned of the fraud allegations when the rest of the public learned.” Regarding the blow to the company’s financial position, they said they believe the “impact on our equity market value and credit perception … is meaningfully overdone, and we expect this to correct soon as the facts and range of outcomes are better understood.”

Regarding its previous relationship with First Brands, Jefferies said over the last 10 years, it only served as a financial advisor once (for an acquisition), and, while it underwrote a $300 million loan in 2023, other financings it arranged in the past decade were on a best-efforts, not underwritten, basis. “We are aware of nine other banks being involved in acquisitions or loan arrangements for First Brands.”

Fallout Spreads Across Wall Street

The bankruptcy’s shockwaves have unsettled broader financial markets, with other major lenders like JPMorgan reporting a $170 million charge-off tied to dealership company Tricolor in the quarter; it had no exposure to First Brands. “My antenna goes up when things like that happen,” JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon said of the First Brands bankruptcy. “And I probably shouldn’t say this, but when you see one cockroach, there are probably more. And so we should—everyone should be forewarned on this one.”

Multiple investigations into First Brands are underway, including a reported Justice Department probe into the mechanics of First Brands’ off-balance-sheet financing arrangements.​ First Brands’ CEO and founder, Patrick James, stepped down in the wake of the scandal, replaced on an interim basis by restructuring expert Charles Moore, whose priority is to stabilize operations and pursue asset sales to salvage residual value for creditors.

Parallels to the infamous Enron collapse have not gone unnoticed. Jim Chanos, the short seller who gained international recognition for helping exponse Enron’s fraud in the early 2000s, is sounding the alarm over First Brands. In speaking with the Financial Times, Chanos flagged First Brands’ aggressive use of off-balance-sheet financing — a hallmark of Enron’s demise — and warned about the dangerous role of private credit, with more shoes set to drop in this matter.​ “I suspect we’re going to see more of these things, like First Brands and others, when the cycle ultimately reverses,” he said, “particularly as private credit has put another layer between the actual lenders and the borrowers.”​

Enron’s flawed accounting was also partially exposed by Fortune itself, with Bethany McLean posing a simple question in March 2001: “Is Enron overpriced?”

For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

49-year-old Democrat who owns a gourmet olive oil store swipes another historically Republican district from Trump and Republicans

Published

on



Democrat Eric Gisler claimed an upset victory Tuesday in a special election in a historically Republican Georgia state House district.

Gisler said he was the winner of the contest, in which he was leading Republican Mack “Dutch” Guest by about 200 votes out of more than 11,000 in final unofficial returns.

Robert Sinners, a spokesperson with the secretary of state’s office, said there could be a few provisional ballots left before the tally is finalized.

“I think we had the right message for the time,” Gisler told The Associated Press in a phone interview. He credited his win to Democratic enthusiasm but also said some Republicans were looking for a change.

“A lot of what I would call traditional conservatives held their nose and voted Republican last year on the promise of low prices and whatever else they were selling,” Gisler said. “But they hadn’t received that.”

Guest did not immediately respond to a text message seeking comment late Tuesday.

Democrats have seen a number of electoral successes in 2025 as the party’s voters have been eager to express dissatisfaction with Republican President Donald Trump.

In Georgia in November, they romped to two blowouts in statewide special elections for the Public Service Commission, unseating two incumbent Republicans in campaigns driven by discontent over rising electricity costs.

Nationwide, Democrats won governor’s races by broad margins in Virginia and New Jersey. On Tuesday a Democrat defeated a Trump-endorsed Republican in the officially nonpartisan race for Miami mayor, becoming the first from his party to win the post in nearly 30 years.

Democrats have also performed strongly in some races they lost, such as a Tennessee U.S. House race last week and a Georgia state Senate race in September.

Republicans remain firmly in control of the Georgia House, but their majority is likely fall to 99-81 when lawmakers return in January. Also Tuesday, voters in a second, heavily Republican district in Atlanta’s northwest suburbs sent Republican Bill Fincher and Democrat Scott Sanders to a Jan. 6 runoff to fill a vacancy created when Rep. Mandi Ballinger died.

The GOP majority is down from 119 Republicans in 2015. It would be the first time the GOP holds fewer than 100 seats in the lower chamber since 2005, when they won control for the first time since Reconstruction.

The race between Gisler and Guest in House District 121 in the Athens area northeast of Atlanta was held to replace Republican Marcus Wiedower, who was in the seat since 2018 but resigned in the middle of this term to focus on business interests.

Most of the district is in Oconee County, a Republican suburb of Athens, reaching into heavily Democratic Athens-Clarke County. Republicans gerrymandered Athens-Clarke to include one strongly Democratic district, parceling out the rest of the county into three seats intended to be Republican.

Gisler ran against Wiedower in 2024, losing 61% to 39%. This year was Guest’s first time running for office.

A Democrat briefly won control of the district in a 2017 special election but lost to Wiedower in 2018.

Gisler, a 49-year-old Watkinsville resident, works for an insurance technology company and owns a gourmet olive oil store. He campaigned on improving health care, increasing affordability and reinvesting Georgia’s surplus funds

Guest is the president of a trucking company and touted his community ties, promising to improve public safety and cut taxes. He was endorsed by Republican Gov. Brian Kemp, an Athens native, and raised far more in campaign contributions than Gisler.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Rivian CEO says it’s a misconception EVs are politicized, with a 50-50 party split among R1 buyers

Published

on



If Rivian’s sales are any indication, owning an electric vehicle isn’t such a partisan issue, despite President Donald Trump’s rollbacks of mandates, incentives, and targets for EVs.

At the Fortune Brainstorm AI conference in San Francisco on Tuesday, Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe said it’s a misconception that electrification is politicized, explaining that most customers buy a product based on how it fits their needs, not their ideology. The questions car buyers ask, he said, are the same whether they’re purchasing one with an internal-combustion engine or a battery: “Is it exciting? Are you attracted to the product? Does it draw you in? Does the brand positioning resonate with you? Do the features answer needs that you have?”

Buyers of Rivian’s R1 electric SUV are split roughly 50-50 between Republicans and Democrats, Scaringe told Fortune’s Andrew Nusca. “I think that’s extraordinarily powerful news for us to recognize—that this isn’t just left-leaning buyers,” he added. “These are people that are saying, ‘I like the idea of this product, I’m excited about it.’ And this is thousands and thousands of customers. This is statistically relevant information.”

Buying an EV was once an indication of left-leaning politics, but the politics got scrambled after Tesla CEO Elon Musk became the top Republican donor and a close adviser to Trump. That drew some new customers to Tesla, and turned off a lot of progressive EV buyers, with many existing owners putting bumper stickers on their Teslas explaining that they bought their cars before Musk’s hard-right turn. Trump and Musk later had a stunning public feud, in part over the administration’s elimination of EV and solar tax credits.

But Scaringe said he started Rivian with a long-term view, independent of any policy framework or political trends. He also insisted that if Americans have more EV choices, sales would follow. Right now, Tesla dominates a key corner of the market, namely EVs in the $50,000 price range. Rivian’s forthcoming R2 mid-size SUV will represent a new choice in that market, with a starting price of $45,000 versus the R1’s $70,000.

Ten years from now, Scaringe said he hopes—and believes—that EV adoption in the U.S. will be meaningfully higher than it is today across the board, explaining that the main constraint isn’t on the demand side. Instead, it’s on the supply side, which suffers from “a shocking lack of choice,” especially compared to Europe and China, he added. EV options in the U.S. are limited by the fact that Chinese brands are shut out of the market.

More choices for U.S. EV buyers would presumably create more competition for Rivian—and indeed, the flood of low-priced Chinese EVs in other auto markets has created a backlash, with countries such as Canada imposing steep tariffs on them. But Scaringe appears to view more competition as positive for the market overall.

“I do think that the existence of choice will help drive more penetration, and it actually creates a unique opportunity in the United States,” he said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Powell warns of a ‘very unusual’ economy as inflation remains high amid a weakening job market

Published

on



Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Wednesday described the U.S. economy as “very unusual,” saying policymakers are navigating a rare combination of tariff-driven goods inflation and a labor market that may already be weaker than official data suggests.

The Fed cut interest rates for the third consecutive meeting, a quarter-point reduction Powell framed not as a confident pivot toward easier policy, but as a defensive move meant to keep the labor market from slipping further. He repeatedly emphasized risks to employment have risen “in recent months,” and noted that behind the headline numbers, job creation may already be negative.

Powell made the striking admission the Fed believes the official payroll figures—which have slowed sharply since the summer—are overstating job growth by roughly 60,000 per month. 

“Forty thousand jobs could be negative 20,” he said, adding this dynamic is not well understood by the public because unemployment claims remain historically low—something both economists Mark Zandi and Claudia Sahm recently toldFortune could be giving people a false sense of security about the job market.

“I think a world where job creation is negative… we need to watch that very carefully,” Powell said. 

It is this weakening backdrop Powell said makes the current moment “very unusual”: Inflation remains elevated, but most of the remaining overshoot comes from goods categories directly affected by tariffs, as opposed to domestic economic overheating, which he said the Fed has worked hard to cool since its 2022 highs; inflation excluding tariff-affected goods is “in the low [two percent],” he said. Services inflation is cooling, wage pressures are easing, and neither the labor market nor business surveys suggest a “Phillips-curve” kind of inflation threat, Powell said, referring to the inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment. 

Instead, Powell said, the bulk of the problem is a “one-time price increase” pushing up goods categories as import levies work their way through supply chains. Goods inflation, he noted, should peak around the first quarter of 2026, assuming no additional tariff rounds.

Those crosscurrents have fractured the Fed. Three officials formally dissented from the rate cut on Wednesday, and several others offered what Powell described as “soft dissents,” when an official’s personal projection falls out of what they ultimately voted for. There were six such “soft dissents” this time, during one of the deepest divides inside the FOMC in years, driven by disagreement over how to weigh the risks of lingering inflation against the possibility that job growth is weaker—and much more fragile—than reported.

Powell stressed that policymakers cannot simply choose one mandate to prioritize. 

“There is no risk-free path,” he said, a refrain he’s repeated for months. “When both sides of the mandate are threatened, you should be kind of neutral.” 

He characterized the current stance as being at the “high end” of neutral, allowing the Fed to “wait and see” how the data evolve.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.