Connect with us

Business

Reeling after being widowed, Suzy Welch created NYU’s most popular b-school class ever, offering Gen Z the one thing they want most: purpose

Published

on



When Suzy Welch walked into the first meeting of the first university course she had ever taught, in the fall of 2022, she looked out onto 20 students. She and the dean of New York University’s Stern School of Business had agreed that the new course, which Welch had created and intriguingly named “Becoming You,” should be offered to two sections of no more than 40 students each–one section for full-time MBA students and one for part-time students. Neither section had reached its modest limit. She recalls, “I went to that classroom saying to myself, ‘What made you think you could do this?’”

One week later, the full-time section alone had a wait list of 150 students, all from word of mouth.

From then until now, Becoming You has been a phenomenon. An administrator recalls, “People were breaking down the door trying to get into the course. I cannot tell you the impact.” Welch will teach the course again this fall, now offered to undergraduates, full-time and part-time MBA candidates, and all other post-graduate students, with one mega-section of 150. It will almost certainly be much over-subscribed.

To spread the course’s message more broadly, NYU has created a staffed Initiative on Purpose and Flourishing, with Welch as director. Beyond academia, on her own she offers (for a fee) attendance at intensive three-day and one-day programs available to anyone, with NYU’s blessing, every six weeks or so; about 150 will attend the next program. Her weekly podcasts have been in the top five on careers, and her book published last spring, Becoming You: The Proven Method for Crafting Your Authentic Life and Career, was No. 1 on Amazon for a month.

Welch has tapped into a widespread modern-day yearning: to find one’s purpose in life. For most of history, earning a living and supporting a family was purpose enough. Now millions can afford to wonder why they’re here and what they truly value–and whether their job, where they spend most of their waking hours, aligns with their purpose. Welch, through rigorously developed academic instruments, guides them to the answers, which are often uncomfortable. As NYU discovered, her students of all ages overwhelmingly value the experience. For them and legions of followers, she has become the purpose doctor.

Many students call the experience life-changing. Attending in person is critical: “All of us were super-motivated to discover what drives us, but also to learn about what drives other people and how they arrived in their journey,” says James Ching, a mid-career corporate manager who flew from Singapore to New York to attend a three-day workshop. “I think that was what made it powerful.” He’s now happily on his own, offering consulting and coaching. Crucially, the fellowship of the group sparks extraordinary candor. Kim Aguilar, a Stern School MBA graduate, says, “Even among my closest friends, I don’t think we could have had similar conversations.” Kristen Johnson, 45, had reached a time where she thought, “My family’s okay, and now maybe I need to explore what’s going on with me.” She speaks for many when she says, “If I had had this information as a young person, I wonder how much different [my life] would have been.”

A winding journey

Welch lives on Manhattan’s Upper East Side with multiple dogs; they shift to an upstate weekend place when travel permits. Her four children are adults, and she refers to their kids as “the most perfect grandchildren in the history of humanity.”

Her own journey has been far from smooth or direct. She grew up in New York and New England, precocious without knowing it and without any clear dreams of adulthood. She graduated from Harvard with high honors (major: fine arts), where she spent many hours at the college newspaper. A job as a Miami Herald reporter came next, then a move to the Associated Press in Boston. But daily journalism wasn’t for her, so she went to the Harvard Business School. She graduated among the Baker Scholars, the class’s top five percent. Next: Five years as a Bain consultant. Didn’t love that either. Became editor-in-chief of the Harvard Business Review.

And then, in 2001, she went to interview Jack Welch, undoubtedly the world’s most famous CEO at the time, who was just retiring from General Electric. Bottom line, the interview took an unexpected turn, and they fell in love. She didn’t mention that to the Harvard Business Review and got fired. They got married–what Suzy has called “the rightest thing I’ve ever done”—and spent 16 productive years together, writing magazine columns (including some for Fortune) and best-selling books.

And then, just before covid reached the U.S. in 2020, Jack died. “I didn’t know what I was going to do with my life,” she says. “I had no way to conceptualize myself as separate from Jack.” After two years of walking the dogs and muddling, “I felt like there was something else for me, and I had been fiddling in my mind for years with this methodology to help you figure out your purpose.”

Values are the foundation of purpose, and Welch had begun to see that most people don’t know their own values. Thus helping people to identify their values is the heart of Becoming You, the part that takes the most time in the course and is most revelatory to each student.

Talking rigorously about values isn’t easy. For most people they’re subjective and ill-defined, a problem for inclusion in a university course. Academics have been codifying values for almost a century, but the most recent version is 35 years old. Welch wanted a more current version. So after Becoming You took off, she enrolled in the PhD program at the University of Bristol in the U.K. and created a new values inventory (and received a PhD for it).

Result: 16 core human values, for example Luminance (public recognition), Familycentrism (family as a life-organizing principle), Agency (self-determination), Achievement (seen success). Everyone has all 16 values in different degrees. Welch teaches her students the language she has developed for talking about values. Her teaching style is hyper-energized, speaking bluntly at a mile a minute. Eventually students rate the importance of all the values to themselves, from one (not important to me at all) to seven (extremely important to me).

After students have done that work, things get profound. Facing a 16-dimension portrait of themselves, they confront realities they had never seen. Some are painful. Students may realize that their seven-level Familycentrism can’t work in the real world aside seven-level Workcentrism. Some–many–acknowledge ruefully that they’ve been living by someone else’s values, not their own. At the same time, students may joyfully uncover their true career, long waiting unseen in their minds.

Any of those realizations, sad or uplifting, are so powerful they often incite tears. Among New York University students, Becoming You is “the class where everyone cries.”

There’s more to the course. After students have found their real values, they must find a way to follow them in the hard world, so the course helps students find their aptitudes and ways to be rewarded financially, emotionally, or both as they live their values. But the course’s overarching theme of purpose and meaning is well placed because it’s so especially relevant to people’s lives today. 

Hunger for purpose has intensified in recent years. A major factor is the covid pandemic, a once-a-century catastrophe that changed millions of people’s views of life. In a McKinsey study, almost two-thirds of US-based workers said “COVID-19 has caused them to reflect on their purpose in life.” A major study by Harvard’s Graduate School of Education finds that “alarming percentages of [young U.S. adults] lack ‘meaning or purpose’ in their lives (58%),” part of the larger trend in which young adults feel “lonely, unmoored, directionless.” That’s especially bad news because extensive research shows that a sense of purpose improves physical as well as mental health–longer lifespan, better sleep, lower stress levels, healthier weight, improved immune function.

Welch acknowledges that luck was on her side in creating Becoming You. “I didn’t intend this, but my timing was very, very good because the world was turned upside down by covid, and here I was with this methodology that helped you figure out what to do with your life,” she says. But the course was still a gamble for her and the Stern School.

In retrospect it was a gamble with long odds. An informed bet would have said she’d probably succeed because she had succeeded in almost everything she had done. In part that was because she had always worked extraordinarily hard. This is someone who says she once worked for 352 days without a break and acknowledges she is “very, very near a seven on Workcentrism.” But in light of her varied career history, how long would she stay on the project?

The ironic reality is that this person on the verge of teaching Becoming You was not fully certain it was the right thing to do. At age 62 a friend told her he was teaching as an adjunct professor (an expert who teaches one course but is not a faculty member) at the Stern School, and Welch thought “well, maybe that’s something I can do.”

Soon after the course became an instant hit, the Stern School’s dean called her suggesting that she teach more sections and “’what if you do this and what if you do that?’” she recalls. “I don’t know what came over me. I said, ‘Does an adjunct do that?’ And he said, ‘No, we would like you to join the faculty as a dean’s appointee.’” Welch burst into tears. “I thought ‘Oh, this is it. This is exactly right. This is exactly what I want to be doing.’”

Becoming the author of your life

As a full professor, Welch teaches another course, Management with Purpose: Strategies for New and Aspiring Managers. “It’s an incredible joy,” she says. “I created a class, and I love teaching that class.”

In addition, being the creator of Becoming You is a full-time job and a business. On Welch’s website anyone can now find where they stand on each of the 16 values and can use tools to help understand the results. One tool shows how a person’s values align with their life, for example.  Another compares the values of two people, identifying conflicts and harmonies. Three tools are available now, and Welch says four are in beta.

Various professions may find value in Welch’s work. She says therapists have expressed interest in using her methodology to treat the increasing patients who have lost their jobs not because they got fired but because their jobs have disappeared. Financial planners and insurance agents have approached her, she says; much of their job is talking with customers about what they really value and how they want to live, but no one has a tested vocabulary and set of concepts for doing so, and that’s what she has.

At the foundation of Welch’s work is an age-old problem, a life-changing conflict for which resolution is straightforward, hard, and liberating. “Sometimes when people find out what their values really are—what they actually care about—they say, ‘I wish this wasn’t what they were,’’’ Welch says. “And we have to talk about why. Usually they say, ‘Well, I really do feel this way, but it’s gonna make my husband so angry,’ or ‘My parents will be so disappointed.’ Well, who are you living for? And is that who you want to live for? Do you want to be the author of your life or the editor of your life? That’s your choice.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

MacKenzie Scott tries to close the higher ed DEI gap, giving away $155 million this week alone

Published

on



MacKenzie Scott has arguably been the biggest name in philanthropy this year—and has nonstop been making major gifts to organizations focused on education, DEI, disaster recovery, and many other causes.

This week alone, several higher education institutions announced major gifts from the billionaire philanthropist and ex-wife of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos—donations totaling well over $100 million. In true Scott fashion, many of these donations are the largest single donations these schools have ever received.

The donations announced this week include: 

  • $50 million to California State University-East Bay
  • $50 million to Lehman College (part of the City University of New York system)
  • $38 million to Texas A&M University-Kingsville
  • $17 million to Seminole State College

All four institutions are public, access-oriented colleges that enroll large shares of low‑income, first‑generation, and racially diverse students and function as minority‑serving institutions or similar engines of social mobility. They fit MacKenzie Scott’s broader pattern of directing large, unrestricted gifts to colleges that serve “chronically underserved” communities rather than already wealthy, highly selective universities.

Scott, who is worth about $40 billion and has donated over $20 billion in the past five years, has doubled down this year on causes that the Trump administration has cut deeply, such as education, DEI, and disaster recovery.

“As higher education, in general, works to find its way in an uncertain environment, this gift is a major source of encouragement that we are on the right path,” Lehman College President Fernando Delgado said in a statement. 

Scott also made one of the largest donations in HBCU Howard University’s 158-year history with an $80 million gift earlier this fall, and a $60 million donation to the Center for Disaster Philanthropy after Trump administration’s cuts to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)—an organization Americans rely on for help during and after hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, and floods.

“All sectors of society—public, private, and social—share responsibility for helping communities thrive after a disaster,” CDP president and CEO Patricia McIlreavy previously told Fortune. “Philanthropy plays a critical role in providing communities with resources to rebuild stronger, but it cannot—and should not—replace government and its essential responsibilities.”

Trust-based philanthropy

Scott accumulated the vast majority of her wealth from her 2019 divorce from Bezos, but is dedicated to giving away most of her fortune. She’s considered a unique philanthropist in today’s environment because her gifts are typically unrestricted, meaning the organizations can use the funding however they choose. 

“She practices trust-based philanthropy,” Anne Marie Dougherty, CEO of the Bob Woodruff Foundation previously told Fortune. Scott has donated $15 million to the veteran-focused nonprofit organization in 2022, and made a subsequent $20 million donation this fall.

Scott is also considered one of the most generous philanthropists, and credits acts of kindness for inspiring her to give back.

“It was the local dentist who offered me free dental work when he saw me securing a broken tooth with denture glue in college,” Scott wrote of her inspiration for philanthropy in an Oct. 15 essay published to her Yield Giving site. “It was the college roommate who found me crying, and acted on her urge to loan me a thousand dollars to keep me from having to drop out in my sophomore year.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Netflix’s bombshell deal to buy Warner Bros. brings Batman and Harry Potter to the streamer, infuriates theater owners and the Ellisons

Published

on


Netflix’s agreement to buy Warner Bros. in a $72 billion deal marks a seismic shift in Hollywood, handing the streaming giant control of iconic franchises such as Batman and Harry Potter and triggering an immediate backlash from theater owners and the jilted Ellison family behind Paramount. The bombshell transaction, struck after a bidding war that ensued after David Ellison’sunsolicited bids several months ago, positions Netflix ever more at the center of the Southern California entertainment business that the Northern California company disrupted so famously decades ago.

The deal will see Netflix acquire Warner Bros. Discovery’s film and TV studios and its streaming operations, including HBO Max, in a deal with an equity value of roughly $72 billion, or about $27.75 per share in cash and stock, valuing Warner Bros. at $82.7 billion. The agreement followed a heated auction in which Netflix’s bid edged out offers from Paramount Skydance and Comcast, both of which had pushed to keep the storied Warner assets in more traditional hands.

Two days before Netflix won the bidding, Paramount hinted at its fury with a strongly worded letter to WBD CEO David Zaslav, arguing the process was “tainted” and Warner Bros. was favoring a single bidder: Netflix. Paramount called it a “myopic process with a predetermined outcome that favors a single bidder,” Bloomberg reported, although Netflix’s bid is understood to be the highest of the three.

Another angry group is theater owners, who have famously warred with Netflix for years over the big red streamer’s reluctance, even refusal to follow traditional theatrical-release practices. Netflix Co-CEO Ted Sarandos has adamantly defended Netflix’s streaming-forward distribution, saying it’s what consumers really want. At the Time 100 event in April of this year, Sarandos called theatrical release “an outmoded idea for most people” and said Netflix was “saving Hollywood” by giving people what they want: streaming at home.

Cinema United, the trade association which represents over 30,000 movie screens in the U.S. and 26,000 internationally, immediately announced its opposition to Netflix acquiring a legacy Hollywood studio. The organization’s chief, Michael O’Leary, said it “poses an unprecedented threat to the global exhibition business” as Netflix’s states business model simply does not support theatrical exhibition. He urged regulators to look closely at the acquisition.

Deadline reported that other producers are warning of “the death of Hollywood” as a result of this deal. Several days earlier, Bank of America Research’s analysts had surveyed the landscape and concluded that as a defensive move, Netflix would be “killing three birds with one stone,” as its ownership of Warner Bros’ would be a daunting blow to Paramount and Comcast, while taking the Warner legacy studio out of the running. The bank calculated that a combined Netflix and Warner Bros. would comprise roughly 21% of total streaming time—still shy of YouTube’s 28% hold on the market, but far greater than Paramount’s 5% and Comcast’s 4%.

What’s known and what’s still at play

As part of the deal, Netflix will retain the studio that controls the superheroes of DC, the Wizarding World of Harry Potter, and HBO’s prestige brands. Other details on what will happen to the standalone streaming service HBO Max were scant, with the companies saying only that Netflix will “maintain” Warner Bros. current operations. The companies expect the transaction to close after regulatory review, with Netflix projecting billions in annual cost savings by the third year after completion.

​The deal will not include all of Warner Bros. Discovery, according to the press release announcing the acquisition, which said the previously announced plans to separate WBD’s cable operations will be completed before the Netflix deal, in the third quarter of 2026. The newly separated publicly traded company holding the Global Networks division will be called Discovery Global, and will include CNN, TNT Sports in the U.S., as well as Discovery, free-to-air channels across Europe, plus digital products such as Discovery+ and Bleacher Report.  

On a conference call with reporters Friday morning, Sarandos said Netflix is “highly confident in the regulatory process,” calling the deal pro-consumer, pro-innovation, pro-worker, pro-creator and pro-growth. He said Netflix planned to work closely with regulators and was running “full speed” ahead toward getting all regulatory approvals. He added that Netflix executives were “tired” after “an incredibly rigorous and competitive process.” Alluding to Netflix’s traditional resistance to big M&A, Sarandos added that “we don’t do many of these, but we were deep in this one.”

Influential entertainment journalist Matt Belloni of Puck previewed the likely deal on Bill Simmons’ podcast on Spotify’s Ringer network (which recently struck a deal to bring some video podcasts to Netflix), and they speculated about potential problems inside Netflix that brought the deal to a head. In conversation about how defensive the move is, Belloni said Netflix is “doing this for a reason” and may have reached a “stress point” because it hasn’t been getting traction with its own moviemaking efforts after 10 years of trying. (Netflix has also been agonizingly close to an elusive Best Picture Oscar, with close calls on Roma and Emilia Perez, the latter of which was derailed in a bizarre social-media controversy.) Belloni also acknowledged the criticism that Netflix has struggled to create its own franchises, also after years of trying.

Sarandos highlighted Netflix’s homegrown franchises while announcing the deal, arguing that Netflix’s ” culture-defining titles like Stranger Things, KPop Demon Hunters and Squid Game” will now combine with Warner’s deep library including classics Casablanca and Citizen Kane, even Friends.

The biggest losers in the bidding war may be David Ellison and his father, Oracle co‑founder (and long-time Republican donor)Larry Ellison, whose Paramount‑Skydance empire had been widely seen as a front‑runner to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery. David Ellison, has since reportedly been pleading his case around Washington, meeting Trump administration officials as allies float antitrust and national‑interest concerns about giving Netflix control of such a critical studio.

While Netflix has tried to calm regulators by arguing that a combined Netflix–HBO Max bundle would increase competition with Disney and others, the Ellisons and their supporters are signaling they will continue to press for tougher scrutiny or even intervention. Large M&A has made a big comeback in 2025 as the Trump administration has been notably friendlier to big deals than the deep freeze of the Biden administration, making this deal an acid test for just how true that is when a company with deep ties to the White House gets jilted.​

[Disclosure: The author worked internally at Netflix from June 2024 through July 2025.]



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Elon Musk and Bill Gates are wrong about AI imminently replacing all jobs. ‘That’s not what we’re seeing,’ LinkedIn exec slams

Published

on



The future of work as we know it is hanging by a thread—at least, that’s what many tech leaders consistently say. Elon Musk predicts AI will replace all jobs in less than 20 years. Bill Gates says even those who train to use AI tools may not be safe from its claws. And then there’s Klarna’s CEO, Sebastian Siemiatkowski, who is even warning workers that “tech bros” are sugarcoating just how badly it’s about to impact jobs.

But according to one LinkedIn exec, that’s simply not what the data is showing. 

With hundreds of millions of workers hunting for jobs and employers posting open roles in real time, LinkedIn acts as one of the clearest barometers of what’s actually happening on the ground—and its managing director for EMEA, Sue Duke, is not buying the AI apocalypse narrative.

“That’s not what we’re seeing,” Duke revealed at the Fortune CEO Forum in The Shard in London. When asked about an AI-induced hiring slowdown she insisted that the opposite is actually true. 

“What we’re seeing is that organizations who are adopting and integrating this technology, they’re actually going out and hiring more people to really take advantage of this technology,” Duke explained. 

“They’re going out and looking for more business development people, more technologically savvy people, and more sales people as they realize the business opportunities, the innovation possibilities, and ultimately the growth possibilities of this technology.”

For the millions of job seeking Gen Zers—who keep being told that entry-level jobs are about the get swallowed by AI and that a youth unemployment crisis is well underway—the news will be a welcome surprise.

LinkedIn exec breaks down exactly what employers are looking for from new hires in 2026

For those looking to make the most of the job market’s shift, Duke says there are two key areas to upskill in.

The first, no surprise one, is AI skills. Whether that’s literacy, tooling, prompt-writing, or more technical capabilities, “we continue to see those AI skills being red, red hot in the labor market,” she said. 

With companies racing to integrate automation into products and workflows, that demand isn’t cooling anytime soon—no matter what industry you’re looking to work in. “We see a huge demand for those skills across the board, economy-wide, across all sectors, and tons of companies looking for those,” Duke added.

As AI takes over many administrative tasks, it’s putting the spotlight on job functions that bots can’t do. “Those unique human skills,” Duke said, is the second area of focus for employers. “They remain rock solid, constant at the heart of hiring desires and demands out there. They’re not going away either.”

She called out communication, team building, and problem solving, as some of those human skills that will stand the test of time: “They’re the ones to invest in.”

And ultimately, the skill employers are zeroing in on most isn’t technical at all—it’s adaptability. Bosses know the tools will change faster than job titles. What they want is someone who can change with them.

“The most important thing for job seekers to think about is the mindset that you’re also bringing to the table,” Duke concluded. 

“What employers are really looking for is that growth mindset and understanding that this technology is moving very, very quickly, and we need adaptability. Adaptability is right at the top of those most in-demand skills, so making sure you’re bringing that mindset, bringing that agility with you, that’s going to be hugely important.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.