Connect with us

Politics

Randy Fine’s bill to ban flags with a ‘political viewpoint’ from government sites clears first committee stop

Published

on


After an hour of comments from residents who overwhelmingly opposed it, Republican Sen. Randy Fine’s latest attempt to ban Pride flags and other banners with a “political viewpoint” from public buildings advanced on a party-line vote.

The Senate Governmental Oversight and Accountability Committee voted 5-2 for the bill (SB 100), despite criticism from Democratic members Kristen Arrington and Tina Polsky that even after three years, the legislation is half-baked.

Fine admitted the measure could use some work and said he planned to tighten up its language, but argued its central premise is watertight.

“The idea here is that the government should not be in the political messaging business,” he said.

“Politics should be for the politicians. The government’s job is to serve the people.”

If passed, SB 100 or its House twin (HB 75) sponsored by Republican Reps. David Borrero and Berny Jacques would prohibit local or state government offices, schools and universities from displaying political or ideological viewpoints.

That includes flags, or depictions of flags, representing any “partisan, racial, sexual orientation and gender, or political ideology viewpoint.”

The ban would not extend to private individuals expressing private speech or viewpoints, including public officials who choose to do so on their own time. However, the measure also provides that active or retired military personnel may use “reasonable force” at any time to prevent the desecration, destruction or removal or unauthorized lowering of the United States flag.

Asked by Polsky whether that provision would enable a current or former military member to stop someone from burning a flag on their own property, Fine said yes.

“If you’re on your property burning the American flag, this bill would authorize them to exercise reasonable force to stop that behavior,” he said.

SB 100 does not define reasonable force. It also doesn’t define what is and isn’t a political viewpoint.

When he announced SB 100 in December, Fine said the bill takes aim at “fictional country flags like ‘Palestine,’ pro-violence ‘Black Lives Matter’ flags, woke and pro-grooming ideological flags, and the flags of any political candidate in government buildings.”

A passel of younger residents, many of them identifying as members of the LGBTQ community, spoke against the proposal by a more than 7-to-1 ratio. In total, 22 unelected attendees opposed the bill. Just three spoke voiced or signaled support for it.

Jon Harris Maurer, speaking for Equality Florida, said it was disappointing to be arguing again about a bill that failed twice before, chalking up its return more to “congressional posturing” — Fine is running for the U.S. House — than problem solving.

“This does nothing to help struggling Floridians,” he said, adding that simple things like an applicable definition for “flag” were still missing from the bill, as noted by Senate staff.

“These deficiencies have been glaringly apparent since last year and at this point, the only conclusion can be that the unconstitutional vagueness and ambiguity in this bill is intentional,” he said.

Mauer said the bill’s assumption that sexual orientation and gender identity are political viewpoints is beyond faulty. They’re “not political viewpoints,” he said. “They’re people’s identities — everyone, not just the LGBTQ community’s. Despite that fact, the bill’s sponsor has made it explicitly clear that his intent is to target Pride flags.”

Greg Mathers, a retired military vet speaking on behalf of Moms for Liberty, said it is the job of parents to instill their children with values and provide them ideological direction, while the government and schools should focus on streamlining education.

“It’s not the place in school rooms to have divisive symbols, things that are conversation starters for discussions that are best held between parents and children,” he said.

Arrington said SB 100 has several “scary” aspects and would all but invite future lawsuits, the cost of which would fall to taxpayers. It’s also inconsistent with Florida being about “freedom” while doing nothing to address many problems Sunshine State residents are dealing with, including unaffordability, a dearth of mass transit options and a need for more housing.

But lawmakers can walk and chew gum at the same time, Lake Mary Republican Sen. Jason Brodeur fired back. The Legislature sees some 3,000 bills and passes 10% of them yearly, he said, including legislation that has since reduced property insurance rates and attracted more providers to the state.

Brodeur noted that free speech isn’t absolute, citing court cases like Kennedy v. Bremerton that determined the First Amendment rights of public school teachers is not limitless and BWA v. Farmington, which found that students are subject to similar restrictions.

“These are places where there are exceptions to the all-public-employees-have-rights argument,” he said. “The government has no place in dictating what views are acceptable. Right — not mine, not yours. Government is a place for everybody.”

Fine said SB 100 isn’t yet in its final draft and that it could look very different if and when it reaches a Senate floor vote. He also cautioned those against the bill that there could soon be a circumstance where they wished its restrictions were in place.

“(For) the same people who are so upset that we might take away certain political flags in classrooms and oppose this bill,” he said, “I guarantee you if (Donald) Trump flags started showing up in classrooms and on government flag poles and in the back of this room, these people who are so upset about those flags being taken down would be in here screaming and yelling.”

SB 100 has two more committee stops before reaching a floor vote. It will next go before the Senate Community Affairs Committee.

HB 75, meanwhile, awaits a hearing in the first of three committees to which it was referred last month.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Ron DeSantis says Casey ‘not seeking’ term as Governor … but it’s ‘flattering’ people keep mentioning it.

Published

on


Is a DeSantis dynasty imminent?

Not so fast, says Florida’s Governor, though he notes it’s “flattering” that it’s being discussed after reportage that First Lady Casey DeSantis is being talked up as a “very real” possibility as the logical successor to her husband as Governor, there may not be fresh polling.

“She’s a force of nature. I think people look at it, they say, ‘Well, the Governor won by 20 points. Obviously Casey would do better because she’s so much better’, but it’s not something that she’s seeking out,” Gov. Ron DeSantis said on the Ingraham Angle.

He believes that “a lot of people are just concerned about the future of the state,” which drives speculation.

“But this is not anything new,” he added. “People have been asking her to do this for a long time, but she’s not seeking to do anything. But it’s flattering that people are asking her to do it.”

Fresh reporting from Matt Dixon of NBC News says differently, with a “source familiar with her thinking” suggesting it’s a possibility.

“I would say this: I have heard donors have been urging her to run and that while it’s not something she has wanted to do, they are causing her to at least stop and listen,” Dixon cites his source.

Gov. DeSantis paints his wife as more ideologically pure than he is, which won’t stifle speculation.

“She’s one of the rare political spouses,” he told Ingraham. “Even though I’m probably the most conservative Governor in the country, she may even be more conservative than me.

Give the Governor credit for consistency: He said in May that if he “had to hypothesize her interest in getting into the political thicket as a candidate,” he would “characterize it as zero.”

That said, polls show Florida Republicans have more than “zero” interest in the DeSantis family remaining in the Governor’s Mansion.

Per a June polling memo from Florida Atlantic University, she leads a field of candidates with 43% support, ahead of Byron Donalds at 19%, with Jimmy Patronis and Matt Gaetz further back still.

poll conducted in April by FAU showed 38% of 372 Florida Republicans polled would choose the First Lady in a head-to-head race against Gaetz, who would receive 16% support in that scenario.

University of North Florida Public Opinion Research Lab survey from November 2023 showed the First Lady with 22% support, a lead in a crowded field of potential candidates.

While she previously acknowledged the talk is “humbling,” she also maintains that the seeming enthusiasm for her running is due to her “rock star” husband and the job he’s done as the state’s Chief Executive.

However, the buzz isn’t quieting, and the race will start to get real after Sine Die, so decision time is nigh for the former newscaster in the Jacksonville market.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

4 FEMA employees are fired over payments to reimburse New York City for hotel costs for migrants

Published

on


Four federal employees were fired Tuesday over payments to reimburse New York City for hotel costs for migrants, Department of Homeland Security officials said.

The workers are accused of circumventing leadership to make the transactions, which have been standard for years through a program that helps with costs to care for a surge in migration. But officials did not give details on how the four had violated any policies.

On Monday, President Donald Trump’s aide Elon Musk posted on X that his team had discovered payments used to house migrants in “luxury hotels” with money intended for disaster relief. Musk blasted the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), which is part of Homeland Security, and called the payments “gross insubordination.”

FEMA’s Acting Administrator, Cameron Hamilton, later said the payments were suspended and the employees who authorized them would be held accountable.

The terminated employees were FEMA’s Chief Financial Officer, two program analysts and a grant specialist, a Homeland Security statement said.

The employees made “egregious payments for luxury NYC hotels for migrants,” the statement said. “DHS will not sit idly and allow deep state activists to undermine the will and safety of the American people.”

The statement gave no other details, and officials didn’t reply to emails seeking further comment.

Information from New York City indicated that money it has received to care for migrants was appropriated by Congress and allocated to the city last year by FEMA. The city has never paid luxury rates for hotels, spokeswoman Liz Garcia said.

The funds were likely sent via the Shelter and Services Program, which reimburses cities, towns or organizations for immigration-related expenses.

The money comes from Congress and is specifically for Customs and Border Protection, which also is part of Homeland Security. FEMA administers the payments.

The money is separate from the disaster relief fund, which is FEMA’s main funding stream to help people and governments affected by disasters.

The Shelter and Services Program has become a flashpoint for criticism by Republicans, who incorrectly claim it’s taking money from people hit by hurricanes or floods.

The firings come as Trump’s Republican administration ratchets up pressure on FEMA, suggesting it should be disbanded and money should be given directly to states to handle disasters.

___

Republished with permission of The Associated Press.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Plastic straws have come to symbolize a global pollution crisis. Donald Trump wants them to stay

Published

on


Straws might seem insignificant, inspiring jokes about the plastic vs. paper debate, but the plastic straw has come to symbolize a global pollution crisis over the past decade.

On Monday, President Donald Trump waded into the issue when he signed an executive order to reverse a federal push away from plastic straws, declaring that paper straws “don’t work” and don’t last very long. Trump said he thinks “it’s OK” to continue using plastic straws, although they’ve have been blamed for polluting oceans and harming marine life.

In 2015, video of a marine biologist pulling a plastic straw out of a turtle’s nose sparked outrage worldwide and countries and cities started banning them, starting with the Pacific Island nation Vanuatu and Seattle in 2018.

Here’s what to know about the larger fight over single-use plastics in the United States:

What happens to plastic straws?

More than 390 million plastic straws are used every day in the United States, most for 30 minutes or less, according to advocacy group Turtle Island Restoration Network.

Plastic straws are usually thrown away after one use, going on to litter beaches and waterways and potentially killing marine animals that mistake them for food.

The straws are not recyclable because they are so small. They take at least 200 years to decompose, the network said.

They break down into incredibly tiny bits of plastic smaller than a fraction of a grain of rice. These microplastics have been found in a wide range of body tissues. Though research is still limited overall, there are growing concerns that microplastics in the body could potentially be linked to heart disease, Alzheimer’s and dementia, and other problems.

Trump’s executive order claims that paper straws use chemicals that may carry risks to human health are more expensive to produce than plastic straws. Researchers from the University of Antwerp found forever chemicals known as PFAS to be present in paper, bamboo, glass and plastic straws, but not stainless steel ones, according to a 2023 study.

The advocacy group Beyond Plastics said that while plastics are often cheaper than paper products, the cheapest option is to skip the straw.

Judith Enck, a former Environmental Protection Agency regional administrator who now heads up Beyond Plastics, said she hopes that people react to the executive order by committing to using fewer plastic straws and that local and state governments do, too.

“It’s easy to just kind of almost poke fun of this, ignore it,” she said Tuesday. “But this is a moment that we as individuals and state and local policymakers can make a statement that they disagree with this executive order and are committed to using less plastic straws. It’s not that hard to do.”

Several states and cities have banned plastic straws and some restaurants no longer automatically give them to customers.

What is being done globally?

President Joe Biden’s administration had committed to phasing out federal purchases of single-use plastics, including straws, from food service operations, events and packaging by 2027, and from all federal operations by 2035.

The move was a way for the federal government to formally acknowledge the severity of the plastic pollution crisis and the scale of the response required to effectively confront it.

Erin Simon, an expert on plastics and packaging at the World Wildlife Fund, said at the time that it sent a message around the world: If we can make change happen at scale, so can you.

The declaration came in July, just a few months before negotiators met in South Korea to try to finish crafting a treaty to address the global crisis of plastic pollution. Negotiators didn’t reach an agreement late last year, but talks resume this year.

Under the Biden administration, the United States at first adopted a position viewed as favoring industry, stating that countries should largely develop their own plans instead of abiding by global rules. China, the United States and Germany are the biggest players in the global plastics trade.

The United States changed its position heading into South Korea. The delegation said it would support having an article in the treaty that addresses supply, or plastic production. More than 100 countries want an ambitious treaty that limits plastic production while tackling cleanup and recycling.

U.S. manufacturers have asked Trump to remain at the negotiating table but revert to the old position that focused on redesigning plastic products, recycling and reuse.

Aren’t other plastics a problem?

The environment is littered with single-use plastic food and beverage containers — water bottles, takeout containers, coffee lids, straws and shopping bags.

Every year, the world produces more than 400 million tons of new plastic. About 40% of all plastics are used in packaging, according to the United Nations.

In 2023, Ocean Conservancy volunteers collected more than 61,000 plastic straws and stirrers polluting beaches and waterways in the United States. There were even more cigarette butts, plastic bottles, bottle caps and food wrappers, the nonprofit said.

Most plastic is made from fossil fuels. Negotiators at the United Nations climate talks known as COP28 agreed in 2023 the world must transition away from planet-warming fossil fuels and triple the use of renewable energy.

As pressure to reduce fossil fuels has increased globally, oil and gas companies have been looking more to the plastics side of their business as a market that could grow. Trump strongly supports and gets support from the oil and gas industry.

___

Republished with permission of The Associated Press.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.