Connect with us

Business

‘They took all of our oil not that long ago. And we want it back’: Trump demands Venezuela return seized assets

Published

on



President Donald Trump demanded Wednesday that Venezuela return assets that it seized from U.S. oil companies years ago, justifying anew his announcement of a “blockade” against oil tankers traveling to or from the South American country that face American sanctions.

Trump cited the lost U.S. investments in Venezuela when asked about his newest tactic in a pressure campaign against leader Nicolás Maduro, suggesting his administration’s moves are at least somewhat motivated by disputes over oil investments, along with accusations of drug trafficking. Some sanctioned tankers already are diverting away from Venezuela.

“We’re not going to be letting anybody going through who shouldn’t be going through,” Trump told reporters. “You remember they took all of our energy rights. They took all of our oil not that long ago. And we want it back. They took it — they illegally took it.”

U.S. oil companies dominated Venezuela’s petroleum industry until the country’s leaders moved to nationalize the sector, first in the 1970s and again in the 21st century under Maduro and his predecessor, Hugo Chávez. Compensation offered by Venezuela was deemed insufficient, and in 2014 an international arbitration panel ordered the country’s socialist government to pay $1.6 billion to ExxonMobil.

While Venezuela’s oil has long dominated relations with the U.S., the Trump administration has focused on Maduro’s links to drug traffickers, accusing his government of facilitating the shipment of dangerous drugs into the U.S. In his social media post Tuesday night, Trump said Venezuela was using using oil to fund drug trafficking and other crimes.

U.S. forces last week seized an oil tanker off Venezuela’s coast amid a massive military buildup that includes the Navy’s most advanced aircraft carrier.

The military also has carried out a series of strikes on suspected drug boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean that have killed a total of at least 99 people, including four in a strike Wednesday. Those attacks have prompted questions from lawmakers and legal experts about their legal justification. Trump also has said he is considering strikes on land.

Trump’s talk of ‘stolen assets’

Stephen Miller, Trump’s deputy chief of staff, likened Venezuela’s move to nationalize its oil industry to a heist.

“American sweat, ingenuity and toil created the oil industry in Venezuela,” Miller wrote on social media Wednesday. “Its tyrannical expropriation was the largest recorded theft of American wealth and property. These pillaged assets were then used to fund terrorism and flood our streets with killers, mercenaries and drugs.”

Venezuela first moved to nationalize its oil industry in the 1970s, a process that expanded under Chávez, who nationalized hundreds of private businesses and foreign-owned assets, including oil projects run by ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips. That led to the arbitration panel’s 2014 order.

“There is a case that can be made that Venezuela owes this money to Exxon. I don’t think it’s ever been paid,” economist Philip Verleger said.

Trump blamed his predecessors for not taking a harder line against Venezuela over the asset seizures.

“They took it away because we had a president that maybe wasn’t watching,” Trump said Wednesday. “But they’re not going to do that again. We want it back. They took our oil rights — we had a lot of oil there. As you know they threw our companies out, and we want it back.”

Chevron has a waiver from the U.S. government for oil production in Venezuela, and the Texas-based oil giant says its operations have not been disrupted.

Venezuela’s debt to Chevron “has decreased substantially” since the company’s license to resume exporting Venezuelan oil to the U.S. was first granted in 2022, said Francisco Monaldi, a Venezuelan oil expert at Rice University in Houston. He said the amount is not public.

A new designation for Maduro’s government?

There was no change Wednesday to the list of foreign terrorist organizations after Trump said in his post that the “Venezuelan Regime” has been designated as one.

Officials at several national security agencies were told not to take Trump’s remarks about the designation literally and they should be treated as a figure of speech, according to a U.S. official involved in the discussions.

That official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe internal interagency communications, also stressed that the “blockade” Trump announced applies only to previously sanctioned vessels against which certain actions are already authorized, such as the seizure last week.

The State Department, which oversees the list, didn’t respond to requests for clarification.

Trump’s Justice Department in 2020 indicted Maduro on narcoterrorism charges and U.S. authorities have alleged that Venezuela’s leaders have profited from drug trafficking. Last month, the Trump administration designated a group linked to Maduro — the Cartel de los Soles — as a terrorist organization.

Venezuela decries American ‘piracy’

Maduro called United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Wednesday for a conversation “regarding the current tensions in the region,” U.N. deputy spokesman Farhan Haq said.

“During the call, the secretary-general reaffirmed the United Nations’ position on the need for member states to respect international law, particularly the United Nations Charter, exert restraint and de-escalate tensions to preserve regional stability,” Haq said.

Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yván Gil demanded in a letter to the U.N. Security Council, which was obtained by The Associated Press, that the U.S. immediately release the “kidnapped crew” and return the oil illegally confiscated on the high seas.

In a second letter Wednesday, Venezuela’s U.N. Ambassador Samuel Moncada called for an emergency meeting of the U.N.’s most powerful body to discuss “the ongoing U.S. aggression.”

Citing Trump’s social media post, Moncada said, “this means that the U.S. government is claiming the world’s largest oil reserves as its own, in what would be one of the greatest acts of plunder in human history.”

In addition to urging the Security Council to condemn the taking of the tanker, Gil urged the U.N.’s most powerful body for a written statement stating that it hasn’t authorized actions against Venezuela “or against the international commercialization of its oil.”

While the strikes on alleged drug boats have raised questions about the use of military force, Trump’s seizure of the tanker and other actions against sanctioned entities are consistent with past American policy, said retired U.S. Vice Admiral Robert Murrett, now a professor at Syracuse University.

He also noted that from a military standpoint, seizing sanctioned oil tankers and imposing a blockade are far less risky than direct military confrontation.

“U.S. policy supports peaceful, democratic transition in Venezuela,” Murrett said. “If Maduro agrees tomorrow to step down and have a free and open election, I think we’d be delighted, Democrats and Republicans alike.”

___

Associated Press writers Matthew Lee in Washington, Regina Garcia Cano in Caracas, Venezuela, Cathy Bussewitz in New York and Edith M. Lederer at the United Nations contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Kate Winslet blasts nepo baby label—she says her children aren’t able to ‘get jobs or gain respect’ just because of her fame and $65 million fortune

Published

on



No industry is a stranger to nepotism. Powerful business families have passed down their billion-dollar empires for generations, and the children of tech innovators have launched their own start-ups. Likewise, actress Kate Winslet’s children are now following in her footsteps, with the two Gen Zers pursuing Hollywood careers—but she’s adamant the Winslet name isn’t opening any doors.

“I don’t like the nepo baby term because these kids are not getting a leg up,” Winslet told the BBC in a recent interview while promoting her upcoming movie, Goodbye June

Perhaps ironically, the film’s screenplay which will hit Netflix on December 24, was written by her eldest son, 21-year-old Joe Anders.

And it wasn’t lost on them how their collaboration could be perceived, with Winslet’s son bracing for the nepotism allegations. 

“[Joe] would say to me, ‘I don’t want people to think that this film is just being made because you’re my mom,’” Winslet continued. “The film would have been made with or without me. The script is so, so good.”

The 50-year-old Academy Award-winning actress, estimated to be worth $65 million, slammed the nepo baby label altogether. She pointed out that children are naturally drawn towards what their parents do for work—whether that be taking over a family business, or continuing a multi-generational lineage of doctors.

“But that doesn’t necessarily translate to being able to actually get jobs and actually…gain respect from your peers and people around you,” Winslet added. 

“Both of them have separately carved their own paths and been able to do that, and part of it actually is teaching them to ignore the white noise of silly terms like nepo baby, which you can’t really do anything about.” 

Kate Winslet fans accuse actor of being in denial as her kids land coveted Hollywood jobs

Two of Winslet’s three kids have already made their Hollywood debuts. 

More recently, Anders starred alongside his mother in the 2023 film Lee; but his first major-motion picture role was in the Oscar-nominated movie 1917, directed by his father, Academy Award-winning director Sam Mendes. The Gen Zer has taken on both of his parents’ passions, with credits in both acting and screenwriting at just 21 years old. Writing scripts for Oscar-wielding actresses, and starring in films directed by the mind behind Skyfall and American Beauty, is no easy feat at such a young age. 

Meanwhile, Winslet’s daughter, 25-year-old Mia Threapleton, has made a splash in the indie film scene. Earlier this year she had a starring role in Wes Anderson’s The Pheonician Scheme. And just like Anders, she had the opportunity to act alongside her mother; she fittingly played Winslet’s daughter in the 2022 BAFTA-winning TV show I Am Ruth. Threapleton has also starred in Apple TV drama series The Buccaneers. 

Winslet’s youngest kid, 12-year-old Bear Blaze Winslet, has yet to star in any project. 

In the comments section of the BBC interview posted on social media, many people were quick to point out Winslet’s pull, citing “privilege” and industry connections as being instrumental to her kids’ success. 

“She seems to ignore reality: her children would almost certainly not have been able to become working actors if Kate weren’t their mother,” one commenter wrote. “There are hundreds of thousands of very talented young people out there, but they don’t have wealthy or famous parents who can provide connections. That doesn’t mean nepotism babies don’t have the right to pursue something creative.”

From Eric to Trump to Phoebe Gates, ‘nepo babies’ are everywhere

Family dynasties have cycled through generations of nepotism, from the Carnegies and Vanderbilts, to the Murdochs and Waltons. Even one of President Donald Trump’s sons, Eric Trump, conceded that “Nepotism is kind of a factor of life”—but stipulated that it doesn’t sustain his career running his father’s real estate business.

Phoebe Gates, the 23-year-old daughter of Microsoft cofounder Bill Gates, also recently entered the tech scene. She co-created AI-powered shopping tool Phia while studying at Stanford, drumming up the idea with roommate and cofounder Sophia Kianni. It launched in April 2025, amassing more than 500,000 users and 5,000 direct brand partners by September. The venture raised $8 million in seed funding, drawing celebrity investments from Hailey Bieber, Kris Jenner, Sheryl Sandberg, and Spanx’s Sara Blakely. Despite all her success, she understands the advantages that come with being a Gates—even if it’s an uncomfortable truth.

“I had so much insecurity and such a desire to prove myself,” Gates said during an episode of her podcast, The Burnouts. “I came in, I was like ‘I have so much privilege, I’m a nepo baby.’ I had so much insecurity around that. I feel like it’s so hard when you’re a freshman in college because you have no experience, you have nothing.”

And when it comes to passing down the family business, every successful parent has a different idea of when their kids are ready to take on their life’s work. Earlier this year, real estate tycoon Jorge M. Pérez succeeded his $40 billion business to his sons. However, Pérez didn’t simply hand over the keys to his empire; to sidestep nepotism claims and ensure that his company was in good hands, the entrepreneur made them prove their chops through 18 years of education and work. His kids had to get an MBA, work for a competitor for five years, and spend over a decade rising the ranks.

“When I felt particularly—beginning with Jon Paul—that they could come to work in the company, what I didn’t want is for people in the company to feel that they were entitled, that the reason that I gave them a position is because they were just my sons,” Jorge told Fortune earlier this year.





Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Devin Nunes and Trump Media get in bed with Google-backed nuclear fusion company in surprise $6 billion merger

Published

on



Trump Media & Technology will merge with a fusion power company in an all-stock deal that the companies said Thursday is valued at more than $6 billion.

Devin Nunes, the Republican congressman who resigned in 2021 to become the CEO of Trump Media, will be co-CEO of the new company with TAE Technologies CEO Michl Binderbauer.

The combined company says it plans to find a site and begin construction next year on the “world’s first utility-scale fusion power plant,” with aims to provide the electricity needed for artificial intelligence.

Shares of Trump Media & Technology, the parent company of President Donald Trump’s Truth Social media platform, have tumbled 70% this year but jumped 20% before the opening bell Thursday.

Backed by Google and other investors, TAE is a private company and the merger with Trump Media would create one of the first publicly traded nuclear fusion companies.

“We’re taking a big step forward toward a revolutionary technology that will cement America’s global energy dominance for generations,” Nunes said in a prepared statement.

TAE focuses on nuclear fusion, a technology that combines two light atomic nuclei to form a single heavier one. It releases enormous amount of energy, a process that occurs on the sun and other stars, according to the United Nations’ International Atomic Energy Agency. It’s been seen as a promising solution to climate change caused by burning fossil fuels, but one that is a long way off compared to today’s clean technologies like wind and solar.

TAE and Trump Media shareholders will each own approximately 50% of the combined company.

Trump is by far the largest stakeholder in Trump Media, owning 41% of all outstanding shares.

In October, the U.S. Department of Energy released what it called a “roadmap” for fusion technology, with the aim of fostering “a burgeoning fusion private sector industry in the U.S. toward maturity on the most rapid timeline.” A number of tech companies, including Google, Microsoft and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, have shown interest in fusion technology as a way of powering the energy-hungry data centers needed to build and run their AI products.

TAE and Trump Media say the transaction values each TAE common stock at $53.89 per share.

At closing, Trump Media & Technology Group will be the holding company for Truth Social and TAE, along with its subsidiaries TAE Power Solutions and TAE Life Sciences.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

State Department announces massive $10 billion arms sale to Taiwan, infuriating China

Published

on



President Donald Trump’s administration has announced a massive package of arms sales to Taiwan valued at more than $10 billion that includes medium-range missiles, howitzers and drones, drawing an angry response from China.

The State Department announced the sales late Wednesday during a nationally televised address by the Republican president, who made scant mention of foreign policy issues and did not speak about China or Taiwan. U.S.-Chinese tensions have ebbed and flowed during Trump’s second term, largely over trade and tariffs but also over China’s increasing aggressiveness toward Taiwan, which Beijing has said must reunify with the mainland.

If approved by Congress, it would be the largest-ever U.S. weapons package to Taiwan, exceeding the total amount of $8.4 billion in U.S. arms sales to Taiwan during President Joe Biden’s Democratic administration.

The eight arms sales agreements announced Wednesday cover 82 high-mobility artillery rocket systems, or HIMARS, and 420 Army Tactical Missile Systems, or ATACMS — similar to what the U.S. had been providing Ukraine during the Biden administration to defend itself from Russia — worth more than $4 billion. They also include 60 self-propelled howitzer systems and related equipment worth more than $4 billion and drones valued at more than $1 billion.

Other sales in the package include military software valued at more than $1 billion, Javelin and TOW missiles worth more than $700 million, helicopter spare parts worth $96 million and refurbishment kits for Harpoon missiles worth $91 million.

The eight sales agreements amount to $11.15 billion, according to Taiwan’s Defense Ministry.

The State Department said the sales serve “U.S. national, economic, and security interests by supporting the recipient’s continuing efforts to modernize its armed forces and to maintain a credible defensive capability.”

“The proposed sale(s) will help improve the security of the recipient and assist in maintaining political stability, military balance, and economic progress in the region,” the statements said.

China’s Foreign Ministry attacked the move, saying it would violate diplomatic agreements between China and the U.S.; gravely harm China’s sovereignty, security and territorial integrity; and undermine regional stability.

“The ‘Taiwan independence’ forces on the island seek independence through force and resist reunification through force, squandering the hard-earned money of the people to purchase weapons at the cost of turning Taiwan into a powder keg,” said Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun.

“This cannot save the doomed fate of ‘Taiwan independence’ but will only accelerate the push of the Taiwan Strait toward a dangerous situation of military confrontation and war. The U.S. support for ‘Taiwan Independence’ through arms will only end up backfiring. Using Taiwan to contain China will not succeed,” he added.

Under federal law, the U.S. is obligated to assist Taiwan with its self-defense, a point that has become increasingly contentious with China, which has vowed to take Taiwan by force, if necessary.

Taiwan’s Defense Ministry in a statement Thursday expressed gratitude to the U.S. over the arms sale, which it said would help Taiwan maintain “sufficient self-defense capabilities” and bring strong deterrent capabilities. Taiwan’s bolstering of its defense “is the foundation for maintaining regional peace and stability,” the ministry said.

Taiwan’s Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung similarly thanked the U.S. for its “long-term support for regional security and Taiwan’s self-defense capabilities,” which he said are key for deterring a conflict in the Taiwan Strait, the body of water separating Taiwan from China’s mainland.

The arms sale comes as Taiwan’s government has pledged to raise defense spending to 3.3% of the island’s gross domestic product next year and to reach 5% by 2030. The boost came after Trump and the Pentagon requested that Taiwan spend as much as 10% of its GDP on its defense, a percentage well above what the U.S. or any of its major allies spend on defense. The demand has faced pushback from Taiwan’s opposition KMT party and some of its population.

Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te last month announced a special $40 billion budget for arms purchases, including to build an air defense system with high-level detection and interception capabilities called Taiwan Dome. The budget will be allocated over eight years, from 2026 to 2033.

The U.S. boost in military assistance to Taiwan was previewed in legislation adopted by Congress that Trump is expected to sign shortly.

Last week, the Chinese embassy in Washington denounced the legislation, known as the National Defense Authorization Act, saying it unfairly targeted China as an aggressor. The U.S. Senate passed the bill Wednesday.

___

Mistreanu reported from Beijing. AP video journalists Olivia Zhang in Beijing and Johnson Lai in Taipei, Taiwan, contributed to this report.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.