Connect with us

Politics

The real threat to Florida jobs isn’t AI – it’s ignoring it

Published

on


While artificial intelligence (AI) transforms American business, Florida risks being left behind. Recent polling by The James Madison Institute reveals a troubling divide among the state’s workers: though 40% use AI daily or regularly in their jobs, nearly one-third report never using it at all. More concerning, younger workers (17%) are more than three times as likely to use AI daily compared to those 55 and older (5%). This gap isn’t just a statistical curiosity. It represents billions in unrealized productivity gains and a competitive disadvantage that Florida businesses can ill afford.

The resistance to AI adoption stems largely from outdated fears about job displacement. But these concerns, while understandable, are increasingly contradicted by reality. Florida businesses that hesitate to embrace AI aren’t protecting jobs. They’re simply ensuring those jobs become less productive and less competitive in a global marketplace that won’t wait for stragglers to catch up. As Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently said, “You’re not going to lose your job to an AI, but you’re going to lose your job to someone who uses AI.”

Consider the efficiency gains already transforming early adopters. AI-powered tools are revolutionizing customer service in Florida’s tourism sector, enabling hotels and attractions to handle inquiries in multiple languages around the clock while freeing staff to focus on complex guest needs that require human judgment. In health care, AI assists physicians in analyzing diagnostic images and identifying potential issues faster and more accurately, allowing doctors to spend more time with patients. Logistics companies use AI to optimize delivery routes, cutting fuel costs and delivery times while reducing their carbon footprint.

These aren’t marginal improvements. Research shows employees using AI report productivity increases averaging 40%,while specific workflows can see efficiency gains ranging from 20% to 40%. Customer service operations have achieved issue resolution improvements of 14% per hour and workers report saving multiple hours per week on routine tasks. For a state built on tourism, health care, real estate and international trade, AI offers competitive advantages in every major sector. Florida companies that fail to adopt these tools aren’t just missing efficiency savings. They’re watching competitors in Texas, Georgia, and elsewhere capture market share with faster service, lower costs, and better customer experiences.

The reluctance to embrace AI often rests on apocalyptic predictions about job losses that haven’t materialized. In 2015, McKinsey’s widely cited analysis initially projected that approximately 45% of work activities could be automated using demonstrated technology. This forecast fueled widespread anxiety about a jobless future. But subsequent research revealed a more nuanced reality. McKinsey’s later analysis found that fewer than 5% of occupations could be entirely automated and that between 15% and 30% of work hours could be affected by 2030, depending heavily on adoption rates.

The difference? Real-world implementation revealed what early predictions were missing.

Why the dramatic revision? Because early predictions failed to account for how AI actually functions in the workplace.

Most jobs aren’t collections of identical, repetitive tasks that machines can simply take over. They’re complex combinations of routine work, judgment calls, interpersonal communication and creative problem-solving. AI excels at handling the routine elements, but the human skills of adaptability, emotional intelligence and complex reasoning remain irreplaceable. Rather than eliminating jobs wholesale, AI transforms them by automating the mundane and elevating the human contribution.

This reality presents Florida with both a challenge and an opportunity. The generational divide in adoption of AI isn’t an insurmountable obstacle but rather a roadmap for where investment and attention are most needed. Workers over 55 represent decades of institutional knowledge, customer relationships, and industry expertise that Florida businesses cannot afford to lose. The solution isn’t to replace these experienced workers with younger, more tech-savvy employees. It’s to pair institutional wisdom with technological tools that amplify productivity.

Smart businesses are already doing this. They’re implementing AI gradually, with training programs that emphasize how these tools make existing jobs easier and more rewarding. They’re discovering that experienced workers, once past initial hesitation, often become the most effective AI users because they understand the business context and can better judge when to trust the technology and when to override it. Companies that invest in upskilling their current workforce gain both technological capability and employee loyalty.

For Florida policymakers, the path forward should emphasize removing barriers rather than creating mandates. The state should ensure that workforce development programs include AI literacy. Community colleges and technical schools should partner with businesses to develop training that matches real-world needs. Regulatory frameworks should be updated to enable AI adoption without stifling innovation through premature or excessive restrictions.

The free market will ultimately determine which businesses thrive and which fall behind; however, Florida can create an environment that provides businesses with every opportunity to compete. That means fostering a culture of technological adoption, celebrating businesses that successfully integrate AI while maintaining their workforce, and ensuring that workers at every career stage have access to training.

Florida’s economy has consistently adapted to change, from the introduction of the car to air conditioning to the emergence of the internet. AI is simply the latest transformation, and those who embrace it earliest will capture the greatest advantages. The question isn’t whether AI will reshape Florida’s workforce. It’s whether Florida will lead that transformation or scramble to catch up. With nearly a third of workers not using AI at all, the time to close that gap is now.

Every day of delay is a day of lost productivity, surrendered competitive advantage, and missed opportunity for workers and businesses alike.

 ___

Dr. Edward Longe is the director of the Center for Tech and Innovation at The James Madison Institute.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Carlos G. Smith files bill to allow medical pot patients to grow their own plants

Published

on


Home cultivation of marijuana plants could be legal under certain conditions.

Medical marijuana patients may not have to go to the dispensary for their medicine if new legislation in the Senate passes.

Sen. Carlos G. Smith’s SB 776 would permit patients aged 21 and older to grow up to six pot plants.

They could use the homegrown product, but just like the dispensary weed, they would not be able to re-sell.

Medical marijuana treatment centers would be the only acceptable sourcing for plants and seeds, a move that would protect the cannabis’ custody.

Those growing the plants would be obliged to keep them secured from “unauthorized persons.”

Chances this becomes law may be slight.

A House companion for the legislation has yet to be filed. And legislators have demonstrated little appetite for homegrow in the past.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Rolando Escalona aims to deny Frank Carollo a return to the Miami Commission

Published

on


Early voting is now underway in Miami for a Dec. 9 runoff that will decide whether political newcomer Rolando Escalona can block former Commissioner Frank Carollo from reclaiming the District 3 seat long held by the Carollo family.

The contest has already been marked by unusual turbulence: both candidates faced eligibility challenges that threatened — but ultimately failed — to knock them off the ballot.

Escalona survived a dramatic residency challenge in October after a rival candidate accused him of faking his address. A Miami-Dade Judge rejected the claim following a detailed, three-hour trial that examined everything from his lease records to his Amazon orders.

After the Nov. 4 General Election — when Carollo took about 38% of the vote and Escalona took 17% to outpace six other candidates — Carollo cleared his own legal hurdle when another Judge ruled he could remain in the race despite the city’s new lifetime term limits that, according to three residents who sued, should have barred him from running again.

Those rulings leave voters with a stark choice in District 3, which spans Little Havana, East Shenandoah, West Brickell and parts of Silver Bluff and the Roads.

The runoff pits a self-described political outsider against a veteran official with deep institutional experience and marks a last chance to extend the Carollo dynasty to a twentieth straight year on the dais or block that potentiality.

Escalona, 34, insists voters are ready to move on from the chaos and litigation that have surrounded outgoing Commissioner Joe Carollo, whose tenure included a $63.5 million judgment against him for violating the First Amendment rights of local business owners and the cringe-inducing firing of a Miami Police Chief, among other controversies.

A former busboy who rose through the hospitality industry to manage high-profile Brickell restaurant Sexy Fish while also holding a real estate broker’s license, Escalona is running on a promise to bring transparency, better basic services, lower taxes for seniors and improved permitting systems to the city.

He wants to improve public safety, support economic development, enhance communities, provide more affordable housing, lower taxes and advocate for better fiscal responsibility in government.

He told the Miami Herald that if elected, he’d fight to restore public trust by addressing public corruption while re-engaging residents who feel unheard by current officials.

Carollo, 55, a CPA who served two terms on the dais from 2009 to 2017, has argued that the district needs an experienced leader. He’s pointed to his record balancing budgets and pledges a residents-first agenda focused on safer streets, cleaner neighborhoods and responsive government.

Carollo was the top fundraiser in the District 3 race this cycle, amassing about $501,000 between his campaign account and political committee, Residents First, and spending about $389,500 by the last reporting dates.

Escalona, meanwhile, reported raising close to $109,000 through his campaign account and spending all but 6,000 by Dec. 4.

The winner will secure a four-year term.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Florida kicks off first black bear hunt in a decade, despite pushback

Published

on


For the first time in a decade, hunters armed with rifles and crossbows are fanning out across Florida’s swamps and flatwoods to legally hunt the Florida black bear, over the vocal opposition of critics.

The state-sanctioned hunt began Saturday, after drawing more than 160,000 applications for a far more limited number of hunting permits, including from opponents who are trying to reduce the number of bears killed in this year’s hunt, the state’s first since 2015.

The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission awarded 172 bear hunt permits by random lottery for this year’s season, allowing hunters to kill one bear each in areas where the population is deemed large enough. At least 43 of the permits went to opponents of the hunt who never intend to use them, according to the Florida chapter of the Sierra Club, which encouraged critics to apply in the hopes of saving bears.

The Florida black bear population is considered one of the state’s conservation success stories, having grown from just several hundred bears in the 1970s to an estimated more than 4,000 today.

The 172 people who were awarded a permit through a random lottery will be able to kill one bear each during the 2025 season, which runs from Dec. 6 to Dec. 28. The permits are specific to one of the state’s four designated bear hunting zones, each of which have a hunting quota set by state officials based on the bear population in each region.

In order to participate, hunters must hold a valid hunting license and a bear harvest permit, which costs $100 for residents and $300 for nonresidents, plus fees. Applications for the permits cost $5 each.

The regulated hunt will help incentivize maintaining healthy bear populations, and help fund the work that is needed, according to Mark Barton of the Florida chapter of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, an advocacy group that supported the hunt.

Having an annual hunt will help guarantee funding to “keep moving conservation for bears forward,” Barton said.

According to state wildlife officials, the bear population has grown enough to support a regulated hunt and warrant population management. The state agency sees hunting as an effective tool that is used to manage wildlife populations around the world, and allows the state to monetize conservation efforts through permit and application fees.

“While we have enough suitable bear habitat to support our current bear population levels, if the four largest subpopulations continue to grow at current rates, we will not have enough habitat at some point in the future,” reads a bear hunting guide published by the state wildlife commission.

___

Republished with permission of the Associated Press.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.