Connect with us

Politics

School zone speeders face a crackdown under new state law, but legislative guidance is still needed

Published

on


State law allows local governments to place automated speed cameras in school zones to ensure drivers are reducing their speed accordingly, to keep kids safe as they travel to and from school. But talk across the state is heating up around the issue, with some local governments seeking clarification on just where exactly the cameras must be placed.

The school zone safety program was authorized under a measure (HB 657) signed into law by Gov. Ron DeSantis in 2023. It seems simple enough — place a camera that can observe driving activity in school zones and use that footage to issue citations to drivers who are not obeying the posted speed limit — but questions have arisen regarding signage and camera placement, and enforcement can be tricky given that enforcement times vary school-to-school.

The Florida Department of Transportation has issued guidance on the law that, depending on interpretation, may be at odds with language in current state law. Specifically, FDOT says the placement “shall not reduce, impede, restrict or obstruct driver view or sight distance of any intersection, driveway, crosswalk, or existing traffic control devices” and the camera must be installed “at a location where it does not detect vehicles beyond the beginning and end points of school zone limits.”

Unlike state law, FDOT’s interpretation does not explicitly require the cameras to be located in the school zone boundary, rather it must only observe activity within the boundary.

And that’s a critical difference, one that is prompting calls for legislative clarification.

State Rep. Traci Koster sponsored the original school zone speed legislation, with the goal of improving safety near schools. She said she has no issue with legislation clarifying the original law, to ensure local governments are able to adequately enforce it.

“These programs successfully slow down drivers who otherwise would speed through school zones and put students and teachers at risk,” she said. “With every new program it’s important that we identify any implementation issues that need further refinement. I am supportive of making changes to ensure it is clear to drivers what the speed limit is at the time they enter the school zone and that the cameras can be installed to accurately catch any violations of that speed limit.”

The issue is timely, with some localities suspending programs as they await guidance. Osceola County, for example, has suspended its program because officials there are not sure where to place the cameras — either inside the school zone, or just outside of it.

There’s an excellent argument for placing the cameras just outside the school zone. Doing so allows the cameras to observe the driver and the flashing beacon required alerting drivers of the reduced speed in the school zone. The flashing beacon is a visual indication that reduced speeds are in place at that time, and video of speeders easily verifies that they were speeding through the zone during enforcement hours.

But the school zone doesn’t start until the flashing beacon, meaning that to capture it, cameras must be placed just outside the school zone.

Sources tell Florida Politics legislation addressing the issue is likely, but with the Legislative Session not starting until January, it will leave local governments in limbo until then.

It’s worth noting that while some local governments have chosen to hit the pause button for now, others are moving forward, and state law does allow them to do so.

But with any well-intentioned legislation, sometimes there are kinks to work out after initial implementation. All indications are that these kinks will be addressed, because who doesn’t support cracking down on school zone speeders to keep Florida’s children safe?



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Carlos G. Smith files bill to allow medical pot patients to grow their own plants

Published

on


Home cultivation of marijuana plants could be legal under certain conditions.

Medical marijuana patients may not have to go to the dispensary for their medicine if new legislation in the Senate passes.

Sen. Carlos G. Smith’s SB 776 would permit patients aged 21 and older to grow up to six pot plants.

They could use the homegrown product, but just like the dispensary weed, they would not be able to re-sell.

Medical marijuana treatment centers would be the only acceptable sourcing for plants and seeds, a move that would protect the cannabis’ custody.

Those growing the plants would be obliged to keep them secured from “unauthorized persons.”

Chances this becomes law may be slight.

A House companion for the legislation has yet to be filed. And legislators have demonstrated little appetite for homegrow in the past.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Rolando Escalona aims to deny Frank Carollo a return to the Miami Commission

Published

on


Early voting is now underway in Miami for a Dec. 9 runoff that will decide whether political newcomer Rolando Escalona can block former Commissioner Frank Carollo from reclaiming the District 3 seat long held by the Carollo family.

The contest has already been marked by unusual turbulence: both candidates faced eligibility challenges that threatened — but ultimately failed — to knock them off the ballot.

Escalona survived a dramatic residency challenge in October after a rival candidate accused him of faking his address. A Miami-Dade Judge rejected the claim following a detailed, three-hour trial that examined everything from his lease records to his Amazon orders.

After the Nov. 4 General Election — when Carollo took about 38% of the vote and Escalona took 17% to outpace six other candidates — Carollo cleared his own legal hurdle when another Judge ruled he could remain in the race despite the city’s new lifetime term limits that, according to three residents who sued, should have barred him from running again.

Those rulings leave voters with a stark choice in District 3, which spans Little Havana, East Shenandoah, West Brickell and parts of Silver Bluff and the Roads.

The runoff pits a self-described political outsider against a veteran official with deep institutional experience and marks a last chance to extend the Carollo dynasty to a twentieth straight year on the dais or block that potentiality.

Escalona, 34, insists voters are ready to move on from the chaos and litigation that have surrounded outgoing Commissioner Joe Carollo, whose tenure included a $63.5 million judgment against him for violating the First Amendment rights of local business owners and the cringe-inducing firing of a Miami Police Chief, among other controversies.

A former busboy who rose through the hospitality industry to manage high-profile Brickell restaurant Sexy Fish while also holding a real estate broker’s license, Escalona is running on a promise to bring transparency, better basic services, lower taxes for seniors and improved permitting systems to the city.

He wants to improve public safety, support economic development, enhance communities, provide more affordable housing, lower taxes and advocate for better fiscal responsibility in government.

He told the Miami Herald that if elected, he’d fight to restore public trust by addressing public corruption while re-engaging residents who feel unheard by current officials.

Carollo, 55, a CPA who served two terms on the dais from 2009 to 2017, has argued that the district needs an experienced leader. He’s pointed to his record balancing budgets and pledges a residents-first agenda focused on safer streets, cleaner neighborhoods and responsive government.

Carollo was the top fundraiser in the District 3 race this cycle, amassing about $501,000 between his campaign account and political committee, Residents First, and spending about $389,500 by the last reporting dates.

Escalona, meanwhile, reported raising close to $109,000 through his campaign account and spending all but 6,000 by Dec. 4.

The winner will secure a four-year term.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Florida kicks off first black bear hunt in a decade, despite pushback

Published

on


For the first time in a decade, hunters armed with rifles and crossbows are fanning out across Florida’s swamps and flatwoods to legally hunt the Florida black bear, over the vocal opposition of critics.

The state-sanctioned hunt began Saturday, after drawing more than 160,000 applications for a far more limited number of hunting permits, including from opponents who are trying to reduce the number of bears killed in this year’s hunt, the state’s first since 2015.

The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission awarded 172 bear hunt permits by random lottery for this year’s season, allowing hunters to kill one bear each in areas where the population is deemed large enough. At least 43 of the permits went to opponents of the hunt who never intend to use them, according to the Florida chapter of the Sierra Club, which encouraged critics to apply in the hopes of saving bears.

The Florida black bear population is considered one of the state’s conservation success stories, having grown from just several hundred bears in the 1970s to an estimated more than 4,000 today.

The 172 people who were awarded a permit through a random lottery will be able to kill one bear each during the 2025 season, which runs from Dec. 6 to Dec. 28. The permits are specific to one of the state’s four designated bear hunting zones, each of which have a hunting quota set by state officials based on the bear population in each region.

In order to participate, hunters must hold a valid hunting license and a bear harvest permit, which costs $100 for residents and $300 for nonresidents, plus fees. Applications for the permits cost $5 each.

The regulated hunt will help incentivize maintaining healthy bear populations, and help fund the work that is needed, according to Mark Barton of the Florida chapter of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, an advocacy group that supported the hunt.

Having an annual hunt will help guarantee funding to “keep moving conservation for bears forward,” Barton said.

According to state wildlife officials, the bear population has grown enough to support a regulated hunt and warrant population management. The state agency sees hunting as an effective tool that is used to manage wildlife populations around the world, and allows the state to monetize conservation efforts through permit and application fees.

“While we have enough suitable bear habitat to support our current bear population levels, if the four largest subpopulations continue to grow at current rates, we will not have enough habitat at some point in the future,” reads a bear hunting guide published by the state wildlife commission.

___

Republished with permission of the Associated Press.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.