After losing in the Orlando City Council election, Chris Durant posed arm-in-arm with his former opponent Roger Chapin and wholeheartedly endorsed him for next month’s runoff against Mira Tanna.
But Durant’s endorsement posted on social media Nov. 9 and Chapin’s new mailer highlighting his friendship with Durant doesn’t tell the full story.
Chapin paid Durant $1,500 on Nov. 10 for “contract labor,” according to Chapin’s campaign finance report.
Both Durant and Chapin denied Durant was compensated for his endorsement.
In an interview, Durant described the nature of the $1,500 work as doing canvassing and offering messaging strategies for Precinct 45 for the Rosemont neighborhood where Durant lives.
“The financial transaction had nothing to do with my verbal or my public endorsement,” Durant said. “He’s the one that offered. It was in recognition that I was a hard worker and a hard canvasser. … I knocked on more doors than anybody else. And Roger recognized my hard work and he wanted me to be on his team because he recognized that I’m indispensable. I’m someone that could help him win.”
Meanwhile, Tanna’s campaign countered that she doesn’t pay money to people who endorse her.
“I’m very proud of the campaign and vision we’ve built. All of our endorsers and volunteers believe in that vision and that’s why they’re backing us without any financial incentive,” Tanna said in a statement. “That’s why they have been tirelessly knocking on doors with us, showing up at events, making phone calls, and donating their hard earned resources to this campaign.”
Chapin has led Tanna in fundraising by 3 to 1 for the District 3 nonpartian race that covers Baldwin Park, Audubon Park, College Park, Coytown, Rosemont and a few other neighborhoods north of downtown Orlando.
Durant, 24, who had never run for political office before, finished third in the Nov. 4 election. Nearly one out of every five voters chose Durant, a real estate wholesaler looking for residential properties not yet on the market while also coaching youth basketball on the side.
“I consider myself a super canvasser,” Durant said about his success. “ Walked and knocked. I did it every single day from 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. … I did that for five months straight.”
Durant’s finish surprised some people although Durant said he was disappointed because he expected to make the runoff.
Instead it was Chapin and Tanna, both Democrats separated by a mere 14 votes, who advanced to the Dec. 9 runoff out of the initial field of five candidates.
After the Nov. 4 election, Durant’s phone blew up. He got calls from state Rep. Anna Eskamani and U.S. Rep. Maxwell Frost, two popular Orlando Democrats backing Tanna.
Frost “tried to get him not to endorse me, and Chris still stuck with me. Having a U.S. Congressman call you is pretty big,” Chapin said in a earlier interview with Florida Politics. “I think that having a former opposition endorsing you speaks volumes.”
In his timeline for events, Durant said he spoke to both Tanna and Chapin Nov. 5 and decided afterward he was all in on Chapin.
The next day, that’s when Chapin and his campaign manager called him, offering him paid work for the runoff election, Durant said. He added he had not been promised any city hall jobs if Chapin is elected.
Roger Chapin’s new mailer.
The roots of Durant and Chapin’s friendship grew on the campaign trail where Durant said his opponent was genuine and complimentary as they crossed paths at events. They started reaching out if one knocked on the door of a resident supporting the other one, Durant said. Chapin even called asking for advice the best way to leave a message on residents’ Ring cameras if they weren’t home.
“The campaign really exposes who you are,” Durant said of Chapin’s personality. “It didn’t matter what Maxwell Frost told me. I was going to go with Roger because I believed in him. I believed in who he was, and I believe he would be the best person for this district.”
Frost declined to comment about Durant’s $1,500 contract work but he elaborated on his support for Tanna, the Orlando city grants manager
“She understands the inner workings of what the city does, but also more importantly, how to utilize the federal and state resources to get the mission completed,” Frost said in an interview.
The District 3 runoff comes at a time of major transformation for Central Florida since both Orange County and Orlando are getting new mayors in the upcoming years and the community is grappling with big challenges, from an affordable housing crisis to traffic congestion and a broken and underfunded public transit system.
“I think people just want to know, ‘Are you going to make sure my trash gets on time, that we fill the potholes,’” Frost said. “’And are you going to make sure that you’re going to City Council with brand new ideas that can actually move our city forward?’ I think Mira checks both of those boxes.”
Early voting is now underway in Miami for a Dec. 9 runoff that will decide whether political newcomer Rolando Escalona can block former Commissioner Frank Carollo from reclaiming the District 3 seat long held by the Carollo family.
The contest has already been marked by unusual turbulence: both candidates faced eligibility challenges that threatened — but ultimately failed — to knock them off the ballot.
Escalona survived a dramatic residency challenge in October after a rival candidate accused him of faking his address. A Miami-Dade Judge rejected the claim following a detailed, three-hour trial that examined everything from his lease records to his Amazon orders.
After the Nov. 4 General Election — when Carollo took about 38% of the vote and Escalona took 17% to outpace six other candidates — Carollo cleared his own legal hurdle when another Judge ruled he could remain in the race despite the city’s new lifetime term limits that, according to three residents who sued, should have barred him from running again.
Those rulings leave voters with a stark choice in District 3, which spans Little Havana, East Shenandoah, West Brickell and parts of Silver Bluff and the Roads.
The runoff pits a self-described political outsider against a veteran official with deep institutional experience and marks a last chance to extend the Carollo dynasty to a twentieth straight year on the dais or block that potentiality.
Escalona, 34, insists voters are ready to move on from the chaos and litigation that have surrounded outgoing Commissioner Joe Carollo, whose tenure included a $63.5 million judgment against him for violating the First Amendment rights of local business owners and the cringe-inducing firing of a Miami Police Chief, among other controversies.
A former busboy who rose through the hospitality industry to manage high-profile Brickell restaurant Sexy Fish while also holding a real estate broker’s license, Escalona is running on a promise to bring transparency, better basic services, lower taxes for seniors and improved permitting systems to the city.
He wants to improve public safety, support economic development, enhance communities, provide more affordable housing, lower taxes and advocate for better fiscal responsibility in government.
He told the Miami Herald that if elected, he’d fight to restore public trust by addressing public corruption while re-engaging residents who feel unheard by current officials.
Carollo, 55, a CPA who served two terms on the dais from 2009 to 2017, has argued that the district needs an experienced leader. He’s pointed to his record balancing budgets and pledges a residents-first agenda focused on safer streets, cleaner neighborhoods and responsive government.
Carollo was the top fundraiser in the District 3 race this cycle, amassing about $501,000 between his campaign account and political committee, Residents First, and spending about $389,500 by the last reporting dates.
Escalona, meanwhile, reported raising close to $109,000 through his campaign account and spending all but 6,000 by Dec. 4.
For the first time in a decade, hunters armed with rifles and crossbows are fanning out across Florida’s swamps and flatwoods to legally hunt the Florida black bear, over the vocal opposition of critics.
The state-sanctioned hunt began Saturday, after drawing more than 160,000 applications for a far more limited number of hunting permits, including from opponents who are trying to reduce the number of bears killed in this year’s hunt, the state’s first since 2015.
The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission awarded 172 bear hunt permits by random lottery for this year’s season, allowing hunters to kill one bear each in areas where the population is deemed large enough. At least 43 of the permits went to opponents of the hunt who never intend to use them, according to the Florida chapter of the Sierra Club, which encouraged critics to apply in the hopes of saving bears.
The Florida black bear population is considered one of the state’s conservation success stories, having grown from just several hundred bears in the 1970s to an estimated more than 4,000 today.
The 172 people who were awarded a permit through a random lottery will be able to kill one bear each during the 2025 season, which runs from Dec. 6 to Dec. 28. The permits are specific to one of the state’s four designated bear hunting zones, each of which have a hunting quota set by state officials based on the bear population in each region.
In order to participate, hunters must hold a valid hunting license and a bear harvest permit, which costs $100 for residents and $300 for nonresidents, plus fees. Applications for the permits cost $5 each.
The regulated hunt will help incentivize maintaining healthy bear populations, and help fund the work that is needed, according to Mark Barton of the Florida chapter of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, an advocacy group that supported the hunt.
Having an annual hunt will help guarantee funding to “keep moving conservation for bears forward,” Barton said.
According to state wildlife officials, the bear population has grown enough to support a regulated hunt and warrant population management. The state agency sees hunting as an effective tool that is used to manage wildlife populations around the world, and allows the state to monetize conservation efforts through permit and application fees.
“While we have enough suitable bear habitat to support our current bear population levels, if the four largest subpopulations continue to grow at current rates, we will not have enough habitat at some point in the future,” reads a bear hunting guide published by the state wildlife commission.
___
Republished with permission of the Associated Press.