Connect with us

Politics

Miami-Dade Dems accuse Elections Supervisor of pro-GOP bias, trying to ‘steal’ local elections

Published

on


Leaders of the Miami-Dade Democratic Party are accusing recently elected Supervisor of Elections Alina Garcia, a longtime Republican operative and former state lawmaker, of using her new post to tilt the county’s voter composition in her party’s favor.

They’re now diving into public records, they say, to determine whether — and to what extent — the Supervisor of Elections (SOE) Office has manipulated voter rolls since November.

More than a quarter-million Miami-Dade voters have been removed from the county’s active voter rolls in recent months, and Democratic and non-party affiliated voters (NPA) made up a disproportionate share of the reduction.

A side-by-side comparison of active voter numbers from February and those from July, after an off-year voter roll maintenance that occurred statewide, shows Miami-Dade shed a 106,435 Democratic and 105,183 NPA voters — 41% each of the net total 259,606-voter reduction — while removing just 47,988 Republicans (18% of the total) over the same period.

Sue Whitman-Helfgot, the Miami-Dade Democratic Party’s Finance Chair, said in a Saturday fundraising email that the party is now “investigating Garcia’s antics” and have a plan to “combat her attempt to steal the upcoming Miami mayoral election.”

“Our staff of hardworking volunteers has a state-of-the-art tech stack,” she said. “But they need deep material support so they can knock on thousands of doors, make even more phone calls, and run voter registration drives. All before the election this Fall.”

Miami-Dade’s red wave

Whitman-Helfgot’s email came nearly eight months after a seismic election shook Miami-Dade, a long-dependably blue county that has increasingly trended redder in recent cycles. The proverbial dam broke in November, when Miami-Dade voters sided with a GOP presidential nominee for the first time this century.

President Donald Trump outpaced then-Vice President Kamala Harris by 11.4 percentage points in Miami-Dade. The last Republican at the top of the ticket to take the county was George H.W. Bush in 1988, and he won by 11 points.

The effect trickled down, with the Miami-Dade GOP sweeping all five county constitutional office races — including the contest for SOE, which Garcia won with 56% of the vote — while not losing a single congressional or state legislative seat.

A snippet of the Miami-Dade Democratic Party fundraising email Finance Chair Sue Whitman-Helfgot sent July 26.

Garcia told Florida Politics by text Tuesday that the change in Miami-Dade’s voter numbers is hardly due to treachery and is instead reflective of a shift that occurred in compliance with Florida Statutes.

“These are voters who have had mail returned as undeliverable and who have not voted or had any contact with our office in the past four years or two General Election cycles,” she said. “To avoid being removed from the rolls, it is important that voters update their address when moving and maintain contact with their Supervisors of Elections Office.”

Miami-Dade Republican Party Chair Kevin Cooper said the swing wasn’t an overnight phenomenon but the result of a nearly decade-long GOP push.

“The reality is, Miami-Dade would have flipped regardless of this,” he said by text. “Over the last eight years Miami-Dade County flipped 22 points from Democrat to Republican. … In March 2020, Democrats held a lead of 228,000 voters. In March 2025, that lead shrank to just under 19,000.”

Two Democrat-aligned consultants — Matt Isbell of Tallahassee, who is known for constructing data-driven political maps; and Miami political strategist Vanessa Britoscoffed on X at the suggestion that malfeasance contributed to the party’s losses.

Isbell called it a “fake scandal.”

“The party split here is driven (by) poor Democratic turnout in past years (and) that there are far more Democrats who haven’t voted in years,” Isbell said. “The last thing Democrats need to do is embrace conspiracy. Also distracts from real issues.”

Miami-Dade Supervisor of Elections Alina Garcia says the county’s red shift isn’t unique, citing what she described as even more disproportionate purges of Democratic voters in Orange and Palm Beach counties. Image via Alina Garcia.

Brito pointed out, as Florida Politics reported in May, that “inactive” isn’t the same thing as removed and that Democratic voters technically still outnumber Republicans in Miami-Dade, even if it isn’t reflected on county and state websites.

“Instead of doing the hard work to re-engage them and actually invest in long-term infrastructure in what used to be one of Florida’s biggest blue strongholds,” she said, “they’d rather pretend the problem doesn’t exist.”

‘We need to make sure’

But that assessment isn’t accurate, according to Miami-Dade Democratic Party Chair Laura Kelley, who pushed back on what she called an “unfair” narrative that her party idly stood by while its advantage in Florida’s most populous county eroded.

And it certainly hasn’t been the case since the party’s leadership changed in December, she said.

“This administration is actively doing things differently. We’ve made almost 100,000 calls to voters, and we’ll be reaching out to people who had their vote-by-mail in 2022 and didn’t re-enroll or didn’t vote,” she said. “We’ll also be reaching out to NPAs to make sure they understand they have the right to vote in municipal elections. We have various tiers of how we’re reaching out to voters, and we’re not going to stop until we contact them and ensure they’re reactivated.”

Several municipal elections in the coming months will be affected by the shifting voter rolls. Homestead has its Primary Election on Oct. 7. Its General Election is on Nov. 4, alongside those for Miami Beach and, depending on the outcome of a legal battle over a City Hall attempt to delay its election to 2026, Miami. Hialeah’s Primary and Special Elections are also on Nov. 4, with its General Election coinciding with potential Miami and Miami Beach runoffs Dec. 9.

Kelley said that unlike Republicans in past election cycles, Miami-Dade Democrats aren’t clinging to discredited theories about plots to throw away ballots or hack voting machines. But the “alarming number of purged voters” with D or NPA next to their name should raise concerns, she said, “and it’s our responsibility to double-check that.”

“We’re talking about approximately 210,000 voters, and we have to ask the critical questions about voter suppression and what protocols, documentation and criteria were used to make these determinations to remove them,” she said by phone Monday. “I want to be fair in saying that it’s entirely possible that Democratic and NPA voters may be more transient. But more transient to the number we’re seeing? That’s not something we can just assume happened because everything is being followed correctly, and we need to make sure that what’s being done is being done correctly.”

Chair Laura Kelley said the Miami-Dade Democratic Party needs to do more than just take Alina Garcia at her word. Image via Miami-Dade Dems.

Kelley said Miami-Dade Democrats are collaborating with the Florida Democratic Party — led by ex-Agriculture Commissioner Nikki Fried, the last Democrat to win a statewide race — to get answers.

Both submitted public records requests roughly a month ago. The county party has since received “a number of lists” that includes a partial register of people whom the SOE purged from its voter rolls, Kelley said, but queries the state party sent in and paid for still haven’t been answered.

Kelley said the current mechanism for removing voters from the rolls lends itself to error. People often ignore or throw out mail, or it can get lost. But when a voter learns they’ve been removed or marked as inactive, she said, it can deter them from reengaging with the electoral process.

There’s also a question of whether Garcia’s Office has been unbiased when contacting voters at risk of losing their active status, Kelley continued.

“Let’s be completely transparent: Alina Garcia is an election denier,” she said, referring to Garcia’s equivocation last year when asked whether Trump, who endorsed her, lost the 2020 election to Joe Biden.

“We need to know what efforts are being made to reach out to voters to ensure they’re correctly being removed, and are they being made equally across the board and in all parts of the county, whether they’re highly Democratic or highly Republican?” Kelley said.

Mail and money issues

Kelley also noted the steep drop in requests for mail-in ballots, which Democrats have historically favored far more than Republicans, following a measure (SB 90) the GOP-controlled Legislature passed in 2021 to cancel all standing vote-by-mail requests.

By July 2024, according to POLITICO, 46% fewer Florida voters requested mail-in ballots than they did during the 2022 Midterm. That rate tracked in Miami-Dade, whose Elections Department — then under SOE Christina White, a Democrat whom Republican U.S. Rep. Carlos Giménez appointed in 2015 when he was county Mayor — said its ballot mailouts fell from 392,000 in July 2022 to 215,000 the same month last year.

“If they can send out postcards to voters to tell them they’ve been deactivated, where are the postcards saying, ‘Hey, you previously enrolled in vote-by-mail and here’s how you can re-enroll,” Kelley said. “Why aren’t they trying to do that? Which political party would that help?”

In the last reporting period, the Miami-Dade Democratic Party’s fundraising and operational arm raised about $28,000 through more than 200 direct donations. Its Republican counterpart amassed $12,000 over the same period through fewer than 100 contributions.

Both relied mostly on direct donations of three figures or less.

At the state level, the parties’ gains were the converse and far starker. Last quarter, the Florida Democratic Party raised close to $606,500, bringing its total gains this year to about $974,000. The Republican Party of Florida, meanwhile, added $1.87 million to its coffers in the second quarter and has stacked more than $6.46 million since New Year’s Day.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

AI bill of rights legislation clears its first Senate committee stop

Published

on


A Senate committee advanced a bill to create an artificial intelligence bill of rights aiming to protect consumers and minors.

With unanimous bipartisan support, the Senate Commerce and Tourism Committee backed Sen. Tom Leek’s bill (SB 482).

“Quite simply, we get a 60-day Session once a year. If we don’t act and Congress doesn’t act, those protections won’t exist for Florida’s children and vulnerable adults,” Leek, a Port Orange Republican, told lawmakers before the 10-0 vote Wednesday. “So I believe we have to act.”

Wednesday’s vote was the bill’s first committee stop to support Gov. Ron DeSantis’ agenda as the measure heads next to the Senate Appropriations Committee.

DeSantis has increasingly been calling for more regulation to protect young people from the dangers of AI technology. But President Donald Trump has also been critical of states passing AI reforms and signed an executive order in December aimed at restricting states from overregulating the technology.

Leek argued that his bill doesn’t defy Trump’s order.

“I think the protections that we’ve got here for minors and for vulnerable adults, and for all of us really, are in line with what President Trump wants,” Leek said during Wednesday’s hearing.

Leek argued Trump was striking back against “onerous restrictions,” while his bill was specifically focused on consumer protections.

“It is purposely and deliberately targeted at those protections and not … the universe of things that could be done,” Leek said.

Under Leek’s bill, chatbot platforms would be required to post pop-up warnings that a person is talking to AI. The message would appear at the start of the conversation and reappear at least every hour.

Children would not be allowed to communicate with chatbots without parental permission. Parents would have control to see their child’s communications with the chatbot and could also limit access or delete the child’s account.

The bill would also require minors to be reminded to “take a break” at least once every hour.

Chatbot platform operators that violate the proposed new rules could face civil fines up to $50,000 per violation.

The AI bill of rights legislation comes after a 14-year-old Orlando boy killed himself in 2024 after he had been chatting with an AI bot extensively. Some of the conversations turned sexual and romantic. The family later sued in a case that got national coverage by The New York Times.

“Artificial intelligence, holding a great deal of promise, also poses novel and unique threats. Generative AI in particular can be particularly insidious in some contexts when used by children or unsuspecting or vulnerable or adults,” Leek said at Wednesday’s hearing.

“Given the incredible pace of the evolution of the technology and its adoption by business and academia, it is incumbent on us to protect Floridians for some of its problematic results.”

Several advocates and Democrats praised the bill, while also arguing there was room for improvement in Leek’s legislation.

“We would like to be a part of the conversation,” said Florida AFL-CIO lobbyist Rich Templin. “This is a great consumer protection beginning, but what about workers?”

And Turner Loesel, a technology policy analyst at the James Madison Institute, warned that the bill’s language needed to be tweaked, which Leek teased is coming. Leek said he is still working with stakeholders to tighten the bill’s definitions.

“Its definition of artificial intelligence is broad enough to capture spam filters alongside companion chatbot platforms, and we look forward to the amendments on that definition,” Loesel said.

Sen. Carlos  Guillermo Smith, an Orlando Democrat, called the bill a good first step but also agreed the legislation could be beefed up.

“We need meaningful accountability in the bill. Floridians deserve more than promises. They deserve proof. That means compliance reporting and audits that show companies are actually protecting biometric data, that they’re preventing misuse, and that they’re operating transparently,” Smith said.

“I think relying solely on political actors in the Office of the Attorney General for enforcement is not enough. To stop harmful conduct, I think we need stronger civil protections, including a private cause of action for all ages to defend all of our rights that are outlined in this AI bill of rights.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

As pennies fade away, Senate panel advances Don Gaetz proposal setting cash-rounding rules

Published

on


The rounding requirement would apply only to cash purchases.

A proposal addressing how Florida retailers will handle cash transactions now that pennies are no longer being minted has cleared its first Senate committee stop.

The Senate Commerce and Tourism Committee approved the bill (SB 1074) without debate or amendment. Sen. Don Gaetz, the bill sponsor, told lawmakers that Federal Reserve regional vaults stopped distributing pennies last month, leaving retailers unable to provide exact change in cash transactions when 1-cent coins are unavailable.

“Retailers will have no choice but to round to the nearest nickel for cash customers,” Gaetz said.

“As you know President (Donald) Trump ended the production of pennies, so now we’re moving to a pennyless economy. This bill tries to provide some guidance to help retailers know how to proceed.”

Under the bill, in-person cash transactions ending in 1 or 2 cents would be rounded down, while amounts ending in 3 or 4 cents would be rounded up to the nearest nickel. Transactions ending in 6 or 7 cents would be rounded down to a nickel, and those ending in 8 or 9 cents would be rounded up to the nearest dime.

The rounding requirement would apply only to cash purchases. Sales tax would be calculated before rounding occurs, ensuring the amount of tax owed does not increase or decrease because of the adjustment.

SB 1074 also amends Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act to specify that rounding cash transactions under these circumstances would not constitute a deceptive or unfair trade practice.

The Senate bill now advances to the Finance and Tax Committee, its second of three committee stops.

Sarasota Republican Rep. Fiona McFarland filed HB 951, the House version of the proposal, earlier this month.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

UWF analysis on ‘puppy mills’ leads to consumer protection investigation

Published

on


Attorney General James Uthmeier issued a report this week concluding that deceptive sales of pets have ripped off Floridians to the tune of $25.1 million annually.

The analysis focused largely on the sale of puppies in the state. The report found that at least 80% of young canines sold in Florida are sourced from breeders in other states in so-called “puppy mills.”

Since those animals usually undergo extensive transport to get to Florida, the puppies often arrive sick or mischaracterized in their breeds, which ultimately results in substantial vet bills for families.

The research was conducted by the University of West Florida’s Haas Center, an economic impact and workforce survey arm of the Panhandle campus. Uthmeier said the results led to his Office launching a consumer protection investigation into deceptive sales, sick animals and predatory financing schemes.

“Florida families deserve fair and honest business practices,” Uthmeier said. “This report exposes how deceptive retailers and shady lenders are preying on consumers who are bringing a pet into their family. Our office is opening a formal investigation into the lenders and retailers pushing these predatory loans for sick puppies.”

The 90-page report, “The Cost of Deception: How Sick Pets Drain Florida’s Economy,” also outlines the difficult conditions puppies face on their way to Florida.

As many as 120 puppies can be crammed into one van and transported thousands of miles, with few exams by veterinarians and hardly any oversight. That creates conditions for the spread of disease, which often leads to pricey veterinarian bills.

The report also found that some pet sales involve big retailers that include store-brand credit cards with interest rates as high as 35.9%, along with hidden fees and “deferred interest” in promotions.

“A $5,000 pet purchase can ultimately cost families as much as $16,000 under these terms,” a news release said.

The counties with the most complaints about puppy problems include Orange, Pinellas, Duval, Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach.

The UWF analysis also provided some recommendations, including increasing consumer protections and oversight for breeders and transporters. Researchers also suggest the state modernize pet lemon laws and restrict questionable financing practices.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.