Connect with us

Politics

Legislation on former phosphate mining lands in next committee

Published

on


The legislation creates a defense that is centered on transparency and public health assurances related to former phosphate mines.

The Senate Environment and Natural Resources Committee unanimously advanced a measure that seeks to limit the liability of owners of former phosphate mining lands if they meet certain requirements.

Zephyrhills Republican Sen. Danny Burgess presented the bill (SB 832). Burgess explained that landowners would be able to go through a new process to record public notice about their lands former use as a mine, as well as have a radiation survey conducted by the Department of Health (DOH).

“Senate Bill 832 is an act related to former phosphate mining lands,” Burgess said. “This bill provides a new process for landowners of former phosphate mines to record a public notice that their land is a former phosphate mine, and to also have a radiation survey conducted by DOH on their land. If they take both of these steps, that landowner can then assert a much needed and incredibly narrow defense provided by this bill against strict liability lawsuits.”

Burgess said the bill is narrow and would require that certain lawsuits include documents from certified health experts to ensure lawsuits regarding public health and safety are based on science.

“The defense created by this bill is centered on transparency and public health assurances,” Burgess said. “It is only against one specific kind of claim, that brings strict liability, or what is otherwise known as automatic liability, and it is only for lands that were once mined for phosphates, which as we all know is a naturally occurring geological feature in the state of Florida.”

One amendment was adopted that Burgess explained was based on public feedback received during the bill’s stop in the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“In the spirit of working through this as we go through the process, based on feedback in the last committee, this amendment does two things to address some concerns that were raised,” Burgess said. “Number one it removes the statement about the necessity of phosphate mining, we received feedback that it was superfluous language, and we decided to take that out. The amendment also makes it clear that when a study takes place, the landowner who requested it is responsible for paying for the study, and this was done to clarify the who pays scenario.”

The bill will now go to the Senate Rules Committee.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Bill to establish rules for student athlete compensation advances

Published

on


The House Education and Employment Committee passed a measure Wednesday that seeks to establish rules and protections regarding student athlete representation and compensation for the use of their name, image, and likeness (NIL).

Naples Republican Rep. Yvette Benarroch presented the bill (HB 981) and explained that the legislation would limit what athlete agents are able to receive from NIL earnings and would create transparency by establishing a public database of agents.

“This bill protects student athletes by placing a 5% cap on the fees athlete agents can collect from new name, imagine, and likeness or NIL contracts, involving NIL collectives,” Benarroch said. “It also allows high student athletes, not just seniors, to earn NIL compensation if they’re being recruited to play sports.”

Benarroch said that student athletes would be able to seek advice, while audit requirements would be removed.

“Additionally, the bill ensures student athletes can seek advice from coaches, economic advisers, or their school registered advisers, with parental consent required for minors,” Benarroch said. “Finally, it removes an unnecessary Department of Education audit requirement, as schools are only required to maintain a list of registered advisers.”

“The bill is a balanced approach that protects student athletes, ensures transparency, and promotes responsible NIL participation,” Benarroch added.

An amendment was adopted that clarifies that the 5% cap only applies to collectives and does not require a student athlete to register compensation with the Florida High School Athletic Association. It further clarifies that a high school student may earn compensation for name, image, or likeness and must get parental consent if the student athlete is under the age of 18.

Sarasota Republican Rep. Fiona McFarland thanked Benarroch for the bill and for taking suggestions into consideration after the last committee stop.

“This bill has made a great improvement, and I know that you will continue to do so as it completes its journey through the committee process,” McFarland said. “As it moves forward, I still have some concerns about this new category we’re creating of a registered adviser. Perhaps outlining where the adviser needs to register, that feels like a very formal title to me.”

McFarland added that she also has concerns over public high school coaches having an alternative revenue source through NIL deals when they’re being paid by Florida taxpayers.

“Those are two very separate activities in my mind, and I know that your heart for protecting our student athletes will dive into these issues,” she said.

Jacksonville Democratic Rep. Kimberly Daniels supported the bill and said she would like to sign on as a co-sponsor and encouraged her colleagues to do the same.

“Representative Benarroch, thank you for this great bill,” Daniels said. “It’s awesome the work that you’re doing and I’m even going to sign on as a co-sponsor and ask my colleagues to do the same.”

North Miami Beach Democratic Rep. Wallace Aristide also supported the bill and noted that he has personal experience with student athletes as an educator and pointed out that his son is a football coach at Texas A&M.

“I’ve been around football all my life, my son is a football coach at Texas A&M, there’s really a tremendous issue, it’s a major problem, families will understand,” Aristide said. “See, there’s a real-life thing happening here, and sometimes when you don’t really know about it, you’re not in the middle of it, where people are getting cars, we’re they’re going leasing cars, some very young people, that advantage can be taken, they could be taken advantage of.”

Aristide added that he understands concerns over high school coaches and said there are people who would take advantage of young student athletes who find themselves suddenly with a lot of money.

“This is a major concern, and I understand about the coaches who don’t get paid a whole lot, they’re going to be given a whole lot of responsibility, because the parents come and they listen to the coaches, they build relationships with the coaches,” Aristide said. “This is going to be a problem that is going to explode eventually, because you’ve got people who are predators, they’re going to try to take advantage of these families, so I want to thank you for bringing this.”


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Gift card fraud bills charged for floor votes

Published

on


Companion bills designed to crack down on gift card fraud in Florida are close to passing. Both await floor votes.

Members of the House Judiciary Committee voted unanimously Wednesday to advance HB 1007, which would codify language and punishments specific to gift card fraud in Florida Statutes.

Senate lawmakers did the same for the bill’s upper-chamber analog (SB 1198) Tuesday.

The House bill’s sponsor, St. Augustine Republican Rep. Sam Greco, a lawyer, said the crime his legislation aims to address “has victimized many Floridians in recent years.”

“These schemes have resulted in meaningful financial losses for both consumers and businesses, while our law enforcement and State Attorneys lack the necessary tools to combat this misconduct effectively,” he said.

“The bill aims to protect Floridians from exploitation and give our police and prosecutors the tools they need to hold bad actors accountable.”

SB 1198 and HB 1007 differ slightly in language, but their effects are essentially the same. If passed, the legislation would:

— Establish clear definitions for gift cards and terms related to their use and misuse.

— Make committing gift card fraud a first-degree misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in jail and $1,000 in fines.

— Increase the penalty to a third-degree felony, punishable by up to five years in prison and $5,000 in fines, if the value of ill-gotten money, goods or services exceeds $750.

Representatives from the International Council of Shopping Centers, Florida Chamber of Commerce, Florida Retail Federation, Florida Restaurant and Lodging Association, Associated Industries of Florida, Florida Smart Justice Alliance, AARP and Interactive Communications International support the legislation.

In 2023 alone, gift card-related fraud accounted for $217 million of the record $10 billion lost in scams across the U.S., according to Federal Trade Commission data.

In Florida, there have been many news reports about gift card fraudsters getting caught.

Democratic Rep. Dan Daley, a Broward County prosecutor, said the state’s existing petit theft laws aren’t sufficient in tamping down on gift card fraud.

“This is not a person that’s going in and just taking a gift card or two off the shelf,” he said.

“This is a complicated scheme where they’re going in, taking as many as they can, taking them home, stripping them out of the packaging, taking down the information, repackaging it, putting it back in the store, somebody’s unexpectedly buying them and giving them to a loved one — a family member, whatever — as a gift, and when there’s money loaded onto the card (the criminal takes) the money. … So, very complicated, very complex.”

St. Petersburg Sen. Nick DiCeglie is carrying SB 1198.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Claims bill clearing $1.2M payment to Pasco man maimed in school bus crash advances to House floor

Published

on


Florida lawmakers are closer than they’ve ever been to helping a man who suffered life-altering injuries in a devastating crash nearly two decades ago.

Members of the House Judiciary Committee voted unanimously for HB 6507, which would authorize Pasco County Schools to pay $1 million to Marcus Button and $200,000 to his mother, Robin Button, for pain, suffering, costs and lost wages due to a 2006 collision with a school bus.

The bill is now heading to the House floor. So far, it hasn’t received a single “no” vote in the chamber.

Meanwhile, the bill’s Senate twin (SB 8) has cleared two of three committee stops. That’s further than any prior version of the measure has gotten since former Sen. Mike Fasano filed the original legislation in 2010.

HB 6507 and SB 8 are claims bills, a special classification of legislation intended to compensate a person or entity for injury or loss due to the negligence or error of a public officer or agency.

Claims bills arise when appropriate damages exceed what is allowable under Florida’s sovereign immunity law, which protects government agencies from costly lawsuits by capping payouts — today — at $200,000 per person and $300,000 per incident. For payments beyond those sums, legislative action is necessary.

Marcus Button was 16 on Sept. 22, 2006, when his friend was driving him to their high school. A school bus driver pulled out in front of Jessica Juettner’s car on State Road 54. It was later determined that bus driver John E. Kinne, whose only other passenger was a backup driver, failed to yield the right-of-way.

The car struck the bus between its wheels, slipping under the larger vehicle. Button, who was riding in the front seat and allegedly not wearing a seatbelt, struck the windshield headfirst, sustaining facial and skull fractures, brain damage and vision loss.

Button had to relearn to walk, still suffers from pain, is mostly blind in his right eye and has no sense of smell, among other chronic issues. He also now speaks with a British accent due to foreign accent syndrome, a speech disorder associated with traumatic brain injury. He also endures visual and auditory hallucinations that contribute to chronic paranoia.

Button’s parents sued the Pasco County School Board in 2007 and ultimately won a $1.38 million settlement for Button and $289,000 for themselves. But Button and his mother have seen just $163,000 due to Florida’s statutory limits.

For the past two years, Tallahassee Sen. Corey Simon and Pensacola Rep. Alex Andrade, both Republicans, have been sponsoring Button’s claims bill. They were the first to take up the cause since 2020, when former Senate Democratic Leader Audrey Gibson filed a comparable measure with no House companion.

It died without a hearing, as did prior efforts by former Republican Sen. Miguel Díaz de la Portilla in 2012 and 2013, and former Republican Sen. Denise Grimsley in 2014, 2015 and 2017.

The Pasco County School Board supports Simon and Andrade’s legislation.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.