Connect with us

Business

The Gen Z glossary for Gen X managers: Here’s what your workers mean by “menty B” and “cozzie livs”

Published

on



As millions of workers have returned to the office, workplaces have welcomed a sizable cohort of Gen Z workers who came of age during the pandemic—and they’re bringing their own slang with them.

In a remote setting, language barriers were fairly easy to navigate with the safety net of Google (or rather, Urban Dictionary). But as conversations move from online to in person, it’s going to be impossible to subtly search the definition of “cozzie livs” when talking to younger staff members.

Just as research has shown that corporate jargon is isolating young workers because they don’t know the meaning of phrases like “deep dive,” it won’t be long until Gen X managers feel left out of watercooler chats with their twentysomething workers. 

“Lack of familiarity with Gen Z slang could potentially lead to misunderstandings or misinterpretations, hampering effective communication,” Jessica Kelly, CEO of the corporate well-being company Meet Your Mind, tells Fortune. “It could also create a generational divide, making it harder for different age groups to collaborate effectively.”

So here’s the list of some terms Gen Z (those born between 1997 and 2012) told Fortune they’re currently using that older generations ought to know—if they don’t already.

Slay

Like many of the words on this list that Gen Z are bringing to the workplace, “slay” isn’t exactly new. The compliment can loosely translate to “killing it” and has been used widely by Black people and the LGBTQ+ community for decades. But it has now entered the vocabulary of young people via TikTok.  

Menty B

If you have had a stressful day, sent the wrong email to your boss, or missed your train to the office, you might have a “menty B”—or rather a mental breakdown. The new lighthearted term is being used more for minor stressful situations than the very serious get-signed-off-work type. 

Cozzie livs

As in many parts of the world, the cost-of-living crisis is affecting every household in the U.K., with energy bills, food, rent, and interest rates spiraling. Youngsters in the country are affectionately referring to the current economic backdrop as the “cozzie livs.”

That slaps / Hits different

If something slaps, it’s very good. The term originally came from the hip-hop scene to describe a hit, but today people are using it to describe everything from their food to their work. For example, “The video you edited slaps. I’ve watched it three times already.” Similarly, if something hits different it means it’s better than expected. 

Ate that

This essentially refers to someone doing a great job. If a peer smashed a presentation at work, you might say, “They ate that.” Or for a job extra well done you could say, “They ate and left no crumbs.” Impressive items can also eat too, for example: “Those jeans eat.” 

Understood the assignment

This phrase pretty much means what it says on the can: Someone who understood the assignment got the task at hand and is excelling. For example, “Chris’s pitch won the clients over. He understood the assignment.” It can also be used when someone’s outfit is perfect for the occasion, like Princess Diana’s infamous revenge dress: She understood the assignment. 

Say less

Again, “say less” has been used for some time as an alternative to “say no more” by Black people, but Gen Z has recently popularized the term. You’d use this to confirm to your coworkers, “I’ve got it, you don’t have to say any more,” when they’re breaking down a task, for example. 

Sending me

This is the Gen Z equivalent of LOL (laugh out loud, for those who still think the acronym means lots of love). If you watched a video you found hilarious, you could say, “That sent me.” You can even spice it up by elaborating, for example: “That sent me into orbit” (it sent you so far, you ended up in space).

It’s giving

The term “it’s giving” (usually followed by a description, like “innocent intern” or “boss vibes”) refers to when something or someone is emitting a particular vibe. Be warned: This can be used in both a positive or negative sense.

_core

“Core” is a suffix that is being used to categorize a type of aesthetic. For example, #cottagecore is extremely popular on TikTok. It highlights everything from what someone who lives in the countryside might wear and the types of hobbies they’d have to how they’d decorate their home. Meanwhile, “Barbiecore” has been used to describe everything pink—from fashion to sofas for sale—that may have seemingly been inspired by the new movie.

Cheugy

Used to classify a product or trend as old, out-of-date, or cringeworthy, “cheugy” is predominantly negative and often used in reference to products or trends associated with millennials. So if young peer is describing your outfit as cheugy, it’s definitely not a compliment—although apparently even the word cheugy is becoming cheugy.

A note on acronyms and emojis 

Although you won’t feel the sting of embarrassment from misusing an emoji, as you would if you thought “cheugy” was a compliment, it’s still worth knowing the new rules of messaging for those days when you’re working from home.

To begin with, Gen Z apparently prefers to send a stream of small messages instead of one big note. Meanwhile, it’s out with LOL and in with IJBOL—“I just burst out laughing.”

Other acronyms worth noting include IYKYK (if you know you know) and W or L (for “win or loss,” like “take the L”).

Also, when it comes to emojis, gone is the use of thumbs-up and smiley faces. “That’s so basic,” sums up one Gen Zer at Fortune’s office. Instead, younger workers prefer to agree to their manager’s commands using the saluting face or handshake emoji. 

Meanwhile, the melting face is apparently the virtual equivalent of melting on the spot from embarrassment.

 A version of this story originally published on Fortune.com on September 12, 2023.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

U.S. consumers are so strained they put more than $1B on BNPL during Black Friday and Cyber Monday

Published

on



Financially strained and cautious customers leaned heavily on buy now, pay later (BNPL) services over the holiday weekend.

Cyber Monday alone generated $1.03 billion (a 4.2% increase YoY) in online BNPL sales with most transactions happening on mobile devices, per Adobe Analytics. Overall, consumers spent $14.25 billion online on Cyber Monday. To put that into perspective, BNPL made up for more than 7.2% of total online sales on that day.

As for Black Friday, eMarketer reported $747.5 million in online sales using BNPL services with platforms like PayPal finding a 23% uptick in BNPL transactions.

Likewise, digital financial services company Zip reported 1.6 million transactions throughout 280,000 of its locations over the Black Friday and Cyber Monday weekend. Millennials (51%) accounted for a chunk of the sizable BNPL purchases, followed by Gen Z, Gen X, and baby boomers, per Zip.

The Adobe data showed that people using BNPL were most likely to spend on categories such as electronics, apparel, toys, and furniture, which is consistent with previous years. This trend also tracks with Zip’s findings that shoppers were primarily investing in tech, electronics, and fashion when using its services.

And while some may be surprised that shoppers are taking on more debt via BNPL (in this economy?!), analysts had already projected a strong shopping weekend. A Deloitte survey forecast that consumers would spend about $650 million over the Black Friday–Cyber Monday stretch—a 15% jump from 2023.

“US retailers leaned heavily on discounts this holiday season to drive online demand,” Vivek Pandya, lead analyst at Adobe Digital Insights, said in a statement. “Competitive and persistent deals throughout Cyber Week pushed consumers to shop earlier, creating an environment where Black Friday now challenges the dominance of Cyber Monday.”

This report was originally published by Retail Brew.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

AI labs like Meta, Deepseek, and Xai earned worst grades possible on an existential safety index

Published

on



A recent report card from an AI safety watchdog isn’t one that tech companies will want to stick on the fridge.

The Future of Life Institute’s latest AI safety index found that major AI labs fell short on most measures of AI responsibility, with few letter grades rising above a C. The org graded eight companies across categories like safety frameworks, risk assessment, and current harms.

Perhaps most glaring was the “existential safety” line, where companies scored Ds and Fs across the board. While many of these companies are explicitly chasing superintelligence, they lack a plan for safely managing it, according to Max Tegmark, MIT professor and president of the Future of Life Institute.

“Reviewers found this kind of jarring,” Tegmark told us.

The reviewers in question were a panel of AI academics and governance experts who examined publicly available material as well as survey responses submitted by five of the eight companies.

Anthropic, OpenAI, and GoogleDeepMind took the top three spots with an overall grade of C+ or C. Then came, in order, Elon Musk’s Xai, Z.ai, Meta, DeepSeek, and Alibaba, all of which got Ds or a D-.

Tegmark blames a lack of regulation that has meant the cutthroat competition of the AI race trumps safety precautions. California recently passed the first law that requires frontier AI companies to disclose safety information around catastrophic risks, and New York is currently within spitting distance as well. Hopes for federal legislation are dim, however.

“Companies have an incentive, even if they have the best intentions, to always rush out new products before the competitor does, as opposed to necessarily putting in a lot of time to make it safe,” Tegmark said.

In lieu of government-mandated standards, Tegmark said the industry has begun to take the group’s regularly released safety indexes more seriously; four of the five American companies now respond to its survey (Meta is the only holdout.) And companies have made some improvements over time, Tegmark said, mentioning Google’s transparency around its whistleblower policy as an example.

But real-life harms reported around issues like teen suicides that chatbots allegedly encouraged, inappropriate interactions with minors, and major cyberattacks have also raised the stakes of the discussion, he said.

“[They] have really made a lot of people realize that this isn’t the future we’re talking about—it’s now,” Tegmark said.

The Future of Life Institute recently enlisted public figures as diverse as Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, former Trump aide Steve Bannon, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, and rapper Will.i.am to sign a statement opposing work that could lead to superintelligence.

Tegmark said he would like to see something like “an FDA for AI where companies first have to convince experts that their models are safe before they can sell them.

“The AI industry is quite unique in that it’s the only industry in the US making powerful technology that’s less regulated than sandwiches—basically not regulated at all,” Tegmark said. “If someone says, ‘I want to open a new sandwich shop near Times Square,’ before you can sell the first sandwich, you need a health inspector to check your kitchen and make sure it’s not full of rats…If you instead say, ‘Oh no, I’m not going to sell any sandwiches. I’m just going to release superintelligence.’ OK! No need for any inspectors, no need to get any approvals for anything.”

“So the solution to this is very obvious,” Tegmark added. “You just stop this corporate welfare of giving AI companies exemptions that no other companies get.”

This report was originally published by Tech Brew.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Hollywood writers say Warner takeover ‘must be blocked’

Published

on



Hollywood writers, producers, directors and theater owners voiced skepticism over Netflix Inc.’s proposed $82.7 billion takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery Inc.’s studio and streaming businesses, saying it threatens to undermine their interests.

The Writers Guild of America, which announced in October it would oppose any sale of Warner Bros., reiterated that view on Friday, saying the purchase by Netflix “must be blocked.”

“The world’s largest streaming company swallowing one of its biggest competitors is what antitrust laws were designed to prevent,” the guild said in an emailed statement. “The outcome would eliminate jobs, push down wages, worsen conditions for all entertainment workers, raise prices for consumers, and reduce the volume and diversity of content for all viewers.”

The worries raised by the movie and TV industry’s biggest trade groups come against the backdrop of falling movie and TV production, slack ticket sales and steep job cuts in Hollywood. Another legacy studio, Paramount, was sold earlier this year.

Warner Bros. accounts for about a fourth of North American ticket sales — roughly $2 billion — and is being acquired by a company that has long shunned theatrical releases for its feature films. As part of the deal, Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos has promised Warner Bros. will continue to release moves in theaters.

“The proposed acquisition of Warner Bros. by Netflix poses an unprecedented threat to the global exhibition business,” Michael O’Leary, chief executive officer of the theatrical trade group Cinema United, said in en emailed statement Friday. “The negative impact of this acquisition will impact theaters from the biggest circuits to one-screen independents.”

The buyout of Warner Bros. by Netflix “would be a disaster,” James Cameron, the director of some of Hollywood’s highest-grossing films in history including Titanic and Avatar, said in late November on The Town, an industry-focused podcast. “Sorry Ted, but jeez. Sarandos has gone on record saying theatrical films are dead.”

On a conference call with investors Friday, Sarandos said that his company’s resistance to releasing films in cinemas was mostly tied to “the long exclusive windows, which we don’t really think are that consumer friendly.”

The company said Friday it would “maintain Warner Bros.’ current operations and build on its strengths, including theatrical releases for films.”

On the call, Sarandos reiterated that view, saying that, “right now, you should count on everything that is planned on going to the theater through Warner Bros. will continue to go to the theaters through Warner Bros.” 

Competition from online outfits like YouTube and Netflix has forced a reckoning in Hollywood, opening the door for takeovers like the Warner Bros. deal announced Friday. Media giants including Comcast Corp., parent of NBCUniversal, are unloading cable-TV networks like MS Now and USA, and steering resources into streaming. 

In an emailed note to Warner Bros. employees on Friday, Chief Executive Officer David Zaslav said the board’s decision to sell the company “reflects the realities of an industry undergoing generational change in how stories are financed, produced, distributed, and discovered.”

The Producers Guild of America said Friday its members are “rightfully concerned about Netflix’s intended acquisition of one of our industry’s most storied and meaningful studios,” while a spokesperson for the Directors Guild of America raised concerns about future pay at Warner Bros.

“We will be meeting with Netflix to outline our concerns and better understand their vision for the future of the company,” the Directors Guild said.

In September, the DGA appointed director Christopher Nolan as its president. Nolan has previously criticized Netflix’s model of releasing films exclusively online, or simultaneously in a small number of cinemas, and has said he won’t make movies for the company.

The Screen Actors Guild said Friday that the transaction “raises many serious questions about its impact on the future of the entertainment industry, and especially the human creative talent whose livelihoods and careers depend on it.”

Oscar winner Jane Fonda spoke out on Thursday before the deal was announced. 

“Consolidation at this scale would be catastrophic for an industry built on free expression, for the creative workers who power it, and for consumers who depend on a free, independent media ecosystem to understand the world,” the star of the Netflix series Grace and Frankie wrote on the Ankler industry news website.

Netflix and Warner Bros. obviously don’t see it that way. In his statement to employees, Zaslav said “the proposed combination of Warner Bros. and Netflix reflects complementary strengths, more choice and value for consumers, a stronger entertainment industry, increased opportunity for creative talent, and long-term value creation for shareholders.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.