Connect with us

Business

Reeling after being widowed, Suzy Welch created NYU’s most popular b-school class ever, offering Gen Z the one thing they want most: purpose

Published

on



When Suzy Welch walked into the first meeting of the first university course she had ever taught, in the fall of 2022, she looked out onto 20 students. She and the dean of New York University’s Stern School of Business had agreed that the new course, which Welch had created and intriguingly named “Becoming You,” should be offered to two sections of no more than 40 students each–one section for full-time MBA students and one for part-time students. Neither section had reached its modest limit. She recalls, “I went to that classroom saying to myself, ‘What made you think you could do this?’”

One week later, the full-time section alone had a wait list of 150 students, all from word of mouth.

From then until now, Becoming You has been a phenomenon. An administrator recalls, “People were breaking down the door trying to get into the course. I cannot tell you the impact.” Welch will teach the course again this fall, now offered to undergraduates, full-time and part-time MBA candidates, and all other post-graduate students, with one mega-section of 150. It will almost certainly be much over-subscribed.

To spread the course’s message more broadly, NYU has created a staffed Initiative on Purpose and Flourishing, with Welch as director. Beyond academia, on her own she offers (for a fee) attendance at intensive three-day and one-day programs available to anyone, with NYU’s blessing, every six weeks or so; about 150 will attend the next program. Her weekly podcasts have been in the top five on careers, and her book published last spring, Becoming You: The Proven Method for Crafting Your Authentic Life and Career, was No. 1 on Amazon for a month.

Welch has tapped into a widespread modern-day yearning: to find one’s purpose in life. For most of history, earning a living and supporting a family was purpose enough. Now millions can afford to wonder why they’re here and what they truly value–and whether their job, where they spend most of their waking hours, aligns with their purpose. Welch, through rigorously developed academic instruments, guides them to the answers, which are often uncomfortable. As NYU discovered, her students of all ages overwhelmingly value the experience. For them and legions of followers, she has become the purpose doctor.

Many students call the experience life-changing. Attending in person is critical: “All of us were super-motivated to discover what drives us, but also to learn about what drives other people and how they arrived in their journey,” says James Ching, a mid-career corporate manager who flew from Singapore to New York to attend a three-day workshop. “I think that was what made it powerful.” He’s now happily on his own, offering consulting and coaching. Crucially, the fellowship of the group sparks extraordinary candor. Kim Aguilar, a Stern School MBA graduate, says, “Even among my closest friends, I don’t think we could have had similar conversations.” Kristen Johnson, 45, had reached a time where she thought, “My family’s okay, and now maybe I need to explore what’s going on with me.” She speaks for many when she says, “If I had had this information as a young person, I wonder how much different [my life] would have been.”

A winding journey

Welch lives on Manhattan’s Upper East Side with multiple dogs; they shift to an upstate weekend place when travel permits. Her four children are adults, and she refers to their kids as “the most perfect grandchildren in the history of humanity.”

Her own journey has been far from smooth or direct. She grew up in New York and New England, precocious without knowing it and without any clear dreams of adulthood. She graduated from Harvard with high honors (major: fine arts), where she spent many hours at the college newspaper. A job as a Miami Herald reporter came next, then a move to the Associated Press in Boston. But daily journalism wasn’t for her, so she went to the Harvard Business School. She graduated among the Baker Scholars, the class’s top five percent. Next: Five years as a Bain consultant. Didn’t love that either. Became editor-in-chief of the Harvard Business Review.

And then, in 2001, she went to interview Jack Welch, undoubtedly the world’s most famous CEO at the time, who was just retiring from General Electric. Bottom line, the interview took an unexpected turn, and they fell in love. She didn’t mention that to the Harvard Business Review and got fired. They got married–what Suzy has called “the rightest thing I’ve ever done”—and spent 16 productive years together, writing magazine columns (including some for Fortune) and best-selling books.

And then, just before covid reached the U.S. in 2020, Jack died. “I didn’t know what I was going to do with my life,” she says. “I had no way to conceptualize myself as separate from Jack.” After two years of walking the dogs and muddling, “I felt like there was something else for me, and I had been fiddling in my mind for years with this methodology to help you figure out your purpose.”

Values are the foundation of purpose, and Welch had begun to see that most people don’t know their own values. Thus helping people to identify their values is the heart of Becoming You, the part that takes the most time in the course and is most revelatory to each student.

Talking rigorously about values isn’t easy. For most people they’re subjective and ill-defined, a problem for inclusion in a university course. Academics have been codifying values for almost a century, but the most recent version is 35 years old. Welch wanted a more current version. So after Becoming You took off, she enrolled in the PhD program at the University of Bristol in the U.K. and created a new values inventory (and received a PhD for it).

Result: 16 core human values, for example Luminance (public recognition), Familycentrism (family as a life-organizing principle), Agency (self-determination), Achievement (seen success). Everyone has all 16 values in different degrees. Welch teaches her students the language she has developed for talking about values. Her teaching style is hyper-energized, speaking bluntly at a mile a minute. Eventually students rate the importance of all the values to themselves, from one (not important to me at all) to seven (extremely important to me).

After students have done that work, things get profound. Facing a 16-dimension portrait of themselves, they confront realities they had never seen. Some are painful. Students may realize that their seven-level Familycentrism can’t work in the real world aside seven-level Workcentrism. Some–many–acknowledge ruefully that they’ve been living by someone else’s values, not their own. At the same time, students may joyfully uncover their true career, long waiting unseen in their minds.

Any of those realizations, sad or uplifting, are so powerful they often incite tears. Among New York University students, Becoming You is “the class where everyone cries.”

There’s more to the course. After students have found their real values, they must find a way to follow them in the hard world, so the course helps students find their aptitudes and ways to be rewarded financially, emotionally, or both as they live their values. But the course’s overarching theme of purpose and meaning is well placed because it’s so especially relevant to people’s lives today. 

Hunger for purpose has intensified in recent years. A major factor is the covid pandemic, a once-a-century catastrophe that changed millions of people’s views of life. In a McKinsey study, almost two-thirds of US-based workers said “COVID-19 has caused them to reflect on their purpose in life.” A major study by Harvard’s Graduate School of Education finds that “alarming percentages of [young U.S. adults] lack ‘meaning or purpose’ in their lives (58%),” part of the larger trend in which young adults feel “lonely, unmoored, directionless.” That’s especially bad news because extensive research shows that a sense of purpose improves physical as well as mental health–longer lifespan, better sleep, lower stress levels, healthier weight, improved immune function.

Welch acknowledges that luck was on her side in creating Becoming You. “I didn’t intend this, but my timing was very, very good because the world was turned upside down by covid, and here I was with this methodology that helped you figure out what to do with your life,” she says. But the course was still a gamble for her and the Stern School.

In retrospect it was a gamble with long odds. An informed bet would have said she’d probably succeed because she had succeeded in almost everything she had done. In part that was because she had always worked extraordinarily hard. This is someone who says she once worked for 352 days without a break and acknowledges she is “very, very near a seven on Workcentrism.” But in light of her varied career history, how long would she stay on the project?

The ironic reality is that this person on the verge of teaching Becoming You was not fully certain it was the right thing to do. At age 62 a friend told her he was teaching as an adjunct professor (an expert who teaches one course but is not a faculty member) at the Stern School, and Welch thought “well, maybe that’s something I can do.”

Soon after the course became an instant hit, the Stern School’s dean called her suggesting that she teach more sections and “’what if you do this and what if you do that?’” she recalls. “I don’t know what came over me. I said, ‘Does an adjunct do that?’ And he said, ‘No, we would like you to join the faculty as a dean’s appointee.’” Welch burst into tears. “I thought ‘Oh, this is it. This is exactly right. This is exactly what I want to be doing.’”

Becoming the author of your life

As a full professor, Welch teaches another course, Management with Purpose: Strategies for New and Aspiring Managers. “It’s an incredible joy,” she says. “I created a class, and I love teaching that class.”

In addition, being the creator of Becoming You is a full-time job and a business. On Welch’s website anyone can now find where they stand on each of the 16 values and can use tools to help understand the results. One tool shows how a person’s values align with their life, for example.  Another compares the values of two people, identifying conflicts and harmonies. Three tools are available now, and Welch says four are in beta.

Various professions may find value in Welch’s work. She says therapists have expressed interest in using her methodology to treat the increasing patients who have lost their jobs not because they got fired but because their jobs have disappeared. Financial planners and insurance agents have approached her, she says; much of their job is talking with customers about what they really value and how they want to live, but no one has a tested vocabulary and set of concepts for doing so, and that’s what she has.

At the foundation of Welch’s work is an age-old problem, a life-changing conflict for which resolution is straightforward, hard, and liberating. “Sometimes when people find out what their values really are—what they actually care about—they say, ‘I wish this wasn’t what they were,’’’ Welch says. “And we have to talk about why. Usually they say, ‘Well, I really do feel this way, but it’s gonna make my husband so angry,’ or ‘My parents will be so disappointed.’ Well, who are you living for? And is that who you want to live for? Do you want to be the author of your life or the editor of your life? That’s your choice.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

4 times in 7 seconds: Trump calls Somali immigrants ‘garbage’

Published

on



He said it four times in seven seconds: Somali immigrants in the United States are “garbage.”

It was no mistake. In fact, President Donald Trump’s rhetorical attacks on immigrants have been building since he said Mexico was sending “rapists” across the border during his presidential campaign announcement a decade ago. He’s also echoed rhetoric once used by Adolf Hitler and called the 54 nations of Africa “s—-hole countries.” But with one flourish closing a two-hour Cabinet meeting Tuesday, Trump amped up his anti-immigrant rhetoric even further and ditched any claim that his administration was only seeking to remove people in the U.S. illegally.

“We don’t want ‘em in our country,” Trump said five times of the nation’s 260,000 people of Somali descent. “Let ’em go back to where they came from and fix it.” The assembled Cabinet members cheered and applauded. Vice President JD Vance could be seen pumping a fist. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, sitting to the president’s immediate left, told Trump on-camera, “Well said.”

The two-minute finale offered a riveting display in a nation that prides itself as being founded and enriched by immigrants, alongside an ugly history of enslaving millions of them and limiting who can come in. Trump’s U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids and deportations have reignited an age-old debate — and widened the nation’s divisions — over who can be an American, with Trump telling tens of thousands of American citizens, among others, that he doesn’t want them by virtue of their family origin.

“What he has done is brought this type of language more into the everyday conversation, more into the main,” said Carl Bon Tempo, a State University of New York at Albany history professor. “He’s, in a way, legitimated this type of language that, for many Americans for a long time, was seen as outside the bounds.”

A question that cuts to the core of American identity

Some Americans have long felt that people from certain parts of the world can never really blend in. That outsider-averse sentiment has manifested during difficult periods, such as anti-Chinese fear-mongering in the late 19th century and the imprisonment of some 120,000 Japanese Americans during World War II.

Trump, reelected with more than 77 million votes last year, has launched a whole-of-government drive to limit immigration. His order to end birthright citizenship — declaring that children born to parents who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens despite the 14th Amendment — is being considered by the Supreme Court. He has largely frozen the country’s asylum system and drastically reduced the number of refugees it is allowed to admit. And his administration this week halted immigration applications for migrants from 19 travel-ban nations.

Immigration remains a signature issue for Trump, and he has slightly higher marks on it than on his overall job approval. According to a November AP-NORC poll, roughly 4 in 10 adults — 42% — approved of how the president is handling the issue, down from about half who approved in March. And Trump has pushed his agenda with near-daily crackdowns. On Wednesday, federal agents launched an immigration sweep in New Orleans,

There are some clues that Trump uses stronger anti-immigration rhetoric than many members of his own party. A study of 200,000 speeches in Congress and 5,000 presidential communications related to immigration between 1880 and 2020 found that the “most influential” words on the subject were terms like “enforce,” “terrorism” and “policy” from 1973 through Trump’s first presidential term.

The authors wrote in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that Trump is “the first president in modern American history to express sentiment toward immigration that is more negative than the average member of his own party.” And that was before he called thousands of Somalis in the U.S. “garbage.”

The U.S. president, embattled over other developments during the Cabinet meeting and discussions between Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. envoys, opted for harsh talk in his jam-packed closing.

Somali Americans, he said, “come from hell” and “contribute nothing.” They do “nothing but bitch” and “their country stinks.” Then Trump turned to a familiar target. Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., an outspoken and frequent Trump critic, “is garbage,” he said. “Her friends are garbage.”

His remarks on Somalia drew shock and condemnation from Minneapolis to Mogadishu.

“My view of the U.S. and living there has changed dramatically. I never thought a president, especially in his second term, would speak so harshly,” Ibrahim Hassan Hajji, a resident of Somalia’s capital city, told The Associated Press. “Because of this, I have no plans to travel to the U.S.”

Omar called Trump’s “obsession” with her and Somali-Americans “creepy and unhealthy.”

“We are not, and I am not, someone to be intimidated,” she said, “and we are not gonna be scapegoated.”

Trump’s influence on these issues is potent

But from the highest pulpit in the world’s biggest economy, Trump has had an undeniable influence on how people regard immigrants.

“Trump specializes in pushing the boundaries of what others have done before,” said César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández, a civil rights law professor at Ohio State University. “He is far from the first politician to embrace race-baiting xenophobia. But as president of the United States, he has more impact than most.” Domestically, Trump has “remarkable loyalty” among Republicans, he added. “Internationally, he embodies an aspiration for like-minded politicians and intellectuals.”

In Britain, attitudes toward migrants have hardened in the decade since Brexit, a vote driven in part by hostility toward immigrants from Eastern Europe. Nigel Farage, leader of the hard-right Reform U.K. party, has called unauthorized migration an “invasion” and warned of looming civil disorder.

France’s Marine Le Pen and her father built their political empire on anti-immigrant language decades before Trump entered politics. But the National Rally party has softened its rhetoric to win broader support. Le Pen often casts the issue as an administrative or policy matter.

In fact, what Trump said about people from Somalia would likely be illegal in France if uttered by anyone other than a head of state, because public insults based on a group’s national origin, ethnicity, race or religion are illegal under the country’s hate speech laws. But French law grants heads of state immunity.

One lawyer expressed concerns that Trump’s words will encourage other heads of state to use similar hate speech targeting people as groups.

“Comments saying that a population stinks — coming from a foreign head of state, a top world military and economic power — that’s never happened before,” said Paris lawyer Arié Alimi, who has worked on hate speech cases. “So here we are really crossing a very, very, very important threshold in terms of expressing racist … comments.”

But the “America first” president said he isn’t worried about others think of his increasingly polarizing rhetoric on immigration.

“I hear somebody say, ‘Oh, that’s not politically correct,’” Trump said, winding up his summation Tuesday. “I don’t care. I don’t want them.”

___

Contributing to this report are Associated Press writers Will Weissert and Linley Sanders in Washington, John Leicester in Paris, Jill Lawless in London, Evelyne Musambi in Nairobi, Kenya, and Omar Faruk in Mogadishu.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Nearly three-quarters of Trump voters think the cost of living is bad or the worst ever

Published

on



President Donald Trump and his administration insist that costs are coming down, but voters are skeptical, including those who put him back in the White House.

Despite Republicans getting hammered on affordability in off-year elections last month, Trump continues to downplay the issue, contrasting with his message while campaigning last year.

“The word affordability is a con job by the Democrats,” Trump said during a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday. “The word affordability is a Democrat scam.”

But a new Politico poll found that 37% of Americans who voted for him in 2024 believe the cost of living is the worst they can ever remember, and 34% say it’s bad but can think of other times when it was worse.

The White House has said Trump inherited an inflationary economy from President Joe Biden and point to certain essentials that have come down since Trump began his second term, such as gasoline prices.

The poll shows that 57% of Trump voters say Biden still bears full or almost full responsibility for today’s economy. But 25% blame Trump completely or almost completely.

That’s as the annual rate of consumer inflation has steadily picked up since Trump launched his global trade war in April, and grocery prices have gained 1.4% between January and September.

Meanwhile, Vice President JD Vance pleaded for “patience” on the economy last month as Americans want to see prices decline, not just grow at a slower pace.

Even a marginal erosion in Trump’s electoral coalition could tip the scales in next year’s midterm elections, when the president will not be on the ballot to draw supporters.

A soft spot could be Republicans who don’t identify as “MAGA.” Among those particular voters, 29% said Trump has had a chance to change things in the economy but hasn’t taken it versus 11% of MAGA voters who said that.

Across all voters, 45% named groceries as the most challenging things to afford, followed by housing (38%) and health care (34%), according to the Politico poll.

The poll comes as wealthier households are having trouble affording basics, while discount retailers like Walmart and even Dollar Tree are seeing more higher-income customers.

And in a viral Substack post last month, Michael Green, chief strategist and portfolio manager for Simplify Asset Management, argued that the real poverty line should be around $140,000.

“If the crisis threshold—the floor below which families cannot function—is honestly updated to current spending patterns, it lands at $140,000,” he wrote. “What does that tell you about the $31,200 line we still use? It tells you we are measuring starvation.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Apple is experiencing its biggest leadership shakeup since Steve Jobs died, with over half a dozen key executives headed for the exits

Published

on



Apple is currently undergoing the most extensive executive overhaul in recent history, with a wave of senior leadership departures that marks the company’s most significant management realignment since its visionary co-founder and CEO Steve Jobs died in 2011. The leadership exodus spans critical divisions from artificial intelligence to design, legal affairs, environmental policy, and operations, which will have major repercussions for Apple’s direction for the foreseeable future.

On Thursday, Apple announced Lisa Jackson, its VP of environment, policy, and social initiatives, as well as Kate Adams, the company’s general counsel, will both retire in 2026. Adams has been Apple’s chief legal officer since 2017, and Jackson joined Apple in 2013. Adams will step down late next year, while Jackson will leave next month.

Jackson and Adams join a growing list of top executives who have either left or announced their exits this year. AI chief John Giannandrea announced his retirement earlier this month, and its design lead Alan Dye, who took charge of Apple’s all-important user interface design after Jony Ive left the company in 2019, was just poached by Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta this week.​

The scope of the turnover is unprecedented in the Tim Cook era. In July, Jeff Williams, Apple’s COO who was long thought to succeed Cook as CEO, decided to retire after 27 years with the company. One month later, Apple’s CFO Luca Maestri also decided to step back from his role. And the design division, which just lost Dye, also lost Billy Sorrentino, a senior design director, who left for Meta with Dye. Things have been particularly turbulent for Apple’s AI team, though: Ruoming Pang, who headed its AI Foundation Models Team, left for Meta in July and took about 100 engineers with him. Ke Yang, who led AI-driven web search for Siri, and Jian Zhang, Apple’s AI robotics lead, also both left for Meta.

Succession talks heat up

While all of these departures are a big deal for Apple, the timing may not be a coincidence. Both Bloomberg and the Financial Times have reported on Apple ramping up its succession plan efforts in preparation for Cook, who has led the company since 2011, to retire in 2026. Cook turned 65 in November and has grown Apple’s market cap from about $350 billion to a whopping $4 trillion under his tenure. Bloomberg reports John Ternus has emerged as the leading internal candidate to replace him.​

Apple choosing Ternus would be a pretty major departure from what’s worked for Apple during the past decade, which has been letting someone with an operational background and a strong grasp of the global supply chain lead the company. Ternus, meanwhile, is focused on hardware development, specifically for the iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Apple Watch. But it’s that technical expertise that’s made him an attractive candidate, especially as much of the recent criticism about Apple has revolved around the company entering new product categories (Vision Pro, but also the ill-fated Apple Car), as well as its struggling AI efforts.​

Now, of course, with so many executives leaving Apple, succession plans extend beyond the CEO role. Apple this week announced it’s bringing in Jennifer Newstead, who currently works as Meta’s chief legal officer, to replace Adams as the company’s general counsel starting March 1, 2026. Newstead is expected to handle both legal and government affairs, which is essentially a consolidation of responsibilities among Apple’s leadership team, merging Adams’ and Jacksons’ roles into one.​

Alan Dye, meanwhile, will be replaced by Stephen Lemay, a move that’s reportedly being celebrated within Apple and its design team in particular. John Gruber, who’s reported on Apple for decades and has deep ties within the company, wrote a pretty scathing critique about Dye, but in that same breath said employees are borderline “giddy” about Lemay—who has worked on every major Apple interface design since 1999, including the very first iPhone—taking over.

Meanwhile, on the AI team, John Giannandrea will be replaced by Amar Subramanya, who led AI strategy and development efforts at Google for about 16 years before a brief stint at Microsoft.

Hitting the reset button

All of the above departures cover critical functions for Apple: AI competitiveness, design innovation, regulatory navigation, and operational efficiency. Each replacement brings specialized expertise that aligns with the challenges Cook’s successor will inherit.

The real test will be execution across multiple fronts simultaneously. Can Subramanya accelerate Apple’s AI development to match competitive threats? Will Lemay’s design leadership maintain Apple’s interface advantages as AI reshapes user interaction? Can Newstead navigate regulatory challenges while preserving Apple’s privacy-first approach?

What’s certain is the company will look fundamentally different in 2026—and the executive team that grew Apple into a $4 trillion behemoth is departing. The transformation could be as profound as any since Jobs handed the reins to his COO at the time, Tim Cook, 14 years ago.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.