Connect with us

Business

Luigi Mangione is seeking to avoid the death penalty after Attorney General’s public comments are blasted as a ‘political stunt’

Published

on



  • Luigi Mangione, accused of murdering UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, is seeking to avoid the death penalty by arguing that Attorney General Pamela Bondi’s public comments and political framing of the case have violated his right to a fair trial. His legal team claims Bondi’s statements, which presume Mangione’s guilt and promote a political agenda, have prejudiced the jury pool and corrupted the judicial process.

Luigi Mangione, the 26-year-old man accused of murdering UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in New York last year, is seeking to avoid the death penalty in the state by saying his case has become politicized.

Mangione has pleaded not guilty to state and federal murder charges after Thompson was gunned down outside a hotel in Manhattan in December. A manhunt for Thompson’s killer ensued after the perpetrator fled the scene on a bike and escaped via Central Park.

An Ivy League graduate and UPenn alumnus, Mangione was arrested in Pennsylvania in connection with the case and was subsequently charged.

Thompson’s murder sparked a widespread conversation about healthcare in America, as well as some ugly reactions. Some people have chosen to support Mangione for his alleged action, believing he was challenging the status quo of corporate America.

Despite Mangione amassing supporters, high-profile individuals also called for the heaviest of sentences for the suspect accused of murdering Thompson, a father of two.

Attorney General Pamela Bondi was one of them, saying on April 1: “I have directed federal prosecutors to seek the death penalty in this case as we carry out President Trump’s agenda to stop violent crime and Make America Safe Again.”

Bondi followed up the statement with a shared post on the U.S. Justice Department’s Instagram page, which read: “Luigi Mangione’s murder of Brian Thompson—an innocent man and father of two young children—was a premeditated, cold-blooded assassination that shocked America.”

This statement is highly unusual, as it states that Mangione has committed the crime he is on trial for—a direct contraction of his legal right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Moreover, Bondi’s statement presents further legal ramifications for Mangione’s right to a fair trial, protected under the Sixth Amendment.

Chief among the issues is that potential jurors for the trial—tasked with having no prejudice about the defendant before proceedings begin—may be influenced by Bondi’s statement and presume his guilt instead of being convinced by evidence.

Once again, Mangione’s right to an impartial jury is constitutionally protected.

As such, Bondi’s statement—complete with a name drop for President Trump and implied guilt on the part of a suspect who has yet to go before trial—has been blasted by Mangione’s defense team as a “political stunt.”

In a filing on Friday seen by Fortune, Mangione’s team wrote: “The stakes could not be higher. The United States government intends to kill Mr. Mangione as a political stunt … the Attorney General’s actions and public statements in this case have not followed the usual course.

“Because the Attorney General has chosen to proceed in this way, Mr. Mangione’s due process rights have already been violated and the manner in which the government has acted has prejudiced the grand jury pool and has corrupted the grand jury process.”

The White House and the Department of Justice have been approached by Fortune for comment.

Avoiding the death sentence

Mangione’s team is seeking to avoid the death sentence because of Bondi’s actions.

The filing explains: “Because the Attorney General’s direction to the [Southern District of New York] prosecutors—issued publicly, as a press release—to seek a death sentence for Mr. Mangione is political, arbitrary, capricious, a breach of established death penalty protocol and has now indelibly prejudiced this process, the government should be precluded from seeking the death penalty.”

Mangione’s lawyers have also demanded a list of actions be taken to ensure their client’s right to a fair trial, including screening grand jurors for exposure to Bondi’s public statements and “restraining” Bondi from making any further statements.

They also request that Bondi confirm she has read legal materials outlining a suspect’s right to a fair trial.

Moreover, the defense has asked for notes and documents sharing how the Southern District of New York considered a death penalty option, and asked the “government to produce … any emails, records, documents, memoranda and notes of any communication between a government official and anyone advocating for the death sentence.”

On day one of her role as attorney general, Bondi penned a note titled ‘Reviving The Federal Death Penalty And Lifting The Moratorium On Federal Executions.’

Representatives for Mangione’s lawyers told Fortune they had no further comment.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Ulta Beauty says online shopping habits are changing. Here’s how the retailer invests in tech to keep up

Published

on

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

RTX warns of potential $850M hit from tariffs as defense companies grapple with fallout of rising costs

Published

on

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

The companies that had the best shareholder return in the previous recessions did these 3 key things

Published

on



While a recession isn’t guaranteed in 2025, Wall Street’s increasing bets on one will have businesses eyeing cost-saving measures to prepare themselves for negative repercussions from President Donald Trump’s tariff maneuverings.

In bids to save costs and weather the economic headwinds, some firms are even resorting to large-scale layoffs. 

Siemens is letting go of 5,600 staff around the world, while job cuts at HP will impact around 2,000 members of its workforce.

Yet there is good data to show that there is more to surviving a recession than cuts—and actually now might be the time to grab market share and reinvest into the business. 

McKinsey studied around 1,200 public companies in the U.S. and Europe during the Great Recession (2007–11) and the peak of the coronavirus pandemic (2020–21) and found that the companies that had the best shareholder return during this period were the ones that did three things: improved margins, decreased their financial leverage, and timed it all perfectly before the economy hit rock bottom. 

Lesson 1: Improve margins as economies tilt into recession

McKinsey’s research shows that across sectors, leaders who worked to improve their margins or grow their revenue early on during a recession experienced better total shareholder return through the economic cycle than their peers. Essentially, boosting margins allows companies to squirrel away more capital.

“Strong margins help a company ease through macro headwinds; many companies achieve margin strength by improving operating efficiency through upskilling and digital innovation that increases frontline productivity,” the report says.

The key is that improving margins early produced bigger gains in performance than early-cycle revenue growth did. Meanwhile, businesses that led in revenue growth but lagged behind peers on EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) margin performance didn’t come out of either recession on top.

The study maintains that this means leaders must look to both long-term growth opportunities, as well as short-term “timely jolts”.

Lesson 2: Optionality in the balance sheet is vital

History has shown that businesses that do the little things to grow retained earnings, improve working capital, and lower their debt burden outperform those that don’t.

Optionality in the balance sheet—a combination of growth in retained earnings and improvement in working capital, on one hand, and a decrease in financial leverage, on the other—is particularly helpful going into and coming out of a period of constrained credit.

This was less important during the last economic downturn in 2020 when interest rates were low. However, building optionality during the 2007-2008 financial crash—when interest rates started at a level comparable to today—was key to success.

Likewise, companies refinancing their debt face considerably higher expenses than they did in the past, due to the rise in interest rates in recent years. They must decrease their financial leverage and reinvest in new opportunities to drive growth and productivity, or “pursue accretive M&A as the economy begins to rebound” to outperform competitors. 

“Companies with deep and flexible balance sheets not only have better protection against the risks of economic slowdown but also have reserve funds to pursue the valuable growth opportunities that the recovery phase of a recession brings,” the report adds.

Lesson 3: Timing and balance are key

Companies must take a balanced approach to growth, margin improvements, and balance sheet optionality.

Interestingly, businesses that were in the top 20 to 40% on all three dimensions outperformed those that excelled on only one dimension and fell into the bottom 60% on others. So a balanced performance across all three delivered better returns than an outstanding performance on one factor alone.

But most importantly, they acted proactively rather than reactively.

Companies that got their ducks in a row before the economy hit rock bottom were able to use the strength of their balance sheets to invest in the business, such as by acquiring new businesses or staff members. 

Indeed industries that are cash-rich or have longer investment horizons are better positioned to do this. But overall, the strategy of increasing growth and margin levers in advance, rather than making last-minute drastic cuts, has been proven to work across every sector. 

As McKinsey says in its report: “It’s clear that moving early in the recovery cycle brings outsize rewards.”

A version of this story originally published on Fortune.com on Jan. 16, 2023.

More on management:

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.