The world of travel changed immeasurably during the pandemic. Due to passengers being concerned about their health, premium classes and private jets both experienced a rise in customers, which continued long after the restrictions were removed.
Returning to how you used to travel is hard once you experience business class or the relative tranquility of an airport lounge. All this has resulted in airline lounges becoming increasingly crowded and less peaceful than before.
Airlines have tried to rectify the problems by removing lounge access for groups of customers or, in the case of British Airways, making status hard to achieve for most leisure travelers.
Meanwhile, wealthy passengers have found their own solution with ultra-luxury private lounges and even separate terminals.
These new experiences have been growing within the United States for some time, and now the concept is spreading to Europe and, in particular, the UK.
The exclusive airport spaces offer a different world from the standard airport lounge with its tired buffet and cheap drinks. No expense is spared for the privileged passengers, who can expect food by celebrity chefs, private security, and chauffeur-driven cars to their aircraft.
In the U.S., the ultra-luxury options include hiring a whole suite at La Guardia with three private rooms and a dedicated server in the Reserve Suites at the Sapphire Lounge.
In addition to a welcome caviar service and a wine list from New York wine bar Parcelle, guests can enjoy an à la carte menu from Jeffrey’s Grocery. Even the ensuite bathroom offers an elevated spa-like experience with Augustinus Bader amenities. Prices start from $2,200 for the smallest suite, which can take four people. The suites are even more exclusive, as you must be a Sapphire Reserve cardholder to book them.
Even more exclusive are the PS private terminals located in Los Angeles and Atlanta.
These offer different levels of service, with the entry-level offering general lounge access and shared transport from the terminal to your commercial flight for a mere $1,095. If you want more privacy, there is also the option of a private suite, which is perfect for a group or those with pets. All the options include check-in and customs in the terminal.
London Heathrow’s Windsor Suite has long been the preserve of royalty and superstars.
Heathrow was the first to offer an airport VIP service in the early sixties, initially serving diplomats and royalty exclusively.
Later, it became a paid-for suite in 2009, ready for the London Olympics.
The Suite has recently had a £3 million ($3.9 million) upgrade, which took eight months to complete.
Now named The Windsor by Heathrow, the private terminal prides itself on its discretion for high-profile guests but is open to anyone who can afford the fees.
With prices starting at £3,812 (inc VAT) for up to 3 guests, the luxury service offers a unique, ‘door to door’ experience, with a chauffeur-driven, all-electric BMW taking guests to their plane door.
The lounge consists of eight suites for the ultimate privacy which have been redesigned with British brands such as Tom Dixon and Axminster carpets.
Perhaps The Windsor suite’s most unusual feature is that it doubles as a private art gallery, showcasing museum-worthy art from British artists such as David Hockney, Tracey Emin, and Francis Bacon, as well as American icons like Andy Warhol.
Guests can also sample exclusive fine dining options from Michelin-starred chef Jason Atherton, including a new quintessentially British signature dish of butter shortbread with praline cream, Earl Grey tea ice cream, custard sauce, and charred mandarin.
Heathrow celebrated a record-breaking year in 2024 with 83.9 million passengers in 2024 which is 3 million more than the previous 2019 record.
Charlotte Burns, VIP Lead at Heathrow, said: “The Windsor by Heathrow is more than just a rebrand, it’s a testament to our heritage in pioneering luxury travel. From our carefully curated interiors to our exceptional service, we provide our guests with an unparalleled experience that reflects the finest of British hospitality.”
Paris Charles de Gaulle has also been trying to attract premium customers away from its rival Heathrow with the launch of a new La Premiere check-in and lounge for first-class passengers.
The concept was to provide a completely private and seamless experience for first-class customers, including luggage assistance and a new check-in area with two private lounges for even more privacy.
Next comes a dedicated private pathway, through security checkpoints. Once in the main lounge, La Première customers can now book optional suites with a butler, a spacious living room, a bedroom with a double bed, a bathroom, and even an outdoor patio.
Air France also unveiled its new La Premiere First Class suites, which feature five windows, an Air France exclusive, a seat and a chaise longue that transform into a real 2-meter bed.
Meanwhile, at Manchester airport, the latest entrant on the scene is aether, which is a completely private terminal, making the experience similar to flying from a private jet terminal. Aether opened in 2024 after the previous reiteration of a private terminal closed during the pandemic.
A big bonus with aether is that if you want to bring your car, you can drive up to the private terminal and go through all the normal airport admin, such as check-in and security, within the building.
This not only reduces the stress of the airport experience but also drastically reduces the amount of time needed to complete formalities and get to the terminal.
Guest are taken to a lounge area by their host, who ensures they will get to their flight at exactly the right time. Meanwhile, they can sample seven-course menus by Adam Reid, the award-winning and renowned chef at Adam Reid at The French.
Even security within Aether is a premium experience as it will be closed off entirely for each person or traveling group. Finally, you will be chauffeur-driven in a BMW to your gate or aircraft.
Unlike many of its rivals, the aether experience is accessible for many budgets, with prices starting at £90 ($118) per person for the Express package for those with just cabin bags.
This provides access to go straight through the Private Terminal. ‘Inclusive’ is for those with either cabin or checked bags and can be used on either departure or arrival. This gives guests the full offering, including food, drinks, and even a private chauffeur to their aircraft.
A Manchester Airport spokesperson said: “Here at Manchester Airport we’re proud to connect the North to the world via our ever-growing route network of over 200 destinations – more than any UK airport outside London.
“One thing we’ve seen in recent years is that despite pressures on household budgets, people really value their holidays and prioritise them; we’ve actually seen more people choosing to elevate their airport experience by choosing to use our lounges – and now they can go one step further and choose to fly from aether.
“aether is an incredibly exciting addition to the range of premium options available here at Manchester Airport, and it’s great to see how well it’s been received already.”
With impressive facilities springing up at airports, it remains to be seen if passengers will forgo ever harder-to-attain loyalty programs with the crowded terminals and instead pay for premium lounges or private terminals. For many business travelers, choosing the best schedule and being assured of an efficient and relaxing experience will trump any status benefits.
MacKenzie Scott has arguably been the biggest name in philanthropy this year—and has nonstop been making major gifts to organizations focused on education, DEI, disaster recovery, and many other causes.
This week alone, several higher education institutions announced major gifts from the billionaire philanthropist and ex-wife of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos—donations totaling well over $100 million. In true Scott fashion, many of these donations are the largest single donations these schools have ever received.
The donations announced this week include:
$50 million to California State University-East Bay
$50 million to Lehman College (part of the City University of New York system)
$38 million to Texas A&M University-Kingsville
$17 million to Seminole State College
All four institutions are public, access-oriented colleges that enroll large shares of low‑income, first‑generation, and racially diverse students and function as minority‑serving institutions or similar engines of social mobility. They fit MacKenzie Scott’s broader pattern of directing large, unrestricted gifts to colleges that serve “chronically underserved” communities rather than already wealthy, highly selective universities.
Scott, who is worth about $40 billion and has donated over $20 billion in the past five years, has doubled down this year on causes that the Trump administration has cut deeply, such as education, DEI, and disaster recovery.
“As higher education, in general, works to find its way in an uncertain environment, this gift is a major source of encouragement that we are on the right path,” Lehman College President Fernando Delgado said in a statement.
Scott also made one of the largest donations in HBCU Howard University’s 158-year history with an $80 million gift earlier this fall, and a $60 million donation to the Center for Disaster Philanthropy after Trump administration’s cuts to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)—an organization Americans rely on for help during and after hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, and floods.
“All sectors of society—public, private, and social—share responsibility for helping communities thrive after a disaster,” CDP president and CEO Patricia McIlreavy previously told Fortune. “Philanthropy plays a critical role in providing communities with resources to rebuild stronger, but it cannot—and should not—replace government and its essential responsibilities.”
Trust-based philanthropy
Scott accumulated the vast majority of her wealth from her 2019 divorce from Bezos, but is dedicated to giving away most of her fortune. She’s considered a unique philanthropist in today’s environment because her gifts are typically unrestricted, meaning the organizations can use the funding however they choose.
“She practices trust-based philanthropy,” Anne Marie Dougherty, CEO of the Bob Woodruff Foundation previously told Fortune. Scott has donated $15 million to the veteran-focused nonprofit organization in 2022, and made a subsequent $20 million donation this fall.
Scott is also considered one of the most generous philanthropists, and credits acts of kindness for inspiring her to give back.
“It was the local dentist who offered me free dental work when he saw me securing a broken tooth with denture glue in college,” Scott wrote of her inspiration for philanthropy in an Oct. 15 essay published to her Yield Giving site. “It was the college roommate who found me crying, and acted on her urge to loan me a thousand dollars to keep me from having to drop out in my sophomore year.”
Netflix’s agreement to buy Warner Bros. in a $72 billion deal marks a seismic shift in Hollywood, handing the streaming giant control of iconic franchises such as Batman and Harry Potter and triggering an immediate backlash from theater owners and the jilted Ellison family behind Paramount. The bombshell transaction, struck after a bidding war that ensued after David Ellison’sunsolicited bids several months ago, positions Netflix ever more at the center of the Southern California entertainment business that the Northern California company disrupted so famously decades ago.
The deal will see Netflix acquire Warner Bros. Discovery’s film and TV studios and its streaming operations, including HBO Max, in a deal with an equity value of roughly $72 billion, or about $27.75 per share in cash and stock, valuing Warner Bros. at $82.7 billion. The agreement followed a heated auction in which Netflix’s bid edged out offers from Paramount Skydance and Comcast, both of which had pushed to keep the storied Warner assets in more traditional hands.
Two days before Netflix won the bidding, Paramount hinted at its fury with a strongly worded letter to WBD CEO David Zaslav, arguing the process was “tainted” and Warner Bros. was favoring a single bidder: Netflix. Paramount called it a “myopic process with a predetermined outcome that favors a single bidder,” Bloomberg reported, although Netflix’s bid is understood to be the highest of the three.
Another angry group is theater owners, who have famously warred with Netflix for years over the big red streamer’s reluctance, even refusal to follow traditional theatrical-release practices. Netflix Co-CEO Ted Sarandos has adamantly defended Netflix’s streaming-forward distribution, saying it’s what consumers really want. At the Time 100 event in April of this year, Sarandos called theatrical release “an outmoded idea for most people” and said Netflix was “saving Hollywood” by giving people what they want: streaming at home.
Cinema United, the trade association which represents over 30,000 movie screens in the U.S. and 26,000 internationally, immediately announced its opposition to Netflix acquiring a legacy Hollywood studio. The organization’s chief, Michael O’Leary, said it “poses an unprecedented threat to the global exhibition business” as Netflix’s states business model simply does not support theatrical exhibition. He urged regulators to look closely at the acquisition.
Deadline reported that other producers are warning of “the death of Hollywood” as a result of this deal. Several days earlier, Bank of America Research’s analysts had surveyed the landscape and concluded that as a defensive move, Netflix would be “killing three birds with one stone,” as its ownership of Warner Bros’ would be a daunting blow to Paramount and Comcast, while taking the Warner legacy studio out of the running. The bank calculated that a combined Netflix and Warner Bros. would comprise roughly 21% of total streaming time—still shy of YouTube’s 28% hold on the market, but far greater than Paramount’s 5% and Comcast’s 4%.
What’s known and what’s still at play
As part of the deal, Netflix will retain the studio that controls the superheroes of DC, the Wizarding World of Harry Potter, and HBO’s prestige brands. Other details on what will happen to the standalone streaming service HBO Max were scant, with the companies saying only that Netflix will “maintain” Warner Bros. current operations. The companies expect the transaction to close after regulatory review, with Netflix projecting billions in annual cost savings by the third year after completion.
The deal will not include all of Warner Bros. Discovery, according to the press release announcing the acquisition, which said the previously announced plans to separate WBD’s cable operations will be completed before the Netflix deal, in the third quarter of 2026. The newly separated publicly traded company holding the Global Networks division will be called Discovery Global, and will include CNN, TNT Sports in the U.S., as well as Discovery, free-to-air channels across Europe, plus digital products such as Discovery+ and Bleacher Report.
On a conference call with reporters Friday morning, Sarandos said Netflix is “highly confident in the regulatory process,” calling the deal pro-consumer, pro-innovation, pro-worker, pro-creator and pro-growth. He said Netflix planned to work closely with regulators and was running “full speed” ahead toward getting all regulatory approvals. He added that Netflix executives were “tired” after “an incredibly rigorous and competitive process.” Alluding to Netflix’s traditional resistance to big M&A, Sarandos added that “we don’t do many of these, but we were deep in this one.”
Influential entertainment journalist Matt Belloni of Puck previewed the likely deal on Bill Simmons’ podcast on Spotify’s Ringer network (which recently struck a deal to bring some video podcasts to Netflix), and they speculated about potential problems inside Netflix that brought the deal to a head. In conversation about how defensive the move is, Belloni said Netflix is “doing this for a reason” and may have reached a “stress point” because it hasn’t been getting traction with its own moviemaking efforts after 10 years of trying. (Netflix has also been agonizingly close to an elusive Best Picture Oscar, with close calls on Roma and Emilia Perez, the latter of which was derailed in a bizarre social-media controversy.) Belloni also acknowledged the criticism that Netflix has struggled to create its own franchises, also after years of trying.
Sarandos highlighted Netflix’s homegrown franchises while announcing the deal, arguing that Netflix’s ” culture-defining titles like Stranger Things, KPop Demon Hunters and Squid Game” will now combine with Warner’s deep library including classics Casablanca and Citizen Kane, even Friends.
The biggest losers in the bidding war may be David Ellison and his father, Oracle co‑founder (and long-time Republican donor)Larry Ellison, whose Paramount‑Skydance empire had been widely seen as a front‑runner to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery. David Ellison, has since reportedly been pleading his case around Washington, meeting Trump administration officials as allies float antitrust and national‑interest concerns about giving Netflix control of such a critical studio.
While Netflix has tried to calm regulators by arguing that a combined Netflix–HBO Max bundle would increase competition with Disney and others, the Ellisons and their supporters are signaling they will continue to press for tougher scrutiny or even intervention. Large M&A has made a big comeback in 2025 as the Trump administration has been notably friendlier to big deals than the deep freeze of the Biden administration, making this deal an acid test for just how true that is when a company with deep ties to the White House gets jilted.
[Disclosure: The author worked internally at Netflix from June 2024 through July 2025.]
The future of work as we know it is hanging by a thread—at least, that’s what many tech leaders consistently say. Elon Musk predicts AI will replace all jobs in less than 20 years. Bill Gates says even those who train to use AI tools may not be safe from its claws. And then there’s Klarna’s CEO, Sebastian Siemiatkowski, who is even warning workers that “tech bros” are sugarcoating just how badly it’s about to impact jobs.
But according to one LinkedIn exec, that’s simply not what the data is showing.
With hundreds of millions of workers hunting for jobs and employers posting open roles in real time, LinkedIn acts as one of the clearest barometers of what’s actually happening on the ground—and its managing director for EMEA, Sue Duke, is not buying the AI apocalypse narrative.
“That’s not what we’re seeing,” Duke revealed at the Fortune CEO Forum in The Shard in London. When asked about an AI-induced hiring slowdown she insisted that the opposite is actually true.
“What we’re seeing is that organizations who are adopting and integrating this technology, they’re actually going out and hiring more people to really take advantage of this technology,” Duke explained.
“They’re going out and looking for more business development people, more technologically savvy people, and more sales people as they realize the business opportunities, the innovation possibilities, and ultimately the growth possibilities of this technology.”
LinkedIn exec breaks down exactly what employers are looking for from new hires in 2026
For those looking to make the most of the job market’s shift, Duke says there are two key areas to upskill in.
The first, no surprise one, is AI skills. Whether that’s literacy, tooling, prompt-writing, or more technical capabilities, “we continue to see those AI skills being red, red hot in the labor market,” she said.
With companies racing to integrate automation into products and workflows, that demand isn’t cooling anytime soon—no matter what industry you’re looking to work in. “We see a huge demand for those skills across the board, economy-wide, across all sectors, and tons of companies looking for those,” Duke added.
As AI takes over many administrative tasks, it’s putting the spotlight on job functions that bots can’t do. “Those unique human skills,” Duke said, is the second area of focus for employers. “They remain rock solid, constant at the heart of hiring desires and demands out there. They’re not going away either.”
She called out communication, team building, and problem solving, as some of those human skills that will stand the test of time: “They’re the ones to invest in.”
And ultimately, the skill employers are zeroing in on most isn’t technical at all—it’s adaptability. Bosses know the tools will change faster than job titles. What they want is someone who can change with them.
“The most important thing for job seekers to think about is the mindset that you’re also bringing to the table,” Duke concluded.
“What employers are really looking for is that growth mindset and understanding that this technology is moving very, very quickly, and we need adaptability. Adaptability is right at the top of those most in-demand skills, so making sure you’re bringing that mindset, bringing that agility with you, that’s going to be hugely important.”