Connect with us

Business

Tesla may have no new car coming after all as report reveals plan to launch a stripped down Model Y 

Published

on



  • The much touted $25,000 entry level Tesla, known colloquially as the Model 2, may not be built, dashing investor hopes. Instead, future sales growth may have to come from a car without steering wheel or pedals—the CyberCab.

The biggest mystery surrounding Tesla’s product roadmap may have been lifted on Thursday, with news trickling out of China that suggests there may be no Model 2 after all.

First reported by local tech website 36kr and later confirmed by Reuters, Tesla is developing a low-priced version of the Model Y, its best seller with roughly 1.1 million units sold. This suggests that hopes of a coming entry level compact car, possibly a hatchback rather than a sedan, will not come to fruition. 

The car codenamed “E41” will start production next year in Shanghai and will be at least 20% cheaper to produce than the current refreshed Model Y known as “Juniper”, according to Reuters. It could come even earlier if Juniper disappoints, sources told 36kr.

Tesla did not respond to a request by Fortune for comment. 

Since many institutional investors put a premium on tangible sales of EVs over hazier dreams of building humanoid robots, a key growth assumption for many was Tesla entering a new segment, like the compact car, where it could expand its total addressable market. 

These hopes persisted largely because Tesla has been coy about its actual product roadmap ever since last April. “Plans for new vehicles, including more affordable models, remain on track for start of production in the first half of 2025” is the most explicit it has gone in its comments.  

Chief executive Elon Musk kept these embers of hope burning late last year when he promised in October that Tesla EV sales would surge this year. 

“With our lower-cost vehicles, with the advent of autonomy, something like a 20 to 30 percent growth next year is my best guess,” he said

This was not repeated in January’s fourth quarter investor call, however. Officially Tesla is only aiming to increase sales. Analysts are now slashing their forecasts to reflect ongoing boycotts and a lack of compelling new product

Growth story in doubt

First teased as costing $25,000 back in September 2020, the low-cost car has long been for many investors a bigger strategic priority than the Cybertruck, with estimated annual sales in the millions. 

No carmaker had ever achieved such a feat. If Tesla managed to turn an expensive mid-size electric vehicle into the world’s most popular car, then it was trusted to build a smaller, low-cost model that could breach the 2 million unit ceiling in a single year. 

But the last supposed spy photographs of what some believed to be a Model 2 came in early 2023, prior to a Reuters report last April that revealed plans for a low-cost car built on the next-gen platform it would share with the CyberCab had been scrapped. 

The stock tanked on that news, but Musk was able to restore faith that Tesla’s growth story was intact by saying he had accelerated plans for a new more affordable model by six months to the first half of this year. 

‘Having a regular 25k model is pointless’

Yet he never got more specific. During the same October call when Musk predicted growth of up to 30% in 2025, he then made a comment whose significance may have been underappreciated at the time. 

“Having a regular 25k model is pointless, it would be silly, like it would be completely at odds with what we believe,” he said.

At the time that was interpreted to mean Musk simply would not launch a new product that was so cheap as to not come equipped with its Full Self Driving hardware, an AI inference computer known as AI4 (previously HW4). 

Now it seems increasingly clear the explosive growth Tesla forecasts will come from only one model: the CyberCab. The silver lining is Musk estimates its sales could amount to 2 million a year, or even 4 million. 

But that is little consolation for investors because of one key concern: the CyberCab has no steering wheel or pedals. It requires a full legal and regulatory framework in place in order to be sold and operated on public roads. 

Nor can Tesla simply convert the CyberCab into a car for sale by adding human controls, because the market for two-door cars seating a maximum of three people is minuscule. The vehicle as it is conceived and designed is likley only financially viable as a vehicle for robotaxi fleets.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

American postmaster wants Elon Musk’s DOGE to save ‘broken’ USPS

Published

on



America’s postmaster general knew that sooner or later, DOGE would come calling at the US Postal Service.

So Louis DeJoy decided to have DOGE work with him.

The nation’s top mailman this week signed an agreement with Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency to collaborate on reforms to the sprawling service, which delivers letters and packages from tropical Guam to the Alaskan wilderness. Rather than wait for the DOGE crew to dictate changes, DeJoy is seeking to shape them. 

“This was a short and healthy conversation” that stated a few days ago, DeJoy said in an interview. “We’re off to the races.”

Read More: Postal Service Head Signs DOGE Agreement to Spur Reforms

He also wants to cement in place a series of reforms he’s been pursuing for the last four years. Unnoticed by most Americans, the venerable Post Office has been trying to reinvent itself, cutting expenses while shifting to a modern hub-and-spoke distribution system similar to competitors United Parcel Service Inc. and FedEx Corp.

For customers at least, DeJoy’s “Delivering for America” reform plan has produced limited results, with many Americans now waiting longer to get their mail. But in a letter to Congressional leaders Thursday disclosing the DOGE deal, DeJoy touted the costs — and staff — already cut and said the service is headed for better days.

“The Postal Service once faced the immediate threat of insolvency, which would have required a taxpayer bailout,” he wrote. “Now, the Postal Service is instead finally experiencing an unprecedented period of growth and innovation.”

DeJoy already announced he intends to step down from his office, even though the 10-year Delivering for America plan isn’t yet halfway through. President Donald Trump has mused about taking the service private or folding it into the Department of Commerce, while Musk also called for privatization. In contrast, DeJoy’s letter called for ensuring that some version of his own reforms continues after his departure. 

At least two DOGE and GSA employees will work under DeJoy’s supervision, searching for potential savings and efficiencies, according to a person familiar with the details of the plan. “It’s not an army,” DeJoy said. “I still run the organization.”

Reforming the nearly 250-year-old Postal Service, which employs 635,000 people, is a complex task — in part because of its mandate. Unlike its private competitors, the USPS is required to reach Americans even in the most remote places, no matter how sparsely populated. Indeed, UPS and FedEx alike pay the service to cover “last-mile” deliveries in many rural areas where they would otherwise struggle to operate profitably. And while it’s an independent government agency, not directly under White House control, it faces regulations and legal requirements its private competitors don’t.

“The level of transformation needed at the US Post Office to basically be a profitable network in 2025, versus what DeJoy’s actually been able to move the dial on, there’s a huge disconnect between those two,” said Derek Lossing, founder of Cirrus Global Advisors, a logistics consulting firm.

Big Losses

In his letter, DeJoy, a former private-sector logistics executive and Trump donor who took office in 2020, said he inherited an organization that had experienced close to $100 billion in losses and was on track to lose another $200 billion. 

“When I got there, I didn’t take into account how broken we were,” DeJoy told Bloomberg in December. 

He never envisioned staying at the agency for this long. “I originally came here for three years, fell in love with the people,” DeJoy said on Thursday. “It’s very, very important work.”

Some of the changes he implemented were relatively straightforward, such as making sure trucks were full before going out on a route rather than sending out a driver with a half-empty trailer. Others were bigger, including consolidating facilities and shifting volume away from expensive air transport to ground trucks. The service also is establishing a series of 60 regional distribution centers. 

He increased revenue by focusing more on packages and raising rates, with the cost of a stamp rising 33% between January 2019 and July 2024. The service is largely self-funded through its revenue from operations.

DeJoy has also trimmed the service’s immense payroll, cutting its labor workforce by 30,000 people from fiscal 2021, with another 10,000 expected to depart in a voluntary early retirement program. And yet, for all the changes, the service posted a $9.5 billion loss last year, while on-time delivery of first-class mail declined. 

DeJoy sees slower deliveries as temporary growing pains. He’s pushing employees “to step up and act like FedEx and UPS.” Those are “formidable organizations, and we had a lot of transition, a lot of heavy baggage,” he said. Come summer, “we’re gonna be rocking.”

In his letter, DeJoy asked Congress to fix some issues the service itself cannot. In particular, he said unfunded federal legislative mandates saddle the agency with $6 billion to $11 billion in annual costs. And he took particular aim at the Postal Regulatory Commission, which oversees the service’s rates and performance. He called it an “unnecessary agency” too attached to “defective pricing models and decades old bureaucratic processes.”

‘Failed Miserably’

The commission promptly fired back, issuing a statement Thursday that DeJoy’s Delivering for America program had made the service less efficient and degraded its performance, particularly in rural areas. Commissioners also slammed his focus on the highly competitive package market, calling it “a strategy which has failed miserably to this point.”

In February, DeJoy asked the Postal Service Board of Governors to begin looking for his replacement, a process he hopes will take months rather than years. Even some critics of his plan praise him with taking on a difficult task. 

“His successor has a mess, in short,” said Paul Steidler, a senior fellow at the Lexington Institute, a center-right think tank in Virginia. “His plan hasn’t worked, but give the guy some credit. At least he took a shot.”

DeJoy himself feels more confident stepping away now. “They know what they need to do, and that’s why I feel comfortable in giving the leave,” he said. “And if I get this help that I just laid out with these issues, the Postal Service will be in great shape for a long time.”

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Becoming an accountant is more accessible as 3 states scrap the stringent 150-hour education requirement

Published

on

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Nvidia surpasses Tesla as the No. 1 held stock on Robinhood, fueled by Gen Z interest

Published

on



  • Nvidia is loved by young investors, but despite the alarm caused by DeepSeek and tariffs, many investors are still bullish about the company’s future.

Nvidia investors have had a mind-blowing experience in the last five years. The tech hardware company’s stock value has skyrocketed over 1,800% since 2020, elevating Nvidia to become one of the most valuable companies in the entire world—and interest from young investors may be to thank.

The company recently overtook Tesla as the top-held stock on Robinhood, the investing platform with 75% funded accounts held by Gen Z and Millenials. Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev tells Bloomberg that investing in companies like Nvidia is going to be more important than ever, thanks to AI.

“I think AI is going to make investing more important because if control over the technology is going to be centralized in the technology companies, then you have to be an investor in those companies to benefit,” he says.

Many Gen Zers are already listening. On any given day, Nvidia is one of the most commonly discussed individual stocks on the 18-million-user strong subReddit r/wallstreetbets, and over 88,000 individuals are part of the NVDA_Stock community, one that exclusively discusses investing in the tech company.

Nvidia is a growing linchpin in the U.S. economy 

Nvidia is one of the most closely watched stocks globally, and experts now say its earning reports are now on par with U.S. jobs reports in terms of driving market moves.

The company’s most recent earnings results smashed expectations, having generated $39.3 billion in the last part of 2024 alone. Many industry analysts are also bullish about Nvidia’s future, placing it in a “Buy” recommendation, according to Barron’s

But the company has had somewhat of a rocky start to 2025. Off news of DeepSeek’s ability to match U.S. AI at a fraction of the cost, Nvidia’s value dropped $500 billion, and its stock price has somewhat stagnated ever since. This has led some investors to question whether the company’s impressive growth in 2023 and 2024 will be mimicked in the years to come, especially in the wake of tariffs and rising fears of a U.S. recession

CNBC’s Jim Cramer says many Nvidia investors may be too quick to drop the stock.

“The relentless selling in Nvidia is a sign, once again, or the weak shareholder base that only knows it is a hot stock not that it is a great company, plus worries about a potential Taiwan sellout by President Trump,” Cramer wrote on X in early March.

Gen Zers are investing earlier than ever

Gen Zers are beginning to invest earlier than ever. According to Charles Schwab’s Moden Wealth Survey, the generation on average is starting at age 19—that’s compared to age 25 for Millenials and 35 for Baby Boomers. Given ongoing concerns about financial literacy, it’s more important than ever for younger generations to understand the risks associated with investing. 

Sherron Permashwar, CPA and financial education expert, says for new investors, buying an individual stock or two, like Nvidia, can be a great way to become educated on the stock market and its ebbs and flows. 

“You don’t want to make mistakes on your $400,000 portfolio. You want to make mistakes on your $4,000 portfolio,” she says.

Having a diversified portfolio, such as with an ETF, is the smart move since it can minimize risk, she adds. Moreover, despite Nvidia being the second-best performer in the entire S&P 500 last year, not having all your eggs in one basket can avoid falling for the misconception that past performance might dictate future results.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.