Connect with us

Business

Runway’s AI transformed films. The $3 billion startup’s founders have a bold, new script: building immersive worlds

Published

on



Artists like Claude Monet, Pierre-Auguste Renoir, and Edgar Degas were ridiculed, their work described by critics as “base,” “unfinished,” and the worst thing to ever happen to art. A commercial flop, the exhibition saw 3,500 visitors, who mostly sauntered by to express horror at the plain frames and individual brushstrokes. 

About a decade later, Georges Seurat would start A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte. Seven feet tall and ten feet wide, Sunday would become the most famous example of an Impressionist offshoot technique, pointillism. 

Sunday’s central conceit was simple—one detailed image of a bustling afternoon at a Parisian park on the Seine. If you looked closely, you could see distinct spots of color and light that zoomed out into parasols, instruments, hats, humans, and a monkey on a leash. Each image could be unraveled, deconstructed into individual dots—the pixels of an analog age. And there’s a direct throughline between Seurat and the Impressionists and Total Pixel Space, the winning film at this month’s Runway AI Film Festival (AIFF)

“Pixels are the building blocks of digital images, tiny tiles forming a mosaic,” the film’s velvety voiceover says. “Each pixel is defined by numbers representing color and position. Therefore, any digital image can be represented as a sequence of numbers…Therefore, every photograph that could ever be taken exists as coordinates. Every frame of every possible film exists as coordinates. Every face that could ever be seen exists as coordinates. To deny this would be to deny the existence of numbers themselves.”

Jacob Adler, who made Total Pixel Space, is a classically-trained musician and composer, a multidisciplinary artist rendered a filmmaker by advances in AI. Adler worked on the film for more than a year, generating tens of thousands of images along the way, inspired by Jorge Luis Borges’s short story “The Library of Babel” and the miracle of making sense in a random, vast world.

“I was fascinated by the act of generating these images, and it spawned all these philosophical questions,” said Adler. “In this vast combinatorial space of language, the overwhelming majority of combinations of letters are gibberish and nonsense. So, apply that to digital imagery: How many images can possibly exist? And how many of these images are incomprehensible noise? I tried expressing this idea in other media, and it just failed. But it came together as a short AI film.”

Runway, the $3 billion AI video startup, has hosted the AIFF since 2023 to showcase short films made with AI. This year’s festival—won by Total Pixel Space—marked a major leap: from 300 submissions in small NYC theaters in 2023 to a sold-out Lincoln Center show with 6,000 submissions, drawing an international crowd. Runway didn’t pick the winner—a panel of judges, including directors Harmony Korine and Gaspar Noe, made the call—but Total Pixel Space reflects how Runway is thinking about its own future: AI-generated experiences that don’t just tell stories but build worlds.

“We’re going to have all these new forms of media that go beyond film and games, that exist in all the spaces in-between,” said Anastasis Germanidis, Runway CTO and cofounder. “Some of it might look more like immersive theater productions, where there’s a fixed storyline, but you can kind of move around, experiencing it from different perspectives.”

Germanidis added: “Imagine these models get really good at generating realistic depictions of reality, and you have a world where you can essentially simulate most of what we care about as we navigate the world. That’s going to be both a very important piece of solving problems.  

Germanidis is thinking about world simulation as a principle more than anything else; one that could be applied not just to stories, but to biology, robotics, and physics. It’s distinctly about finding ways to mimic not just humans, but physics and biology. 

“We want to be able to simulate pretty much every instruction you have in the physical world,” said Cristóbal Valenzuela, CEO and cofounder of Runway. “We know that’s coming…AI labs have been very obsessed with simulating the human mind. But I think that might be the wrong approach long-term. What you want to do is not simulate how humans work, but how the world works.”

We’re seeing the beginnings of this strategy play out this week, as Runway plans to launch an interactive gaming experience, marking a push into the gaming market. The product right now is text and image generation, but is expected to become increasingly visual over time. How this all will ultimately lead to world-building applications is hazy—and that’s part of the point. 

“If you have a predetermined way of getting there, it’s too late and it’s obvious,” Valenzuela said. “For me, it goes back to how creative [something is]…. If you’re not involved in creative acts, you don’t understand. Most people who have any form of creative expression within their work know that when they start, they don’t exactly know where they’re heading. You’re putting yourself in a very vulnerable position to just explore everything. Then, eventually you’ll know by experience that you will have to land somewhere.”

Runway has no shortage of competition in AI video generation—including but not limited to OpenAI’s Sora, Stability AI, Moonvalley, and Pika Labs. And Runway is in the position where they must continue to distinguish themselves in order to compete. The company has raised more than $500 million to date from investors like General Atlantic, SoftBank, Nvidia, Salesforce Ventures, Felicis, and Coatue. Meta reportedly approached Runway in an attempt to acquire the company before dropping billions on Scale AI this summer.  

The AI “wake up” call

The history of art is a history of technological disruption, from the invention of the printing press to the advent of “talkies” in the 1920s. Job displacement is, of course, part of that story—and always has been. 

“Before the printing press, it was all monks and people who knew how to share specific stories,” said Valenzuela. “Then, with the printing press, more people could read and write, which was treated as an apocalyptic event.”

This is true: When the printing press was invented in 1440 and adoption of the technology spread, religious authorities worried about losing control, and guilds of scribes were displaced. But a world of people could now read, and stories could scale. 

Valenzuela brings up another example, this one infused with a comically droll element: 

“Before alarm clocks were invented, you’d hire a guy who came to your door, at the time you wanted, and throw up a stone to your window,” said Valenzuela. “That was a job. What else were you going to do if you didn’t have family around and needed to wake up?”

In 19th-century Britain and Ireland, these people were called “knocker-uppers.” They’d tap on windows with long sticks or shoot peas at windows to wake workers for shifts. Once alarm clocks were invented, it became natural for people to just, well, use alarm clocks. As AI comes tapping at Hollywood windows, a trend that Valenzuela is directly involved in, the industry reaction has been fraught—even as people secretly use it. 

“It’s been a little dirty secret, because whether it’s Runway or, you know, he does have a little competition,” said Michael Burns, vice chair at Lionsgate onstage at AIFF, gesturing to Valenzuela. “We believe that this tool is being used by everybody that doesn’t talk about the fact that they’re using it.”

Runway’s Germanidis says there are three phases of technological art evolution: getting the technology to work, imitating existing art forms, and then creating unique forms. We’re just starting to “enter that third stage with, like generative generative models,” he said. That’s not to say, of course, that everything should be AI—for Adler, an artist whose practice has fundamentally expanded with AI, is very clear that some things (like surrealistic images and philosophical concepts) are well-suited to AI, whereas other material (like complex human interactions) isn’t. 

“I look at [AI] as a tool, but I don’t know yet if I’m convinced that it’s a new genre,” said Adler. “There are things I can produce with cameras that are impossible with AI and vice versa—things I can do with AI that are impossible with cameras.”

That alone is an incredible phenomenon that speaks to excitement, and fear, that Runway and its video AI rivals are already causing throughout the worlds of art, media, and entertainment. For Runway’s founders however, the real payoff of their AI vision, if they can pull it off, will extend far beyond the screen, existing as something spectacular, immersive—and probably unrecognizable.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

MacKenzie Scott tries to close the higher ed DEI gap, giving away $155 million this week alone

Published

on



MacKenzie Scott has arguably been the biggest name in philanthropy this year—and has nonstop been making major gifts to organizations focused on education, DEI, disaster recovery, and many other causes.

This week alone, several higher education institutions announced major gifts from the billionaire philanthropist and ex-wife of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos—donations totaling well over $100 million. In true Scott fashion, many of these donations are the largest single donations these schools have ever received.

The donations announced this week include: 

  • $50 million to California State University-East Bay
  • $50 million to Lehman College (part of the City University of New York system)
  • $38 million to Texas A&M University-Kingsville
  • $17 million to Seminole State College

All four institutions are public, access-oriented colleges that enroll large shares of low‑income, first‑generation, and racially diverse students and function as minority‑serving institutions or similar engines of social mobility. They fit MacKenzie Scott’s broader pattern of directing large, unrestricted gifts to colleges that serve “chronically underserved” communities rather than already wealthy, highly selective universities.

Scott, who is worth about $40 billion and has donated over $20 billion in the past five years, has doubled down this year on causes that the Trump administration has cut deeply, such as education, DEI, and disaster recovery.

“As higher education, in general, works to find its way in an uncertain environment, this gift is a major source of encouragement that we are on the right path,” Lehman College President Fernando Delgado said in a statement. 

Scott also made one of the largest donations in HBCU Howard University’s 158-year history with an $80 million gift earlier this fall, and a $60 million donation to the Center for Disaster Philanthropy after Trump administration’s cuts to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)—an organization Americans rely on for help during and after hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, and floods.

“All sectors of society—public, private, and social—share responsibility for helping communities thrive after a disaster,” CDP president and CEO Patricia McIlreavy previously told Fortune. “Philanthropy plays a critical role in providing communities with resources to rebuild stronger, but it cannot—and should not—replace government and its essential responsibilities.”

Trust-based philanthropy

Scott accumulated the vast majority of her wealth from her 2019 divorce from Bezos, but is dedicated to giving away most of her fortune. She’s considered a unique philanthropist in today’s environment because her gifts are typically unrestricted, meaning the organizations can use the funding however they choose. 

“She practices trust-based philanthropy,” Anne Marie Dougherty, CEO of the Bob Woodruff Foundation previously told Fortune. Scott has donated $15 million to the veteran-focused nonprofit organization in 2022, and made a subsequent $20 million donation this fall.

Scott is also considered one of the most generous philanthropists, and credits acts of kindness for inspiring her to give back.

“It was the local dentist who offered me free dental work when he saw me securing a broken tooth with denture glue in college,” Scott wrote of her inspiration for philanthropy in an Oct. 15 essay published to her Yield Giving site. “It was the college roommate who found me crying, and acted on her urge to loan me a thousand dollars to keep me from having to drop out in my sophomore year.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Netflix’s bombshell deal to buy Warner Bros. brings Batman and Harry Potter to the streamer, infuriates theater owners and the Ellisons

Published

on


Netflix’s agreement to buy Warner Bros. in a $72 billion deal marks a seismic shift in Hollywood, handing the streaming giant control of iconic franchises such as Batman and Harry Potter and triggering an immediate backlash from theater owners and the jilted Ellison family behind Paramount. The bombshell transaction, struck after a bidding war that ensued after David Ellison’sunsolicited bids several months ago, positions Netflix ever more at the center of the Southern California entertainment business that the Northern California company disrupted so famously decades ago.

The deal will see Netflix acquire Warner Bros. Discovery’s film and TV studios and its streaming operations, including HBO Max, in a deal with an equity value of roughly $72 billion, or about $27.75 per share in cash and stock, valuing Warner Bros. at $82.7 billion. The agreement followed a heated auction in which Netflix’s bid edged out offers from Paramount Skydance and Comcast, both of which had pushed to keep the storied Warner assets in more traditional hands.

Two days before Netflix won the bidding, Paramount hinted at its fury with a strongly worded letter to WBD CEO David Zaslav, arguing the process was “tainted” and Warner Bros. was favoring a single bidder: Netflix. Paramount called it a “myopic process with a predetermined outcome that favors a single bidder,” Bloomberg reported, although Netflix’s bid is understood to be the highest of the three.

Another angry group is theater owners, who have famously warred with Netflix for years over the big red streamer’s reluctance, even refusal to follow traditional theatrical-release practices. Netflix Co-CEO Ted Sarandos has adamantly defended Netflix’s streaming-forward distribution, saying it’s what consumers really want. At the Time 100 event in April of this year, Sarandos called theatrical release “an outmoded idea for most people” and said Netflix was “saving Hollywood” by giving people what they want: streaming at home.

Cinema United, the trade association which represents over 30,000 movie screens in the U.S. and 26,000 internationally, immediately announced its opposition to Netflix acquiring a legacy Hollywood studio. The organization’s chief, Michael O’Leary, said it “poses an unprecedented threat to the global exhibition business” as Netflix’s states business model simply does not support theatrical exhibition. He urged regulators to look closely at the acquisition.

Deadline reported that other producers are warning of “the death of Hollywood” as a result of this deal. Several days earlier, Bank of America Research’s analysts had surveyed the landscape and concluded that as a defensive move, Netflix would be “killing three birds with one stone,” as its ownership of Warner Bros’ would be a daunting blow to Paramount and Comcast, while taking the Warner legacy studio out of the running. The bank calculated that a combined Netflix and Warner Bros. would comprise roughly 21% of total streaming time—still shy of YouTube’s 28% hold on the market, but far greater than Paramount’s 5% and Comcast’s 4%.

What’s known and what’s still at play

As part of the deal, Netflix will retain the studio that controls the superheroes of DC, the Wizarding World of Harry Potter, and HBO’s prestige brands. Other details on what will happen to the standalone streaming service HBO Max were scant, with the companies saying only that Netflix will “maintain” Warner Bros. current operations. The companies expect the transaction to close after regulatory review, with Netflix projecting billions in annual cost savings by the third year after completion.

​The deal will not include all of Warner Bros. Discovery, according to the press release announcing the acquisition, which said the previously announced plans to separate WBD’s cable operations will be completed before the Netflix deal, in the third quarter of 2026. The newly separated publicly traded company holding the Global Networks division will be called Discovery Global, and will include CNN, TNT Sports in the U.S., as well as Discovery, free-to-air channels across Europe, plus digital products such as Discovery+ and Bleacher Report.  

On a conference call with reporters Friday morning, Sarandos said Netflix is “highly confident in the regulatory process,” calling the deal pro-consumer, pro-innovation, pro-worker, pro-creator and pro-growth. He said Netflix planned to work closely with regulators and was running “full speed” ahead toward getting all regulatory approvals. He added that Netflix executives were “tired” after “an incredibly rigorous and competitive process.” Alluding to Netflix’s traditional resistance to big M&A, Sarandos added that “we don’t do many of these, but we were deep in this one.”

Influential entertainment journalist Matt Belloni of Puck previewed the likely deal on Bill Simmons’ podcast on Spotify’s Ringer network (which recently struck a deal to bring some video podcasts to Netflix), and they speculated about potential problems inside Netflix that brought the deal to a head. In conversation about how defensive the move is, Belloni said Netflix is “doing this for a reason” and may have reached a “stress point” because it hasn’t been getting traction with its own moviemaking efforts after 10 years of trying. (Netflix has also been agonizingly close to an elusive Best Picture Oscar, with close calls on Roma and Emilia Perez, the latter of which was derailed in a bizarre social-media controversy.) Belloni also acknowledged the criticism that Netflix has struggled to create its own franchises, also after years of trying.

Sarandos highlighted Netflix’s homegrown franchises while announcing the deal, arguing that Netflix’s ” culture-defining titles like Stranger Things, KPop Demon Hunters and Squid Game” will now combine with Warner’s deep library including classics Casablanca and Citizen Kane, even Friends.

The biggest losers in the bidding war may be David Ellison and his father, Oracle co‑founder (and long-time Republican donor)Larry Ellison, whose Paramount‑Skydance empire had been widely seen as a front‑runner to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery. David Ellison, has since reportedly been pleading his case around Washington, meeting Trump administration officials as allies float antitrust and national‑interest concerns about giving Netflix control of such a critical studio.

While Netflix has tried to calm regulators by arguing that a combined Netflix–HBO Max bundle would increase competition with Disney and others, the Ellisons and their supporters are signaling they will continue to press for tougher scrutiny or even intervention. Large M&A has made a big comeback in 2025 as the Trump administration has been notably friendlier to big deals than the deep freeze of the Biden administration, making this deal an acid test for just how true that is when a company with deep ties to the White House gets jilted.​

[Disclosure: The author worked internally at Netflix from June 2024 through July 2025.]



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Elon Musk and Bill Gates are wrong about AI imminently replacing all jobs. ‘That’s not what we’re seeing,’ LinkedIn exec slams

Published

on



The future of work as we know it is hanging by a thread—at least, that’s what many tech leaders consistently say. Elon Musk predicts AI will replace all jobs in less than 20 years. Bill Gates says even those who train to use AI tools may not be safe from its claws. And then there’s Klarna’s CEO, Sebastian Siemiatkowski, who is even warning workers that “tech bros” are sugarcoating just how badly it’s about to impact jobs.

But according to one LinkedIn exec, that’s simply not what the data is showing. 

With hundreds of millions of workers hunting for jobs and employers posting open roles in real time, LinkedIn acts as one of the clearest barometers of what’s actually happening on the ground—and its managing director for EMEA, Sue Duke, is not buying the AI apocalypse narrative.

“That’s not what we’re seeing,” Duke revealed at the Fortune CEO Forum in The Shard in London. When asked about an AI-induced hiring slowdown she insisted that the opposite is actually true. 

“What we’re seeing is that organizations who are adopting and integrating this technology, they’re actually going out and hiring more people to really take advantage of this technology,” Duke explained. 

“They’re going out and looking for more business development people, more technologically savvy people, and more sales people as they realize the business opportunities, the innovation possibilities, and ultimately the growth possibilities of this technology.”

For the millions of job seeking Gen Zers—who keep being told that entry-level jobs are about the get swallowed by AI and that a youth unemployment crisis is well underway—the news will be a welcome surprise.

LinkedIn exec breaks down exactly what employers are looking for from new hires in 2026

For those looking to make the most of the job market’s shift, Duke says there are two key areas to upskill in.

The first, no surprise one, is AI skills. Whether that’s literacy, tooling, prompt-writing, or more technical capabilities, “we continue to see those AI skills being red, red hot in the labor market,” she said. 

With companies racing to integrate automation into products and workflows, that demand isn’t cooling anytime soon—no matter what industry you’re looking to work in. “We see a huge demand for those skills across the board, economy-wide, across all sectors, and tons of companies looking for those,” Duke added.

As AI takes over many administrative tasks, it’s putting the spotlight on job functions that bots can’t do. “Those unique human skills,” Duke said, is the second area of focus for employers. “They remain rock solid, constant at the heart of hiring desires and demands out there. They’re not going away either.”

She called out communication, team building, and problem solving, as some of those human skills that will stand the test of time: “They’re the ones to invest in.”

And ultimately, the skill employers are zeroing in on most isn’t technical at all—it’s adaptability. Bosses know the tools will change faster than job titles. What they want is someone who can change with them.

“The most important thing for job seekers to think about is the mindset that you’re also bringing to the table,” Duke concluded. 

“What employers are really looking for is that growth mindset and understanding that this technology is moving very, very quickly, and we need adaptability. Adaptability is right at the top of those most in-demand skills, so making sure you’re bringing that mindset, bringing that agility with you, that’s going to be hugely important.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.