Connect with us

Business

The Deadhead who became a $38 billion CEO: What HubSpot founder Brian Halligan learned from Jerry Garcia and passed on to his MIT students

Published

on



On one hot June day in 1985, a 17-year-old Brian Halligan walked out to a Cape Cod road, scrawled “Saratoga Springs” on a piece of wood, and stuck out his thumb. 

He and Eric Olson, a fellow high-school student and his partner in a painting company, had decided to follow a certain band on tour. Their car, a battered Subaru Brat with a broken starter, wasn’t exactly road-trip-proof. So they thumbed rides from the eastern tip of Massachusetts to the Adirondack foothills, camped for a couple of nights near the venue, took in the tunes, and then hitchhiked home.

Halligan didn’t know it yet, but that first show would take him from a curious listener into a full-blown superfan of the Grateful Dead. And throughout his professional life— he became a cofounder and former CEO of HubSpot, which at its peak valuation in late 2024 had a market capitalization of about $38 billion, a partner at Sequoia Capital working with hot AI startups, and a senior lecturer at MIT — he has carried the Dead’s ethos with him. 

On Tuesday, he’s releasing a new edition of his book, Marketing Lessons From the Grateful Dead. The book folds together his dual life, Deadhead kid hitchhiking to a concert and the scale-up CEO advising founders burning through growth curves never before seen in tech. 

At first glance, it might seem like a bizarre pairing. But Halligan believes the Dead behaved like great founders long before Silicon Valley formalized the playbook. Traditional business-school frameworks? “A lot of this is bullsh–t,” Halligan said. 

He should know. In three years, Halligan and his cofounder Dharmesh Shah scaled HubSpot, a software platform for marketing, from revenues of $250,000 to $15 million — during the 2008 financial crisis. And he said he was inspired by the Dead’s experimentation, user feedback and unconventional strategies while building. 

Take, for example, the band’s taping culture. Rather than crack down on fans recording shows, as other artists at the time did, the Dead created designated “taper sections,” allowing people to tape multiple nights, pick the best performance and trade copies on campuses. 

“That’s how they spread the music,” Halligan said. “Not radio. Not PR. It was the customers doing the work.” 

He calls it an early version of “freemium” business models, which is what helped propel HubSpot to success early on as they promoted their free SEO and Twitter tracker for companies.

Or take the Dead’s mail-order ticketing system — “disintermediation before Amazon,” as he puts it. To get the best seats, fans mailed in handwritten index cards, postal money orders, and elaborately decorated envelopes with flowers and busses and mushrooms. Scalpers were cut out entirely.

Fans with the most creativity — not the most money — ended up closest to the stage, Halligan recalled.

Dead concerts were also broadly built around participation: fans showed up in homemade tie-dyes, face paint, wings, capes, mushroom hats, anything that signaled they were part of the scene rather than just spectators. Parking lots functioned as marketplaces, jam sessions, costume parades and social networks all at once. 

“Everyone was part of the show,” Halligan said, noting that this ethos came from the band’s early days at Ken Kesey’s Acid Tests, where the expectation was that every attendee contributed to the experience.

Halligan sees a direct parallel to founders, like former Amazon CEO and founder Jeff Bezos, who are “obsessed with their customers” today. Rather than being focused on going to market, and thus choosing slick, revenue-maximizing shortcuts, founders who are deeply interested in their consumers will choose the long, difficult, user-first path. 

That sort of humility should also come through your hiring, Halligan advised; your team should be full of people who challenge and frustrate you with their differences, rather than carbon copies of yourself. The Dead’s makeup— players of bluegrass, blues, avant-garde jazz and country—was what Halligan calls “spiky,” not smooth. It’s the same advice he gives founders today: build teams around people who don’t resemble one another.

“The most tempting thing is to hire people just like you,” he said. “But innovation comes from spiky teams, not uniform ones.”

Jerry Garcia as the ultimate CEO

Halligan is not your average music fan. He started out that way: “I kind of liked this stuff,” the CEO remembered of Olson, his friend, blasting tapes from a boombox on job sites.

But by the time Halligan went off to college at the University of Vermont, he was fully immersed. This was Dead country, with cover bands constantly playing and Phish, founded by another UVM deadhead out of the college town of Burlington, coming up through the local scene.

Halligan estimates he saw the Grateful Dead around 40 times while lead Jerry Garcia was alive, and hundreds more shows from various post-Garcia lineups after that. 

“I don’t know the number … a lot,” he said.

That teenage obsession never really went away. Today, Halligan owns Wolf, Jerry Garcia’s famous custom guitar, despite not knowing how to play guitar too much. He bought it at auction in 2018 and is very clear about how he sees that role: “I’m not really the owner, I’m the steward,” he said. 

He lets serious players use it; John Mayer has played it onstage with Dead & Co.

 “I don’t think [Garcia] would have wanted it sitting in my apartment or in a museum.”

Halligan thinks a lot about Garcia; he’s “ran into” his family several times at different events, he said. He sees Garcia, in particular, as having the personality of the perfect “founder.” 

Halligan thinks CEOs too often model themselves on the loudest personalities in tech. Garcia, he argues, was the opposite of a front-man CEO: quiet, craft-driven, allergic to theatrics.

“He wore the same black T-shirt. He didn’t care about being a rock star,” Halligan said. “He cared about the music.”

Those traits form the backbone of the framework Halligan now uses to evaluate young, eager, founders, which he calls FLOCK: first-principles, lovable, obsessed, courageous, knowledgeable. By his own measure, Garcia scores “a 10 on all of those.”

Garcia ignored industry convention and built his own systems (first-principles), attracted fiercely loyal followers (lovable), practiced obsessively (“he’d take his guitar into the bathroom”), took huge creative risks like the multimillion-dollar Wall of Sound (courageous), and surrounded himself with wildly different, deeply talented musicians (knowledgeable).

And the cherry on top, for Halligan: the Dead started in Palo Alto, playing pizza joints a few blocks from Stanford.

“They grew out of this beat generation – the psychedelic generation – and they were the original San Francisco, Silicon Valley startup that went through generations and exists today,” Halligan said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

SpaceX to offer insider shares at record-setting valuation

Published

on



SpaceX is preparing to sell insider shares in a transaction that would value Elon Musk’s rocket and satellite maker at a valuation higher than OpenAI’s record-setting $500 billion, people familiar with the matter said.

One of the people briefed on the deal said that the share price under discussion is higher than $400 apiece, which would value SpaceX at between $750 billion and $800 billion, though the details could change. 

The company’s latest tender offer was discussed by its board of directors on Thursday at SpaceX’s Starbase hub in Texas. If confirmed, it would make SpaceX once again the world’s most valuable closely held company, vaulting past the previous record of $500 billion that ChatGPT owner OpenAI set in October. Play Video

Preliminary scenarios included per-share prices that would have pushed SpaceX’s value at roughly $560 billion or higher, the people said. The details of the deal could change before it closes, a third person said. 

A representative for SpaceX didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. 

The latest figure would be a substantial increase from the $212 a share set in July, when the company raised money and sold shares at a valuation of $400 billion.

The Wall Street Journal and Financial Times, citing unnamed people familiar with the matter, earlier reported that a deal would value SpaceX at $800 billion.

News of SpaceX’s valuation sent shares of EchoStar Corp., a satellite TV and wireless company, up as much as 18%. Last month, Echostar had agreed to sell spectrum licenses to SpaceX for $2.6 billion, adding to an earlier agreement to sell about $17 billion in wireless spectrum to Musk’s company.

Subscribe Now: The Business of Space newsletter covers NASA, key industry events and trends.

The world’s most prolific rocket launcher, SpaceX dominates the space industry with its Falcon 9 rocket that launches satellites and people to orbit.

SpaceX is also the industry leader in providing internet services from low-Earth orbit through Starlink, a system of more than 9,000 satellites that is far ahead of competitors including Amazon.com Inc.’s Amazon Leo.

SpaceX executives have repeatedly floated the idea of spinning off SpaceX’s Starlink business into a separate, publicly traded company — a concept President Gwynne Shotwell first suggested in 2020. 

However, Musk cast doubt on the prospect publicly over the years and Chief Financial Officer Bret Johnsen said in 2024 that a Starlink IPO would be something that would take place more likely “in the years to come.”

The Information, citing people familiar with the discussions, separately reported on Friday that SpaceX has told investors and financial institution representatives that it is aiming for an initial public offering for the entire company in the second half of next year.

A so-called tender or secondary offering, through which employees and some early shareholders can sell shares, provides investors in closely held companies such as SpaceX a way to generate liquidity.

SpaceX is working to develop its new Starship vehicle, advertised as the most powerful rocket ever developed to loft huge numbers of Starlink satellites as well as carry cargo and people to moon and, eventually, Mars.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

U.S. consumers are so strained they put more than $1B on BNPL during Black Friday and Cyber Monday

Published

on



Financially strained and cautious customers leaned heavily on buy now, pay later (BNPL) services over the holiday weekend.

Cyber Monday alone generated $1.03 billion (a 4.2% increase YoY) in online BNPL sales with most transactions happening on mobile devices, per Adobe Analytics. Overall, consumers spent $14.25 billion online on Cyber Monday. To put that into perspective, BNPL made up for more than 7.2% of total online sales on that day.

As for Black Friday, eMarketer reported $747.5 million in online sales using BNPL services with platforms like PayPal finding a 23% uptick in BNPL transactions.

Likewise, digital financial services company Zip reported 1.6 million transactions throughout 280,000 of its locations over the Black Friday and Cyber Monday weekend. Millennials (51%) accounted for a chunk of the sizable BNPL purchases, followed by Gen Z, Gen X, and baby boomers, per Zip.

The Adobe data showed that people using BNPL were most likely to spend on categories such as electronics, apparel, toys, and furniture, which is consistent with previous years. This trend also tracks with Zip’s findings that shoppers were primarily investing in tech, electronics, and fashion when using its services.

And while some may be surprised that shoppers are taking on more debt via BNPL (in this economy?!), analysts had already projected a strong shopping weekend. A Deloitte survey forecast that consumers would spend about $650 million over the Black Friday–Cyber Monday stretch—a 15% jump from 2023.

“US retailers leaned heavily on discounts this holiday season to drive online demand,” Vivek Pandya, lead analyst at Adobe Digital Insights, said in a statement. “Competitive and persistent deals throughout Cyber Week pushed consumers to shop earlier, creating an environment where Black Friday now challenges the dominance of Cyber Monday.”

This report was originally published by Retail Brew.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

AI labs like Meta, Deepseek, and Xai earned worst grades possible on an existential safety index

Published

on



A recent report card from an AI safety watchdog isn’t one that tech companies will want to stick on the fridge.

The Future of Life Institute’s latest AI safety index found that major AI labs fell short on most measures of AI responsibility, with few letter grades rising above a C. The org graded eight companies across categories like safety frameworks, risk assessment, and current harms.

Perhaps most glaring was the “existential safety” line, where companies scored Ds and Fs across the board. While many of these companies are explicitly chasing superintelligence, they lack a plan for safely managing it, according to Max Tegmark, MIT professor and president of the Future of Life Institute.

“Reviewers found this kind of jarring,” Tegmark told us.

The reviewers in question were a panel of AI academics and governance experts who examined publicly available material as well as survey responses submitted by five of the eight companies.

Anthropic, OpenAI, and GoogleDeepMind took the top three spots with an overall grade of C+ or C. Then came, in order, Elon Musk’s Xai, Z.ai, Meta, DeepSeek, and Alibaba, all of which got Ds or a D-.

Tegmark blames a lack of regulation that has meant the cutthroat competition of the AI race trumps safety precautions. California recently passed the first law that requires frontier AI companies to disclose safety information around catastrophic risks, and New York is currently within spitting distance as well. Hopes for federal legislation are dim, however.

“Companies have an incentive, even if they have the best intentions, to always rush out new products before the competitor does, as opposed to necessarily putting in a lot of time to make it safe,” Tegmark said.

In lieu of government-mandated standards, Tegmark said the industry has begun to take the group’s regularly released safety indexes more seriously; four of the five American companies now respond to its survey (Meta is the only holdout.) And companies have made some improvements over time, Tegmark said, mentioning Google’s transparency around its whistleblower policy as an example.

But real-life harms reported around issues like teen suicides that chatbots allegedly encouraged, inappropriate interactions with minors, and major cyberattacks have also raised the stakes of the discussion, he said.

“[They] have really made a lot of people realize that this isn’t the future we’re talking about—it’s now,” Tegmark said.

The Future of Life Institute recently enlisted public figures as diverse as Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, former Trump aide Steve Bannon, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, and rapper Will.i.am to sign a statement opposing work that could lead to superintelligence.

Tegmark said he would like to see something like “an FDA for AI where companies first have to convince experts that their models are safe before they can sell them.

“The AI industry is quite unique in that it’s the only industry in the US making powerful technology that’s less regulated than sandwiches—basically not regulated at all,” Tegmark said. “If someone says, ‘I want to open a new sandwich shop near Times Square,’ before you can sell the first sandwich, you need a health inspector to check your kitchen and make sure it’s not full of rats…If you instead say, ‘Oh no, I’m not going to sell any sandwiches. I’m just going to release superintelligence.’ OK! No need for any inspectors, no need to get any approvals for anything.”

“So the solution to this is very obvious,” Tegmark added. “You just stop this corporate welfare of giving AI companies exemptions that no other companies get.”

This report was originally published by Tech Brew.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.