Connect with us

Business

Morgan Stanley’s blunt challenge to GM CEO Mary Barra: ‘How does GM expect to be profitable with EVs when players like Tesla apparently cannot?’

Published

on



General Motors and its legacy auto industry peers need a bold strategy for the future if they ever want investors to rethink their growth prospects, investment bank Piper Sandler warned on Tuesday. Otherwise their collective tinkering around on the edges with cost cuts here and inventory changes there amount to little more than rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic, the bank implied.

And Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas had a blunt statement for CEO Mary Barra, comparing her company unfavorably to Tesla in the Q&A section of the earnings call.

Shares in GM tumbled 8% after second-quarter adjusted net profit fell by a sixth due in part to a $1.1 billion hit from the Trump administration’s tariffs. It comes after fellow Detroit carmaker Stellantis, the parent of Jeep and Ram, pre-announced results for the first six months that revealed it swung to a €2.3 billion ($2.7 billion) loss from a net profit of €5.6 billion the prior year.

A major uncertainty clouding the outlook for GM’s North American profits moving forward remains the impact of import duties. As a result, on Tuesday, Piper Sandler warned clients it’s possible that GM could end up closer to the $8.25 in adjusted earnings per share for this year rather than the upper bound of $10 in its forecast range.

“But to us, these aren’t thesis-defining issues. More problematic, in our view, is that the call focused almost entirely on tactical or cyclical topics,” it wrote in a research note.

Only worth paying five times next year’s earnings for GM, bank argues

The bank gave as an example issues like incentive spending, inventory levels, and cost offsets with regard to tariffs to name just one example. GM imports the popular Chevrolet Equinox and Cadillac Optiq EVs from Mexico. Both saw a surge in Q2 demand potentially reflecting pull-forward effects as dealers stocked up on inventory before the 25% auto sector tariffs hit, and as customers bought EVs before the September 30 deadline for the end of the federal EV credit, discontinued by the Trump Administration.

“In our view, if GM and other traditional automakers want to emerge from their multi-year funk, they don’t need smart tactics,” Piper Sandler continued, “they need bold strategic changes.”

Otherwise the bank will continue to view GM share based on the same $48 price target that represents five times next year’s forecast earnings. 

Shares in GM first listed on the New York stock exchange back in November 2010. At the time, the company boasted what it called a “fortress balance sheet” free of legacy risks like pension and healthcare obligations for staff and retirees that helped plunge it into bankruptcy the year prior. 

Yet investors that bought in at the IPO price of $33 have not been rewarded relative to the broader equity market. The stock has averaged just a 2.6% annual compound return in the subsequent fifteen years versus an 11.8% with the S&P 500. 

‘How does GM expect to be profitable with EVs when players like Tesla apparently cannot?’

By comparison, Piper Sandler views Tesla, a $1 trillion-plus megacap company in the Magnificent 7 stock group, as being fairly valued at 140 times its estimated 2026 earnings. A major reason for that lofty multiple is Tesla’s efforts in the area of artificial intelligence and humanoid robotics.

In a research note published this weekend, Piper Sandler argued a further geographic expansion of the Austin area serviced by Tesla’s new AI-powered robotaxi fleet (generally estimated to still include only a dozen cars) was likely favorable enough to overshadow any negative revisions to forecast earnings. CEO Elon Musk’s company is due to report quarterly earnings after the close of markets on Wednesday. 

GM did not respond to a Fortune request for comment made outside normal working hours. 

But the carmaker’s CEO, Mary Barra, faced scrutiny from analysts during her Q2 conference call, with another Tesla bull asking where are its humanoid robots?

“Elon seems to be also exiting the auto industry, clearly pulling capital out of the business and doubling down on AI, autonomy and robotaxis,” Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas said during the Tuesday investor call. “So how does GM expect to be profitable with EVs when players like Tesla apparently cannot?”

Barra replied there were partnerships “we’re looking at” in the field of automation, but that when it comes to the subject, GM is mainly interested in improving efficiency at its automobile factories.

“Overall, we’re focused on what’s going to drive manufacturing optimization,” GM’s CEO answered. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

New contract shows Palantir working on tech platform for another federal agency that works with ICE

Published

on



Palantir, the artificial intelligence and data analytics company, has quietly started working on a tech platform for a federal immigration agency that has referred dozens of individuals to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for potential enforcement since September.

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services agency—which handles services including citizenship applications, family immigration, adoptions, and work permits for non-citizens—started the contract with Palantir at the end of October, and is paying the data analytics company to implement “Phase 0” of a “vetting of wedding-based schemes,” or “VOWS” platform, according to the federal contract, which was posted to the U.S. government website and reviewed by Fortune.

The contract is small—less than $100,000—and details of what exactly the new platform entails are thin. The contract itself offers few details, apart from the general description of the platform (“vetting of wedding-based schemes”) and an estimate that the completion of the contract would be Dec. 9.Palantir declined to comment on the contract or nature of the work, and USCIS did not respond to requests for comment for this story.

But the contract is notable, nonetheless, as it marks the beginning of a new relationship between USCIS and Palantir, which has had longstanding contracts with ICE, another agency of the Department of Homeland Security, since at least 2011. The description of the contract suggests that the “VOWS” platform may very well be focused on marriage fraud and related to USCIS’ recent stated effort to drill down on duplicity in applications for marriage and family-based petitions, employment authorizations, and parole-related requests.

USCIS has been outspoken about its recent collaboration with ICE. Over nine days in September, USCIS announced that it worked with ICE and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to conduct what it called “Operation Twin Shield” in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area, where immigration officials investigated potential cases of fraud in immigration benefit applications the agency had received. The agency reported that its officers referred 42 cases to ICE over the period. In a statement published to the USCIS website shortly after the operation, USCIS director Joseph Edlow said his agency was “declaring an all-out war on immigration fraud” and that it would “relentlessly pursue everyone involved in undermining the integrity of our immigration system and laws.” 

“Under President Trump, we will leave no stone unturned,” he said.

Earlier this year, USCIS rolled out updates to its policy requirements for marriage-based green cards, which have included more details of relationship evidence and stricter interview requirements.

While Palantir has always been a controversial company—and one that tends to lean into that reputation no less—the new contract with USCIS is likely to lead to more public scrutiny. Backlash over Palantir’s contracts with ICE have intensified this year amid the Trump Administration’s crackdown on immigration and aggressive tactics used by ICE to detain immigrants that have gone viral on social media. Not to mention, Palantir inked a $30 million contract with ICE earlier this year to pilot a system that will track individuals who have elected to self-deport and help ICE with targeting and enforcement prioritization. There has been pushback from current and former employees of the company alike over contracts the company has with ICE and Israel.

In a recent interview at the New York Times DealBook Summit, Karp was asked on stage about Palantir’s work with ICE and later what Karp thought, from a moral standpoint, about families getting separated by ICE. “Of course I don’t like that, right? No one likes that. No American. This is the fairest, least bigoted, most open-minded culture in the world,” Karp said. But he said he cared about two issues politically: immigration and “re-establishing the deterrent capacity of America without being a colonialist neocon view. On those two issues, this president has performed.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

CoreWeave CEO: Despite see-sawing stock, IPO was ‘incredibly successful’ amid challenges of tariff timing

Published

on



CoreWeave has been rocked by dizzying stock swings—with its stock currently trading 52% below its post-IPO high—and a frequent target of market commentators, but CEO Michael Intrator says the company’s move to the public markets has been “incredibly successful. And he takes the public’s mixed reaction in stride, given the novelty of CoreWeave’s “neocloud” business which competes with established cloud providers like Amazon AWS and Google Cloud.

“When you introduce new models, introduce a new way of doing business, disrupt what has been a static environment, it’s going to take some people some time,” Intrator said Tuesday at Fortune’s Brainstorm AI conference in San Francisco. But, he added, more people are beginning to understand the CoreWeave’s business model.

“We came out into one of the most challenging environments,” Intrator said of CoreWeave’s March IPO, which occurred very close to President Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs in April. “In spite of the incredible headwinds, we’re able to launch a successful IPO.”

CoreWeave, which priced its IPO at $40 per share, has experienced frequent severe up-and-down price swings in the eight months since its public market debut. At its closing price of $90.66 on Tuesday, the stock remains well above its IPO price.

As Fortune reported last month, CoreWeave’s rapid rise has been fueled by an aggressive, debt-heavy strategy to stand up data centers at unprecedented speed for AI customers. And for now, the bet is still paying off. In its third-quarter results released in November, the company said its revenue backlog nearly doubled in a single quarter—to $55.6 billion from $30 billion—reflecting long-term commitments from marquee clients including Meta, OpenAI, and French AI startup Poolside. Both earnings and revenue came in ahead of Wall Street expectations.

But the numbers were not all celebratory. CoreWeave disclosed a further increase in the debt it has taken on to finance its expansion, and it revised its full-year revenue outlook downward—suggesting that, even with historic demand in the pipeline.

With media headlines calling CoreWeave a “ticking time bomb,” with critics calling out insider stock sales, circular financing accusations and an overreliance on Nvidia, Intrator was asked whether he felt CoreWeave was misunderstood.

“Look, we built a company that is challenging one of the most stable businesses that exist—that cloud business, these three massive players,” he said, referring to AWS, Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud.  I feel like it’s incumbent on CoreWeave to introduce a new business model on how the cloud is going to be built and run. And that’s what we’re doing.” 

He repeatedly framed CoreWeave not as a GPU reseller or traditional data-center operator but as a company purpose-built from scratch to deliver high-performance, parallelized computing for AI workloads. That focus, he said, means designing proprietary software that orchestrates GPUs, building and colocating its own infrastructure, and moving “up the stack” through acquisitions such as Weights & Biases and OpenPipe.

Intrator also defended the company’s debt strategy, saying CoreWeave is effectively inventing a new financing model for AI infrastructure. He pointed to the company’s ability to repurpose power sources, rapidly deploy capacity, and finance large-scale clusters as proof it is solving problems incumbents never had to face.

“When I look back at history of the company, it took us a year with with a company investor like Fidelity, before they were like, ‘Oh, I get it,’” he said. “So look, we’ve been public for eight months. I couldn’t be prouder of what the company has accomplished.” 



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

UK launches $965 million plan to get unemployed Gen Z into AI, hospitality, and engineering

Published

on



Some Gen Zers have been desperately trying to break into the job market, sending out thousands of applications, standing on Wall Street with a sign begging for a job, and waitressing at industry conferences to stealthily hand out their résumés. There’s also a growing camp of disillusioned young adults who have completely checked out of education, employment, and training: NEETs. Now, one country is trying to tackle the youth unemployment crisis with a nearly $1 billion plan.

Earlier this week, the U.K. government announced a $965 million investment to create more apprenticeships and place 50,000 young people into roles.

In partnership with regional leaders, the three-year initiative will equip young hopefuls with the skills training needed for local job opportunities. A $186 million chunk of the eye-watering funding will be used for a pilot in which mayors will connect the Gen Zers, especially NEETs, with nearby employers. And to ease the financial burden on some companies, the plan will also cover the full cost of apprenticeships for talent under 25 years old at small and medium-size businesses.

U.K. Gen Zers will have access to more apprenticeship roles in high-demand industries like hospitality and retail. But the government is still paying close attention to the critical skills young professionals need in the age of AI; new short courses in engineering, digital skills, and AI will also start rolling out starting April 2026. This apprenticeship push by the U.K. is all part of Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s master plan to get two-thirds of young people active in higher-level learning and apprenticeships, after a sharp drop in 2017.

“For too long, success has been measured by how many young people go to university. That narrow view has held back opportunity and created barriers we need to break,” Starmer said. “It’s time to change the way apprenticeships are viewed and to put them on an equal footing with university.”

Gen Zers are struggling with unemployment in the U.K. and abroad

The U.K.’s ambitious billion-dollar strategy is a welcome one, as youth unemployment rates have surged all around the world.

During the first half of last year, more than 16%, or almost 460,000 of 18- to 24-year-old U.K. men, were NEETs—the highest rate in over a decade. On a global scale, about a fifth of people between ages 15 and 24 in 2023 were NEET-status. And for those actively on the job-hunt, options are scarce. In 2023 and 2024, more than 1.2 million applications were submitted for just under 17,000 open graduate roles in the U.K., according to the Institute of Student Employers (ISE). 

It marked the highest number of applications per job ever recorded since the ISE started collecting data in 1991.

But across the pond, the situation doesn’t look any better: In 2022, there were roughly 4.3 million jobless Gen Z NEETs in the United States. And as of September this year, 9.4% of men and 9% of women ages 20 to 24 were jobless—more than two times higher than the general 4.4% unemployment rate, according to a FRED analysis of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data. 

What’s more, U.S. officials caution the problem could get even worse. U.S. Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) warned that joblessness among recent college graduates could skyrocket to as high as 25% in the next two to three years, thanks to AI. 

Similar to the U.K. government, Warner proposed a job retraining program—and the issue goes beyond party lines. In partnership with Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), they introduced a bill that would require businesses and federal agencies to report any AI-related job disruption to the Department of Labor, with results to be published to the public. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.