A bill aimed at changing how Florida taxes emerging tobacco alternatives has cleared its first committee stop this week with little opposition.
Sen. Nick DiCeglie, a St. Petersburg Republican, presented SB 754 before the Senate Committee on Regulated Industries, where it was reported favorably without debate.
The proposal would create a statutory definition for “heated tobacco products” and exempt those products from being taxed as cigarettes. Under current law, cigarettes are subject to a specific excise tax, while other nicotine products such as vaping devices are not. DiCeglie said the bill is designed to treat heated tobacco products more like vapes for tax purposes.
“This bill will statutorily define heated tobacco product, and excludes heated tobacco products from taxation as cigarettes,” DiCeglie told the committee Monday.
DiCeglie said heated tobacco products are a less harmful alternative to traditional cigarettes, though they still contain nicotine. He said the products heat tobacco rather than burn it, and claimed they contain significantly fewer harmful additives and toxins.
“We know that cigarettes are incredibly harmful, and this heated tobacco product is an alternative to that,” DiCeglie said. “This product has around 95% less harmful additives and toxins and all of those things, and is very similar to the vape product.”
DiCeglie said the bill aims to provide a tax incentive for smokers who may be trying to move away from combustible cigarettes.
According to the bill text, SB 754 defines heated tobacco products as tobacco-containing devices that heat, but do not burn, tobacco and produce an inhalable aerosol rather than smoke. The bill specifically removes heated tobacco products from both the cigarette excise tax and Florida’s “other tobacco products” tax category, while making conforming changes to state statutes.
Democratic Sen. Darryl Rouson raised concerns about youth access, citing issues with minors obtaining vaping products. DiCeglie acknowledged the concern, but said SB 754 is limited to tax policy and does not address age restrictions or enforcement. He said he would research existing regulations and be prepared to provide more detailed answers at the bill’s next committee stop.
“I don’t want any product to get in the hands of kids,” DiCeglie said.
With no further debate, the committee voted to advance SB 754. The measure now moves forward in the legislative process as lawmakers head into the 2026 Legislative Session starting Tuesday.