A bill that would end all of Florida’s community redevelopment agencies (CRAs) within the next 20 years is advancing in the House, where even some who voted for the measure believe it’s too severe.
Members of the State Affairs Committee voted 17-8 for HB 991, which would ban the creation of new CRAs — special government entities meant to improve blighted areas by funding infrastructure, housing, and business development projects — on or after July 1.
Any existing CRA would have to be terminated by the end of fiscal 2045 or the termination date in the CRA’s charter, whichever is earliest. Existing CRAs couldn’t be extended.
The bill, as written, would also bar CRAs from initiating new projects or issuing debt after Oct. 1. Those with outstanding bonds would still be able to operate until the bonds mature, but with a closing deadline of no later than Oct. 1, 2045.
Cape Coral Republican Rep. Mike Giallombardo filed HB 991 after learning that some CRAs have misappropriated funds. He said their Boards, usually composed of City Council members or their local analogs, have used the money to fund pet projects like art festivals and give themselves raises.
Giallombardo said he had pictures on his phone proving breaches of fiduciary duty by CRA Board members. He declined repeated requests to specify whom he was talking about or where the malfeasance had occurred.
“These CRAs become pockets of, let’s just call it, slush funds for some of these local governments,” he said. “And some of these are 50 years old. They just continue to kick the ball down the road,” he said. “We’re in an opportunity right now, especially with the climate — you know, DOGE and accountability — (and) I think it’s important for us to take a look at these.”
Rep. Mike Giallombardo said eliminating CRAs will end the waste, fraud, and abuse, which he’s seen evidence that he declined to share with his colleagues on Thursday. Image via Florida House.
First authorized by the Legislature in 1969, CRAs are state-authorized but locally established to target and develop specific urban or rural areas affected by economic distress or underdevelopment. Their principal funding mechanism is tax increment financing (TIF), where taxable property values are “frozen” at the onset of the CRA’s creation. As property values increase over time alongside redevelopment and improvement projects, the additional property tax revenue generated feeds back into the CRA for reinvestment in future projects.
Many have been staggeringly successful. Rep. Griff Griffitts, a Panama City Beach Republican, spoke of one CRA created in his district in 2020. At the time, the taxable value of the area was $900,000. Today, he said, it’s $6 billion.
“I know the good that they can provide for communities,” he said, adding that “bad actors” still misuse agency dollars and comingle funds. He said one of the objectives of CRAs, to finance the development of affordable and workforce housing, can be supplemented or replaced by the state’s SHIP and SAIL programs that the lawmakers infused with funding through the Live Local Act.
Griffitts said HB 991 “is not perfect” and appeared to disagree with its central premise of killing CRAs outright within the next two decades. “But I think this is a really good start to put some guardrails around these CRAs.”
Griffitts voted for the bill, as did Melbourne Republican Rep. Debbie Mayfield, who similarly expressed concern about wiping out CRAs altogether and recommended instead that tighter restrictions be placed on them.
It would hardly be the first time. In 2019, lawmakers passed more stringent oversight rules for CRAs through HB 9, which, among other things, imposed new audit disclosure requirements, mandated that CRA spending must have County Commission preapproval, and provided that the state could terminate inactive agencies.
Rep. Debbie Mayfield said her vote for HB 991 Tuesday came with a hope that it would be amended before passage to address the many concerns she heard from both sides of the dais. Image via Colin Hackley/Florida Politics.
Boynton Beach Democratic Rep. Joe Casello suggested that a more reasonable approach would be strengthening the standards HB 9 established “rather than eliminating a tool that has successfully driven local economic growth.”
Delray Beach Republican Rep. Mike Caruso agreed. He said some Board members may be acting improperly, but the benefit CRAs provide to “blighted areas that the free market failed to improve” is more than enough of a testament to their worth.
“I look at this bill as if we’re chopping down a tree when we should be just trimming a branch,” Caruso said.
Giallombardo noted that funds from a CRA would remain with its given city, which could directly take on revitalization projects. But several members of the Committee pointed out problems with that perspective.
Rep. Anna Eskamani, an Orlando Democrat, said the runway his bill provides CRAs with outstanding bonds may not be long enough, particularly for longer, multiphase projects. North Miami Democratic Rep. Dotie Joseph said HB 991 would compound the negative impacts of a proposal (SB 852) Gov. Ron DeSantissupports this year to study eliminating property taxes, which could hamper local services, including “defunding the police.”
Small businesses within CRAs pay lower rents, made possible by the frozen property values, and eliminating that arrangement could drive their overhead costs to untenable levels, Lake Worth Democratic Rep. Debra Tendrich said. The bill would also prevent some less well-to-do residents from being able to buy homes and imperil local transportation provisions that benefit seniors, she said.
Casello, Caruso, Eskamani, Joseph and Tendrich voted against HB 991. St. Pete Beach Republican Rep. Linda Chaney voted for it but said she still sees the benefit of CRAs.
“I also have experienced the use of CRAs maybe not in the best interest of the taxpayer in terms of need-to-have versus nice-to-have projects,” she said. “Having said that, I would like to talk to you about maybe some refinement to this so that the need-to-have projects are funded above the nice-to-have projects.”
Rep. Dotie Joseph repeatedly asked Giallombardo for specific examples of CRA malfeasance. He said he had them on his phone, but didn’t elaborate, Image via Colin Hackley/Florida Politics.
Rep. Ashley Gantt, a Miami Democrat, contended that HB 991 is too vague and looks to destroy rather than correct. She said she was troubled by Giallombardo’s reference to DOGE, President Donald Trump’s federal initiative through which unelected billionaire Elon Musk has taken a (somewhat figurative) chainsaw to federal agencies in the name of government efficiency.
“We see how many thousands of federal employees have been laid off and are hopeless. I don’t want that to happen in my community,” Gantt said. “We have the power and ability … to protect our citizens, to make sure that they know that they are seen. … Why can’t we be transformative in thinking of new ways to still be accomplished? We don’t want CRAs to exist in perpetuity, but we also don’t want to kill the hope in our community. And it’s not like we’re asking for unreasonable changes or clarification.”
Gantt, Joseph and Tampa Democratic Rep. Diane Hart, who is not a member of the State Affairs Committee but appeared at the meeting, each proffered amendments to HB 991. Hart’s would have deleted the ban on new CRAs after July 1. Gantt aimed to erase the bill’s prohibition on new CRA projects and debts after Oct. 1. Joseph’s would have replaced the bill’s language entirely with an allowance that any resident or business owner in a CRA could file a complaint about any violation of state CRA rules that the Department of Commerce would have to investigate.
The GOP-dominated panel rejected them all.
Americans for Prosperity signaled support for the HB 991. Mulberry Commissioner Neil Devine, 1000 Friends of Florida and representatives of Wakulla and the CRAs of North Miami, North Miami Beach and Opa-locka opposed the measure.
Lobbyist Ryan Matthews, representing the Florida Redevelopment Association, which includes all 213 CRAs in the state, said cities without CRAs wouldn’t be able to use TIF funding to multiply their investment dollars and significantly improve their ability to issue bonds for projects.
He said that Florida’s 213 CRAs aren’t averse to sunsetting, but some need more time.
“We have multi-hundred-million-dollar projects in the pipeline,” he said, adding that HB 991 passes with its prohibition on new projects intact, it “will prevent those projects from coming to fruition.”
David Cruz of the Florida League of Cities told the panel about a project underway in Southwest Florida. A developer wants to build 78 new affordable units. The company bought land, obtained entitlements, went through zoning, and secured funding. Groundbreaking is scheduled for December.
Giallombardo’s bill puts the project at risk, he said, because the developer’s previously guaranteed tax rebate through the local CRA wouldn’t be possible.
“That entire project is going to go up in smoke,” he said.
HB 991 advanced on a party-line vote, with only Caruso crossing the aisle to vote “no” with his Democratic colleagues. The bill will next go to the House State Affairs Committee, after which it has one more stop before a floor vote.
Its Senate twin (SB 1242) by Ocala Republican Sen. Stan McClain skidded by its first of three Committee stops Tuesday on a 4-3 vote. It’s next slated for a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
The Senate finds itself on Friday in a familiar position, working to avoid a partial government shutdown with just hours to spare as Democrats confront two painful options: allowing passage of a bill they believe gives President Donald Trump vast discretion on spending decisions or voting no and letting a funding lapse ensue.
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer gave members of his caucus days to vent their frustration about the options before them, but late Thursday made clear he will not allow a government shutdown. His move gives Democrats room to side with Republicans and allow the continuing resolution, often described as a CR, to come up for a vote as soon as Friday.
A procedural vote Friday will provide a first test of whether the package has the 60 votes needed to advance, ahead of final voting likely later in the day. At least eight Democrats will need to join with Republicans to move the funding package forward.
“While the CR still is very bad, the potential for a shutdown has consequences for America that are much, much worse,” Schumer said.
Congress has been unable to pass the annual appropriations bills designed to fund the government, so they’ve resorted to passing short-term extensions instead. The legislation before the Senate marks the third such continuing resolution for the current fiscal year, now nearly half over.
The legislation would fund the federal government through the end of September. It would trim non-defense spending by about $13 billion from the previous year and increase defense spending by about $6 billion, which are marginal changes when talking about a topline spending level of nearly $1.7 trillion.
The Republican-led House passed the spending bill on Tuesday and then adjourned. The move left senators with a decision to either take it or leave it. And while Democrats have been pushing for a vote on a fourth short-term extension, GOP leadership made clear that option was a non-starter.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republicam, and others used their floor time Thursday to make the case that any blame for a shutdown would fall squarely on Democrats.
“Democrats need to decide if they’re going to support funding legislation that came over from the House, or if they’re going to shut down the government,” Thune said when opening the chamber.
Progressive groups urged Democratic lawmakers to insist on the 30-day extension and oppose the spending bill, saying “business as usual must not continue” while Trump and ally Elon Musk dismantle critical agencies and programs.
But Schumer said Trump would seize more power during a shutdown, because it would give the administration the ability to deem whole agencies, programs and personnel non-essential, furloughing staffwith no promise they would ever be rehired.
“A shutdown would give Donald Trump the keys to the city, the state and the country,” Schumer said.
Democrats have been critical of the funding levels in the bill. They note that both defense and non-defense spending is lower than what was agreed to nearly two years ago when Congress passed legislation lifting the debt ceiling in return for spending restraints.
But they are even more worried about the discretion the bill gives the Trump administration on spending decisions. Many Democrats are referring to the measure as a “blank check” for Trump.
Spending bills typically come with specific funding directives for key programs, but hundreds of those directives fall away under the continuing resolution passed by the House. So the administration will have more leeway to decide where the money goes.
For example, a Democratic memo said the bill would allow the administration to steer money away from combating fentanyl and instead use it on mass deportation initiatives. At the Army Corps of Engineers, funding levels for more than 1,000 projects to enhance commerce, flood control and healthy ecosystems would be determined by the administration rather than Congress.
Democrats also object to the treatment of the District of Columbia, as the bill effectively repeals its current year budget and forces it to go back to the prior year’s levels, even though the district raises most of its own money. Mayor Muriel Bowser said the district would have to cut spending by $1.1 billion over just a few months.
Democrats also object to clawing back $20 billion in special IRS funding, on top of the $20 billion rescission approved the year before. The changes essentially cut in half the funding boost that Congress intended to give the agency through legislation passed by Democrats during Joe Biden’s presidency.
The spending bill before the Senate is separate from the GOP effort to extend tax cuts for individuals passed in Trump’s first term and to pay for those with spending cuts elsewhere in the budget.
That second package will be developed in the months ahead, but it was clearly part of the political calculus Democrats were considering as they argued against the six-month extension. Both efforts are designed to help the well-off at the expense of other Americans, they said.
“You’re looking at a one-two punch, a very bad CR, then a reconciliation bill coming down, which will be the final kick in the teeth for the American people,” said Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent.
Sen. Tom Cotton, an Arkansas Republican., said the Democratic arguments were hypocritical because they were essentially calling for shutting down the government to protect the government.
“Democrats are fighting to withhold the paychecks of air traffic controllers, our troops, federal custodial staff,” Cotton said. “They can’t be serious.”
___
Republished with permission of The Associated Press.
Florida’s future workforce depends on a strong foundation in K-12 math. As industries evolve and technology reshapes the job market, math proficiency is no longer optional — it’s imperative. Yet, 2024 annual data from the Florida Department of Education reveals that more than 128,600 students in grades 10 -12 in Florida are testing as “not proficient” in math. If this trend continues, Florida risks falling behind in its goal of becoming a top 10 global economy by 2030, as outlined in the Florida Chamber Foundation’s Florida 2030 Blueprint.
Florida’s 8th grade math proficiency has risen to 65% in recent years, but it still falls short of the 100% goal outlined in the Florida 2030 Blueprint, as shown on TheFloridaScorecard.org.
The Florida Chamber Foundation’s new research report, Math Matters: Bridging Gaps for Florida’s Future Workforce highlights this challenge and provides a roadmap for business leaders and policymakers to act. The research shows that a modest 10-percentage-point increase in 8th graders math proficiency would mean 27,000 more Florida students entering high school each year with strong foundational math skills — students who are better positioned to take advanced math courses in high school, and eventually successfully transition into college, workforce training, and high-demand career fields.
The Math Gap: A Roadblock to Economic Growth
Math proficiency isn’t just about passing tests — business leaders know it’s about building the problem-solving and analytical skills that power innovation and economic growth. Students who struggle with math may encounter further difficulties in postsecondary and/or workforce education, limiting their career options and creating long-term talent shortages in Florida’s key industries. The Florida Chamber Foundation’s guide on Top 30 High-Demand Careers (2032) shows that STEM careers and careers that rely on math skills are in-demand now and will be in the near future.
One pressing challenge is chronic absenteeism. When students miss school regularly, they fall behind in math and often never catch up. Addressing absenteeism through targeted interventions, like those recently deployed in Volusia County’s chronic absenteeism initiative, can help students stay on track and prevent learning gaps from widening.
“Ensuring every student has consistent access to education is paramount to their success and the future of Florida’s workforce. Volusia County’s targeted efforts to address chronic absenteeism are making a real difference, providing students with the support they need to stay engaged in the classroom and on track for success.”
—Rep. Chase Tramont, Volusia County
Further, rural schools are disproportionately represented among the bottom performing quartile in math proficiency. Rural school districts comprise 46% of all Florida school districts but represent 71% of the bottom quartile in math proficiency.
Investing in Early Intervention and Data-Driven Solutions
Business leaders and policymakers have a unique opportunity to drive change. The passage of House Bill 1361 (2024), which enhances the New Worlds Learning Initiative to provide resources improve early math achievement, is an important step to helping students early in their educational career. This initiative will help ensure that by the time students reach middle and high school, they are prepared to advance through courses like Algebra 1 and Geometry. However, more could be done to make certain students stay on track as they progress through middle and high school.
Expanding access to early intervention programs, increasing support for teachers, and fostering business-education partnerships can make a significant difference. Additionally, better access to education data is fundamental. Research-driven strategies, enabled by expanded data-sharing mechanisms, can pinpoint the most effective solutions and scale them statewide.
A Call to Action: How Business Leaders Can Help
The business community has a vested interest in ensuring today’s students are ready for tomorrow’s workforce. Employers can join the movement by supporting initiatives such as math-focused internships, mentoring programs, and scholarships for students pursuing math-intensive fields. Investing in math education is not just a philanthropic effort—it’s an economic imperative.
Florida is at a turning point. The state has the potential to lead the nation in workforce development and economic innovation, but that future hinges on closing the math proficiency gap today. If we fail to act, we risk leaving thousands of students unprepared and businesses without the skilled workforce they need to thrive.
___
Florida Chamber Foundation Vice President Dr. Keith Richardcan be contacted at [email protected]. Click here to read the full research report that informed this op-ed.
Republicans in Congress want to return education to the states and jettison the U.S. Department of Education. But they still want to ensure students get ideological education.
Scott isn’t the only Florida Republican backing this legislation. U.S. Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar is carrying the House version.
The bill would give students nationwide a version of the anti-communist curriculum that Florida students enjoy. The measure would make sure students know that more than 100 million people have died at the hands of communist regimes, while 1.5 billion still live under them.
The Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation would be charged with developing the curriculum, which will contrast “freedom and patriotism” with “communism and totalitarianism.” The lessons, per the bill, would be “compatible with a variety of courses, including social studies, government, history, and economics classes.”
“For families across America, particularly many in Florida, America shines as a beacon of freedom and democracy, standing in stark contrast to the communist regimes that once stripped them of their basic freedoms and liberties. For decades, the left has worked to promote failed socialist and communist ideologies that go against the very values we and President Donald Trump are fighting so hard to protect,” Scott said.
Salazar’s bill passed the House last year, so odds are good it has a shot of doing so again, and so “will ensure future generations will remember the pain and suffering caused by the brutal communist ideology,” as she said last December.
Florida’s “History of Communism” law was passed with overwhelming bipartisan support last year.
Students in traditional public and charter K-12 schools are on track to receive instruction on the history of communism beginning in the 2026-27 academic year in what is billed as an age-appropriate and developmentally appropriate way.