Connect with us

Politics

Michelle Salzman’s minor-protecting social media bill heads to final House committee

Published

on


Legislation to better safeguard kids online is bound for its last House committee hearing after clearing its second stop with uniform support.

The House Criminal Justice Subcommittee voted 15-0 to advance HB 743, which would require social media platforms to allow parents and legal guardians to view their 14- or 15-year-olds’ messages.

Police would be given access too, with a warrant or parental permission. Platforms would also be prohibited from allowing kids under 14 to use or access messages designed to disappear after a certain period of time, like those on Snapchat and Instagram.

Florida lawmakers in 2024 passed a law limiting minors’ access to social media platforms, including prohibiting kids 13 and younger from holding accounts and requiring parental consent for 14- and 15-year-olds. The restriction is now being challenged in court.

HB 743 differs from its upper-chamber companion (SB 868), which takes aim at end-to-end encryption that many platforms use to protect their systems and users from privacy breaches.

Escambia County Republican Rep. Michelle Salzman, who filed HB 743 with Merritt Island Republican Rep. Tyler Sirois, said her bill “basically just tells social media platforms that they must provide access to parents, as well as law enforcement with a warrant.”

The Florida Citizens Alliance, Florida Smart Justice Alliance and Florida Family Voice signaled support for HB 743 on Wednesday.

The bill passed through its first committee last week, also with zero “no” votes.

According to the U.S. Department of Justice, 1 in 5 children per year receives an unwanted sexual solicitation online. And 1 in 33 are targets of aggressive sexual solicitation, which involves pushes by the culprit to make offline contact. And at any given time, some 50,000 predators are on the internet actively seeking out children.

HB 743 will next go to the House Budget Committee before heading to the chamber floor.

SB 868, sponsored by Spring Hill Republican Sen. Blaise Ingoglia, surmounted its first committee hurdle on a 7-2 vote Tuesday after receiving criticism from both sides of the dais about its potential impact on cybersecurity and privacy.


Post Views: 0





Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Florida to elect 2 newest members of Congress in Special Elections Tuesday

Published

on


Strong turnout among Democrats so far and remarkably robust fundraising by a public middle school teacher are making one of Florida’s special congressional elections next week tighter than expected for a prominent Republican hoping to replace a GOP incumbent in a comfortably red district.

State Sen. Randy Fine — a Republican firebrand who has openly feuded with Gov. Ron DeSantis and earned an endorsement by President Donald Trump — is facing a Democratic candidate, Josh Weil, 40, of Orlando.

Weil, a teacher at Kissimmee Middle School and single dad of two sons, has raised nearly 10 times more money than Fine, including more than $7 million from donors who gave less than $200 each, generally considered a sign of grassroots enthusiasm among prospective voters. A new political poll this week of likely voters conducted for Florida Politics showed the race within the survey’s margin of error — effectively a tie.

In early and mail voting so far, through Wednesday, about 12% of the district’s roughly 270,600 active, registered Republican voters have cast ballots — compared to 20% of the district’s roughly 141,500 Democrats, according to real-time tracking by Fresh Take Florida, a news service of the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications.

Even DeSantis is saying that he expects Fine to underperform in the district compared to his own and Trump’s re-elections there — but DeSantis still expects Fine ultimately to win. “The district is so overwhelmingly Republican that it’s almost impossible for someone with an ‘R’ by their name to lose that district,” DeSantis said.

The race for Florida’s 6th Congressional District is one of two special House elections that will culminate on Tuesday. The district runs from St. Augustine to Daytona Beach along the state’s East Coast. Fine and Weil are vying to replace Mike Waltz, who resigned to become Trump’s National Security Adviser — and has become embroiled in the scandal in Washington over military plans accidentally shared in a chat group with a magazine journalist.

The other race is the Florida’s 1st Congressional District in the Panhandle, a reliably Republican region that hasn’t elected a Democrat since 1995. Jimmy Patronis, Florida’s Chief Financial Officer and former state Representative, is competing against Democrat Gay Valimont, who lost a race for the same seat in November by 32 percentage points.

Valimont has outraised Patronis in the race, raising almost $6.5 million in campaign contributions and spending about $4.3 million. Trump endorsed Patronis, who raised more than $2.1 million and spent about $1.3 million.

In an interview, Patronis said the two congressional elections in Florida could embolden Democrats in the House to undermine Trump’s political agenda. The GOP holds a slim 218-213 margin over Democrats there.

“This is (Democrats’) Alamo,” he said. “If they can win the Florida Panhandle seat, if they can win the District 6th seat of Volusia County, they stop Congress.”

Patronis said he supports Trump’s immigration goals and wants to complete the border wall Trump proposed. He also supports limits on government spending.

Valimont has focused her campaign on veterans’ care in the Panhandle, which has among the highest concentration of veterans in the U.S. She said the Trump administration’s cuts to federal employment will make veteran care even worse, especially with perceived threats to Medicare and Medicaid. She said voters have also complained to her about expensive property insurance — an industry Patronis regulated — and the cost of living.

“I’m going to go and fight against all of these bad decisions on the part of our President,” Valimont said. “We are being ruled by an oligarch, and that’s not American.”

The seat in the Panhandle opened after former U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz resigned in an unsuccessful effort to become Trump’s Attorney General.

Four hundred miles away, Fine acknowledged in an interview that he is a divisive figure in American politics.

The No. 1 threat to America — more so that a foreign adversary — is the country’s inability to spend within its means, Fine said. He also sees himself as someone who doesn’t mind “calling out evil.” He’s enthusiastically embraced Trump’s plans to deport immigrants in the U.S. illegally.

“I’m not interested in sitting around the drum circle and talking about how we can all get along. I want to kick them out of the country,” Fine said. “So, that’s divisive, and I’m proud of it.”

Fine scored political points after the arrest of a canvasser, Arlecia Brown, 35, of Palm Coast working on behalf of Weil’s campaign. Brown is facing burglary and theft charges in Flagler County over a stolen bicycle. Weil called the case an unacceptable incident, and added, “The individual is no longer authorized to do any work on behalf of our campaign.”

Weil emphasized the high prices that Trump promised during his own campaign to reduce.

“People who are struggling to afford groceries are in a situation that millionaire casino executives can’t necessarily relate to,” Weil said. “I’m a single parent of two boys on a teacher’s salary. I felt it firsthand when we would go to Walmart to buy groceries, and the boys would fill up a shopping cart… I just can’t afford it.”

___

This story was produced by Fresh Take Florida, a news service of the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications. The reporter can be reached at [email protected]. You can donate to support our students here.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Winner and Loser of the Week in Florida politics — Week of 3.23.25

Published

on


We’ve got a FEMA faceoff, as different parts of the federal government are arguing over whether to keep the Federal Emergency Management Agency intact, move it out of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), or abolish it altogether.

And Florida folks are playing an outsized role.

U.S. Reps. Byron Donalds and Jared Moskowitz are supporting a bipartisan plan to set up FEMA as a stand-alone agency, arguing that moving it away from DHS will make FEMA more efficient and better able to respond to disasters.

Under that proposal, FEMA’s head would be part of the President’s Cabinet and report directly to President Donald Trump. Moskowitz previously served as Florida’s Director of the Division of Emergency Management, operating a similar agency at the state level. Donalds, a close Trump ally, is running for Governor next year with the President’s support.

But that support may not extend to Donalds’ joint plan with Moskowitz to keep FEMA alive. Trump’s hand-picked Homeland Security Secretary, Kristi Noem, doesn’t want FEMA moved out of her agency. She wants FEMA axed altogether.

Reports emerged this week that Noem told a Trump Cabinet meeting that she was “going to eliminate” FEMA.

That’s stronger language than she has used before. But even Trump has floated eliminating the agency. So perhaps he’s finally putting those words into motion as part of his effort to completely dismantle parts of the federal government.

What does that mean for Florida, one of the most disaster-prone areas of the country? Well, likely nothing good. And the fact that Donalds and Moskowitz are working across the aisle to maintain some version of the agency shows there are major stakeholders who agree.

But does the President?

Now, it’s onto our weekly game of winners and losers.

Winners

Honorable mention: Kevin Marino Cabrera. Cabrera flew through his Senate confirmation hearing with flying colors as he prepares to become the U.S. Ambassador to Panama.

Trump picked Cabrera for the role late last year, and it appears he’s closing in on a start date for the position.

It’s an important one, given Trump’s insistence on the U.S. growing its influence over the Panama Canal, if not outright seizing control.

Cabrera faced questioning over those tensions regarding the shipping channel, leaning on his experience as a Miami-Dade County Commissioner, serving a region where shipping is integral.

Cabrera also worked as Florida State Director for Trump’s 2020 campaign. But his hearing featured Cabrera playing a more diplomatic role rather than echoing Trump’s often bombastic approach.

Expect him to clear his upcoming Senate vote easily.

Almost (but not quite) the biggest winner: Fiscal sanity. The first versions for the House and Senate budgets were released this week, and both chambers are looking to rein in spending.

The Senate’s proposed budget comes in at $117.36 billion. That’s a cut of $1.3 billion from spending levels during the last fiscal year.

The House gets even more cut-happy. They are outlining a budget of just under $113 billion, coming in even lower than the Senate and below Gov. Ron DeSantis’ proposed $115.6 billion budget.

This is just the beginning of the process, so we’ll see where these final numbers land. But both chambers — and the Governor, for that matter — are showing they are aware of the need to get Florida’s finances in order.

Last week, we spotlighted comments from the Miami-Dade County Mayor that some austerity may be coming after years of cash influx aided in part by federal COVID legislation.

Well those problems could exist at the state level as well, especially given the federal government’s, let’s say, unorthodox economic policy these first few months. Even members of the administration are signaling there will be a “transition” period and “corrections” in the economy as Trump continues toying with tariffs.

So who knows what’s on the horizon. And yes, Florida is flush with cash reserves. But to keep it that way, they’ll need to avoid continuing to hike spending every year regardless of the economic realities.

The biggest winner: Daniel Perez. In addition to his role overseeing the House’s budget proposal, Perez also stood out in The Process this week for taking two bold stances.

One got attention due to its catchiness as a Republican-on-Republican showdown, as the House voted Wednesday to override four DeSantis vetoes issued following the 2024 Session.

Lawmakers first raised the specter of such a move as GOP legislative leaders and DeSantis were locked in a showdown over a Special Session regarding immigration. That clash ended in compromise, but the House’s review of those vetoes continued forward.

“This Session, we have focused on restoring the institutional role of the Florida House of Representatives,” Perez said. And that independence is key to a well-functioning government. More than 9 times out of 10, GOP leaders in the Legislature will agree with the Governor on policy. But it’s good to know that Perez’s words aren’t empty and that the Legislature is willing to demonstrate that they will stand up to some of DeSantis’ worst impulses.

Perez’s second attention-grabbing move does align with a DeSantis policy position. Perez is moving forward to cut the state sales tax from 6% to 5.25%. That would save spenders close to $5 billion each year, per Perez.

Florida’s affordability crisis goes well beyond some extra dollars at the store. We’re still waiting for meaningful, effective reforms to help the housing market and fix the insurance crisis.

But Perez and Senate President Ben Albritton have promised movement on those issues as well. And combined with this push on dropping the sales tax, Florida lawmakers may yet be successful in stopping Florida from turning into New York or San Francisco and being synonymous with unaffordability.

Losers

Dishonorable mention: Cory Mills. Mills is facing an ethics probe, adding to personal problems already plaguing the lawmaker and making it increasingly difficult to follow through with his promise to mount a Senate Primary challenge to Republican U.S. Sen. Ashley Moody in 2026.

The House Ethics Committee announced Thursday that members will review whether Mills broke any rules by holding contracts with the government while serving in the House.

“Prior to being sworn in to Congress, Rep. Mills made a series of public statements regarding his business dealings with U.S. law enforcement agencies and foreign governments over the years,” read a report from the Office of Congressional Conduct, formerly the Office of Congressional Ethics.

“Government procurement records show companies owned by Rep. Mills have been awarded numerous federal contracts. These contracts primarily consist of purchase orders stemming from the manufacture and delivery of less than lethal ammunitions — products manufactured by the Member-owned entities Pacem Defense, LLC, Pacem Solutions International, LLC and ALS, Inc. — to federal law enforcement agencies and the U.S. Department of Justice.”

Mills said he plans to cooperate but slammed the claims he acted improperly as politically motivated.

Whether Mills was in the wrong here will be sussed out by the probe. But Mills is now navigating a proverbial minefield, promising to run for Senate in 2026 while this investigation continues and questions fly about his role in an incident police investigated as a potential assault.

Forget a promotion to the Senate, it’s reasonable that some voters may begin to ask whether Mills should serve in Congress at all.

Almost (but not quite) the biggest loser: Small-dollar Democratic donors. Last week, we gave Florida Dems a winner slot based in part on the jaw-dropping amount of money raised for Special Elections in two deep red congressional districts.

This week, a poll showed the Democrat in Florida’s 6th Congressional District in striking range of the presumed favorite, Republican state Sen. Randy Fine.

That gives even more hope to democrats frustrated with the Trump administration and seeing a razor-thin margin in the House. Every seat counts, and Democrats are now wondering if they can count either race in Florida’s 1st Congressional District or CD 6 as an upset.

Well, we’re now two days away from Election Day. So here’s where the rubber meets the road. Are Democrats going to pull off a miracle here?

Our verdict: No.

Young athletes learn early that winning isn’t everything. Maybe that’s true here as well, as cutting either of these races to an uncomfortable margin for Republicans can give Democrats some momentum heading into the Midterms and send a message about their displeasure with Trump.

But $10 million in a Trump +30 district in CD 6? Millions more in even redder CD 1?

We’re not saying Democrats shouldn’t have given this a shot. But without a win, a lot of this is wasted money. If they are after moral victories, they could have sent a message with much less.

As we said last week: “If these huge sums of money get wasted yet again, the rest of the country really needs to try to come to grips with the fact that Florida is a red state, and their green should go elsewhere.”

Unless a miracle happens Tuesday, we stand by that statement.

The biggest loser: Mike Waltz. Waltz is in hot water after this week. And if you somehow found yourself perusing this column within the vast sea of reading options across the World Wide Web, then you know why.

This story was so unbelievable even the reporter in the group chat couldn’t fathom it was real as it was happening, so we’re not going to bore you with a full recap.

The question everyone is wondering is: Does Waltz survive this?

After all, he was the one who added The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg to the chat in the first place. In a follow-up piece on this whole affair, Goldberg displayed much of the messages he received after laughable claims by the Trump administration that details about an impending attack that had not yet occurred were not classified.

So Goldberg released text and images of the conversation. Right at the top of the image of Goldberg’s perspective read, “Michael Waltz added you to the group.”

And Waltz has already said a staffer wasn’t responsible for adding Goldberg. So by process of elimination, our friends, that means Waltz did it.

Waltz has tried a bunch of silly tactics to get out of this, making it seem like some technical mystery that needs solving and taking needless shots at Goldberg, whose reporting Trump has hammered for years.

So again, does Waltz survive this?

Trump publicly has stood by him. Point for Waltz.

Privately, it’s reportedly a different story. And see it’s not just the Signal chat. Passwords belonging to Waltz were among a trove of public officials’ info uncovered by German outlet Der Spiegel. Waltz’s passwords were among that trove. Separate reporting also showed Waltz left his Venmo friends list viewable to the public.

That all adds to the drip-drip-drip of controversy Trump is always eager to avoid. It also had proved to override Team Trump’s strategy, as explained by adviser Steve Bannon, to “flood the zone with shit” — i.e. make so many button-pushing moves that the media and the public can’t catch up, allowing Trump to emerge scot-free from it all and accomplish his agenda.

Well, no luck here. This story broke through, and in a big way. And back to that Venmo list, it showed Waltz was friends with several media figures even, gasp, a CNN host.

That’s not controversial, nor should it be. But see, we’re still stuck on why Waltz had Goldberg’s number to begin with. We don’t have an inside info here, but if Trump begins to believe Waltz might be friendly with one of Trump’s many media enemies, that may do more to convince the President that Waltz needs to go than even this catastrophic security breach.

That is, as Trump might say, sad! But it’s the truth. And if that’s not enough, this story continuing to drag out and serve as a cudgel against this administration’s competence will.

Waltz better hope this story blows over soon. And the administration — Waltz included — would do well to stop trying to gaslight the public if that’s going to happen.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Florida gears up for Elite 8 Matchup with Texas Tech

Published

on


Tipoff nears. The winner goes to the Final Four.

Texas Tech Red Raiders (28-8, 16-6 Big 12) vs. Florida Gators (33-4, 17-4 SEC)

San Francisco; Saturday, 6:09 p.m. EDT

BETMGM SPORTSBOOK LINE: Gators -6.5; over/under is 156.5

BOTTOM LINE: No. 3 Florida takes on No. 9 Texas Tech in the Elite Eight round of the NCAA Tournament.

The Gators’ record in SEC games is 17-4, and their record is 16-0 in non-conference play. Florida ranks second in the SEC with 26.6 defensive rebounds per game led by Alex Condon averaging 4.8.

The Red Raiders’ record in Big 12 play is 16-6. Texas Tech ranks fourth in the Big 12 with 16.2 assists per game led by Elijah Hawkins averaging 6.2.

Florida averages 9.9 made 3-pointers per game, 3.6 more made shots than the 6.3 per game Texas Tech allows. Texas Tech has shot at a 46.7% clip from the field this season, 6.8 percentage points higher than the 39.9% shooting opponents of Florida have averaged.

TOP PERFORMERS: Walter Clayton Jr. is scoring 17.7 points per game with 3.7 rebounds and 4.1 assists for the Gators. Will Richard is averaging 16.1 points over the last 10 games.

Chance McMillian averages 2.3 made 3-pointers per game for the Red Raiders, scoring 14.2 points while shooting 43.4% from beyond the arc. JT Toppin is shooting 54.5% and averaging 20.6 points over the last 10 games.

LAST 10 GAMES:

Gators: 9-1, averaging 90.5 points, 37.9 rebounds, 16.2 assists, 6.9 steals and 3.7 blocks per game while shooting 48.6% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 77.8 points per game.

Red Raiders: 8-2, averaging 78.8 points, 34.7 rebounds, 14.8 assists, 4.6 steals and 3.8 blocks per game while shooting 42.9% from the field. Their opponents have averaged 70.4 points.

____

Republished with permission of the Associated Press.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.