Connect with us

Politics

Orange County Board confronts Visit Orlando about $20M misspending, lobbying efforts

Published

on


As the Orange County Board confronted Visit Orlando about a critical audit, some Commissioners said they are alarmed by the tourism marketing association’s lobbying efforts and the millions of public dollars that auditors have said should be returned to public coffers due to years of misspending.

Assistant Comptroller Wendy Kittleson said Visit Orlando may have misspent an estimated $20 million dating back to 2019, as the organization misappropriated private funds and the proceeds from the tourist development tax (TDT), which is a 6% countywide hotel tax.

“Those TDT funds could help us reduce our bonds, could go to arts, could be reallocated for many things,” said Commissioner Mayra Uribe, reacting to the auditors’ update. “It’s $20 million, and it shouldn’t be taken lightly.”

Commissioner Kelly Martinez Semrad said she found it inappropriate that Visit Orlando spent more than $100,000 on lobbyists and $28,000 on an event rental in Tallahassee during Committee Week.

“Visit Orlando absolutely has a purpose and nobody here thinks that it doesn’t. The question becomes, ‘Is it a $115 million purpose?’” she said, advocating for hotel tax reform. 

Orange County officials have not forgotten a tourism lobbying scandal last year. Former Sen. Linda Stewart went behind the county’s back to work with an Orange County lobbyist — who also worked for the Central Florida Hotel and Lodging Association — to draft a bill to protect Visit Orlando’s funding.

But not every county official was outraged Tuesday over Visit Orlando. Some took a more subdued approach, saying they felt the audit’s results were more subjective and that county staff would address any issues now.

Commissioner Christine Moore acknowledged the board was divided philosophically on how to spend the hotel tax money.

“Today is about what happened with the audit,” Moore argued.

She said the issues raised in the audit and the review of Visit Orlando’s contract were best left to be sorted out by county staff and county attorneys, rather than being brought to the County Board level.

“It’s important that we don’t overdo our observation and accountability,” Moore said, adding, “We’ve been here for hours.”

To the County Board, Visit Orlando CEO Casandra Matej responded that her organization is willing to make changes and is hiring an internal auditor for increased oversight. 

“We viewed this audit as an opportunity to learn and improve during the 19-month-long process. We worked collaboratively and openly with the comptroller’s office, providing full access to our staff, our records,” said Matej, Visit Orlando’s leader since December 2020. “We’ve already worked through and resolved many of the new requests made by the Comptroller and acknowledge that there were opportunities for us to improve policies and processes.”

She has continued to make the case that Visit Orlando plays a significant role in growing Orlando’s tourism economy, which creates a multibillion-dollar economic impact.

In the end, the Orange County Board took no action on Tuesday and is expected to revisit the issue in December, when the county confirms more information, including the estimated $20 million in misspending. Orange County staff and Visit Orlando will continue negotiations over how much hotel tax money needs to get repaid and other matters in the contract.

“Our Board of County Commission needs more discussion, quite frankly, on the Board’s position about what any changes in the agreement needs to look like,” Orange County Mayor Jerry Demings said.

The discussion over Orange County’s 6% hotel tax is taking place amid a broader landscape where some officials want to allocate the hotel tax for public transit and other needs. Gov. Ron DeSantis is also pushing for DOGE, which is making local officials mindful of spending government wisely. 


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Carlos G. Smith files bill to allow medical pot patients to grow their own plants

Published

on


Home cultivation of marijuana plants could be legal under certain conditions.

Medical marijuana patients may not have to go to the dispensary for their medicine if new legislation in the Senate passes.

Sen. Carlos G. Smith’s SB 776 would permit patients aged 21 and older to grow up to six pot plants.

They could use the homegrown product, but just like the dispensary weed, they would not be able to re-sell.

Medical marijuana treatment centers would be the only acceptable sourcing for plants and seeds, a move that would protect the cannabis’ custody.

Those growing the plants would be obliged to keep them secured from “unauthorized persons.”

Chances this becomes law may be slight.

A House companion for the legislation has yet to be filed. And legislators have demonstrated little appetite for homegrow in the past.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Rolando Escalona aims to deny Frank Carollo a return to the Miami Commission

Published

on


Early voting is now underway in Miami for a Dec. 9 runoff that will decide whether political newcomer Rolando Escalona can block former Commissioner Frank Carollo from reclaiming the District 3 seat long held by the Carollo family.

The contest has already been marked by unusual turbulence: both candidates faced eligibility challenges that threatened — but ultimately failed — to knock them off the ballot.

Escalona survived a dramatic residency challenge in October after a rival candidate accused him of faking his address. A Miami-Dade Judge rejected the claim following a detailed, three-hour trial that examined everything from his lease records to his Amazon orders.

After the Nov. 4 General Election — when Carollo took about 38% of the vote and Escalona took 17% to outpace six other candidates — Carollo cleared his own legal hurdle when another Judge ruled he could remain in the race despite the city’s new lifetime term limits that, according to three residents who sued, should have barred him from running again.

Those rulings leave voters with a stark choice in District 3, which spans Little Havana, East Shenandoah, West Brickell and parts of Silver Bluff and the Roads.

The runoff pits a self-described political outsider against a veteran official with deep institutional experience and marks a last chance to extend the Carollo dynasty to a twentieth straight year on the dais or block that potentiality.

Escalona, 34, insists voters are ready to move on from the chaos and litigation that have surrounded outgoing Commissioner Joe Carollo, whose tenure included a $63.5 million judgment against him for violating the First Amendment rights of local business owners and the cringe-inducing firing of a Miami Police Chief, among other controversies.

A former busboy who rose through the hospitality industry to manage high-profile Brickell restaurant Sexy Fish while also holding a real estate broker’s license, Escalona is running on a promise to bring transparency, better basic services, lower taxes for seniors and improved permitting systems to the city.

He wants to improve public safety, support economic development, enhance communities, provide more affordable housing, lower taxes and advocate for better fiscal responsibility in government.

He told the Miami Herald that if elected, he’d fight to restore public trust by addressing public corruption while re-engaging residents who feel unheard by current officials.

Carollo, 55, a CPA who served two terms on the dais from 2009 to 2017, has argued that the district needs an experienced leader. He’s pointed to his record balancing budgets and pledges a residents-first agenda focused on safer streets, cleaner neighborhoods and responsive government.

Carollo was the top fundraiser in the District 3 race this cycle, amassing about $501,000 between his campaign account and political committee, Residents First, and spending about $389,500 by the last reporting dates.

Escalona, meanwhile, reported raising close to $109,000 through his campaign account and spending all but 6,000 by Dec. 4.

The winner will secure a four-year term.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Florida kicks off first black bear hunt in a decade, despite pushback

Published

on


For the first time in a decade, hunters armed with rifles and crossbows are fanning out across Florida’s swamps and flatwoods to legally hunt the Florida black bear, over the vocal opposition of critics.

The state-sanctioned hunt began Saturday, after drawing more than 160,000 applications for a far more limited number of hunting permits, including from opponents who are trying to reduce the number of bears killed in this year’s hunt, the state’s first since 2015.

The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission awarded 172 bear hunt permits by random lottery for this year’s season, allowing hunters to kill one bear each in areas where the population is deemed large enough. At least 43 of the permits went to opponents of the hunt who never intend to use them, according to the Florida chapter of the Sierra Club, which encouraged critics to apply in the hopes of saving bears.

The Florida black bear population is considered one of the state’s conservation success stories, having grown from just several hundred bears in the 1970s to an estimated more than 4,000 today.

The 172 people who were awarded a permit through a random lottery will be able to kill one bear each during the 2025 season, which runs from Dec. 6 to Dec. 28. The permits are specific to one of the state’s four designated bear hunting zones, each of which have a hunting quota set by state officials based on the bear population in each region.

In order to participate, hunters must hold a valid hunting license and a bear harvest permit, which costs $100 for residents and $300 for nonresidents, plus fees. Applications for the permits cost $5 each.

The regulated hunt will help incentivize maintaining healthy bear populations, and help fund the work that is needed, according to Mark Barton of the Florida chapter of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, an advocacy group that supported the hunt.

Having an annual hunt will help guarantee funding to “keep moving conservation for bears forward,” Barton said.

According to state wildlife officials, the bear population has grown enough to support a regulated hunt and warrant population management. The state agency sees hunting as an effective tool that is used to manage wildlife populations around the world, and allows the state to monetize conservation efforts through permit and application fees.

“While we have enough suitable bear habitat to support our current bear population levels, if the four largest subpopulations continue to grow at current rates, we will not have enough habitat at some point in the future,” reads a bear hunting guide published by the state wildlife commission.

___

Republished with permission of the Associated Press.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.