Connect with us

Politics

St. Pete City Council is all in for Science Center, even if Ken Welch isn’t

Published

on


St. Petersburg City Council voted unanimously Thursday to support selling city land to allow a private group to revitalize and reopen the long-shuttered St. Petersburg Science Center, which the city currently owns. 

St. Pete for STEAM, the group working to reactivate the Center, had already entered into an agreement with the city to pay $1.6 million for the Science Center site.

The vote came after passionate comments from Council members who took issue with Mayor Ken Welch’s administration’s assertion that a land sale is not feasible due to possible future waste water resource needs. 

At issue is a feasibility study the city commissioned in which the Science Center was identified as the most feasible site for a new water reclamation facility — which is not currently planned or funded. Welch said last month he is no longer considering selling the property based on feasibility report results.

City Council members agreed the city should be proactive in identifying feasible space for future waste and storm water capacity, but they disagreed that it had to be at the Science Center site. 

“The most prudent thing to do is to not build this and save that land for future tanks,” City Council member Mike Harting said. But, he added, “prudent is not necessarily a consideration.”

He said the city can find a way to set land aside for future water resources use, while still moving forward with the Science Center project, which is being undertaken entirely by private interests, with both public and private dollars that have largely already been raised.

And that’s what the motion Council members unanimously approved said. City Council member Gina Driscoll, who called for Thursday’s discussion, moved to have the city move forward with its agreement to sell land for the Science Center’s use, while also continuing to identify a location for future water resources needs. 

Council members were clear the project is important to the community. 

“We need a win and, selfishly, I’d love for that win to be on the West side of St. Petersburg,” said Council member Copley Gerdes, who represents District 1 on the West side. “I do think, if there’s a way to get an ‘and’ rather than an ‘or,’ I’d certainly love to get there.”

Even Deborah Figgs-Sanders, one of Welch’s top allies, said the city should “figure out how we can do both.” 

And Richie Floyd, a self-described Democratic socialist who is often skeptical of economic development projects, reminded that the city has an obligation to provide certainty to those looking to do business with the city. 

“We let them get a long way down the road before we pulled the rug,” he lamented of Welch’s change of heart on selling the city-owned Science Center land to the group seeking revitalization. 

The feasibility report at issue in Thursday’s discussion examined nine sites within the Northwest St. Pete geographic area to build new water storage tanks, including the Science Center.

The Science Center and an existing brush site were ranked the most feasible locations for a future water project. 

Both sites ranked similarly, with the brush site ranking better for ease of construction.

The difference came down to demolition costs. Because the brush site amounts to basically cleared land, except for some brush and debris piles that would need to be cleared, the Science Center’s demolition costs would be about four times as expensive.

The city’s feasibility center further looked at land acquisition costs. Because it already owns the Science Center property, no cost would be associated with acquiring that property. However, if the brush site were to be used, the city would have to acquire new land to establish a new brush site. It estimated that cost at $2.9 million, far more than the $1.6 million the St. Pete STEAM has agreed on to purchase the Science Center site.

But there are potential flaws in determining those costs. The study used a specific address — 2401 72nd St. North — as a comparison for property value. That property includes a well-maintained warehouse that includes 7,000 square feet of office space.

A presentation Florida Politics previously obtained offered an alternative cost at just $1.3 million, factoring a price of $650,000 per acre for land and highest and best use, for two acres to accommodate the brush site. 

One of the project’s biggest proponents is former St. Pete City Council member Robert Blackmon. Blackmon ran unsuccessfully against Welch in the 2021 Mayor’s race. 

He was on hand Thursday for the conversation. 

“Today shows that there is universal public and political support for this project. Hopefully Mayor Welch hears the message and reverses course without delay. Our citizens demand it, and our children deserve it,” he told Florida Politics. 

The project also has broad community support. Letters of support have been received from various professors at the University of South Florida, the Tampa Bay Rays, Orlando Health, state Rep. Michele Rayner, Pinellas County School Board member Caprice Edmond, and more.

And local officials have worked diligently to draw down public dollars in support of the project, including former U.S. Rep. Charlie Crist, state Sen. Darryl Rouson and state Reps. Linda Chaney and Berny Jacques.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Carlos G. Smith files bill to allow medical pot patients to grow their own plants

Published

on


Home cultivation of marijuana plants could be legal under certain conditions.

Medical marijuana patients may not have to go to the dispensary for their medicine if new legislation in the Senate passes.

Sen. Carlos G. Smith’s SB 776 would permit patients aged 21 and older to grow up to six pot plants.

They could use the homegrown product, but just like the dispensary weed, they would not be able to re-sell.

Medical marijuana treatment centers would be the only acceptable sourcing for plants and seeds, a move that would protect the cannabis’ custody.

Those growing the plants would be obliged to keep them secured from “unauthorized persons.”

Chances this becomes law may be slight.

A House companion for the legislation has yet to be filed. And legislators have demonstrated little appetite for homegrow in the past.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Rolando Escalona aims to deny Frank Carollo a return to the Miami Commission

Published

on


Early voting is now underway in Miami for a Dec. 9 runoff that will decide whether political newcomer Rolando Escalona can block former Commissioner Frank Carollo from reclaiming the District 3 seat long held by the Carollo family.

The contest has already been marked by unusual turbulence: both candidates faced eligibility challenges that threatened — but ultimately failed — to knock them off the ballot.

Escalona survived a dramatic residency challenge in October after a rival candidate accused him of faking his address. A Miami-Dade Judge rejected the claim following a detailed, three-hour trial that examined everything from his lease records to his Amazon orders.

After the Nov. 4 General Election — when Carollo took about 38% of the vote and Escalona took 17% to outpace six other candidates — Carollo cleared his own legal hurdle when another Judge ruled he could remain in the race despite the city’s new lifetime term limits that, according to three residents who sued, should have barred him from running again.

Those rulings leave voters with a stark choice in District 3, which spans Little Havana, East Shenandoah, West Brickell and parts of Silver Bluff and the Roads.

The runoff pits a self-described political outsider against a veteran official with deep institutional experience and marks a last chance to extend the Carollo dynasty to a twentieth straight year on the dais or block that potentiality.

Escalona, 34, insists voters are ready to move on from the chaos and litigation that have surrounded outgoing Commissioner Joe Carollo, whose tenure included a $63.5 million judgment against him for violating the First Amendment rights of local business owners and the cringe-inducing firing of a Miami Police Chief, among other controversies.

A former busboy who rose through the hospitality industry to manage high-profile Brickell restaurant Sexy Fish while also holding a real estate broker’s license, Escalona is running on a promise to bring transparency, better basic services, lower taxes for seniors and improved permitting systems to the city.

He wants to improve public safety, support economic development, enhance communities, provide more affordable housing, lower taxes and advocate for better fiscal responsibility in government.

He told the Miami Herald that if elected, he’d fight to restore public trust by addressing public corruption while re-engaging residents who feel unheard by current officials.

Carollo, 55, a CPA who served two terms on the dais from 2009 to 2017, has argued that the district needs an experienced leader. He’s pointed to his record balancing budgets and pledges a residents-first agenda focused on safer streets, cleaner neighborhoods and responsive government.

Carollo was the top fundraiser in the District 3 race this cycle, amassing about $501,000 between his campaign account and political committee, Residents First, and spending about $389,500 by the last reporting dates.

Escalona, meanwhile, reported raising close to $109,000 through his campaign account and spending all but 6,000 by Dec. 4.

The winner will secure a four-year term.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Florida kicks off first black bear hunt in a decade, despite pushback

Published

on


For the first time in a decade, hunters armed with rifles and crossbows are fanning out across Florida’s swamps and flatwoods to legally hunt the Florida black bear, over the vocal opposition of critics.

The state-sanctioned hunt began Saturday, after drawing more than 160,000 applications for a far more limited number of hunting permits, including from opponents who are trying to reduce the number of bears killed in this year’s hunt, the state’s first since 2015.

The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission awarded 172 bear hunt permits by random lottery for this year’s season, allowing hunters to kill one bear each in areas where the population is deemed large enough. At least 43 of the permits went to opponents of the hunt who never intend to use them, according to the Florida chapter of the Sierra Club, which encouraged critics to apply in the hopes of saving bears.

The Florida black bear population is considered one of the state’s conservation success stories, having grown from just several hundred bears in the 1970s to an estimated more than 4,000 today.

The 172 people who were awarded a permit through a random lottery will be able to kill one bear each during the 2025 season, which runs from Dec. 6 to Dec. 28. The permits are specific to one of the state’s four designated bear hunting zones, each of which have a hunting quota set by state officials based on the bear population in each region.

In order to participate, hunters must hold a valid hunting license and a bear harvest permit, which costs $100 for residents and $300 for nonresidents, plus fees. Applications for the permits cost $5 each.

The regulated hunt will help incentivize maintaining healthy bear populations, and help fund the work that is needed, according to Mark Barton of the Florida chapter of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, an advocacy group that supported the hunt.

Having an annual hunt will help guarantee funding to “keep moving conservation for bears forward,” Barton said.

According to state wildlife officials, the bear population has grown enough to support a regulated hunt and warrant population management. The state agency sees hunting as an effective tool that is used to manage wildlife populations around the world, and allows the state to monetize conservation efforts through permit and application fees.

“While we have enough suitable bear habitat to support our current bear population levels, if the four largest subpopulations continue to grow at current rates, we will not have enough habitat at some point in the future,” reads a bear hunting guide published by the state wildlife commission.

___

Republished with permission of the Associated Press.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.