Connect with us

Business

These market veterans still think America is the best place to put your money — ‘Tech Trumps Tariffs even if Mickey Mouse or a clown were to run the US!’

Published

on



  • President Donald Trump’s aggressive tariff campaign is creating doubts about the attractiveness and safety of US assets. But there are still some who believe the US will produce the best returns, despite an epic selloff and signs of a shifting world order. That’s due in part to America’s dominance in critical technologies.

The idea of “American exceptionalism” in the global economy and financial markets has rapidly lost favor this year as President Donald Trump embarks on an aggressive tariff campaign that is creating doubts about US assets.

Stocks have suffered an epic meltdown and only partially recouped their losses. The dollar and Treasury bonds are losing their safe haven status. The economy may slip into a recession, soaring debt may start to overwhelm the “exorbitant privilege” the US enjoys, and the world was already having trust issues with America.

In contrast, markets in China and Europe have been relative outperformers this year after years of lagging behind the US.

But there are still some market veterans who believe the US is the place to be, due in part to America’s dominance in critical innovations.

‘Tech Trumps Tariffs’

Nouriel Roubini, an economist and CEO of the consultancy Roubini Macro Associates, believes “tech trumps tariffs” in the short run and the medium term.

The US boasts leadership in key technologies and industries, so it doesn’t matter who the president is, he wrote in a post on X on Thursday. Meanwhile, China comes in a “close second,” and Europe is out of the picture completely.

Roubini estimates that tech innovations will increase US potential growth by 200 basis points from 2% to 4% by 2030, while tariffs would drag down growth by 50 basis points, even assuming a permanent average rate of 15% after negotiations.

“So Tech Trumps Tariffs even if Mickey Mouse or a clown were to run the US! It doesn’t matter and American exceptionalism will remain and be resilient regardless of Trump given the hyper dynamism and innovations of the US private sector,” he added.

A critical part of Roubini’s thesis is that the nature of innovation itself is shifting from producing an “initial growth spurt that fizzles out over time” to exponential growth that accelerates and gives first-movers enduring advantages versus followers.

He pointed to DeepSeek’s AI model that shocked Silicon Valley earlier this year, saying it’s not a revolution but an evolution that owes its existence to US companies like OpenAI and their years of massive investments.

“MAG-7, hyperscalers and tech firms (in Nasdaq) could not care less about tariffs,” he added. “They gotta continue and increase massive Ai capex to avoid becoming obsolete relative to each other.”

‘Stay Home’

Meanwhile, Ed Yardeni has said that if Trump’s tariffs cause a recession, the US will suffer less than international markets and economies would.

“While some allocation to key international markets might be warranted over a long-term time horizon, we are sticking with our Stay Home investment bias,” he wrote in a note early Wednesday.

That came before Trump put a 90-day pause on his “reciprocal tariffs” on Wednesday afternoon and Friday night’s exemptions on tech imports. But Trump also warned Sunday that tariffs will eventually hit the “whole electronic supply chain.”

Still, the US enjoys full employment, is a net energy exporter, and has a flexible services-driven economy, with productivity growth that’s strong enough to outweigh pressures from supply-chain realignment and less immigration, Yardeni explained.

On the other side, China’s export-driven growth strategy may not work without US demand, while Germany’s manufacturers are being crushed by China, he added.

‘The US has a lot positive going for it’

Then there’s Mark Delaney, chief investment officer at AustralianSuper, which manages $223 billion of assets.

He told the Financial Times on Tuesday that the US is still the most attractive region for long-term investments, even as he acknowledged that Trump’s tariffs were a “significant volatility event.”

In fact, he hasn’t reduced his fund’s US exposure in recent weeks, and it remains more than half of AustralianSuper’s international holdings.

“The US has a lot positive going for it—strong economic performance (though it’s given a bit back), strong productivity growth, strong profit growth and, by any measure, many of the best companies in the world—all that makes it an attractive place to store capital,” Delaney told the FT

Even though global trade flows could be upended by tariffs, the companies he’s investing in will likely be affected less.

That’s because tariffs are targeting goods instead of services—for now—though any escalation in the trade war may eventually hit those too.

“Look at any investor’s major holdings,” Delaney said. “There aren’t that many goods, it’s mostly services, that’s the way the global economy has evolved.”

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Bitcoin infrastructure company Arch Labs raises $13 million from Pantera Capital

Published

on

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Why the CHRO of New York Life says being an extrovert makes her a better HR leader

Published

on

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

FTC is suing Uber over claims its Uber One subscription service is ‘deceptive’

Published

on



  • The Federal Trade Commission has filed a lawsuit against Uber, alleging the company used deceptive practices to market and manage its Uber One subscription service. The complaint centers on claims of misleading savings and a deliberately complex cancellation process. It’s the first major tech lawsuit to be brought under the Trump administration’s FTC.

The FTC is suing Uber over claims it engages in “deceptive” billing and cancellation practices through its subscription service, Uber One.

The agency is alleging that Uber misled its users about potential savings and made cancellation difficult, violating consumer protection laws. The agency claimed that some users had to click through up to 23 pages and perform 32 actions just to cancel their subscriptions.

A spokesperson for Uber did not immediately respond to Fortune’s request for comment.

However, Uber spokesperson Noah Edwardsen told Reuters: “We are disappointed that the FTC chose to move forward with this action, but are confident that the courts will agree with what we already know: Uber One’s sign-up and cancellation processes are clear, simple, and follow the letter and spirit of the law.”

It’s the first major tech lawsuit to be brought under the current Trump administration. The Federal Trade Commission has several ongoing lawsuits against Meta, Google, and Amazon. While some of these legal battles began under the Biden administration, the agency was already ramping up enforcement during Trump’s first term—with Meta becoming one of its most prominent early targets.

“Americans are tired of getting signed up for unwanted subscriptions that seem impossible to cancel,” FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson said in a statement. “The Trump-Vance FTC is fighting back on behalf of the American people. Today, we’re alleging that Uber not only deceived consumers about their subscriptions, but also made it unreasonably difficult for customers to cancel.”

Late last year, Bloomberg reported that Uber was facing an investigation from the U.S. consumer watchdog into its flagship subscription plan. At the time, the company defended its cancellation policy and said it was cooperating with the FTC to answer the regulator’s questions.

Uber One

Launched in 2021, Uber One offers members benefits like free delivery fees and discounts on select rides and orders for a fee of $9.99 a month or $96 annually. As of December, Uber said the service had around 30 million subscribers, according to the company’s most recent annual report.

The FTC is claiming that customers who signed up for Uber’s subscription service were wrongly promised savings when they signed up. In its lawsuit, the regulator argues that Uber advertises its subscription service as offering savings of $25 a month, but fails to include the monthly cost of its membership in this calculation. It also accuses the ride-hailing company of charging consumers before their official billing date.

The case is not the first time Uber has faced scrutiny from the FTC.

In 2017, the company settled allegations that it had misrepresented its privacy and data security practices. The following year, it agreed to pay $20 million to resolve claims that it had overstated potential driver earnings in its recruitment efforts. Most recently, in 2022, Uber avoided criminal charges through a settlement in which it acknowledged that employees had failed to disclose a 2016 data breach affecting 57 million users and drivers.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.