Connect with us

Politics

Monroe Doctrine 2.0? Why Marco Rubio’s headed to Latin America

Published

on


Secretary of State Marco Rubio is en route to Panama, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Guatemala, and the Dominican Republic.

The trip, which extends from Saturday to Thursday, is said to “advance President Donald Trump’s America First foreign policy.”

The stakeholder talks, meanwhile, spotlight cooperation amid Chinese encroachments in the Western Hemisphere.

“Secretary Rubio’s engagements with senior officials and business leaders will promote regional cooperation on our core, shared interests: stopping illegal and large-scale migration, fighting the scourge of transnational criminal organizations and drug traffickers, countering China, and deepening economic partnerships to enhance prosperity in our hemisphere,” claims the travel advisory.

“Under the Trump Administration we stand with our regional partners and look forward to working with them,” Rubio personally says.

In a briefing with press this week, Special Envoy Mauricio Claver-Carone noted the nature of the power struggle with Beijing.

“20 years ago people were talking about whether the 21st century was going to be a Chinese century or an American century … the 21st century will also be an American century.  And that’s what the focus – and America can’t – just like in the 20th century, it begins right here.  It begins right here in where we live, in the hemisphere we live.  It begins right here, harkening back to what made America great – the growth, the manufacturing growth of America, the reindustrialization of America, and frankly the great assets that America has built across the world, and in this case particularly the Panama Canal,” he said.

To that end, the Panama Canal will be discussed, as the Trump administration seeks to undo the misstep of the Carter era that left it open for Chinese control.

“So, well, they’re all over Panama.  A few years ago, Panama made the decision that they were going to de-recognize Taiwan and align with Beijing.  And with that came all sorts of money that was provided to the then president’s administration to – for projects and things of that nature, but also Chinese investment.  And one of the main investments they have is in these two port facilities on both – on the entry – on both sides of the canal.  And all kinds of other infrastructure, cranes and the like,” Rubio told Megyn Kelly this week, regarding a Hong Kong company that has disproportionate sway and ability to impact American aims.

“Every company that operates from China or Hong Kong, which is controlled by China – more than ever controlled by China; it’s no longer autonomous – they have to do whatever the government tells them.  And if the government in China in a conflict tells them to shut down the Panama Canal, they will have to.  And in fact, I have zero doubt that they have contingency planning to do so.  That is a direct threat.”

It’s not just the canal, though.

Rubio will meet with Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele, and strategic cooperation is the point, per the envoy, who lauds his “extraordinary handling of the MS-13 gang problem, how he’s managed it in El Salvador, and frankly how that can also be an alternative to help and support the United States in dealing with the most current gang problem that we have, which are the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gangs and how they can – and how President Bukele can help us there.”

In Guatemala and Costa Rica, meanwhile, repatriation will be a focus, as the Trump team seeks to reverse the migrant flood of the Biden years. And in the D.R., Haiti will be a point of conversation.

Ultimately, the unifying factor is national interest.

As Rubio told Kelly, “the Chinese will do what’s in the best interests of China, the Russians will do what’s in the best interest of Russia, the Chileans are going to do what’s in the best interest of Chile, and the United States needs to do what’s in the best interest of the United States.”

“Where our interests align, that’s where you have partnerships and alliances; where our differences are not aligned, that is where the job of diplomacy is to prevent conflict while still furthering our national interests and understanding they’re going to further theirs.  And that’s been lost,” he said.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Dems pick new leadership. Who does Florida’s contingent like?

Published

on


Democrats, desperately seeking a new message and messengers to push back against the Trump administration, will elect a new leader Saturday in a low-profile Democratic National Committee election that could have big implications for the party’s future.

More than 400 DNC members from every state and U.S. territory have gathered in suburban Washington for the election, which features a slate of candidates dominated by party insiders. Outgoing Chair Jaime Harrison is not seeking reelection.

Most of the candidates acknowledge that the Democratic brand is badly damaged, but few are promising fundamental changes. Indeed, nearly three months after Donald Trump won the popular vote and gained ground among key Democratic constituencies, there is little agreement on what exactly went wrong.

Facing an emboldened Trump presidency, however, the leading candidates are talking tough.

“As we reel with shock at the horror that Trump is visiting on communities across this country, we need a DNC and a DNC chair who’s ready to bring the intensity, the focus and the fury to fight back,” said Ben Wikler, the Wisconsin Democratic chairman and a top candidate for DNC chair.

The leading candidates for DNC chair, Wisconsin’s Wikler and Minnesota’s Ken Martin, are low-profile state party chairs. They’re promising to refocus the Democratic message on working-class voters, strengthen Democratic infrastructure across the country and improve the party’s anti-Trump rapid response system.

They have promised not to shy away from the party’s dedication to diversity and minority groups, a pillar of the modern-day Democratic Party. But if Martin, 51, or Wikler, 43, is elected, as expected, either would be the first white man to lead the DNC since 2011.

Also in the race: Marianne Williamson, the activist and author; former Maryland governor and Biden administration official Martin O’Malley; and Faiz Shakir, who managed Bernie Sanders’ last presidential campaign.

Here’s how Florida Democrats will vote.

Chair Nikki Fried, State Senator Shevrin Jones, Judy Mount, Pamela Castellana, Alan Clendenin, Ric Gable, and Lydia Hudson back Martin.

Juan Cuba, Daniel Henry, Karla Hernàndez-Mats, Millie Herrera, Samuel Vilchez Santiago, Samantha Hope-Herring, and Allison Minnerly back Wikler.

Martin O’Malley is the choice of Sean Shaw, meanwhile.

The delegation is more united behind Parkland survivor David Hogg for Vice Chair, meanwhile.

___

Republished with permission of the Associated Press.

The post Dems pick new leadership. Who does Florida’s contingent like? appeared first on Florida Politics – Campaigns & Elections. Lobbying & Government..



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Marco Rubio says that if we don’t control Greenland, China will

Published

on


The Arctic could be the graveyard of American interests if the United States doesn’t gain control of Greenland.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio notes that the issue is serious and indeed time-sensitive, as “the Arctic Circle and the Arctic region is going to become critical for shipping lanes, for how you get some of this energy that’s going to be produced under President Trump – these energies rely on shipping lanes.

“The Arctic has some of the most valuable shipping lanes in the world.  As some of the ice is melting, it’s become more and more navigable.  We need to be able to defend that. So if you project what the Chinese have done, it is just a matter of time before – because they are not an Arctic power.  They do not have an Arctic presence, so they need to be able to have somewhere that they can stage from,” he told Megyn Kelly this week.

To that end, Rubio predicts a more aggressive Chinese posture.

“And it is completely realistic to believe that the Chinese will eventually – maybe even in the short term – try to do in Greenland what they have done at the Panama Canal and in other places, and that is install facilities that give them access to the Arctic with the cover of a Chinese company but that in reality serve a dual purpose: that in a moment of conflict, they could send naval vessels to that facility and operate from there.  And that is completely unacceptable to the national security of the world and to the United – to the security of the world and the national security of the United States.”

Rubio is not alone in these worries.

President Donald Trump expressed similar concerns last month.

“People don’t even know if Denmark has any right to it. They should give it up because we need it for national security. You don’t even need binoculars. You look outside and you have (Chinese) ships all over the place, Russian ships all over the place. We are not letting that happen,” Trump said at a press conference.

National Security Advisor Mike Waltz is likewise concerned.

“Denmark can be a great ally, but you can’t treat Greenland, which they have operational control over, as some kind of backwater. It’s in the Western Hemisphere, multiple Presidents have tried to bring it into our sphere,” he told an interviewer last month.

Greenland, along with other Trump initiatives, strikes Waltz as an “America First” move to secure what he calls the “Monroe Doctrine 2.0.” And America’s ally to the north, who Trump has suggested should be an American state, needs to do more, Waltz argued.

Sen. Rick Scott, meanwhile, frames the prospect of acquiring Greenland as “exciting” and “great” for national security.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Canada, Mexico, China tariffs drop Saturday: POTUS

Published

on


Promises made, promises kept.

President Donald Trump said Friday he would place 25% tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico and 10% tariffs on goods from China effective Saturday, raising the specter of swift price increases for U.S. consumers even though he suggested he would try to blunt the impact on oil imports.

Trump had been threatening the tariffs to ensure greater cooperation from the countries on stopping illegal immigration and the smuggling of chemicals used for fentanyl, but he has also pledged to use tariffs to boost domestic manufacturing and raise revenues for the federal government.

“Starting tomorrow, those tariffs will be in place,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters earlier Friday. “These are promises made and promises kept by the President.” Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office later, Trump said there was nothing the three countries could do to prevent the tariffs from going into force Saturday.

The tariffs carry both political and economic risks for Trump, who is just two weeks into his second term. Many voters backed the Republican on the promise that he could tamp down inflation, but the possibility of tariffs could trigger higher prices and potentially disrupt the energy, auto, lumber and agricultural sectors.

___

Republished with permission of the Associated Press.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.