Connect with us

Politics

Nearly 40% of contracts canceled by DOGE are expected to produce no savings

Published

on


Nearly 40% of the federal contracts that the Trump administration claims to have canceled as part of its signature cost-cutting program aren’t expected to save the government any money, the administration’s own data shows.

The Department of Government Efficiency run by Elon Musk last week published an initial list of 1,125 contracts that it terminated in recent weeks across the federal government. Data published on DOGE’s “Wall of Receipts” shows that more than one-third of the contract cancellations, 417 in all, are expected to yield no savings.

That’s usually because the total value of the contracts has already been fully obligated, which means the government has a legal requirement to spend the funds for the goods or services it purchased and in many cases has already done so.

“It’s like confiscating used ammunition after it’s been shot when there’s nothing left in it. It doesn’t accomplish any policy objective,” said Charles Tiefer, a retired University of Baltimore law professor and expert on government contracting law. “Their terminating so many contracts pointlessly obviously doesn’t accomplish anything for saving money.”

Dozens of them were for already-paid subscriptions to The Associated Press, Politico and other media services that the administration said it would discontinue. Others were for research studies that have been awarded, training that has taken place, software that has been purchased and interns that have come and gone.

An administration official said it made sense to cancel contracts that are seen as potential dead weight, even if the moves do not yield any savings. The official was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.

In all, DOGE data says the 417 contracts in question had a total value of $478 million. Dozens of other canceled contracts are expected to yield little if any savings.

“It’s too late for the government to change its mind on many of these contracts and walk away from its payment obligation,” said Tiefer, who served on the Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Tiefer said DOGE appeared to be taking a “slash and burn” approach to cutting contracts, which he said could damage the performance of government agencies. He said savings could be made instead by working with agency contracting officers and inspectors general to find efficiencies, an approach the administration has not taken.

DOGE says the overall contract cancellations are expected to save more than $7 billion so far, an amount that has been questioned as inflated by independent experts.

The canceled contracts were to purchase a wide range of goods and services.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development awarded a contract in September to purchase and install office furniture at various branches. While the contract does not expire until later this year, federal records show the agency had already agreed to spend the maximum $567,809 with a furniture company.

The U.S. Agency for International Development negotiated a $145,549 contract last year to clean the carpet at its headquarters in Washington. But the full amount had already been obligated to a firm that is owned by a Native American tribe based in Michigan.

Another already-spent $249,600 contract went to a Washington, D.C., firm to help prepare the Department of Transportation for the recent transition from the Biden to the Trump administration.

Some of the canceled contracts were intended to modernize and improve the way government works, which would seem to be at odds with DOGE’s cost-cutting mission.

One of the largest, for instance, went to a consulting firm to help carry out a reorganization at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, which led the agency’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The maximum $13.6 million had already been obligated to Deloitte Consulting for help with the restructuring, which included closing several research offices.

___

Republished with permission of The Associated Press.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Mike Johnson tries to push Donald Trump’s ‘big’ agenda forward, but GOP votes are in jeopardy

Published

on


House Speaker Mike Johnson will try against the odds to muscle a Republican budget blueprint to passage this week, a step toward delivering President Donald Trump’s “big, beautiful bill” with $4.5 trillion in tax breaks and $2 trillion in spending cuts over stiff opposition from Democrats — and even some Republicans.

With almost no votes to spare in Johnson’s bare-bones GOP majority, the Speaker is fighting on all fronts — against Democrats, uneasy rank-and-file Republicans and skeptical GOP Senators — as he works to keep the package on track. Votes set for Tuesday evening are in jeopardy, and the outcome is uncertain.

“We’re going to get everyone there,” Johnson, of Louisiana, said at an event at the start of the week, half-joking that he had a “prayer request” involved.

The package, if approved, would be a crucial part of the budget process as Trump pushes the Republicans who control Congress to approve a massive bill that would extend tax breaks, which he secured during his first term but are expiring later this year, while also cutting spending across federal programs and services.

Slashing government is not always popular at home

But Republicans are running into a familiar problem: Slashing federal spending is typically easier said than done. With cuts to the Pentagon and other programs largely off limits, much of the other government outlays go for health care, food stamps, student loans and programs relied on by their constituents.

It’s all unfolding as billionaire Trump adviser Elon Musk is tearing through federal agencies with his Department of Government Efficiency firing thousands of workers nationwide, and angry voters are starting to confront lawmakers at town hall meetings back home.

“While we fully support efforts to rein in wasteful spending and deliver on President Trump’s agenda, it is imperative that we do not slash programs that support American communities across our nation,” wrote U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, a Texas Republican, and several other GOP lawmakers in the Congressional Hispanic Conference.

Democrats protest tax cuts for wealthy

Democrats in the House and the Senate are vowing to fight the whole process. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York was planning to gather lawmakers on the Capitol steps in protest during Tuesday’s session.

“This is not what people want,” said U.S. Rep. Jim McGovern, a Massachusetts Democrat, during a rules debate ahead of planned votes.

“We all know that trickle-down economics,” he said about the 2017 tax breaks that flowed mainly to the wealthy, “don’t work.”

Trump has signaled a preference for the “big” bill but also appears to enjoy a competition between the House and the Senate, lawmakers said, as he pits the Republicans against each other to see which version will emerge on a path toward approval.

Senate Republicans, wary that Johnson can lift his bill over the finish line, launched their own scaled-back $340 billion package last week. It’s focused on sending Trump money his administration needs for its deportation and border security agenda now, with plans to tackle the tax cuts separately later this year.

“I’m holding my breath. I’m crossing my fingers,” said Republican U.S. Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, who said he is rooting for the House’s approach as the better option. “I think a one-shot is their best opportunity.”

The House GOP faces pitfalls ahead

Johnson, whose party lost seats in last November’s election, commands one of the thinnest majorities in modern history, which means he must keep almost every Republican in line or risk losing the vote.

Already, several lawmakers have objected to the package either because it cuts too much or because it doesn’t cut enough.

The most conservative Republicans warn it will pile onto the nation’s $36 trillion debt load, because the cost of the tax breaks, at least $4.5 trillion over the decade, outweighs the $2 trillion in spending cuts to government programs.

More moderate Republican lawmakers worry that the enormous budget cuts being eyed — some $880 billion to the committee that handles health care spending, including Medicaid, for example, or $230 billion to the agriculture committee that funds food stamps — will be too harmful to their constituents back home.

GOP leaders are trying to convince lawmakers that the details will be debated in the weeks to come and that this week’s vote is just a first step.

The budget is being compiled during a lengthy process that first sends instructions to the various House and Senate committees, which will then have several weeks to devise more detailed plans for additional debate and votes.

“The committees need time to go work to find savings,” said Majority Leader Steve Scalise, a Louisiana Republican. “But we can’t even get to that if we don’t get through the budget. So, we’ve got to get the first step done later this week.”

Ten House GOP Chairs of the committees involved issued a joint statement in a show of force to push the package forward.

“The House’s ‘one big beautiful bill’ delivers on the entirety of President Trump’s policy agenda,” they wrote in a letter obtained by The Associated Press. “We must meet this historic moment with the bold action it requires.”

U.S. Rep. Jodey Arrington, the Republican Chair of the House Budget Committee, told reporters he recognizes the tension between Republicans who want more cuts and those from politically competitive districts who “have a higher level of sensitivity to some of the spending reforms.”

Arrington said with economic growth assumptions, from 1.8% as projected by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office to 2.6% as projected by House Republicans, the package would generate about $2.6 trillion in savings over 10 years and would ensure the plan helps reduce the deficit.

Some fiscal advocacy groups view the GOP’s economic projections as overly optimistic.

___

Republished with permission of The Associated Press.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Ron DeSantis breaks with Donald Trump on DOGE stimmy checks, 2026 endorsement

Published

on


Differences are emerging between the top Republicans in Tallahassee and Washington on key issues. One of them is policy; the other is political.

During an appearance on CNBC’s “Squawk Box,” Gov. Ron DeSantis said it’s unlikely he would back stimulus money being sent to Americans from savings realized by President Donald Trump’s federal Department of Governmental Efficiency (DOGE).

“If they’re able to reduce spending enough that they’re generating an annual surplus, well, of course I would do some of that to retire debt and some of that rebate to taxpayers. But let’s just be clear, they are a long way from getting to that point. I don’t think you want to print additional money to be able to do that,” DeSantis said.

Elon Musk, the driving force behind DOGE, initially suggested the $5,000 rebate figure on X, seemingly gaining endorsement from Trump, who said he loved the idea.

Trump mentioned allocating 20% of DOGE savings to citizens and 20% to debt reduction.

During the same interview Tuesday, DeSantis also questioned the timing of Trump’s endorsement of U.S. Rep. Byron Donalds in the 2026 race for Governor, amid speculation First Lady Casey DeSantis would rather run for the office herself than deal with the headaches of moving trucks next year.

“Talking about ’26, it’s so early. He’s been President for like a month. Now is the time Republicans have been waiting for. All eyes in the Republican universe are on the Trump administration,” DeSantis said.

Though DeSantis noted that he plays golf with Trump “relatively frequently,” he sliced to the right of the President during the cable hit and suggested that Florida has done more for his agenda than Republicans in Washington.

“I raised probably more money than him for the ’24 cycle than any elected official, millions and millions of dollars. Obviously supported him strongly,” DeSantis said.

“But, you know, he supported a marijuana corporate amendment in Florida on our ballot that I opposed, we fought, we defeated. That’s fine. I still supported them. It is what it is. We have done more in Florida to support his agenda than certainly what Congress has done so far.”

DeSantis has dissed Donalds as a non-entity already this week. He said Monday that the Congressman “just hasn’t been a part of any of the victories that we’ve had here over the Left over these last years.”

The Governor was kinder to Trump Tuesday on the negotiation of peace in Ukraine, though, as he expressed faith the White House could end the Russian aggression sooner than later.

He said “the proof is in the pudding” and Trump’s negotiation style is “part of a larger strategy to be able to put this issue to bed.”

“I do think you’ve got to look at it in the context of the art of the deal and trying to land this,” DeSantis added, referencing the President’s iconic book from decades ago.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Lena Juarez named President of Floridians for Better Transportation

Published

on


She will continue running JEJ Associates while leading FBT.

Veteran lobbyist Lena Juarez has been named President of Floridians for Better Transportation (FBT).

For more than 25 years, Juarez has operated a successful government consulting practice, JEJ & Associates, and will continue to lead the firm while taking the helm at FBT.

Juarez succeeds Sally Patrenos, who is retiring after eight years leading FBT.

“Florida’s population is growing every day, and it’s more important than ever that we have a transportation industry that can meet the state’s growing demands,” Juarez said. “From roads, bridges, and transit/rail, to seaports, spaceports, airports and trucks, Florida’s transportation industry keeps our state moving forward. I’m excited to get to work leading this organization.”

FBT Board Chair Sia Kush added, “On behalf of our board, we would like to thank Sally for her near decade of distinguished service to our organization and the broader industry and wish her all the best. We’re also very excited to have Lena join our leadership team and look forward to continued growth in our advocacy for the industry through her efforts.”

FBT is a statewide business and transportation association dedicated to advocating for multimodal transportation funding and making transportation safer and more efficient in Florida. It supports all modes of transportation across the state and serves as an advocate and conduit on its members’ behalf with the Legislature.

Established in 1988, the advocacy group is a leader in promoting sufficient and sustainable transportation funding, efficient mobility for residents, visitors and commerce, and for safe and reliable infrastructure to support a dynamic economy.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.