Connect with us

Business

SPACs are back: This year’s crop of blank check companies lack celebrity sponsors, and that’s likely a good thing

Published

on



Special purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs, were big business in 2021 when everyone from lifestyle mogul Martha Stewart to politicians like Paul Ryan was investing in them. Also known as blank check companies, SPACs offered firms a back door route to becoming a public company by getting acquired by a shell company. But the 2021 trend didn’t last long as more than 60% of blank check companies from that year couldn’t complete a merger and had to return money to investors, giving SPACs a dodgy name in the process. Now, blank check companies have returned, but this year’s crop is a different breed. The celebrities are gone, the buzz has faded, and many SPACs are coming from serial sponsors who are, well, just a little dull.  

So far in 2025, 61 blank check companies have gone public, raising $12.4 billion as of June 26, though it’s hard to assess their success since it typically takes months for a SPAC to complete an acquisition. This compares to just 16 SPACs for the same period last year that collected $2.5 billion, according to Dealogic.  So far none of this year’s deals have found a merger partner.

The $12.4 billion is the most raised by blank check companies since 2021, when the SPAC market was on fire. That year, a record 613 blank check companies went public, raising about $162.6 billion in proceeds.

SPACs are enjoying “a bit of a revival,” said Ben Kwasnick, founder of SPAC Research. Blank check companies are on track this year to raise $25 billion, a nearly 85% drop from 2021, but a total Kwasnick thinks is more sustainable. “There’s still huge demand for the SPAC market,” he said.

A closer look shows that SPACs never really left. But their disappointing outcome cast a pall on the sector and drove many investors away. Blank check companies typically have between 18 to 24 months to buy a company, or they must return the money to investors. Roughly 39% of the Class of 2021 was able to complete a merger, or de-SPAC, according to SPAC Research. This led to many deals that initially traded well but then crashed. One of the more famous was BuzzFeed’s combination with a blank check company in December 2021. BuzzFeed initially spiked to $14.77 from $10 a share and ended its first day as a public company down 11%. The stock currently trades at $2 a share.

Still, some investors of 2021 SPACs were able to get their money back. There were many blank check companies in 2021 chasing a small number of acquisitions, said Stephen Ashley, a partner with law firm Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman. When they couldn’t complete a merger before their deadline, the SPACs were forced to liquidate. Some investors also redeemed their shares before the blank check company completed a merger. Both groups got their money back, Ashley said. “A large number of these investors may be willing to consider investments in another round of SPACs with more seasoned sponsors,” he said. 

Of course, some 2021 investors held onto their shares after a SPAC completed its merger with a business and ended up owning stock in the surviving entity, though many of them likely lost money. Most deals that closed in 2021 are trading below $10, the price that SPACs typically price at, said Kwasnick of SPAC Research.

“These investors will be more wary,” Pillsbury’s Ashley said. 

In 2024, the SEC adopted new rules for SPACs, requiring them to provide more disclosure about items including conflicts of interest, sponsor compensation, and dilution. They also limited the use of forward-looking statements by SPACs. “The SEC clearly had concerns about the performance of SPACs for a while leading up to the rule changes, and the final rules they settled on will probably focus market participants on better and more grounded disclosure,” Ashley said.

Dull is good

SPACs, as we know them, have been around since at least the early 1990s. This year’s class is coming from executives who are very experienced. Instead of Jay-Z pitching a cannabis blank check company or Colin Kaepernick’s social justice SPAC, there’s Michael Klein, a former Citigroup banker, who launched his tenth blank check company, Churchill Capital X, earlier this year. Or Gores Holdings X, the latest SPAC from private equity firm The Gores Group, which raised nearly $360 million in May.  

Some of this year’s SPAC crop, though, are connected to prominent individuals. This includes Renatus Tactical Acquisition, which raised $241.5 million in May and has ties to Trump Media & Technology Group. Eric Swider, CEO of Renatus, is the former head of Digital World Acquisition, the SPAC that merged with Trump Media, the parent of Truth Social, in 2024. Devin Nunes, Renatus’s chairman, is a former Republican congressman and the current CEO of Trump Media. (After completing its SPAC merger in September 2024, Trump Media, during its debut, peaked at $79.38, then experienced volatility and is trading at about $18 a share.)

“It’s encouraging to see serial sponsors doing most of this year’s IPOs, as they’re likely more realistic about their prospects than first-time sponsors are,” said Kwasnick.

The banks underwriting this year’s SPACs are another big change. In 2021, bulge bracket firms like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley worked on many of the blank check offerings but have largely left the sector.

Citi and UBS were No. 1 and No. 2 in terms of SPAC underwriters in 2021. Neither bank completely exited the SPAC market, but both pulled back significantly. Citi worked on 113 deals in 2021, giving it bragging rights as the top SPAC banker. This year, Citi has only two SPACs to its credit. UBS has worked on one or two blank check transactions every year since 2021 when it underwrote 92 transactions. This year, UBS has only worked on one SPAC.

These rankings might still change. Goldman is wading back into the market for SPACs and is open to underwriting new deals for SPAC companies, Bloomberg reported on June 17. Goldman declined to comment.

Without the bulge bracket firms, lesser-known banks have emerged to take their place. This year’s lead underwriter so far is Cantor Fitzgerald, the financial services firm formerly led by U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Cantor has worked on 14 deals valued at around $3.6 billion. BTIG, the broker backed by Goldman and Blackstone, ranked second with a dozen SPAC deals valued at $2.6 billion. And in third place is Santander, the Spanish bank, which has worked on five deals this year, totaling $1.3 billion.

Not everyone is happy with the revival. “I hate SPACs,” said one fintech banker, who has worked on mergers involving blank check companies. They pointed to payments companies like Repay, Payoneer Global, and Paysafe. Each used SPACs as a way to go public and two of the three are trading below $10. All three companies have experienced volatility with their stock prices, and all three have been up for sale recently. “They’re just not performing well,” the banker said of the payments companies. “I’ve made money off [of SPACs] but I don’t really understand their purpose.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

JetBlue flight near Venezuela avoids midair collision with U.S. Air Force tanker

Published

on



A JetBlue flight from the small Caribbean nation of Curaçao halted its ascent to avoid colliding with a U.S. Air Force refueling tanker on Friday, and the pilot blamed the military plane for crossing his path.

“We almost had a midair collision up here,” the JetBlue pilot said, according to a recording of his conversation with air traffic control. “They passed directly in our flight path. … They don’t have their transponder turned on, it’s outrageous.”

The incident involved JetBlue Flight 1112 from Curaçao, which is just off the coast of Venezuela, en route to New York City’s JFK airport. It comes as the U.S. military has stepped up its drug interdiction activities in the Caribbean and is also seeking to increase pressure on Venezuela’s government.

“We just had traffic pass directly in front of us within 5 miles of us — maybe 2 or 3 miles — but it was an air-to air-refueler from the United States Air Force and he was at our altitude,” the pilot said. “We had to stop our climb.” The pilot said the Air Force plane then headed into Venezuelan air space.

Derek Dombrowski, a spokesman for JetBlue, said Sunday: “We have reported this incident to federal authorities and will participate in any investigation.” He added, “Our crewmembers are trained on proper procedures for various flight situations, and we appreciate our crew for promptly reporting this situation to our leadership team.”

The Pentagon referred The Associated Press to the Air Force for comment. The Air Force didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Federal Aviation Administration last month issued a warning to U.S. aircraft urging them to “exercise caution” when in Venezuelan airspace, “due to the worsening security situation and heightened military activity in or around Venezuela.”

According to the air traffic recording, the controller responded to the pilot, “It has been outrageous with the unidentified aircraft within our air.”

Join us at the Fortune Workplace Innovation Summit May 19–20, 2026, in Atlanta. The next era of workplace innovation is here—and the old playbook is being rewritten. At this exclusive, high-energy event, the world’s most innovative leaders will convene to explore how AI, humanity, and strategy converge to redefine, again, the future of work. Register now.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Trump admits he can’t tell if the GOP will keep the House despite massive investment pledges

Published

on



President Donald Trump admitted that he’s not sure if his economic policies will pay off for Republicans at the ballot box in 2026.

In an interview with the Wall Street Journal that was published late Saturday, he pointed to massive investment pledges that he’s secured since returning to the White House.

But when asked if Republicans will lose control of the House in next year’s midterm elections, Trump replied, “I can’t tell you. I don’t know when all of this money is going to kick in,” adding that forecasts say the second quarter.

Trump has previously touted as much as $21 trillion of investments pouring into the U.S., though recent commitments don’t come close to adding up to such levels.

Still, under trade deals Trump has negotiated, the European Union has vowed $600 billion in investment, Japan $550 billion, and South Korea $350 billion. Separately, Saudi Arabia has promised $1 trillion. Companies have also announced plans to invest hundreds of billions of dollars, though some of that includes money planned during the Biden administration.

While the timing of all the money is uncertain, not to mention how much will actually be spent, companies have expressed the need to diversify supply chains with more domestic production. Apple has said its $600 billion pledge to build U.S. factories will create a “domino effect” that ignites manufacturing across the country.

At the same time, Wall Street expects Trump’s tax cuts from his One Big Beautiful Bill Act to deliver a significant jolt of fiscal stimulus to the economy next year, potentially reaccelerating GDP growth.

That would come as voters made clear in last month’s off-year elections that affordability is their top priority. Inflation has cooled from its 2022 high, but prices are up sharply from pre-pandemic levels, and consumers are revolting over higher insurance, electricity and grocery bills. Even most Trump voters say the cost of living is bad.

Trump has dismissed the affordability issue as a Democratic “hoax” and insists prices are down. He told the Journal that he will lower prices.

“I think by the time we have to talk about the election, which is in another few months, I think our prices are in good shape,” Trump said.

“I’ve created the greatest economy in history. But it may take people a while to figure all these things out,” he added. “All this money that’s pouring into our country is building things right now—car plants, AI, lots of stuff. I cannot tell you how that’s going to equate to the voter, all I can do is do my job.”

Trump has floated some ideas to appease voters on affordability, including a 50-year mortgage to lower monthly payments and $2,000 “dividend” checks. He also continues to pressure the Federal Reserve to lower rates, even though it could worsen inflation, and rolled back tariffs on some food imports.

In his interview with the Journal, Trump didn’t say if he would cut tariffs on other goods. He also warned that if the Supreme Court strikes down his global tariffs, his alternatives are not as “nimble, not as quick.”

 “I can do other things, but it’s not as fast. It’s not as good for national security,” Trump added. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Nicotine pouches can be a better alternative to cigarettes says CEO

Published

on



Smoking is one of the clearest public-health failures of our time. More than 500,000 Americans still die each year from smoking-related illnesses, and globally the picture is even more alarming. In the United States, anti-smoking campaigns have reduced the number of new cigarette users, but the effectiveness of these measures may be fading. Indeed, the headline of a widely-shared news story notes “Celebrities Are Making Smoking Cigarettes Cool Again”. Yikes. Meanwhile, a quick trip to Mexico, Europe, or Asia is enough to see that cigarettes remain very much in style.

Reducing cigarette use, and preventing a new generation from getting hooked on nicotine, is a noble goal. That is one reason James Monsees and Adam Bowen founded the vape company JUUL Labs, as a potentially less harmful alternative for adult smokers. But a mix of regulatory missteps by a hostile FDA and market loopholes opened the door to a wave of counterfeit and bootleg vapes, often imported from China, sold in local stores, highly addictive, and completely unregulated. Many people became sick from using vapes with unknown ingredients. Teenagers were easily able to access bootleg vapes from China in youth-friendly flavors. What began as an idealistic goal—moving adult smokers off of cigarettes—turned into a new epidemic. 

Now we have two problems: cigarettes and vapes.

I believe science and technology can solve both. I was a tobacco user who became addicted to vaping. I tried everything to quit and cut down my nicotine use. Eventually, I discovered Swedish-style white pouches. That experience led me to create Sesh+, a premium, tobacco-free nicotine pouch made with transparent ingredients. It has been life-changing for me personally: I haven’t picked up a vape since switching to pouches. In Sweden, where oral nicotine products have been widely used for decades, smoking rates are among the lowest in Europe and smoking-related disease is correspondingly lower.

There is growing evidence that nicotine itself, while addictive, is not what primarily causes smoking-related disease; it’s the toxic byproducts of combustion that kill. With vaping, the concern is different: it’s the lack of transparency and quality standards that should alarm us. As a health-conscious consumer, I want to know exactly what I’m putting into my body. That’s why our pouches are independently lab-tested for contaminants like heavy metals and are manufactured in the United States under strict quality controls. 

Fake nicotine pouches are already in the U.S. market. Sofia Hamilton writes for Reason that her favorite convenience store unknowingly sells counterfeit nicotine pouches, and how only someone deeply familiar with FDA nicotine rules could tell the difference. No one should have to be a nicotine policy expert just to know whether a product is safe.

Important questions remain. We do not want to create a product that attracts people who don’t already use nicotine. The average Sesh+ customer is over 35, and I’m very proud of that. Early data is encouraging: a recent Rutgers study found that new nicotine users taking up pouches remains very low. Government has a responsibility to keep black-market and counterfeit pouches out of consumers’ hands. Industry must ensure retailers are educated and know what they’re selling. And we need strong youth prevention laws.

Nicotine pouches will only be effective if industry and government work together to ensure we are not attracting youth or non-nicotine users.

In the U.K., the proposed Tobacco and Vapes Bill would ban people born in or after 2009 from ever purchasing nicotine products. In the United States, we have already raised the legal age to buy tobacco to 21. These are the kinds of measures our industry should support. If the legislation in the U.K. passes, I hope other countries will adopt similar policies to prevent youth from accessing nicotine products. I also hope to see product-verification technology adopted as an industry standard so counterfeit nicotine products never reach consumers. Age verification is not enough; we must ensure a market for counterfeit and bootleg nicotine pouches does not emerge.

If companies in the nicotine pouch space work together, we can learn from JUUL’s experience and avoid repeating the same mistakes. Our responsibility is clear: help adult smokers move to potentially less harmful alternatives, without creating a new generation of nicotine users. If we get this right, a world free from tobacco is not just aspirational. It’s achievable.

Max Cunningham is the CEO of Sesh+, a nicotine pouch company based in Austin, Texas and backed by 8VC. The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.