Connect with us

Politics

Resident files state complaints against David Suarez over messages criticizing fellow Miami Beach Commissioner

Published

on


Miami Beach Commissioner David Suarez may soon come under state scrutiny after a longtime resident-activist accused him of using his public office to sway voters in an ongoing election.

If proven, it could amount to a criminal violation under Florida law.

The complaints, filed last week with both the Florida Elections Commission and Florida Commission on Ethics, cite Suarez’s public attacks on fellow Commissioner Laura Dominguez, who is seeking re-election this year.

Miami Beach resident Jo Manning, in her complaints filed Sept. 17 and 18, alleged that Suarez crossed a legal line when he used the city’s official seal and government letterhead in communications criticizing Dominguez and her City Hall conduct.

Manning’s filing points to an email Suarez sent Sept. 9 that featured the city seal and the words “Office of the Mayor and Commission.” The bottom of the email said, “Paid for by David Suarez, Miami Beach Commissioner Group 5.” Suarez posted similar content in a series of Facebook posts on Sept. 14 that linked to the email.

In his communications, Suarez laid out what he described as a pattern of “pay-for-play” activity, accusing Dominguez of accepting campaign contributions from developers around the same time she sponsored legislation favorable to them.

He named several donors who he said benefited from measures she sponsored, including the owners of The Standard hotel, board members of the Belle Island Residents Association, owners of the Deauville Beach Resort, and since-disgraced developer Rishi Kapoor.

Calling Dominguez’s record “hypocrisy at its finest,” Suarez said she broke campaign promises to guard neighborhoods from overdevelopment.

“I do not take lightly to speaking out against a colleague, but the scope of developer and lobbyist contributions to Commissioner Laura Dominguez’s re-election campaign — and legislation she has sponsored — cannot be ignored,” he wrote. “We deserve elected officials who actually put residents first, who fight for honesty, transparency, and who will not sell out their own neighborhood to the highest bidder. This election is about breaking the cycle.”

(L-R) Miami Beach Mayor Steven Meiner and Commissioner David Suarez speaking with residents. Image via Facebook.

In her complaints, Manning argued that the language Suarez used “is clearly intended to influence the upcoming election,” including lines such as, “Miami Beach cannot afford four more years.” She said Suarez’s use of official city branding gave his messages “an appearance of authenticity and credibility,” leading recipients to believe it was sanctioned by Miami Beach’s government.

Manning referenced several state statutes, including one prohibiting public officials from using their office for personal benefit and two others that outline campaign spending strictures. She noted that by including a disclaimer in his post that read, “Paid for by David Suarez, Miami Beach Commissioner Group 5,” he indicated he was making a campaign expenditure and must therefore follow state laws governing such spending.

Suarez was elected in 2023, isn’t up for re-election until 2027, and isn’t actively campaigning.

The most punitive law, which Manning cited in her Elections Commission complaint, is Florida Statute 104.31. It bars public officials and employees from using their authority to influence or interfere with an election or the nomination of a public officer.

Violating that statute is a first-degree misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in jail and up to $1,000 in fines.

Manning, a vocal presence in Miami Beach politics, said she has known Suarez for years. She told Florida Politics she first encountered him when he rented a unit in her condo building years ago. Later, she said, he misattributed a quote to her in a homeowners association letter, for which he apologized.

Their relationship soured further when Suarez, a former Republican and current Independent Party member, ran for the Commission against her friend, activist and hotel owner Mitch Novak.

“Suarez, in my opinion, is not a good person. He says things he shouldn’t. He smears other people,” she said. “He has smeared Laura Dominguez like crazy, and people have to speak out.”

Manning, a Democrat, previously took on Republican Rep. Fabián Basabe when he briefly ran for the Miami Beach Commission. Ahead of the 2021 election, she successfully sued Basabe, contending that he did not meet the city’s one-year residency requirement.

Basabe was ultimately disqualified as a candidate, leading to the re-election of then-Commissioner Mark Samuelian, Dominguez’s late partner, whom she replaced in the dais.

Manning’s lawyer in the case was former Rep. J.C. Planas, who also served as Samuelian’s campaign attorney.

(L-R) Activist-resident Jo Manning and Miami Beach Commissioner Laura Dominguez. Image via Facebook.

Basabe recently circulated a video clip that he alleged showed Dominguez urging developers to fund political mailers ahead of the city’s election this year. He called for criminal and civil investigations.

Dominguez countered that the full recording showed her comments were misrepresented and accused Basabe of trying to tarnish her reputation. The full video, which Florida Politics published, shows that Dominguez’s remarks were part of a broader conversation about a possible ballot referendum, not a directive to manipulate voters.

The Florida Commission on Ethics and Elections Commission will separately review the complaints to determine whether they warrant a formal investigation. If probable cause is found, Suarez could face fines or prosecution.

Florida Politics contacted Suarez for comment Wednesday evening. He said he was unaware of any complaint filed against him.

“The bigger story here is that Commissioner Dominguez receives campaign contributions from developers and lobbyists, then turns around sponsoring their legislation and votes in favor, in what appears to be a simple pay-for-play scheme,” he said Thursday, after viewing the ethics complaint. “Don’t take my word for it, the public records have all the receipts.”

Dominguez faces one challenger: Fred Karlton, a 65-year-old real estate investor who is registered with the Independent Party. Another candidate, Democrat Robert Novo, dropped out of the race last week after Dominguez’s campaign successfully challenged his residency bona fides.

Novo’s last government job was as a legislative aide to Basabe.

Other races on the ballot include a two-way contest between Meiner and City Commissioner Kristen Rosen Gonzalez for Mayor, a seven-way contest for Rosen Gonzalez’s Group 1 seat and a head-to-head matchup between Group 3 Commissioner Alex Fernandez and his lone challenger, Luidgi Mary.

Meiner has no party affiliation. Gonzalez and Fernandez are Democrats. Mary is a Republican.

The city’s elections are nonpartisan.

___

Editor’s note: This report was updated to include a statement from Suarez.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

While St. Pete Beach residents were locked out after Hurricane Helene, the Mayor was already having repairs done

Published

on


One day after Hurricane Helene skirted past the Tampa Bay area on Sept. 26, 2024, leaving devastating flooding, St. Pete Beach residents were still blocked from returning to their homes to survey damage, as crews worked to ensure it was safe to return.

Yet even as residents grew anxious to see what remained of their homes and communities, St. Pete Beach Mayor Adrian Petrila was already on the island and, it appears, already taking steps to repair his flooded home.

On Sept. 27, 2024, the city of St. Pete Beach posted a warning on Facebook informing residents that access points to the local barrier islands “remain closed today” as “crews from the county and impacted municipalities continue to work on clearing impassable roadways, removing dangerous debris, restoring power, and addressing other infrastructure issues including returning power to our sanitary sewer system.”

The post went on to caution residents that they “should plan to spend multiple days away from their houses.”

That same day, a local resident who had remained on the island to weather the storm captured video at Petrila’s home of what appears to be crews bringing in fans to dry flood areas.

Donna Miller had stayed on the island with a neighbor — a decision she said many residents made after weathering numerous storms without much damage and with no risks to safety. This time was different, as flooding impacted much of the island, leaving homes badly damaged.

She told Florida Politics that she and others who had stayed behind were unable to obtain water, food or other supplies as the barrier islands remained closed because they were told they could leave the island, but would not be able to return until access was restored. Not wanting to miss out on time to address flood damage, many continued to stay.

Instead, Miller and a friend hopped in her car to check on other neighbors. In doing so, they came across Petrila’s home, where video Miller took shows a crew carrying several large fans into the home. The video is just 10 seconds long, but Petrila’s address is visible in the footage and metadata on the video confirms it was taken the day after the hurricane. Petrila is also visible in the garage.

Miller said she stopped filming to confront the homeowner. Said she didn’t realize it was the Mayor until after the confrontation.

Miller told Florida Politics that during the interaction, she asked Petrila, “How is it that you have workers cleaning out your house when people need food and supplies?”

He responded, according to Miller, that the men had already been on the island, a claim Miller said she doubts.

“It seemed like he played the Mayor card to get them in,” she said.

Florida Politics reached out to Petrila on Monday via his city email asking about the video. The email included questions about how workers were able to bring supplies to his house. As of Wednesday, he had still not responded.

Miller, meanwhile, has sent letters to the Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office and to U.S. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna complaining about what she perceived as Petrila misusing his authority as Mayor for personal benefit.

“A Mayor who puts himself before the people needs to find another career,” Miller told Florida Politics. “What he did was horrible. Instead of getting trucks on the island with emergency supplies, he got blowers and workers on the island.”

Petrila, a Republican, is up for re-election this year. He faces fellow Republican Scott Tate in what is expected to be a tight race. Petrila is the top fundraiser in the race, but only barely. Tate has nearly matched Petrila’s fundraising, with new fourth-quarter totals showing he has brought in just over $14,000, only $1,300 less than Petrila.

The tighter-than-usual fundraising in a beach town election cycle that is more often than not a quiet affair comes as Petrila faces criticism for proposing to impose tolls at the north, central and southern access points to the island to fund ongoing infrastructure repairs and improvements following back-to-back hurricanes in 2024 that devastated the island.

Despite his plan exempting residents, employees and business owners, it has been controversial, with some worrying such tolls would reduce tourism and other revenue-generating traffic on St. Pete Beach.

And Petrila, like neighboring St. Petersburg Mayor Ken Welch, who is also facing intraparty opposition for his re-election, is also earning resident frustration over a permitting backlog following the hurricanes that is ongoing as residents continue to rebuild. While Tate has not directly weighed in on the tolling issue, he has lamented that the permitting red tape is a failure of leadership.

Petrila is facing his first re-election contest after first being elected in 2023, when he unseated then-incumbent Alan Johnson.

The St. Pete Beach municipal election is March 10.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Jane Castor says Tampa will ‘finish strong’ amid construction and transit plans

Published

on


With just over a year remaining in her second and final term, Tampa Mayor Jane Castor’s administration is shifting into a “finish strong” phase to wrap up major redevelopment projects while positioning the city for continued growth under its next Mayor.

Castor told Florida Politics that she is focused on completing long-planned initiatives in the coming year, and creating what she called “project launch pads” for the next administration after nearly seven years of rapid development and population growth.

“We’ve accomplished a great deal in just a bit less than seven years,” Castor said. “Our city’s grown dramatically. We’re focused on finishing up some of those projects and getting other projects ready for the next administration.”

Castor said recent city budgets have emphasized investment in transportation, affordable housing and workforce development.

Transportation remains Tampa’s biggest challenge, she said, calling it the city’s “Achilles heel.” Castor pointed to the defeat of Hillsborough County’s voter-approved transportation surtax as a major setback for the region, though she emphasized that local governments have continued pursuing alternatives.

“We mourned the loss of that, but we didn’t stop,” Castor said. 

Instead, Tampa and regional partners turned to grants and federal funding, securing nearly $4 million through a U.S. Department of Transportation program known as the Regional Infrastructure Accelerator. The grant supports planning for large-scale, multicounty transportation projects across Hillsborough, Pinellas and Pasco counties, including both local and regional transit options.

One proposal under consideration would expand Tampa’s streetcar system beyond its current footprint in Ybor City, Channel District and downtown, extending north into Tampa Heights. Castor said the city is also examining longer-term regional transit connections, including potential airport links and public-private partnerships to help finance future projects.

Meanwhile, construction across Tampa continues at a rapid pace, particularly along the riverfront and in historically underserved neighborhoods.

Castor highlighted projects nearing key milestones, such as the West River redevelopment in West Tampa — where a new Riverwalk extension is under construction. Castor also noted the Rome Yard project near Rome Avenue and Columbus Drive, a 16-acre mixed-use development now rising out of the ground.

In East Tampa, the city recently held a ribbon-cutting for the new East Tampa Recreation Center, a sprawling, multiblock complex that Castor said will be among the best facilities in Tampa’s parks system once completed later this year.

Downtown and surrounding neighborhoods are also seeing a wave of new residential construction. Castor cited multiple high-rise developments near downtown, additional riverfront condominiums along Kennedy Boulevard, student housing tied to the University of Tampa, and the long-anticipated opening of the five-star Pendry Hotel near the river this year.

Ybor City and the Channel District remain hot spots for redevelopment as well, with Water Street Tampa entering its second phase and developer Darryl Shaw advancing residential, office and retail projects, including a food hall, near the Gas Worx site.

“The city is just on fire,” Castor said. “I keep saying I’m going to change our city bird to the crane, there’s cranes all over the city.”

As lawmakers convene in Tallahassee for the ongoing Legislative Session, Castor said her top request is simple: leave property taxes alone. 

Property taxes remain the primary revenue source for cities and counties, she said, and are already constrained by Florida’s Save Our Homes cap, which limits annual increases regardless of rising property values.

“Any cuts to property tax would be cuts to police and fire, to our parks and recreation, and to all the other city departments that rely on property tax funding,” Castor said.

Castor also addressed ongoing discussions surrounding professional sports facilities, noting that planned improvements to Raymond James Stadium and Benchmark International Arena are already accounted for through Hillsborough County’s voter-approved Community Investment Tax extension. She said city and county officials are meeting with the Tampa Bay Rays as discussions continue around a potential baseball stadium site near Hillsborough Community College.

Looking beyond her tenure, Castor said she does not plan to seek another political office, but intends to remain active in civic life after leaving City Hall.

“I don’t have any plans politically, but I definitely will stay involved in the community,” Castor said. “I was born and raised here in Tampa, so I’ll always be involved — participate on boards, volunteering, whatever way I can — to help continue to grow this great city.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Shared services agreement falls flat with Broward voters

Published

on


If something isn’t broken, don’t fix it — especially not behind closed doors.

That’s the message coming through in a new poll by The Tyson Group gauging public sentiment on a proposed shared services agreement between the North and South Broward Hospital districts.

The survey asked likely Broward County voters whether they approve or disapprove of the health care services currently available in the county. Nearly two-thirds (65%) say they approve, including 30% who strongly approve. Just 22% say they disapprove of Broward’s health services.

When asked whether the North and South Broward Hospital Districts should be allowed to change how they operate “without triggering the legal requirements, transparency, or voter approval normally required for a full merger,” nearly three-quarters of respondents (73%) said no, including 62% who said “definitely no.”  Only 16% say the Districts should be allowed.

The polling comes after Sarasota Republican Sen. Joe Gruters and Dania Beach Republican Rep. Hillary Cassel filed bills that would authorize two or more special hospital districts to jointly form, participate in, or control a wide range of collaborative health care ventures — including public or private, for-profit or nonprofit entities — anywhere within their combined boundaries.

Notably, the legislation would explicitly give the Districts and their partners immunity from state action, allowing them to collaborate regardless of anticompetitive effects or potential conflicts with state or federal antitrust laws.

When similar bills were filed last Session, critics warned that it amounted to a backdoor merger that would bypass public scrutiny, regulatory review and possibly a countywide referendum otherwise required under state law. Memorial Healthcare System employees, physicians and community advocates raised alarms about transparency, governance and the potential shifting of financial burdens from North Broward’s struggling Broward Health system onto South Broward taxpayers.

“Once voters understood that the shared services agreement would go into effect without public review or voter approval, it was impossible to generate support. Each message we tested reinforced the negative perception that the shared services agreement was a shady deal designed to circumvent quality control,” the polling memo reads.

Messaging tests in the survey included transparency, lack of a taxpayer vote, financial mismanagement, and consolidation of power — on each front, more than 60% of those polled express concern while no more than 10% are unbothered.

By the end of the poll, just 21% said they supported a shared services agreement, with 63% in opposition, including 47% who say they “strongly oppose” the deal.

The survey was conducted Dec. 8-10. The sample includes 500 likely voters in Broward County and carries a margin of error of 4.38 percentage points.

___

Jesse Scheckner of Florida Politics contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.