Connect with us

Business

Return-to-office mandates are corporate helicopter parenting—and it’s hurting everyone involved

Published

on



Across industries, companies are doubling down on return-to-office mandates, framing them as essential for productivity and fostering a positive culture. The message is clear: get behind the return, or get left behind.

But this stance comes at a cost, especially for working parents, and mothers in particular. As childcare costs soar and flexibility erodes, participation of mothers with young children in the workforce has dropped nearly every month this year.

The responsibilities parents carry are heavier than ever. A growing number of mothers fall into the “sandwich generation,” simultaneously caring for children and aging parents. More than half of these women have left their jobs under the weight of these tasks, with two-thirds citing inadequate employer support.

I see the impact from two sides. I am a mom of two young kids, and also an executive leader at Owlet Baby Care, where nearly 70% of our employees are working parents. At Owlet, we believe raising a child is one of the most important responsibilities. We ground everything we do in the real experiences of families, then turn those insights into innovations that make a genuine difference in their lives. I’ve seen firsthand how flexible workplace policies that give workers agency over their schedules not only sustain families but strengthen culture, retention, and long-term business health.

I’m here to tell you, as both a parent and executive leader, RTO mandates are just corporate helicopter parenting. Companies clinging to this outdated model risk losing their best talent, hurting families of working parents, and ultimately harming their bottom line.

Helicopter parenting doesn’t work at home — or in the office

Helicopter parenting is rooted in control. It hovers, monitors, and second-guesses every move a child makes, all in the name of wanting the “best” for them. But it rarely works. Instead of raising confident, independent kids, it produces burnout, anxiety, and dependence.

Corporate “helicopter managing” works the same way. RTO mandates send the message that employees can’t be trusted unless they’re under constant supervision. Rather than unlocking potential, this approach stifles initiative, fuels frustration, and drives out talent. Leaders think they’re protecting culture and productivity, but are actually undermining both.

Why flexibility works

The opposite of helicopter parenting is trust. The best nurturing comes from giving kids space to grow and learn. The same is true for employees. When companies trust people to manage their own time and responsibilities, they build more resilient teams.

At Owlet, flexibility is built into our culture. We offer year-round remote work and a largely flexible schedule to our entire employee base, more than half of whom are mothers. The result is stronger satisfaction, higher retention, and deeper engagement.

When our company faced one of its most difficult financial chapters a few years ago, we asked employees to take a temporary pay cut that lasted more than a year. It was a daunting request, but because flexibility and trust had been woven into our culture long before that moment, people stayed. They believed in our mission and trusted that leadership was making decisions with their best interests in mind. Instead of an exodus, we saw the majority of our team choose to weather the storm with us. That trust and mutual commitment helped us survive a challenging period and ultimately emerge stronger.

This trust-based approach and parent-friendly culture also attracts top talent. A recent candidate told me she noticed that every woman she interviewed with on our executive team was also a mother. Working parents want to see leaders who understand the realities they face, and talented workers will gravitate towards places where those perspectives shape the culture.

How employers can do better

Just as children thrive in environments where they are trusted to stretch and stumble, employees excel when given room to balance their lives without penalty. True support for working parents means more than permitting remote work. It means embedding caregiving and flexibility into the culture as a normal, valued part of life.

At Owlet, our benefits reflect this philosophy. For example, we offer paid parental leave for both the birth parent and nonbirth parent, and a benefits plan that covers up to $10,000 in fertility treatments (only 40% of U.S. companies actually provide fertility benefits). These policies are not extras. Above all, we offer a flexible work-from-anywhere policy, going on over five years now. As our employees have flourished, the work and results have followed.

If companies want to retain top talent, foster real culture, and grow the next generation of leaders, they must trade control for trust. Stop forcing parents to choose between their careers and their families, and instead empower them to succeed on both fronts.

You want to see your business and workforce thrive? Resist the urge to rein them in. Trust your people, and watch them (and your profits) soar.

Fortune Global Forum returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and global leaders will gather for a dynamic, invitation-only event shaping the future of business. Apply for an invitation.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Coupang CEO resigns over historic South Korean data breach

Published

on



Coupang chief executive officer Park Dae-jun resigned over his failure to prevent South Korea’s largest-ever data breach, which set off a regulatory and political backlash against the country’s dominant online retailer.

The company said in a statement on Wednesday that Park had stepped down over his role in the breach. It appointed Harold Rogers, chief administrative officer for the retailer’s U.S.-based parent company Coupang Inc., as interim head.

Park becomes the highest-profile casualty of a crisis that’s prompted a government investigation and disrupted the lives of millions across Korea. Nearly two-thirds of people in the country were affected by the breach, which granted unauthorized access to their shipping addresses and phone numbers.

Police raided Coupang’s headquarters this week in search of evidence that could help them determine how the breach took place as well as the identity of the hacker, Yonhap News reported, citing officials.

Officials have said the breach was carried out over five months in which the company’s cybersecurity systems were bypassed. Last week President Lee Jae Myung said it was “truly astonishing” that Coupang had failed to detect unauthorized access of its systems for such a long time.

Park squared off with lawmakers this month during an hours-long grilling. Responding to questions about media reports that claimed the attack had been carried out by a former employee who had since returned to China, he said a Chinese national who left the company and had been a “developer working on the authentication system” was involved.

The company faces a potential fine of up to 1 trillion won ($681 million) over the incident, lawmakers said.

Coupang founder Bom Kim has been summoned to appear before a parliamentary hearing on Dec. 17, with lawmakers warning of consequences if the billionaire fails to show.

Park’s departure adds fresh uncertainty to Coupang’s leadership less than seven months after the company revamped its internal structure to make him sole CEO of its Korean operations. In his new role, Rogers will focus on addressing customer concerns and stabilizing the company, Coupang said.

Join us at the Fortune Workplace Innovation Summit May 19–20, 2026, in Atlanta. The next era of workplace innovation is here—and the old playbook is being rewritten. At this exclusive, high-energy event, the world’s most innovative leaders will convene to explore how AI, humanity, and strategy converge to redefine, again, the future of work. Register now.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Databricks CEO Ali Ghodsi says company will be worth $1 trillion by doing these three things

Published

on



Ali Ghodsi, the CEO and cofounder of data intelligence company Databricks, is betting his privately held startup can be the latest addition to the trillion-dollar valuation club.

In August, Ghodsi told the Wall Street Journalthat he believed Databricks, which is reportedly in talks toraise funding at a $134 billion valuation, had “a shot to be a trillion-dollar company.” At Fortune’s Brainstorm AI conference in San Francisco on Tuesday, he explained how it would happen, laying out a “trifecta” of growth areas to ignite the company’s next leg of growth.

The first is entering the transactional database market, the traditional territory of large enterprise players like Oracle, which Ghodsi said has remained largely “the same for 40 years.” Earlier this year, Databricks launched a link-based offering called Lakehouse, which aims to combine the capabilities of traditional databases with modern data lake storage, in an attempt to capture some of this market.

The company is also seeing growth driven by the rise of AI-powered coding. “Over 80% of the databases that are being launched on Databricks are not being launched by humans, but by AI agents,” Ghodsi said. As developers use AI tools for “vibe coding”—rapidly building software with natural language commands—those applications automatically need databases, and Ghodsi they’re defaulting to Databricks’ platform.

“That’s just a huge growth factor for us. I think if we just did that, we could maybe get all the way to a trillion,” he said.

The second growth area is Agentbricks, Databricks’ platform for building AI agents that work with proprietary enterprise data.

“It’s a commodity now to have AI that has general knowledge,” Ghodsi said, but “it’s very elusive to get AI that really works and understands that proprietary data that’s inside enterprise.” He pointed to the Royal Bank of Canada, which built AI agents for equity research analysts, as an example. Ghodsi said these agents were able to automatically gather earnings calls and company information to assemble research reports, reducing “many days’ worth of work down to minutes.”

And finally, the third piece to Ghodsi’s puzzle involves building applications on top of this infrastructure, with developers using AI tools to quickly build applications that run on Lakehouse and which are then powered by AI agents. “To get the trifecta is also to have apps on top of this. Now you have apps that are vibe coded with the database, Lakehouse, and with agents,” Ghodsi said. “Those are three new vectors for us.”

Ghodsi did not provide a timeframe for attaining the trillion-dollar goal. Currently, only a handful of companies have achieved the milestone, all of them as publicly traded companies. In the tech industry, only big tech giants like Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta have managed to cross the trillion-dollar threshold.

To reach this level would require Databricks, which is widely expected to go public sometime in early 2026, to grow its valuation roughly sevenfold from its current reported level. Part of this journey will likely also include the expected IPO, Ghodsi said.

“There are huge advantages and pros and cons. That’s why we’re not super religious about it,” Ghodsi said when asked about a potential IPO. “We will go public at some point. But to us, it’s not a really big deal.”

Could the company IPO next year? Maybe, replied Ghodsi.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

New contract shows Palantir working on tech platform for another federal agency that works with ICE

Published

on



Palantir, the artificial intelligence and data analytics company, has quietly started working on a tech platform for a federal immigration agency that has referred dozens of individuals to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for potential enforcement since September.

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services agency—which handles services including citizenship applications, family immigration, adoptions, and work permits for non-citizens—started the contract with Palantir at the end of October, and is paying the data analytics company to implement “Phase 0” of a “vetting of wedding-based schemes,” or “VOWS” platform, according to the federal contract, which was posted to the U.S. government website and reviewed by Fortune.

The contract is small—less than $100,000—and details of what exactly the new platform entails are thin. The contract itself offers few details, apart from the general description of the platform (“vetting of wedding-based schemes”) and an estimate that the completion of the contract would be Dec. 9.Palantir declined to comment on the contract or nature of the work, and USCIS did not respond to requests for comment for this story.

But the contract is notable, nonetheless, as it marks the beginning of a new relationship between USCIS and Palantir, which has had longstanding contracts with ICE, another agency of the Department of Homeland Security, since at least 2011. The description of the contract suggests that the “VOWS” platform may very well be focused on marriage fraud and related to USCIS’ recent stated effort to drill down on duplicity in applications for marriage and family-based petitions, employment authorizations, and parole-related requests.

USCIS has been outspoken about its recent collaboration with ICE. Over nine days in September, USCIS announced that it worked with ICE and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to conduct what it called “Operation Twin Shield” in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area, where immigration officials investigated potential cases of fraud in immigration benefit applications the agency had received. The agency reported that its officers referred 42 cases to ICE over the period. In a statement published to the USCIS website shortly after the operation, USCIS director Joseph Edlow said his agency was “declaring an all-out war on immigration fraud” and that it would “relentlessly pursue everyone involved in undermining the integrity of our immigration system and laws.” 

“Under President Trump, we will leave no stone unturned,” he said.

Earlier this year, USCIS rolled out updates to its policy requirements for marriage-based green cards, which have included more details of relationship evidence and stricter interview requirements.

While Palantir has always been a controversial company—and one that tends to lean into that reputation no less—the new contract with USCIS is likely to lead to more public scrutiny. Backlash over Palantir’s contracts with ICE have intensified this year amid the Trump Administration’s crackdown on immigration and aggressive tactics used by ICE to detain immigrants that have gone viral on social media. Not to mention, Palantir inked a $30 million contract with ICE earlier this year to pilot a system that will track individuals who have elected to self-deport and help ICE with targeting and enforcement prioritization. There has been pushback from current and former employees of the company alike over contracts the company has with ICE and Israel.

In a recent interview at the New York Times DealBook Summit, Karp was asked on stage about Palantir’s work with ICE and later what Karp thought, from a moral standpoint, about families getting separated by ICE. “Of course I don’t like that, right? No one likes that. No American. This is the fairest, least bigoted, most open-minded culture in the world,” Karp said. But he said he cared about two issues politically: immigration and “re-establishing the deterrent capacity of America without being a colonialist neocon view. On those two issues, this president has performed.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.