Connect with us

Business

Runway’s AI transformed films. The $3 billion startup’s founders have a bold, new script: building immersive worlds

Published

on



Artists like Claude Monet, Pierre-Auguste Renoir, and Edgar Degas were ridiculed, their work described by critics as “base,” “unfinished,” and the worst thing to ever happen to art. A commercial flop, the exhibition saw 3,500 visitors, who mostly sauntered by to express horror at the plain frames and individual brushstrokes. 

About a decade later, Georges Seurat would start A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte. Seven feet tall and ten feet wide, Sunday would become the most famous example of an Impressionist offshoot technique, pointillism. 

Sunday’s central conceit was simple—one detailed image of a bustling afternoon at a Parisian park on the Seine. If you looked closely, you could see distinct spots of color and light that zoomed out into parasols, instruments, hats, humans, and a monkey on a leash. Each image could be unraveled, deconstructed into individual dots—the pixels of an analog age. And there’s a direct throughline between Seurat and the Impressionists and Total Pixel Space, the winning film at this month’s Runway AI Film Festival (AIFF)

“Pixels are the building blocks of digital images, tiny tiles forming a mosaic,” the film’s velvety voiceover says. “Each pixel is defined by numbers representing color and position. Therefore, any digital image can be represented as a sequence of numbers…Therefore, every photograph that could ever be taken exists as coordinates. Every frame of every possible film exists as coordinates. Every face that could ever be seen exists as coordinates. To deny this would be to deny the existence of numbers themselves.”

Jacob Adler, who made Total Pixel Space, is a classically-trained musician and composer, a multidisciplinary artist rendered a filmmaker by advances in AI. Adler worked on the film for more than a year, generating tens of thousands of images along the way, inspired by Jorge Luis Borges’s short story “The Library of Babel” and the miracle of making sense in a random, vast world.

“I was fascinated by the act of generating these images, and it spawned all these philosophical questions,” said Adler. “In this vast combinatorial space of language, the overwhelming majority of combinations of letters are gibberish and nonsense. So, apply that to digital imagery: How many images can possibly exist? And how many of these images are incomprehensible noise? I tried expressing this idea in other media, and it just failed. But it came together as a short AI film.”

Runway, the $3 billion AI video startup, has hosted the AIFF since 2023 to showcase short films made with AI. This year’s festival—won by Total Pixel Space—marked a major leap: from 300 submissions in small NYC theaters in 2023 to a sold-out Lincoln Center show with 6,000 submissions, drawing an international crowd. Runway didn’t pick the winner—a panel of judges, including directors Harmony Korine and Gaspar Noe, made the call—but Total Pixel Space reflects how Runway is thinking about its own future: AI-generated experiences that don’t just tell stories but build worlds.

“We’re going to have all these new forms of media that go beyond film and games, that exist in all the spaces in-between,” said Anastasis Germanidis, Runway CTO and cofounder. “Some of it might look more like immersive theater productions, where there’s a fixed storyline, but you can kind of move around, experiencing it from different perspectives.”

Germanidis added: “Imagine these models get really good at generating realistic depictions of reality, and you have a world where you can essentially simulate most of what we care about as we navigate the world. That’s going to be both a very important piece of solving problems.  

Germanidis is thinking about world simulation as a principle more than anything else; one that could be applied not just to stories, but to biology, robotics, and physics. It’s distinctly about finding ways to mimic not just humans, but physics and biology. 

“We want to be able to simulate pretty much every instruction you have in the physical world,” said Cristóbal Valenzuela, CEO and cofounder of Runway. “We know that’s coming…AI labs have been very obsessed with simulating the human mind. But I think that might be the wrong approach long-term. What you want to do is not simulate how humans work, but how the world works.”

We’re seeing the beginnings of this strategy play out this week, as Runway plans to launch an interactive gaming experience, marking a push into the gaming market. The product right now is text and image generation, but is expected to become increasingly visual over time. How this all will ultimately lead to world-building applications is hazy—and that’s part of the point. 

“If you have a predetermined way of getting there, it’s too late and it’s obvious,” Valenzuela said. “For me, it goes back to how creative [something is]…. If you’re not involved in creative acts, you don’t understand. Most people who have any form of creative expression within their work know that when they start, they don’t exactly know where they’re heading. You’re putting yourself in a very vulnerable position to just explore everything. Then, eventually you’ll know by experience that you will have to land somewhere.”

Runway has no shortage of competition in AI video generation—including but not limited to OpenAI’s Sora, Stability AI, Moonvalley, and Pika Labs. And Runway is in the position where they must continue to distinguish themselves in order to compete. The company has raised more than $500 million to date from investors like General Atlantic, SoftBank, Nvidia, Salesforce Ventures, Felicis, and Coatue. Meta reportedly approached Runway in an attempt to acquire the company before dropping billions on Scale AI this summer.  

The AI “wake up” call

The history of art is a history of technological disruption, from the invention of the printing press to the advent of “talkies” in the 1920s. Job displacement is, of course, part of that story—and always has been. 

“Before the printing press, it was all monks and people who knew how to share specific stories,” said Valenzuela. “Then, with the printing press, more people could read and write, which was treated as an apocalyptic event.”

This is true: When the printing press was invented in 1440 and adoption of the technology spread, religious authorities worried about losing control, and guilds of scribes were displaced. But a world of people could now read, and stories could scale. 

Valenzuela brings up another example, this one infused with a comically droll element: 

“Before alarm clocks were invented, you’d hire a guy who came to your door, at the time you wanted, and throw up a stone to your window,” said Valenzuela. “That was a job. What else were you going to do if you didn’t have family around and needed to wake up?”

In 19th-century Britain and Ireland, these people were called “knocker-uppers.” They’d tap on windows with long sticks or shoot peas at windows to wake workers for shifts. Once alarm clocks were invented, it became natural for people to just, well, use alarm clocks. As AI comes tapping at Hollywood windows, a trend that Valenzuela is directly involved in, the industry reaction has been fraught—even as people secretly use it. 

“It’s been a little dirty secret, because whether it’s Runway or, you know, he does have a little competition,” said Michael Burns, vice chair at Lionsgate onstage at AIFF, gesturing to Valenzuela. “We believe that this tool is being used by everybody that doesn’t talk about the fact that they’re using it.”

Runway’s Germanidis says there are three phases of technological art evolution: getting the technology to work, imitating existing art forms, and then creating unique forms. We’re just starting to “enter that third stage with, like generative generative models,” he said. That’s not to say, of course, that everything should be AI—for Adler, an artist whose practice has fundamentally expanded with AI, is very clear that some things (like surrealistic images and philosophical concepts) are well-suited to AI, whereas other material (like complex human interactions) isn’t. 

“I look at [AI] as a tool, but I don’t know yet if I’m convinced that it’s a new genre,” said Adler. “There are things I can produce with cameras that are impossible with AI and vice versa—things I can do with AI that are impossible with cameras.”

That alone is an incredible phenomenon that speaks to excitement, and fear, that Runway and its video AI rivals are already causing throughout the worlds of art, media, and entertainment. For Runway’s founders however, the real payoff of their AI vision, if they can pull it off, will extend far beyond the screen, existing as something spectacular, immersive—and probably unrecognizable.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

U.S. consumers are so strained they put more than $1B on BNPL during Black Friday and Cyber Monday

Published

on



Financially strained and cautious customers leaned heavily on buy now, pay later (BNPL) services over the holiday weekend.

Cyber Monday alone generated $1.03 billion (a 4.2% increase YoY) in online BNPL sales with most transactions happening on mobile devices, per Adobe Analytics. Overall, consumers spent $14.25 billion online on Cyber Monday. To put that into perspective, BNPL made up for more than 7.2% of total online sales on that day.

As for Black Friday, eMarketer reported $747.5 million in online sales using BNPL services with platforms like PayPal finding a 23% uptick in BNPL transactions.

Likewise, digital financial services company Zip reported 1.6 million transactions throughout 280,000 of its locations over the Black Friday and Cyber Monday weekend. Millennials (51%) accounted for a chunk of the sizable BNPL purchases, followed by Gen Z, Gen X, and baby boomers, per Zip.

The Adobe data showed that people using BNPL were most likely to spend on categories such as electronics, apparel, toys, and furniture, which is consistent with previous years. This trend also tracks with Zip’s findings that shoppers were primarily investing in tech, electronics, and fashion when using its services.

And while some may be surprised that shoppers are taking on more debt via BNPL (in this economy?!), analysts had already projected a strong shopping weekend. A Deloitte survey forecast that consumers would spend about $650 million over the Black Friday–Cyber Monday stretch—a 15% jump from 2023.

“US retailers leaned heavily on discounts this holiday season to drive online demand,” Vivek Pandya, lead analyst at Adobe Digital Insights, said in a statement. “Competitive and persistent deals throughout Cyber Week pushed consumers to shop earlier, creating an environment where Black Friday now challenges the dominance of Cyber Monday.”

This report was originally published by Retail Brew.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

AI labs like Meta, Deepseek, and Xai earned worst grades possible on an existential safety index

Published

on



A recent report card from an AI safety watchdog isn’t one that tech companies will want to stick on the fridge.

The Future of Life Institute’s latest AI safety index found that major AI labs fell short on most measures of AI responsibility, with few letter grades rising above a C. The org graded eight companies across categories like safety frameworks, risk assessment, and current harms.

Perhaps most glaring was the “existential safety” line, where companies scored Ds and Fs across the board. While many of these companies are explicitly chasing superintelligence, they lack a plan for safely managing it, according to Max Tegmark, MIT professor and president of the Future of Life Institute.

“Reviewers found this kind of jarring,” Tegmark told us.

The reviewers in question were a panel of AI academics and governance experts who examined publicly available material as well as survey responses submitted by five of the eight companies.

Anthropic, OpenAI, and GoogleDeepMind took the top three spots with an overall grade of C+ or C. Then came, in order, Elon Musk’s Xai, Z.ai, Meta, DeepSeek, and Alibaba, all of which got Ds or a D-.

Tegmark blames a lack of regulation that has meant the cutthroat competition of the AI race trumps safety precautions. California recently passed the first law that requires frontier AI companies to disclose safety information around catastrophic risks, and New York is currently within spitting distance as well. Hopes for federal legislation are dim, however.

“Companies have an incentive, even if they have the best intentions, to always rush out new products before the competitor does, as opposed to necessarily putting in a lot of time to make it safe,” Tegmark said.

In lieu of government-mandated standards, Tegmark said the industry has begun to take the group’s regularly released safety indexes more seriously; four of the five American companies now respond to its survey (Meta is the only holdout.) And companies have made some improvements over time, Tegmark said, mentioning Google’s transparency around its whistleblower policy as an example.

But real-life harms reported around issues like teen suicides that chatbots allegedly encouraged, inappropriate interactions with minors, and major cyberattacks have also raised the stakes of the discussion, he said.

“[They] have really made a lot of people realize that this isn’t the future we’re talking about—it’s now,” Tegmark said.

The Future of Life Institute recently enlisted public figures as diverse as Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, former Trump aide Steve Bannon, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, and rapper Will.i.am to sign a statement opposing work that could lead to superintelligence.

Tegmark said he would like to see something like “an FDA for AI where companies first have to convince experts that their models are safe before they can sell them.

“The AI industry is quite unique in that it’s the only industry in the US making powerful technology that’s less regulated than sandwiches—basically not regulated at all,” Tegmark said. “If someone says, ‘I want to open a new sandwich shop near Times Square,’ before you can sell the first sandwich, you need a health inspector to check your kitchen and make sure it’s not full of rats…If you instead say, ‘Oh no, I’m not going to sell any sandwiches. I’m just going to release superintelligence.’ OK! No need for any inspectors, no need to get any approvals for anything.”

“So the solution to this is very obvious,” Tegmark added. “You just stop this corporate welfare of giving AI companies exemptions that no other companies get.”

This report was originally published by Tech Brew.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Hollywood writers say Warner takeover ‘must be blocked’

Published

on



Hollywood writers, producers, directors and theater owners voiced skepticism over Netflix Inc.’s proposed $82.7 billion takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery Inc.’s studio and streaming businesses, saying it threatens to undermine their interests.

The Writers Guild of America, which announced in October it would oppose any sale of Warner Bros., reiterated that view on Friday, saying the purchase by Netflix “must be blocked.”

“The world’s largest streaming company swallowing one of its biggest competitors is what antitrust laws were designed to prevent,” the guild said in an emailed statement. “The outcome would eliminate jobs, push down wages, worsen conditions for all entertainment workers, raise prices for consumers, and reduce the volume and diversity of content for all viewers.”

The worries raised by the movie and TV industry’s biggest trade groups come against the backdrop of falling movie and TV production, slack ticket sales and steep job cuts in Hollywood. Another legacy studio, Paramount, was sold earlier this year.

Warner Bros. accounts for about a fourth of North American ticket sales — roughly $2 billion — and is being acquired by a company that has long shunned theatrical releases for its feature films. As part of the deal, Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos has promised Warner Bros. will continue to release moves in theaters.

“The proposed acquisition of Warner Bros. by Netflix poses an unprecedented threat to the global exhibition business,” Michael O’Leary, chief executive officer of the theatrical trade group Cinema United, said in en emailed statement Friday. “The negative impact of this acquisition will impact theaters from the biggest circuits to one-screen independents.”

The buyout of Warner Bros. by Netflix “would be a disaster,” James Cameron, the director of some of Hollywood’s highest-grossing films in history including Titanic and Avatar, said in late November on The Town, an industry-focused podcast. “Sorry Ted, but jeez. Sarandos has gone on record saying theatrical films are dead.”

On a conference call with investors Friday, Sarandos said that his company’s resistance to releasing films in cinemas was mostly tied to “the long exclusive windows, which we don’t really think are that consumer friendly.”

The company said Friday it would “maintain Warner Bros.’ current operations and build on its strengths, including theatrical releases for films.”

On the call, Sarandos reiterated that view, saying that, “right now, you should count on everything that is planned on going to the theater through Warner Bros. will continue to go to the theaters through Warner Bros.” 

Competition from online outfits like YouTube and Netflix has forced a reckoning in Hollywood, opening the door for takeovers like the Warner Bros. deal announced Friday. Media giants including Comcast Corp., parent of NBCUniversal, are unloading cable-TV networks like MS Now and USA, and steering resources into streaming. 

In an emailed note to Warner Bros. employees on Friday, Chief Executive Officer David Zaslav said the board’s decision to sell the company “reflects the realities of an industry undergoing generational change in how stories are financed, produced, distributed, and discovered.”

The Producers Guild of America said Friday its members are “rightfully concerned about Netflix’s intended acquisition of one of our industry’s most storied and meaningful studios,” while a spokesperson for the Directors Guild of America raised concerns about future pay at Warner Bros.

“We will be meeting with Netflix to outline our concerns and better understand their vision for the future of the company,” the Directors Guild said.

In September, the DGA appointed director Christopher Nolan as its president. Nolan has previously criticized Netflix’s model of releasing films exclusively online, or simultaneously in a small number of cinemas, and has said he won’t make movies for the company.

The Screen Actors Guild said Friday that the transaction “raises many serious questions about its impact on the future of the entertainment industry, and especially the human creative talent whose livelihoods and careers depend on it.”

Oscar winner Jane Fonda spoke out on Thursday before the deal was announced. 

“Consolidation at this scale would be catastrophic for an industry built on free expression, for the creative workers who power it, and for consumers who depend on a free, independent media ecosystem to understand the world,” the star of the Netflix series Grace and Frankie wrote on the Ankler industry news website.

Netflix and Warner Bros. obviously don’t see it that way. In his statement to employees, Zaslav said “the proposed combination of Warner Bros. and Netflix reflects complementary strengths, more choice and value for consumers, a stronger entertainment industry, increased opportunity for creative talent, and long-term value creation for shareholders.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.