Miami Beach is expected to soon become the latest locality to receive a Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) order to remove its rainbow roadway markings recognizing the LGBTQ community.
City officials say they won’t comply easily.
Commissioner Joseph Magazine said on Facebook that FDOT informed Miami Beach that the city “must remove all ‘artistic crosswalks,’ specifically the rainbow colored crosswalk on Ocean Drive and 12th Street, which has for so long stood as a welcoming sign to our LGBT community.”
“This is complete and utter bullshit that the state has no business getting involved in,” he said. “I am unequivocal in my support and championing of our LGBT community and that crosswalk was a welcome sign for everyone. It bothered no one.”
Commissioner Alex Fernandez, Miami Beach’s only openly gay elected local official, said he and others at City Hall anticipate receiving formal notice from the state to remove the crosswalk, which was installed in 2018.
The state gave similar orders recently to Delray Beach and Key West, which also plan to fight the mandate.
FDOT has warned that noncompliance beyond Sept. 3 could lead to state funding cuts or direct removal of the markings by the agency.
“As I’ve repeatedly stated, we must appeal this order once it is received and resist. Our Pride crosswalk was properly approved, it is safe, and it reflects the values of inclusion that define Miami Beach,” Fernandez said. “At a time when Floridians face real challenges, this is a distraction and a solution in search of a problem.”
Miami Beach Republican Rep. Fabián Basabe, who voted in 2023 to expand Florida’s restrictions on classroom LGBTQ inclusion to all public school grades, sent Purdue a letter Tuesday requesting a public hearing on the matter.
“My LGBTQ community in particular has expressed that they constantly feel under attack,” he wrote. “It is important to me that the State listen to these voices directly, in a fair and transparent process that respects everyone who calls Miami Beach home.”
In a separate statement, Basabe called debate over the crosswalk “performative politics … Miami Beach leaders have chosen (to use as) another staged distraction.”
“Instead of working on affordability, safety, and accountability … they want to fight over symbols rather than do the work of fixing what is broken,” he said, adding that the city’s Pride Parkis “the appropriate place” for rainbow markings, “not the middle of an active roadway.”
The relatively new state rules stem from a June 30memo by FDOT Assistant Secretary Will Watts, who wrote that “non-standard surface markings, signage, and signals that do not directly contribute to traffic safety” could jeopardize driver and pedestrian safety.
“Examples of non-compliant surface pavement would include any pavement markings … associated with social, political, or ideological message or images and does not serve the purpose of traffic control,” Watts wrote.
Sharing the memo on X two days later, FDOT Secretary Jared Perdue noted that the rules are supported by guidance President Donald Trump’s administration released July 1 that roads “are for safety, not political messages or artwork” and that Governors should remove any such markings from their streets.
“Great to now have our federal partners also aligned behind this same common-sense policy,” he said.
Other cities are bracing for similar scrutiny. Fort Lauderdale Mayor Dean Trantalis said he expects that FDOT will question his city’s street art, while Wilton Manors officials argue their rainbow bridge artwork shouldn’t be considered noncompliant, since it’s only on the side of the structure.
There are also rainbow crosswalks in Orlando and St. Petersburg. Others in Boynton Beach, Gainesville and West Palm Beach have complied, or are complying, with FDOT’s order.
Magazine said he will file a resolution next month to accept two benches for Lummus Park near the city’s crosswalk for residents to paint “in the same rainbow design.” He vowed to pay for the benches.
“As I will be purchasing the benches, NO taxpayer dollars will be used,” he said. “I already want to take that talking point away.”
Florida Democrats say an amendment shot down by the U.S. House Rules Committee could have protected the Everglades from energy exploration.
U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Weston Democrat, pushed for a change in language in the Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act (HR 3668) during Committee proceedings. That bill, filed by U.S. Rep. Richard Hudson, a North Carolina Republican, would expedite review of natural gas or liquified gas pipelines by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).
Wasserman Schultz’s amendment to the bill would have excluded the Everglades and other Florida navigable waters from that change, still requiring extensive review to put a pipeline through Florida’s largestnational park. However, the Rules Committee did not allow the amendment to come to a vote.
“While we spend billions to restore the Everglades, House Republicans voted to pollute it,” Wasserman Schultz posted on social media.
She said the amendment was worked on with the support of most Democrats in Florida’s congressional delegation, including U.S. Reps. Kathy Castor, Lois Frankel, Darren Soto and Frederica Wilson. Wasserman Schultz is the Democratic co-chair of the congressional delegation.
The proposed change “tried to exempt the Everglades from this dirty water bill, but House Republicans rejected it,” Wasserman Schultz said.
Republicans characterized the legislation differently, with some members from Florida.
U.S. Rep. Cory Mills, a New Smyrna Beach Republican, said he supported advancing the bill from the Committee to the floor.
“I voted to support HR 3668, the Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act, to cut red tape and speed up approvals for natural gas pipelines and LNG terminals,” he posted. “This bill puts FERC in charge of NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) reviews, sets strict timelines, improves agency coordination and strengthens pipeline security. This is how we lower energy costs and boost American energy independence.”
FERC is responsible for reviewing and issuing permits for new or expanded gas lines. The legislation, as written, would shift oversight responsibilities from state governments to the agency and eliminate the need for state certifications.
Democratic U.S. Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick is staying true to the old maxim, “Never let a crisis go to waste.”
This week, her re-election campaign sent texts to voters imploring them to donate to help her in “fighting back” against what she calls a “politically motivated” attack against her.
She’s referring, of course, to federal charges filed in November accusing her of stealing $5 million in Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funds to bankroll her 2021 congressional campaign.
“2 weeks ago, I took a stand and voted to demand transparency, truth and accountability from our leaders. The next day, the attacks began. An indictment was filed. This was not random. This was politically motivated retaliation,” the text said.
“But this isn’t about silencing one person. It’s about sending a clear message to anyone who dares to challenge powerful interests: ‘Fall in line — or pay the price. Well, I’m fighting back — but I need you with me. DONATE NOW.”
The text then links to a donations pagethat, among other things, says, “She voted for the truth. They answered with retaliation.”
The fundraising text.
A perusal of Cherfilus-McCormick’s votes from around two weeks back reveals what she is likely referring to: “yes” votes on measures concerning the release of files connected to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Notably, none of the 426 other members of the House who voted to release the Epstein files were federally indicted for embezzling COVID funds in recent weeks.
The grand jury indictment against Cherfilus-McCormick, announced Nov. 19, alleges she and her brother secured funding intended for a COVID vaccine distribution program, but when overpayments were made, she rerouted the money through several accounts that later donated to her campaign.
U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi described the alleged act as “a particularly selfish, cynical crime.”
Cherfilus-McCormick, 46, has maintained and reiterated that she is innocent of wrongdoing, calling the charges “unjust” and “baseless.”
“The timing alone is curious and clearly meant to distract from far more pressing national issues,” she said a day after the indictment was announced, noting that she has “fully cooperated” with a yearslong investigation into the matter. “I look forward to my day in court. Until then, I will continue fighting for my constituents.”
The fundraising site.
Should Cherfilus-McCormick be found guilty of all counts in the indictment, she could face up to 53 years in prison.
Cherfilus-McCormick isn’t the only federal lawmaker from Florida to fundraise off of her legal travails. Last year, following a House Ethics Committee report that there was “substantial evidence” he paid for sex, including with a 17-year-old, former U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz sent out a fundraising plea citing his troubles.
“I need your help,” Gaetz, a Republican, said in an email through his political committee last December. “I’ve fought for you in Congress for eight years against the worst of the Radical Left and Uniparty. Now, they’re seeking their revenge.”
Gaetz, who resigned the month before, called the scrutiny over his alleged impropriety a “witch hunt.”
Former Republican U.S. Rep. George Santos of Long Island used the exact phrase to describe the fraud and money-laundering charges he faced in May 2023, about seven months before his peers in the House expelled him.
Republican U.S. Rep. Greg Steube introduced a resolutionlast month to expel Cherfilus-McCormick. Other than its referral to the Ethics Committee, no action has been taken on the bill.
Cherfilus-McCormick represents Florida’s 20th Congressional District, which spans parts of Broward and Palm Beach counties. She faces Primary challenges from Dale Holness and Elijah Manley, the latter of whom she is suing for defamation over the FEMA funds issue.
Republicans Sendra Dorce and Rodenay Joseph are also running in the district, which leans heavily Democratic.
Florida Politics contacted Cherfilus-McCormick’s Communications Director, Kailyn McBride, seeking comment about the Congresswoman’s texts, but received no response.
Toxic PFAS “forever chemicals” are found in nearly half of all U.S. drinking water. These harmful chemicals are linked to cancer, developmental issues, and immune system damage. They enter our water systems through industrial discharges, firefighting foams, and landfill runoff. Once present, they are nearly impossible to remove using traditional methods.
For years, families, utilities, and local governments have faced a difficult choice: accept unsafe water or pay for costly, slow, and incomplete cleanup methods.
After 10 years of research and development, Eco World Water has the solution.
At Eco World Water, we have completed four months of rigorous pilot testing with an independent laboratory, under protocols reviewed by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. The verified lab results confirm that our system can reduce PFAS to non-detectable levels in a safe, reliable, and quick manner. More importantly, the system produces clean, safe water in minutes, not days.
For a national problem needing a scalable solution, this is a breakthrough with transformative potential.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) earned the nickname “forever chemicals” for a good reason. They persist in the environment for decades, are resistant to conventional treatment, and pose serious risks to public health. That is why our verified results are so significant.
For too long, PFAS have been viewed as an unsolvable challenge. We can now say with confidence: problem solved. Our system demonstrates that communities don’t have to accept “forever chemicals” as a fact of life. PFAS-free water is not theoretical. It’s operational.
Just as important, Eco World Water’s patented, modular technology is a complete, all-in-one system built for permanent installation. It takes up significantly less space than traditional wastewater treatment systems and can be scaled to meet the needs of communities, large or small. Its modular design also enables a version that fits inside a shipping container, ideal for rapid deployment to disaster relief zones or remote locations where clean water is urgently needed.
The system turns raw wastewater into water that meets drinking quality standards, not just removing PFAS, but also eliminating a wide range of harmful contaminants like heavy metals, pharmaceuticals, and pathogens. It’s fast, compact, and easy to operate, bringing clean water where it’s needed most, without the delays or complexity of traditional systems.
This is the result of more than 10 years of focused research and development. Eco World Water’s mission is simple: give every community access to clean, safe, and affordable water. With these latest independent lab-verified results, we are delivering on that mission.
This progress comes at a crucial moment in the quest for clean water.
States across the country are preparing for more demanding PFAS standards and increased federal oversight. Billions of dollars in federal infrastructure funding are available to support water system upgrades. Yet many communities still lack tools that can meet those expectations. Our technology can adapt to the needs of each site and provides a clear, cost-effective path toward compliance with new federal mandates.
Families deserve water they can trust. Local governments deserve options that don’t strain their budgets. Communities deserve solutions that meet the urgency of the clean water moment.
Eco World Water is ready to deliver.
After decades of frustration and uncertainty, we now have a verified solution. Water with undetectable PFAS levels is not just an aspiration. It’s a proven, tested reality.
___
Steve Adelstein is the Executive Chair of Eco World Water.