Connect with us

Politics

Ken Welch can’t save the street murals, but he will fight back

Published

on


St. Petersburg Mayor Ken Welch says the city has no choice but to allow the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to remove several street murals the state deemed noncompliant with a recent executive mandate.

The state has targeted five street murals in the city, including a Pride flag design in the Grand Central district and a Black History Matters street mural on the south side near the Woodson African American History Museum. Welch has said FDOT will remove the murals at the city’s expense.

But while the initial decision came with pushback, Welch defended his administration during a press conference at City Hall, noting that pushing back against the state was a losing strategy.

“When FDOT informed us that our non-standard surface markings, our street murals, had to be removed, we pushed back, utilizing every viable tool available to us. We submitted the requested inventories, we requested exemptions, we consulted with our attorneys and spoke with our stakeholders,” Welch said.

“We also provided data that shows that the markings actually increased safety based on historical data before and after the installation of the subject art. We made it clear that these murals are more than paint on pavement. They are expressions of our community identity and values.”

Unfortunately, he added, “FDOT made their position clear,” threatening “millions of dollars in state transportation funding and potentially tens of millions more in broader state funding in other areas” if the city did not comply with removal.

“As Mayor of our city, I will not risk these essential investments in a fight that I don’t believe we can win,” Welch said. “That would be irresponsible leadership and detrimental to our city in the long run.”

Instead, Welch said the city is already engaged in conversations about how best to honor St. Pete’s diverse communities and culture through public art installations on private and/or city-owned properties.

“Our response will be strategic, not reactionary. It may not be as emotionally satisfying as a street brawl,” Welch said. “We will build back stronger, and we will create new, even more powerful expressions of who we are, expressions that cannot be erased.”

Welch did not say when FDOT will remove the murals — they have yet to inform the city — but he encouraged residents to visit the murals while they still can and memorialize them with photographs. He also suggested sharing the images with hashtags such as “our streets, our voices,” and “can’t erase St. Pete.”

The intersections in question are at Central Avenue and 5th Street North; 6th Avenue and 2nd Street South; 9th Avenue and 22nd Lane South; Central Avenue and 25th Street North; and 11th Avenue and 46th Street South.

The inclusive Pride flag design is located at the Central Avenue intersection in Grand Central, while the Black History Matters mural is at 9th Avenue South in the Deuces.

The mural at 6th Avenue South, known as the Fluid Structures mural, is located at the University of South Florida St. Pete campus and was created by students “to reflect a new generation’s vision for St. Pete,” Welch said. It is not representative of the LGBTQ+ community or the Black Lives Matter movement, rather a series of brightly colored shapes and designs.

Another mural, located on Central Avenue in downtown St. Pete, is known as the Common Ground mural. It includes brightly colored geometric shapes that actually decreased traffic accidents at the intersection by 70%, according to Welch.

The Crux mural in Child’s Park, which was painted with local children, was designed specifically to reduce speed and increase safety for drivers, pedestrians and cyclists.

While Welch emphasized the city’s lack of options in fighting the street mural battle, he nevertheless expressed frustration with the latest in a long line of home rule attacks on Florida cities.

“It is always troubling when state or federal politicians attempt to usurp our local values and priorities, and instead mandate what our values should be,” he said. “We have seen repeated attempts to silence our voices, to change the definition of terms from ‘climate change’ to DEI, even banning the recognition of Black history and the LGBTQ community.”

But Welch said the city is resilient, and always rises to the occasion.

“This latest challenge will be no exception,” he said.

“Whatever is taken away will be replaced in new, more impactful ways,” the Mayor added. “And to those who think they can silence St. Petersburg, all you have done is amplify our voice. Our message will now travel farther and louder than ever before.”

While Welch is encouraging residents and visitors to view the murals while they still can, he also offered a warning rooted in actions in another city. Groups in Orlando gathered with sidewalk chalk to recolor a mural that had been erased at the site of the horrific 2016 mass shooting at the Pulse nightclub after the state erased the mural in the dead of night.

“Obey the law,” Welch said. “Don’t take the bait.”

Blocking an intersection, he reminded, is illegal, and Florida Highway Patrol is now out in force in Orlando enforcing that law.

Welch said he isn’t yet sure what would replace the doomed murals, adding that it could be public art on banners, poles or flags. He’s putting “all the creative minds in our city” on it.

St. Pete’s latest on its street murals follows threatening letters sent to several cities. St. Pete’s latest letter, which prompted Welch’s announcement that the city would not continue to fight the state on the issue, came Friday.

The letter stated that St. Pete was not in compliance with the Engineering and Operations Memorandum No. 25-01 regarding traffic control and street design, issued by Gov. Ron DeSantis.


Post Views: 0



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Ron DeSantis says most Floridians won’t notice ‘schools of hope,’ as they will be in places most people don’t go

Published

on


Gov. Ron DeSantis is strongly advocating for the “Schools of Hope” model, which would co-locate charter schools in underused public school facilities.

And as DeSantis said in Orlando, the facilities primarily will cater to children whose parents aren’t doing as much as some others, in places most people wouldn’t even go, with tonier communities insulated from the concept.

“You’re really relieving burdens on the district, right? Because, you know, you’re creating a program where it is going to be targeted at … the least-advantaged students. And in areas where a lot of people say it’s not even worth trying,” DeSantis said.

It’s unclear which people are allegedly saying it’s not worth “trying” to educate some students but not others.

But worries that they will be in places like Windermere or Palm Beach are misplaced, DeSantis said.

“This is not going to be something where a school of hope is going to be coming in and descending on Palm Harbor or Destin or some of these places,” he said, singling out two wealthy communities where more than 80% of residents are White.

He reassured parents that these schools of hope won’t come in where “my Sally or my Johnny goes,” but instead would be in “some hard areas in Miami. Probably Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, probably Orlando, maybe Tampa, maybe Jacksonville.”

In these areas, DeSantis predicts the Schools of Hope will largely go unnoticed.

“I don’t think most Floridians are even going to know that there’s a school of hope. Because quite frankly, probably where they’re setting up, already a lot of Floridians aren’t spending a lot of time in some of these areas, but they’re going to go in,” DeSantis said.

Regardless of whether residents are aware of the schools, DeSantis made it clear his preferred vendor would be the Success Academies championed by arguably his leading political patron over the years, billionaire Ken Griffin.

Griffin has already pledged to devote $50 million to expanding the concept in Florida.

“It’s a difficult mission, but at least with Success Academy, you have an operator who’s been able to do some really, really great things,” DeSantis said.

He credits Success Academies with having “gone into the worst areas in terms of opportunity … the most at-risk … areas where no one else wants to go.”

Lots of vendors want into the taxpayer-subsidized space.

As of last month, 22 School Districts across the state have received at least 690 letters of intent from charter school operators, according to data gathered by the Florida Policy Institute, a member of the Florida Coalition for Thriving Public Schools.

School Districts reporting letters as of mid-November include Brevard, Broward, Collier, Duval, Hillsborough, Indian River, Lake, Lee, Manatee, Miami-Dade, Orange, Osceola, Palm Beach, Pasco, Pinellas, Polk, St. Johns, St. Lucie, Sarasota, Seminole, Sumter and Volusia counties.

The letters, sent by privately operated charter school organizations, seek to occupy portions of public schools the state considers underutilized. Under provisions added to the 2025–26 state budget, “Hope operators” may move into those spaces at no cost, leaving districts to absorb maintenance, custodial and other operational expenses.

South Florida had received the most letters at last check, with at least 224 between Broward and Miami-Dade counties. Miami-Dade officials said the district received at least 180 letters, though only 90 were considered valid because many came from Bridge Prep Academy, which is not yet an approved Schools of Hope operator.

The impact also was obvious across the Tampa Bay region, where Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Manatee counties collectively show some of the highest concentrations of claims in the state. Together, the four districts account for more than 80 campuses and more than 46,000 requested seats, according to data compiled by the coalition.

Even as those letters go out, state lawmakers are already working to pull the plug on the program’s most controversial rule that allows charter school operators to move into “underused” public school buildings rent-free. SB 424, filed by Democratic Sen. Darryl Rouson of St. Petersburg, would repeal that provision.

“By eliminating language requiring co-location in public schools, we are ensuring schools do not face the unintentional consequence of an unfunded mandate, and that students can continue thriving in their schools without losing access to spaces they need for academic success,” Rouson said in an earlier statement about the bill.

___

A.G. Gancarski and Jesse Mendoza of Florida Politics contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

State lawmakers greenlight sweeping audit of Miami Beach after request by Fabián Basabe

Published

on


Miami Beach is now bracing for a rare, top-to-bottom state audit after lawmakers quietly and unanimously approved a request by Republican Rep. Fabian Basabe.

The Joint Legislative Auditing Committee directed Florida Auditor General Sherill Norman to examine Miami Beach’s operations, a move lawmakers advanced without discussion after Basabe alleged chronic mismanagement and weak transparency.

An audit, he said, would “strengthen systems, reinforce public trust and support the residents we all serve.”

“This isn’t about fault-finding. It’s an opportunity, with the budget of our size and the responsibilities that we carry as a coastal community,” he said. “Transparency and partnership matter.”

Basabe detailed his concerns in an October letter to the panel’s Chairs, Sen. Jason Brodeur and Rep. Chase Tramont, accusing the city of mismanaging its nearly $1 billion budget, procurement irregularities and chronic delays on major capital projects.

Norman will now set the scope of the review, Audit Manager Derek Noonan told the Miami Herald, which first reported on the audit’s approval. Noonan said auditors will coordinate with the city in the coming weeks to begin document requests and arrange on-site work. A final report is expected roughly one year after the audit formally begins.

Miami Beach officials have pushed back on Basabe’s allegations. City Manager Eric Carpenter told the Herald that the city “undergoes comprehensive audits each year” and is prepared to “fully cooperate with the State to dispel any misinformation.”

Notably, those audits are conducted internally.

Commissioner Alex Fernandez — a Democrat with whom Basabe has differed on multiple matters, including the city’s homelessness ordinance, which the lawmaker has argued conflicts with state law — similarly told the Herald that Miami Beach is a “transparent, well-run, and fiscally strong government.” He noted that the city has reduced its millage rates and boasts strong bond ratings, record reserves and a year-end surplus.

Commissioner Laura Dominguez, also a Democrat and target of negative attention from Basabe in the form of a pay-for-play accusation she called a “baseless smear,” also cited the city’s bond ratings, balanced budget and annual audits in a statement to Florida Politics.

Basabe has called for the audit to probe a wide range of concerns, including a 45% increase in the city’s budgets since 2021, spending on international travel, allegedly opaque procurement contracts and what he calls a counterproductive pattern of repeatedly arresting and then releasing homeless people.

His October request also flagged alleged “inflated contracts, diversion of funds,” excessive reliance on outside consultants and favoritism in leases and contract awards. He further questioned delays in completing projects such as Bayshore Park, which he said “took thirty years” to build — contemporary reporting suggested the timeline for the project was closer to 10 years — and the Miami Beach boardwalk, which he said took 20 years to finish.

Though Miami Beach already maintains an independent Inspector General with broad subpoena authority, the Auditor General’s inquiry represents one of the most sweeping state-led examinations of a South Florida municipality in recent years.

It also lands after Gov. Ron DeSantis’ administration, through its separate Department of Government Efficiency initiative led by CFO Blaise Ingoglia, conducted audits of Miami-Dade County, Broward County, Palm Beach County, the city of Miami and other local governments that Ingoglia said have collectively overspent nearly $1.9 billion in one year alone.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Gov. DeSantis now says poorer counties will ‘eventually’ be on their own to deal without property taxes

Published

on


What once was framed as “budget dust” could eventually be gone with the wind, leaving local politicians in small towns with tough decisions in the coming years.

Gov. Ron DeSantis is reiterating his promise to give fiscally constrained counties money in his new budget proposal to replace potentially property tax revenues should they be phased out. But DeSantis is now saying those cash-strapped jurisdictions will have to do without supplementary funds down the road.

“I’m not saying it’s even going to be necessary, but I put in the budget enough money to completely, 100% reimburse any homestead property tax reduction for those fiscally constrained counties,” DeSantis said in Orlando.

“There’s some people that say you shouldn’t do that. But my view is it’s a little more difficult maybe for some of them. And now, eventually they’re going to have to figure it out.”

DeSantis rolled out the budget proposal to aid smaller counties during a cable news hit last week, but did not say there would eventually be an end to state-level generosity despite touting a “big surplus” to a national audience.

“We have 32 fiscally constrained counties. You know, Miami-Dade, Palm Beach, these are powerhouses. I’m putting in my budget the revenue to totally backfill every one of those rural counties. So they’re not going to miss a single thing,” the Governor said on “Fox & Friends.”

However, he first teased the idea in October.

“I can fund all that. I can take all 32 fiscally constrained counties, I could fund 100% of tax revenue that would be derived from a homestead Florida residence, property taxes. And it’s like budget dust for us,” DeSantis said in Panama City.

A total of 32 of Florida’s 67 counties are designated as fiscally constrained.

Typically lower in population and property value, they include Baker, Bradford, Calhoun, Columbia, DeSoto, Dixie, Franklin, Gadsden, Gilchrist, Glades, Gulf, Hamilton, Hardee, Hendry, Highlands, Holmes, Jackson, Jefferson, Lafayette, Levy, Liberty, Madison, Okeechobee, Putnam, Suwannee, Taylor, Union, Wakulla and Washington counties.

DeSantis has been leaning on lawmakers in the supermajority Republican Legislature to put a measure eliminating homestead property taxes on the ballot, even teasing a Special Session during the Summer if they don’t ratify something during the Regular Session.

That ballot measure would need 60% support should it be presented to voters.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Miami Select.